run-train

We need to translate the given English text into German. The text describes a skill called "Rigor Train skill" but the name to preserve is "run-train". However, the instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The source text includes "Rigor Train skill" but not "run-train". The name to preserve is "run-train" but it's not in the source. So we should not add it. We just translate the text as is. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Rigor Train skill" might be a product name? It says "Rigor Train skill" - likely a proper name. Should we preserve it? The instruction says preserve product names. So keep "Rigor Train skill" as is? But it's English. Possibly translate? The instruction says "preserve product names" meaning keep them in original form. So keep "Rigor Train skill". Also "train_outputs/" is a path, keep

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill run-train

run-train

Use this as the Rigor Train skill. The installed slug remains run-train for compatibility.

Use the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should keep training evidence bounded while leaving repository-specific monitoring details to the model.

When to apply

  • When the training command has already been selected and should be executed conservatively.
  • When the researcher wants startup verification, short-run verification, full training kickoff, or resume handling.
  • When the run needs structured training status, checkpoint, and metric reporting.

When not to apply

  • When the main task is environment setup or asset download.
  • When the researcher wants inference-only or evaluation-only execution.
  • When the task is speculative exploration, multi-variant sweeps, or autonomous idea implementation.
  • When the user still needs repository intake or paper gap resolution.

Clear boundaries

  • This skill executes a selected training command and normalizes the resulting evidence.
  • It does not choose the overall research goal on its own.
  • It does not own exploratory branching or speculative code adaptation.
  • It should record partial, blocked, resumed, and kicked-off states clearly.
  • It should preserve reproducibility context such as configs, seeds, checkpoints, logs, metrics, and runtime assumptions when available.

Input expectations

  • selected training goal
  • runnable training command
  • environment and asset assumptions
  • run mode such as startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume

Output expectations

  • train_outputs/SUMMARY.md
  • train_outputs/COMMANDS.md
  • train_outputs/LOG.md
  • train_outputs/SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
  • train_outputs/COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
  • train_outputs/status.json

Notes

Use references/training-policy.md, ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md, scripts/run_training.py, and scripts/write_outputs.py.

Mehr Skills von lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding,...
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit schreibgeschützte Fähigkeit für Deep-Learning-Forschungsrepositorien. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer ein Repository lesen und verstehen, Modellstruktur und Trainings- oder Inferenz-Einstiegspunkte inspizieren, Konfigurationen und Einfügepunkte überprüfen oder verdächtige Implementierungsmuster kennzeichnen möchte, ohne Code zu ändern oder schwere Jobs auszuführen. Nicht für aktive Befehlsausführung, umfassendes Refactoring, spekulative Code-Anpassung oder automatische Fehlerbehebung verwenden.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
ai-research-reproduction
lllllllama
RigorPilot Reproduce-Mode-Orchestrator für die README-first-Reproduktion von Deep-Learning-Repositorien. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer einen durchgängigen, minimal vertrauenswürdigen Ablauf wünscht, der zuerst das Repository liest, das kleinste dokumentierte Inferenz- oder Evaluierungsziel auswählt, Aufnahme, Einrichtung, vertrauenswürdige Ausführung, optionales vertrauenswürdiges Training, optionale Repository-Analyse und optionale Paper-Gap-Auflösung koordiniert, konservative Patch-Regeln durchsetzt, Evidenzannahmen, Abweichungen und menschliche Entscheidungspunkte aufzeichnet,...
researchdevelopmentdocument
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into German, preserving the name "explore-code" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-code" does not appear in the source text. So we just translate the text. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "backbone", "head", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". These should be kept as is. Also "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" might be a proper name? It says "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" - likely a skill name. But the instruction says preserve product names, so keep "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" as is? Actually it says "Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." "Rigor Improve" might
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Rigor Setup-Fähigkeit zur Reproduktion eines README-zuerst Deep-Learning-Repositorys. Verwenden, wenn die Aufgabe spezifisch darin besteht, eine konservative conda-erste Umgebung, Checkpoint- und Dataset-Pfadannahmen, Cache-Speicherort-Hinweise und Setup-Notizen vor einem Durchlauf in einem README-dokumentierten Repository vorzubereiten. Nicht verwenden für Repository-Scans, vollständige Orchestrierung, Papierinterpretation, abschließende Durchlaufberichte oder generische Umgebungseinrichtung, die nicht an ein spezifisches Reproduktionsziel gebunden ist.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into German, preserving the name "explore-run" if it appears. The text is a description of a skill. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" appears in the source text? Let's check: The text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - here "run" is part of the phrase, but "explore-run" as a name? The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run". In the source text, we see "explore-run" is not explicitly written as a single word; it's "Explore run" (two words). But the name to preserve is "explore-run". Possibly it appears as "explore-run" later? The text ends with "explore_outputs/" which is different. The instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should not add "explore-run" if it's not there
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit-Fähigkeit für Deep-Learning-Forschung. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer einen Traceback, Terminalfehler, CUDA OOM, Checkpoint-Ladefehler, Shape-Mismatch, NaN-Verlustsymptom oder Trainingsfehler einfügt und eine konservative Diagnose vor jeglichem Patchen wünscht, wobei Debug-Fixes klar von Forschungsbeiträgen getrennt sind. Nicht verwenden für breites Refactoring, spekulative Anpassung, automatisches exploratives Patchen oder allgemeine Repository-Einarbeitung.
developmenttestingcode-review