prepare-pr

作成者: nvidia

NeMo FabricプルリクエストまたはPR本文を、適切なテスト、ドキュメント、スコープ、レビュー引き継ぎ詳細を含めて準備、オープン、作成、公開、更新、または編集します。

npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/nemo-fabric --skill prepare-pr

Prepare A PR For NeMo Fabric

Companion Guidance

Use karpathy-guidelines alongside this skill for implementation or review work. Keep changes scoped, surface assumptions, and define focused validation before editing.

Use this skill at the end of a contributor or maintainer change before opening a pull request. Also use it whenever a user asks to create, open, publish, update, or edit a NeMo Fabric pull request, pull request description, or PR body.

If this repo-local guidance conflicts with generic GitHub publishing, connector, or plugin guidance, this skill wins for PR body format, validation language, and review handoff details.

Checklist

  • Branch scope is coherent and reviewable
  • Relevant tests passed under validate-change
  • Changed files were formatted with the language-native formatter
  • Any Rust change ran just test-rust
  • Any Rust change ran cargo fmt --all -- --check
  • Native binding changes ran cargo check -p fabric-python --locked
  • crates/fabric-core changes ran both the Rust and Python suites
  • Docs and examples updated for any public behavior changes
  • Dependent maintainer or consumer skills updated when code changes affected their APIs, bindings, commands, paths, packaging guidance, or best practices
  • New or updated dependencies include the functional need, alternatives considered, and why the selected dependency is the narrowest fit
  • The lockfile license diff was reviewed for direct and transitive changes; unresolved, custom, or copyleft terms are called out for dependency approver review
  • Changed ATTRIBUTIONS-*.md files are regenerated and included
  • Pull request title follows Conventional Commit style and uses the correct type
  • Pull request body follows the repository template when one exists
  • Breaking changes or renamed surfaces are called out explicitly

Pull Request Title

Use Conventional Commit style for PR titles:

<type>: <concise imperative summary>

Choose the type from the actual change surface, not from the impact of the review comment or CI outcome. Use fix only for an actual user-facing or runtime/product code bug fix. Never use fix for changes that are not related to product code behavior, including chores, CI configuration, docs, tests, packaging metadata, generated-output handling, or agent/skill guidance.

Common examples:

  • ci: use just recipes in Rust checks
  • docs: clarify adapter setup
  • chore: refresh generated API references
  • test: add session regression coverage
  • fix: preserve runtime session identity

Opening A Pull Request

Always use .github/pull_request_template.md as the source of truth for the PR body. Before opening a PR, read the current template and preserve its headings, checkboxes, comments' intent, and related-issue guidance.

This applies both when creating a new PR and when editing an existing PR description. Do not use a generic Summary / Why / Validation body unless the current repository template uses those headings.

When using GitHub CLI, prefer:

gh pr create --template .github/pull_request_template.md

If a tool cannot consume the template directly, create the PR body from the template content and then fill in every visible section before opening the PR. Do not replace the template with a freeform summary.

After creating or editing a PR, fetch the rendered PR body and verify that the template's visible headings and checklist items are still present.

The PR body must include:

  • #### Overview with a concise summary and both contribution confirmation checklist items preserved
  • #### Details with the concrete changes made
  • #### Validation with commands run and any checks not run
  • #### Where should the reviewer start? with the most useful file, test, or design decision
  • #### Related Issues: (use one of the action keywords Closes / Fixes / Resolves / Relates to) with an issue reference, or a clear Relates to: none entry when there is no related issue

For dependency changes, include the dependency rationale and material license diff findings in the template's #### Overview. The license diff is review evidence, not a compatibility decision.

Only check the contribution confirmation boxes when they are true. If either confirmation cannot be made, stop before opening the PR and surface the blocker.

References

  • README.md
  • .github/pull_request_template.md
  • maintain-packaging
  • scripts/licensing/license_diff.py
  • validate-change

nvidiaのその他のスキル

compileiq-debug
nvidia
何かがおかしいときに使用:Search()がハングする、すべての評価がINVALID_SCOREを返す、スコアが改善しない、すべての設定が同じ数値を返す、ptxasエラー…
create-github-pr
nvidia
gh CLIを使用してGitHubのプルリクエストを作成します。ユーザーが新しいPRを作成したい、コードをレビューに提出したい、またはプルリクエストを開きたい場合に使用します。トリガーキーワード -…
nemoclaw-maintainer-cross-issue-sweep
nvidia
他のオープンなIssueをスキャンし、特定のPRが修正する可能性があるものや、誤って壊す可能性があるものを見つけます。隣接修正の機会や矛盾リスクをfile:line…と共に出力します。
fhir-basics
nvidia
エージェントにFHIR R4 APIの動作方法、利用可能なリソース、検索パラメータを使ったクエリ方法、およびすべてのレスポンス形式を正しく解析する方法を教えます…
compileiq-validate-result
nvidia
検索が完了した後、かつスピードアップの申請やACFの発送の前に使用します。dump_results CSVを読み込み、トップK候補(単一目的)を抽出します…
changelog-audit
nvidia
リリース前にWarp CHANGELOG.mdを監査:失われたエントリを復元、ユーザー影響で並べ替え、エントリの文言を洗練、行折り返し、および(リリースブランチモードで)比較をバンプ…
maintain-dynamic-plugins
nvidia
NeMo Relayの動的プラグインローダー、マニフェスト、RustネイティブSDK、gRPCワーカープロトコル、PythonワーカーSDK、ドキュメント、テスト、およびリリースワークフローのカバレッジを維持する
dgx-diagnose
nvidia
一般的なDGX Station GB300の問題(CUDAクラッシュ、誤ったGPUターゲット、vLLM/SGLangコンテナのバグ、MIG状態の問題、NVLink/Fabric Managerエラーなど)を診断します。