explore-run

We need to translate the given English text into German, preserving the name "explore-run" if it appears. The text is a description of a skill. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" appears in the source text? Let's check: The text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - here "run" is part of the phrase, but "explore-run" as a name? The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run". In the source text, we see "explore-run" is not explicitly written as a single word; it's "Explore run" (two words). But the name to preserve is "explore-run". Possibly it appears as "explore-run" later? The text ends with "explore_outputs/" which is different. The instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should not add "explore-run" if it's not there

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill explore-run

explore-run

Use this as the Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill. The installed slug remains explore-run for compatibility.

Use the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide candidate run planning while preserving model judgment about the active repo.

When to apply

  • When the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs.
  • When the task is a small-subset validation, short-cycle training probe, batch sweep, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trial.
  • When the output should rank candidate runs rather than certify trusted success.

When not to apply

  • When the user wants trusted training execution or conservative verification.
  • When there is no explicit exploratory authorization.
  • When the task is repository setup, intake, or debugging.

Clear boundaries

  • This skill owns exploratory execution planning and summary only.
  • Use ai-research-explore instead when the task spans both current_research coordination and exploratory code changes.
  • It may hand off actual command execution to minimal-run-and-audit or run-train.
  • It should keep experiment state isolated from the trusted baseline.
  • It should prefer small-subset and short-cycle checks before heavier exploratory runs.
  • It should label run results as bounded evidence and explain when a comparison is not directly fair.

Ranking Semantics

  • Pre-execution candidate selection uses three factors: cost, success_rate, and expected_gain.
  • Default weights should stay conservative unless the researcher explicitly provides selection_weights.
  • Budget pruning still applies after scoring through max_variants and max_short_cycle_runs.
  • If runs are executed later, downstream ranking should switch to real execution evidence, not stay purely heuristic.

Variant Spec Hints

  • Use variant_axes to define the candidate dimension grid.
  • Use subset_sizes and short_run_steps to express exploratory run scale.
  • Use selection_weights to rebalance cost, success_rate, and expected_gain.
  • Use primary_metric and metric_goal so downstream ranking can order executed candidates consistently.

Output expectations

  • explore_outputs/CHANGESET.md
  • explore_outputs/SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
  • explore_outputs/COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
  • explore_outputs/TOP_RUNS.md
  • explore_outputs/status.json

Notes

Use references/execution-policy.md, ../../references/explore-variant-spec.md, ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md, scripts/plan_variants.py, and scripts/write_outputs.py.

Mehr Skills von lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding,...
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit schreibgeschützte Fähigkeit für Deep-Learning-Forschungsrepositorien. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer ein Repository lesen und verstehen, Modellstruktur und Trainings- oder Inferenz-Einstiegspunkte inspizieren, Konfigurationen und Einfügepunkte überprüfen oder verdächtige Implementierungsmuster kennzeichnen möchte, ohne Code zu ändern oder schwere Jobs auszuführen. Nicht für aktive Befehlsausführung, umfassendes Refactoring, spekulative Code-Anpassung oder automatische Fehlerbehebung verwenden.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
ai-research-reproduction
lllllllama
RigorPilot Reproduce-Mode-Orchestrator für die README-first-Reproduktion von Deep-Learning-Repositorien. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer einen durchgängigen, minimal vertrauenswürdigen Ablauf wünscht, der zuerst das Repository liest, das kleinste dokumentierte Inferenz- oder Evaluierungsziel auswählt, Aufnahme, Einrichtung, vertrauenswürdige Ausführung, optionales vertrauenswürdiges Training, optionale Repository-Analyse und optionale Paper-Gap-Auflösung koordiniert, konservative Patch-Regeln durchsetzt, Evidenzannahmen, Abweichungen und menschliche Entscheidungspunkte aufzeichnet,...
researchdevelopmentdocument
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into German, preserving the name "explore-code" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-code" does not appear in the source text. So we just translate the text. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "backbone", "head", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". These should be kept as is. Also "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" might be a proper name? It says "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" - likely a skill name. But the instruction says preserve product names, so keep "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" as is? Actually it says "Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." "Rigor Improve" might
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Rigor Setup-Fähigkeit zur Reproduktion eines README-zuerst Deep-Learning-Repositorys. Verwenden, wenn die Aufgabe spezifisch darin besteht, eine konservative conda-erste Umgebung, Checkpoint- und Dataset-Pfadannahmen, Cache-Speicherort-Hinweise und Setup-Notizen vor einem Durchlauf in einem README-dokumentierten Repository vorzubereiten. Nicht verwenden für Repository-Scans, vollständige Orchestrierung, Papierinterpretation, abschließende Durchlaufberichte oder generische Umgebungseinrichtung, die nicht an ein spezifisches Reproduktionsziel gebunden ist.
developmentdevops
safe-debug
lllllllama
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit-Fähigkeit für Deep-Learning-Forschung. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer einen Traceback, Terminalfehler, CUDA OOM, Checkpoint-Ladefehler, Shape-Mismatch, NaN-Verlustsymptom oder Trainingsfehler einfügt und eine konservative Diagnose vor jeglichem Patchen wünscht, wobei Debug-Fixes klar von Forschungsbeiträgen getrennt sind. Nicht verwenden für breites Refactoring, spekulative Anpassung, automatisches exploratives Patchen oder allgemeine Repository-Einarbeitung.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Rigor Paper Context-Helfer für die Reproduktion von Deep-Learning-Repos nach dem README-First-Prinzip. Nur verwenden, wenn die README- und Repository-Dateien eine enge reproduktionskritische Lücke hinterlassen und die Aufgabe darin besteht, ein spezifisches Paper-Detail wie Datensatzaufteilung, Vorverarbeitung, Evaluierungsprotokoll, Checkpoint-Zuordnung oder Laufzeitannahme aus primären Paper-Quellen zu klären, während Konflikte aufgezeichnet werden. Nicht verwenden für allgemeine Paper-Zusammenfassung, Repository-Scanning, Umgebungseinrichtung, Befehlsausführung, titelbasierte Paper-Suche oder...
researchdocumentdata-analysis