setup-matt-pocock-skills

작성자: mattpocock

We need to translate the given text into Korean, preserving the specified name "setup-matt-pocock-skills" and other technical terms. The text describes an agent skill that sets up a block in AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md and docs/agents/ for engineering skills to know the repo's issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. It should be run before first use of certain skills or if those skills lack context. We must not include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "setup-matt-pocock-skills" is not in the provided text, so we don't include it. We only translate the text inside <text>. No labels like "description" or "skill name". Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "AGENTS.md", "CLAUDE.md", "docs/agents/", "GitHub", "to-issues", "to-prd", "triage", "diagnose", "tdd", "improve-codebase-architecture",

npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill setup-matt-pocock-skills

Setup Matt Pocock's Skills

Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:

  • Issue tracker: where issues live (GitHub by default; local markdown is also supported out of the box)
  • Triage labels: the strings used for the five canonical triage roles
  • Domain docs: where GLOSSARY.md and ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading them

This is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.

Process

1. Explore

Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:

  • git remote -v and .git/config: is this a GitHub repo? Which one?
  • AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md at the repo root: does either exist? Is there already an ## Agent skills section in either?
  • GLOSSARY.md and GLOSSARY-MAP.md at the repo root
  • docs/adr/ and any src/*/docs/adr/ directories
  • docs/agents/: does this skill's prior output already exist?
  • .scratch/: a sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in use
  • Is the triage skill installed? (a triage skill folder alongside this one, or triage in your available skills.) This decides whether Section B runs at all.
  • Monorepo signals: a pnpm-workspace.yaml, a workspaces field in package.json, or a populated packages/* with its own src/. These are present only in a genuinely large multi-package repo; their absence means single-context, which is almost every repo.

2. Present findings and ask

Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then take the sections in order. One section, one answer, then the next.

Lead each section with the recommended answer so the user can accept it in a word. Give a one-line explainer only when the choice genuinely branches; skip the section entirely when exploration already settled it (Section B when triage isn't installed, Section C when there's no monorepo).

Section A: Issue tracker.

Explainer: The "issue tracker" is where issues live for this repo. Skills like to-tickets, triage, and to-spec read from and write to it. They need to know whether to call gh issue create, write a markdown file under .scratch/, or follow some other workflow you describe. Pick the place you actually track work for this repo.

Default posture: these skills were designed for GitHub. If a git remote points at GitHub, propose that. If a git remote points at GitLab (gitlab.com or a self-hosted host), propose GitLab. Otherwise (or if the user prefers), offer:

  • GitHub: issues live in the repo's GitHub Issues (uses the gh CLI)
  • GitLab: issues live in the repo's GitLab Issues (uses the glab CLI)
  • Local markdown: issues live as files under .scratch/<feature>/ in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote)
  • Other (Jira, Linear, etc.): ask the user to describe the workflow in one paragraph; the skill will record it as freeform prose

Record the choice in docs/agents/issue-tracker.md. The GitHub and GitLab templates carry a "PRs as a request surface" flag, defaulted off. Leave it off and don't raise it: a user who wants external PRs in the triage queue can flip the flag in the file later.

Section B: Triage label vocabulary. Skip this section entirely if the triage skill isn't installed (exploration told you), since an uninstalled skill needs no labels.

If it is installed, ask exactly one question:

Do you want to keep the default triage labels? (recommended: yes)

The defaults are the five canonical roles, each label string equal to its name: needs-triage, needs-info, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human, wontfix. On yes, write them as-is. Only if the user says no, usually because their tracker already uses other names (e.g. bug:triage for needs-triage), collect the overrides so triage applies existing labels instead of creating duplicates.

Section C: Domain docs. Default to single-context (one GLOSSARY.md + docs/adr/ at the repo root). This fits almost every repo; write it without asking.

Offer multi-context (a root GLOSSARY-MAP.md pointing to per-context GLOSSARY.md files) only when exploration found monorepo signals. Then confirm which layout they want.

