readout

작성자: warpdotdev

~/.readouts 아래에 깔끔하고 독립적인 HTML "readout" 문서(자동 유지 관리되는 인덱스 페이지 포함)를 생성합니다. 현재 대화에서 축적된 결과를 스냅샷으로 찍거나, 새로 호출될 때(예: "/readout on how github webhook events are processed") 명확화 질문으로 범위를 좁히고 코드베이스를 조사한 후 문서화합니다. 작업은 하위 에이전트에서 실행되므로 기본 대화의 컨텍스트가 깔끔하게 유지됩니다. 사용자가 /readout을 호출하거나 말할 때 사용하세요...

npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills --skill readout

Readout

A readout turns an investigation into a durable HTML document someone can read weeks later without any of the original context. It starts one of two ways:

  • Snapshot mode — invoked mid-conversation ("write this up"): the conversation's accumulated findings are the source material.
  • Research mode — invoked fresh ("/readout on how github webhook events are processed in the server"): there is no conversation to mine, so the investigation itself is part of the job.

Either way, invoking this skill is a side task. Your job as the main agent is to sharpen the scope, launch a child agent with a good brief, and get out of the way — the child does the mining/research and the writing, keeping that (often large) work out of your context window.

Orchestrator workflow

1. Sharpen the scope — ask before launching

A vague brief produces a vague document. Before launching you should be able to list the specific questions the document will answer; if you can't, interview the user first:

  • Ask 2–4 targeted questions, offering concrete options rather than open prompts — take a quick look at the code or topic first so the options are real (subsystems, entry points, competing concerns). For "/readout on how github webhook events are processed": which direction matters — inbound triggers, post-back, or both? a current-state reference or a gotcha hunt? which repo(s)?
  • Always pin down depth and audience: high-level orientation vs. deep mechanics with line-level grounding; personal notes vs. shared with the team.
  • Respect a shrug. "Just a high-level overview" is a valid answer — record it in the brief and move on rather than interrogating. Even then, try to extract the two or three questions the reader most needs answered; specificity is what makes a readout useful.
  • Skip the interview when the scope is already specific — a snapshot of a focused conversation, or a precise research request, needs no questions. In snapshot mode the conversation usually supplies the questions; ask only when the invocation is ambiguous about which threads to include.

2. Compose the brief

Write a short brief (roughly 10–20 lines) carrying pointers, not payloads:

  • A working title / topic, and the mode (snapshot or research)
  • The specific questions the document must answer (from the conversation or the interview), plus depth and audience
  • Scope: which threads/subsystems to cover, and anything to explicitly exclude
  • Snapshot mode: headline conclusions worth centering the doc on, one line each — the child pulls the full content from conversation history itself, so don't paste findings wholesale
  • Research mode: starting pointers — entry-point files, symbols, or directories you already know about
  • Absolute paths to the repos/directories that ground the work
  • Each repo's hosted URL and the examined commit when known (e.g. github.com/org/repo @ abc123), so the document can hyperlink code references

3. Launch one local child agent

Spawn exactly one child agent via run_agents, local execution. Local matters: the document lands on the user's filesystem and opens in their browser. Name the child readout-<topic-slug>.

Build the child's prompt from the template below. It must include:

  • The brief
  • The source-material block matching the mode (snapshot mode also needs your agent run ID — current_run_id from the orchestration runtime context — so the child can mine the parent conversation with search_conversation_history)
  • The instruction to read references/doc-guide.md from this skill's directory before writing
  • The output path convention and completion protocol

4. Get back to work

After launching, resume whatever you were doing, or end your turn — the child's completion message arrives on its own; relay the file path to the user with a one-line description when it does. In research mode a fresh conversation may have nothing else pending; just end the turn. Don't sit in a wait loop unless the user asked to wait for the document.

Child agent prompt template

Adapt this; keep the structure, and include the source-material block that matches the mode.

You are producing a "readout": a single self-contained HTML document that answers a
specific set of questions about <topic>, for a reader who has none of this context.

Brief:
<brief — including the questions to answer, depth, and audience>

Source material (snapshot mode):
- The parent conversation: agent run ID <current_run_id>. Use search_conversation_history
  with agent_run_id set to that ID. Make several targeted queries — one per question in
  the brief — rather than one broad query; targeted queries surface far more usable detail.
- The codebase(s) at <absolute paths>. The conversation is your starting point, not a cage:
  verify file references before asserting them, and where a section needs more depth to
  stand on its own, go read the code and fill the gap.

Source material (research mode):
- Investigate directly in the codebase(s) at <absolute paths>. Let the brief's questions
  drive the investigation: trace the actual code paths, read the real implementations, and
  ground every claim in file:line references. Distinguish verified from inferred. Do not
  pad the document with generic knowledge — its value is what's true of THIS codebase.

- Repo host + commit for linked code references, if known: <github.com/org/repo @ commit>
  (otherwise derive from git; see the doc guide's "Linked code references").

