ai-research-reproduction

RigorPilot Reproduce-Mode-Orchestrator für die README-first-Reproduktion von Deep-Learning-Repositorien. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer einen durchgängigen, minimal vertrauenswürdigen Ablauf wünscht, der zuerst das Repository liest, das kleinste dokumentierte Inferenz- oder Evaluierungsziel auswählt, Aufnahme, Einrichtung, vertrauenswürdige Ausführung, optionales vertrauenswürdiges Training, optionale Repository-Analyse und optionale Paper-Gap-Auflösung koordiniert, konservative Patch-Regeln durchsetzt, Evidenzannahmen, Abweichungen und menschliche Entscheidungspunkte aufzeichnet,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward the smallest trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Preserve documented meaning; record assumptions, deviations and blockers instead of changing semantics to manufacture success. Load specialized references only for a concrete uncertainty.

Fast Path

For a routine bounded run, keep the control path short:

  1. Read the target README and only the target test/config/source needed to understand the documented command.
  2. Run scripts/orchestrate_repro.py --repo <repo> --plan-only --agent-output with any explicit user timeout bound (--timeout or --train-timeout) already supplied; review command_candidates, the selected cmd-XX, side-effect contract, selection fingerprint, and returned reviewed_run_args. With no --output-dir, later evidence goes to <repo>/repro_outputs regardless of caller cwd.
  3. Run the selected candidate, or another reviewed candidate, with --run-selected --command-id <cmd-XX> --plan-fingerprint <fingerprint> --agent-output plus requested timeout/metric/source-adjacent options. Preserve an explicit user command-timeout bound instead of silently making it stricter on a routine trusted run. --timeout limits the target command; do not wrap the whole orchestrator in an equal or shorter external timeout, because it still needs time to terminate children and write terminal evidence. A changed command set fails closed; setup/download commands are never target candidates.
  4. Run --verify-output --agent-output; inspect detailed evidence files only when verification fails or the result is partial/blocked.
  5. Deliver the bounded result and stop.

For a host with short tool-call deadlines, rerun planning with --include-agent-handoff and follow references/agent-job.md; otherwise keep the direct path above. Job completion is not task acceptance, and uncertain state is never a reason for automatic replay.

Do not inspect orchestrate_repro.py, annotate_readme.py, _bundled/, writers, or runtime internals on a normal success path. Inspect implementation only for a concrete blocker, unexpected side effect, bundle-integrity failure, or unresolved safety question. Use scripts/doctor.py for first-use environment/install diagnostics. Executed commands keep full lifecycle/log evidence under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/.

Fit

Use this skill for repository-grounded, multi-phase trusted reproduction where the goal is a small reproducible target. Do not use it for paper summaries, generic setup, isolated scanning, standalone commands, open-ended research design, or explicitly authorized candidate exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Treat README guidance as primary; extract and select the minimum trustworthy target.
  2. Use setup/assets only for target-specific prerequisites and analyze-project only when structural clarification is needed.
  3. Use minimal-run-and-audit for inference/evaluation/smoke and run-train for training startup, kickoff, or resume; direct execution is the default.
  4. Pause before fuller training or changes to dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or interpretation.
  5. Award result-match only against explicit expected metrics and tolerance; process success alone is not reproduction success.
  6. Write the evidence bundle, return the requested bounded result, and stop; optional stages are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and references/output-spec.md. Keep summaries short, commands copyable, machine state stable, and scientific/comparability changes explicit. ANNOTATED_README.md must preserve the source README byte-for-byte outside inserted evidence blocks and pass its strip/check round trip. Use --source-adjacent-readme only for an owned RIGORPILOT_README.md; never replace an unrelated file. Distinguish verified facts from inference.

Reference Loading

  • Workflow judgment: references/agent-operating-principles.md.
  • Human-readable output: references/language-policy.md.
  • Scientific/comparability judgment: references/research-rigor-principles.md and, when experiment details matter, references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md.
  • Protocol-sensitive changes: references/research-safety-principles.md and references/patch-policy.md.
  • Personal rigor and lessons are advisory only; keep specialized detail in references/scripts rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Mehr Skills von lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding,...
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit schreibgeschützte Fähigkeit für Deep-Learning-Forschungsrepositorien. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer ein Repository lesen und verstehen, Modellstruktur und Trainings- oder Inferenz-Einstiegspunkte inspizieren, Konfigurationen und Einfügepunkte überprüfen oder verdächtige Implementierungsmuster kennzeichnen möchte, ohne Code zu ändern oder schwere Jobs auszuführen. Nicht für aktive Befehlsausführung, umfassendes Refactoring, spekulative Code-Anpassung oder automatische Fehlerbehebung verwenden.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into German, preserving the name "explore-code" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-code" does not appear in the source text. So we just translate the text. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "backbone", "head", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". These should be kept as is. Also "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" might be a proper name? It says "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" - likely a skill name. But the instruction says preserve product names, so keep "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill" as is? Actually it says "Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." "Rigor Improve" might
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Rigor Setup-Fähigkeit zur Reproduktion eines README-zuerst Deep-Learning-Repositorys. Verwenden, wenn die Aufgabe spezifisch darin besteht, eine konservative conda-erste Umgebung, Checkpoint- und Dataset-Pfadannahmen, Cache-Speicherort-Hinweise und Setup-Notizen vor einem Durchlauf in einem README-dokumentierten Repository vorzubereiten. Nicht verwenden für Repository-Scans, vollständige Orchestrierung, Papierinterpretation, abschließende Durchlaufberichte oder generische Umgebungseinrichtung, die nicht an ein spezifisches Reproduktionsziel gebunden ist.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into German, preserving the name "explore-run" if it appears. The text is a description of a skill. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" appears in the source text? Let's check: The text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - here "run" is part of the phrase, but "explore-run" as a name? The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run". In the source text, we see "explore-run" is not explicitly written as a single word; it's "Explore run" (two words). But the name to preserve is "explore-run". Possibly it appears as "explore-run" later? The text ends with "explore_outputs/" which is different. The instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should not add "explore-run" if it's not there
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit-Fähigkeit für Deep-Learning-Forschung. Verwenden, wenn der Benutzer einen Traceback, Terminalfehler, CUDA OOM, Checkpoint-Ladefehler, Shape-Mismatch, NaN-Verlustsymptom oder Trainingsfehler einfügt und eine konservative Diagnose vor jeglichem Patchen wünscht, wobei Debug-Fixes klar von Forschungsbeiträgen getrennt sind. Nicht verwenden für breites Refactoring, spekulative Anpassung, automatisches exploratives Patchen oder allgemeine Repository-Einarbeitung.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Rigor Paper Context-Helfer für die Reproduktion von Deep-Learning-Repos nach dem README-First-Prinzip. Nur verwenden, wenn die README- und Repository-Dateien eine enge reproduktionskritische Lücke hinterlassen und die Aufgabe darin besteht, ein spezifisches Paper-Detail wie Datensatzaufteilung, Vorverarbeitung, Evaluierungsprotokoll, Checkpoint-Zuordnung oder Laufzeitannahme aus primären Paper-Quellen zu klären, während Konflikte aufgezeichnet werden. Nicht verwenden für allgemeine Paper-Zusammenfassung, Repository-Scanning, Umgebungseinrichtung, Befehlsausführung, titelbasierte Paper-Suche oder...
researchdocumentdata-analysis