3. Confirm and edit

Show the user a draft of:

  • The ## Agent skills block to add to whichever of CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md is being edited (see step 4 for selection rules)
  • The contents of docs/agents/issue-tracker.md, docs/agents/domain.md, and docs/agents/triage-labels.md (the last only when triage is installed)

Let them edit before writing.

4. Write

Pick the file to edit:

  • If CLAUDE.md exists, edit it.
  • Else if AGENTS.md exists, edit it.
  • If neither exists, ask the user which one to create; don't pick for them.

Never create AGENTS.md when CLAUDE.md already exists (or vice versa); always edit the one that's already there.

If an ## Agent skills block already exists in the chosen file, update its contents in-place rather than appending a duplicate. Don't overwrite user edits to the surrounding sections.

The block:

## Agent skills

### Issue tracker

[one-line summary of where issues are tracked]. See `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`.

### Triage labels

[one-line summary of the label vocabulary]. See `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`.

### Domain docs

[one-line summary of layout: "single-context" or "multi-context"]. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.

Include the ### Triage labels sub-block, and write docs/agents/triage-labels.md, only when triage is installed and Section B ran. When it isn't, both are omitted.

When Section B ran on GitHub or GitLab, create each configured label the tracker lacks (gh label create / glab label create).

Then write the docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a starting point:

For "other" issue trackers, write docs/agents/issue-tracker.md from scratch using the user's description.

5. Done

Tell the user the setup is complete and which engineering skills will now read from these files. Mention they can edit docs/agents/*.md directly later; re-running this skill is only necessary if they want to switch issue trackers or restart from scratch.

mattpocock의 다른 스킬

writing-for-agents
mattpocock
에이전트를 위한 문서 작성. 스킬을 생성하거나 편집할 때, 또는 AGENTS.md나 CLAUDE.md를 수정할 때 사용합니다.
wait-what
mattpocock
멈춰. 그 마지막 메시지는 전달되지 않았어 — 다시 제안해.
communication
to-questionnaire
mattpocock
완전히 답할 수 없는 결정을 다른 사람이 작성할 설문지로 바꿉니다.
grill-me
mattpocock
사용자의 계획이나 디자인에 대해 철저히 질문하여 공통된 이해에 도달할 때까지 결정 트리의 각 분기를 해결합니다. 사용자가 계획을 검증받고 싶어하거나, 디자인에 대해 집중 질문을 받고 싶어하거나, "grill me"라고 언급할 때 사용하세요.
researchcommunicationproject-management
tdd
mattpocock
레드-그린-리팩터 루프를 사용한 테스트 주도 개발. 사용자가 TDD로 기능을 구축하거나 버그를 수정하려 할 때, "레드-그린-리팩터"를 언급할 때, 통합 테스트를 원할 때, 또는 테스트 우선 개발을 요청할 때 사용합니다.
developmenttesting
handoff
mattpocock
현재 대화를 다른 에이전트가 이어받을 수 있도록 핸드오프 문서로 압축합니다.
communicationproject-managementdocument
prototype
mattpocock
디자인을 확정하기 전에 일회용 프로토타입을 만들어 검토합니다. 상태나 비즈니스 로직을 확인할 수 있는 실행 가능한 터미널 앱과, 하나의 경로에서 전환 가능한 여러 개의 완전히 다른 UI 변형이라는 두 가지 분기로 나뉩니다. 사용자가 프로토타입을 만들고, 데이터 모델이나 상태 머신을 검증하며, UI를 목업하고, 디자인 옵션을 탐색하려 하거나, "이걸 프로토타입으로 만들어 봐", "한번 가지고 놀게 해줘", "몇 가지 디자인을 시도해 봐"라고 말할 때 사용합니다.
developmentdesigncreative
triage
mattpocock
트라이지 역할에 의해 구동되는 상태 머신을 통해 이슈를 분류합니다. 사용자가 이슈를 생성하거나, 이슈를 분류하고, 들어오는 버그나 기능 요청을 검토하고, AFK 에이전트를 위해 이슈를 준비하거나, 이슈 워크플로를 관리하려는 경우 사용합니다.
developmentproject-managementcommunication