Start from the canonical template at <skill-directory>/assets/template.html — its
data-readout chrome blocks must be copied verbatim so every readout looks like every
other. Before writing, read <skill-directory>/references/doc-guide.md and follow it.

Output:
- Write ONE self-contained HTML file to ~/.readouts/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<topic-slug>.html
  (create ~/.readouts if it doesn't exist; suffix -2, -3, ... if the name is taken;
  get the date from `date +%F`).
- Embed referenced source per the doc guide when a repo is checked out
  (<skill-directory>/scripts/embed_snippets.py).
- Refresh the readouts index: python3 <skill-directory>/scripts/update_index.py
  (fully regenerates ~/.readouts/index.html listing every readout).
- When the file is written, open it with `open <path>` (skip this if the environment is
  headless).
- Report back to your orchestrator: the absolute file path, a 2–3 sentence summary of what
  the document covers, and anything you could not verify.

Fallbacks

  • Child spawning unavailable or denied: produce the document yourself, following references/doc-guide.md. If a research subagent is available, delegate the conversation-mining or code investigation to it so your context still stays lean.
  • Child can't search conversation history (snapshot mode; it will report this back): reply to the child with a distilled dump of the findings so it can proceed — this is the one case where payload-in-prompt is the right call.
  • User-provided material instead of a conversation (transcripts, files, links): treat that material as the source; everything else in the workflow is unchanged.

warpdotdev의 다른 스킬

council
warpdotdev
모델 다양성을 갖춘 하위 에이전트 위원회를 운영하여 동일한 문제를 여러 관점에서 조사하고, 결과를 비교한 후 최종 권장 사항을 도출합니다. 사용자가 위원회, 추가 의견, 하나의 질문을 평가할 여러 에이전트/모델, 병렬 조사, 레드팀/블루팀 비교, 또는 경쟁 기술 접근법 중 결정을 도와달라고 요청할 때 이 스킬을 사용하세요.
researchcommunicationproject-management
spec-driven-implementation
warpdotdev
구현 전에 PRODUCT.md를 작성하고, 필요시 TECH.md를 작성하며, 구현이 진행됨에 따라 두 문서를 최신 상태로 유지함으로써 주요 기능에 대한 명세 우선 워크플로를 추진합니다. 중요한 기능을 시작할 때, 에이전트 기반 구현을 계획할 때, 또는 사용자가 제품 및 기술 명세를 소스 제어에 포함시키려 할 때 사용하세요.
developmentdocumentproject-management
review-pr
warpdotdev
풀 리퀘스트 diff를 검토하고, 워크플로우가 게시할 수 있도록 구조화된 피드백을 review.json에 작성합니다. 로컬 아티팩트(예: pr_diff.txt, pr_description.txt)에서 체크아웃된 PR을 검토하고, GitHub에 직접 게시하는 대신 기계가 읽을 수 있는 리뷰 출력을 생성할 때 사용합니다.
code-reviewdevelopment
create-pr
warpdotdev
현재 브랜치를 warp 저장소에 풀 리퀘스트로 생성합니다. 사용자가 PR 열기, 풀 리퀘스트 생성, 리뷰를 위한 변경 제출, 또는 병합을 위한 코드 준비를 언급할 때 사용하세요.
developmentcode-review
implement-specs
warpdotdev
승인된 PRODUCT.md와 TECH.md의 기능을 구현하며, 구현이 진행됨에 따라 사양과 코드를 동일한 PR에서 일관되게 유지합니다. 제품 및 기술 사양이 승인되고 다음 단계가 기능 구축일 때 사용하세요.
developmentcode-reviewapi
cross-critique
warpdotdev
논쟁이 있는 질문에 대해 두 번째 라운드를 실행하여 각 하위 에이전트의 독립적인 제안을 다른 작성자에게 전달하고 구조화된 장단점을 요청한 후 종합합니다. 이 스킬은 아키텍처 트레이드오프, 코드 리뷰 불일치, 설계 선택, 경쟁하는 근본 원인 이론 등 논쟁이 있는 결정에 대해 여러 독립적인 제안이나 의견이 있을 때 단독으로 종합하는 것보다 더 날카로운 분석을 원할 때 사용하세요. council 및 research 스킬과 자연스럽게 짝을 이룹니다.
resolve-merge-conflicts
warpdotdev
Resolve Git merge conflicts by extracting only unresolved paths, conflict hunks, and compact diffs instead of loading whole files into context. Use when a merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop stops on conflicts, when `git status` shows unmerged paths, or when files contain conflict markers.
developmentcode-review
brandalf
warpdotdev
Warp 또는 Oz 브랜드 자산의 제작, 수정, 검토를 안내합니다. 런칭 페이지, 문서, HTML/CSS 컴포넌트, UI 목업, 프롬프트, 소셜 자산, 카피, 프레젠테이션 등 Warp 또는 Oz의 정체성이 분명히 드러나야 하는 모든 브랜드 결과물에 사용하세요.
designcreativemarketing