ai-research-reproduction

Оркестратор режима воспроизведения RigorPilot для воспроизведения репозиториев глубокого обучения с подходом "сначала README". Используется, когда пользователю нужен сквозной, минимально надёжный процесс, который сначала читает репозиторий, выбирает наименьшую задокументированную цель для инференса или оценки, координирует приёмку, настройку, доверенное выполнение, опциональное доверенное обучение, опциональный анализ репозитория и опциональное устранение расхождений с публикацией, применяет консервативные правила патчей, фиксирует свидетельства, предположения, отклонения и точки принятия решений человеком,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Use this as the Rigor Reproduce compatible skill slug for README-first deep learning repository reproduction. The installed slug remains ai-research-reproduction for compatibility. The skill guides the agent toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence; it should not micromanage implementation details that the model can infer from the repository. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; it means faithfully reading the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then recording results and deviations.

Start from the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md, then load ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md and ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning, comparability, or experiment details are at stake.

Fit

Use this skill when all are true:

  • The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or documented commands.
  • The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution, training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
  • The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.

Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Read the README and nearby repo signals.
  2. Use repo-intake-and-plan to extract documented commands and candidate targets.
  3. Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
  4. Use env-and-assets-bootstrap only for target-specific environment, checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
  5. Use analyze-project only when structure, insertion points, or suspicious implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
  6. Use minimal-run-and-audit for documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or sanity execution.
  7. Use run-train instead when the selected trusted target is training startup, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
  8. Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
  9. Write the standardized outputs and give a concise final note in the user's language when practical.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.

  • Put the shortest high-value summary in SUMMARY.md.
  • Put copyable commands in COMMANDS.md.
  • Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in LOG.md.
  • Put scientific meaning and change effects in SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md.
  • Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md.
  • Put durable machine-readable state in status.json.
  • Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md when needed.
  • Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.

Reference Loading

  • Load references/language-policy.md when writing human-readable outputs.
  • Load ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md before making comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
  • Load ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when dataset, split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
  • Load references/research-safety-principles.md before protocol-sensitive decisions.
  • Load references/patch-policy.md before modifying repository files.
  • Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Больше skills от lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding,...
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Навык Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit только для чтения, предназначенный для исследовательских репозиториев глубокого обучения. Используйте, когда пользователь хочет прочитать и понять репозиторий, изучить структуру модели и точки входа для обучения или инференса, просмотреть конфигурации и точки вставки, или выявить подозрительные шаблоны реализации без изменения кода или запуска тяжелых задач. Не используйте для активного выполнения команд, масштабного рефакторинга, спекулятивной адаптации кода или автоматического исправления ошибок.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted...
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Навык Rigor Setup для воспроизведения репозитория глубокого обучения с README-first. Используйте, когда задача заключается в подготовке консервативного окружения на основе conda, предположений о путях к контрольным точкам и наборам данных, подсказок о расположении кэша и заметок по настройке перед запуском в репозитории с документацией README. Не используйте для сканирования репозитория, полной оркестрации, интерпретации статей, составления финальных отчетов или общей настройки окружения, не привязанной к конкретной цели воспроизведения.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill for bounded exploratory evidence in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs such as small-subset validation, short-cycle guess-and-check, batch sweeps, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trials, with fair-comparison caveats and no-overclaim summaries in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline...
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Навык Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit для исследовательской работы в области глубокого обучения. Используйте, когда пользователь вставляет traceback, ошибку терминала, CUDA OOM, сбой загрузки контрольной точки, несоответствие форм, симптом NaN loss или сбой обучения и хочет консервативной диагностики до любого исправления, с четким разделением отладочных исправлений и исследовательских вкладов. Не используйте для широкого рефакторинга, спекулятивной адаптации, автоматического исследовательского исправления или общего ознакомления с репозиторием.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Вспомогательный инструмент для контекста статей Rigor Paper, предназначенный для воспроизведения репозиториев глубокого обучения с приоритетом README. Используйте только в тех случаях, когда файлы README и репозитория оставляют узкий критический для воспроизведения пробел, и задача состоит в разрешении конкретной детали статьи, такой как разделение набора данных, предобработка, протокол оценки, сопоставление контрольных точек или предположения о времени выполнения, на основе первоисточников статьи с фиксацией конфликтов. Не используйте для общего обзора статьи, сканирования репозитория, настройки окружения, выполнения команд, поиска статей только по названию или...
researchdocumentdata-analysis