aicr-auditing-docs

作成者: nvidia

AICRのMarkdownドキュメントをレビューする際に使用します。重複、乖離、肥大化、欠落をチェックし、プロジェクトの進化に伴ってドキュメントの高い価値を維持します。「audit…」で始まるフレーズでトリガーされます。

npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/aicr --skill aicr-auditing-docs

Auditing AICR Documentation

Overview

AICR's docs are mature and already well-structured: a persona split under docs/ (user / integrator / contributor), a docs hub with glossary (docs/README.md), ADRs in docs/design/, and a strong root README.md. The recurring risk is not missing structure — it is duplication and drift as features land. This skill is a repeatable audit, not a rewrite: default to a findings report; only edit when explicitly asked.

When to Use

  • Periodic doc health check, or before a release.
  • After a large feature merges (new CLI flag, API endpoint, component, recipe field).
  • When the same explanation appears in multiple files and you suspect drift.
  • Not for: writing a single new doc (just write it, following the style rules below), or generated content (docs/conformance/, docs/user/container-images.md).

The Map (what to audit, and how it's owned)

AreaCanonical ownerNotes
Project pitch, features, supported envsroot README.mdQuick Start may duplicate docs/user/installation.md — acceptable for README only.
User how-to / referencedocs/user/cli-reference.md owns flags; task narrative belongs in task docs (validation.md, agent-deployment.md).
Integration / embeddingdocs/integrator/Resolver internals belong in contributor/, not here.
Project internalsdocs/contributor/Architecture overview = contributor/index.md.
Demos / runbooksdemos/GitHub-only (not in fern/docs.yml nav). Terse names hurt discovery.
GovernanceCONTRIBUTING.md, DEVELOPMENT.md, RELEASING.md, SECURITY.mdEach owns one concern; cross-link instead of repeating.
Agent rules.claude/CLAUDE.md (canonical) → AGENTS.md (CI-synced mirror — never flag).github/copilot-instructions.md should be a pointer, not a copy.

Sources of Truth (drift hotspots — check these first)

Drift between examples and these authoritative sources is the highest-value class of finding:

  • Component/chart/image versionsdocs/user/container-images.md (the BOM, regenerated by make bom-docs). Inline version examples elsewhere (cli-reference.md, api-reference.md, data-flow.md) should be marked illustrative and point here — never hand-pinned to a stale tag.
  • Tool versions (golangci-lint, Go, Ko) → .settings.yaml. Never hardcode in prose or sample workflow YAML.
  • Criteria/enum values (service, accelerator, os, intent, platform, error codes) → the Go type (e.g. pkg/recipe/criteria.go). Enums are enumerated in many files; see the enum-audit checklist in CLAUDE.md → Documentation updates.
  • API shapeapi/aicr/v1/server.yaml (OpenAPI). The component lists and response samples in api-reference.md drift from the registry — diff them.

The Five Audit Dimensions

Run every file through these. Group findings by dimension, prioritized.

  1. Duplication — same steps/tables/concepts in >1 file. Pick the canonical owner (table above), trim the rest to a cross-link. Known repeat offenders: agent/snapshot deployment, recipe-evidence walkthrough, constraint paths/operators table, make-target block, DCO/signing rules, the six demos/cuj*-{eks,gke}.md files (~80% shared).
  2. Overlap / misplacement — content in the wrong persona tree (e.g., resolver internals in integrator/, agent deployment in integrator/ when it's a user concern), or a topic split awkwardly across files.
  3. Bloat — verbose sections that lose no value when cut: embedded SBOM/JSON dumps, repeated export TAG= blocks, stub code that contradicts the architecture ("AICR is not a controller"), generic K8s boilerplate that isn't AICR-specific, walls of text needing structure.
  4. Gaps (Diátaxis) — is each of tutorial / how-to / reference / explanation present for the persona? Known holes: no end-to-end tutorial (install→recipe→bundle→deploy→validate), no aicr bundle how-to.
  5. Staleness / style violations — TODOs, "(Future)" content shown as usable, contradictory version numbers, leftover template placeholders (__AICR (AICR)__), and violations of the repo's own doc-style rules below.

Repo Doc-Style Rules (enforce during audit)

These are defined in CLAUDE.mdDocumentation Style; flag violations:

  • Auto-anchors, no manual TOCs — GitHub/Fern generate anchors. Manual ## Table of Contents blocks (present in CONTRIBUTING.md, DEVELOPMENT.md) are violations.
  • Promote **Bold Label:** to a heading sparingly — only a named topic with ≥ ~8 lines beneath it.
  • Anchor hygiene — when renaming/removing a heading, grep <file>.md#<old-slug> repo-wide and fix inbound links. Broken anchors fail CI via lychee on any docs/** PR (.github/workflows/fern-docs-ci.yaml) — but not make qualify.

How to Run It

  1. Parallelize by area to protect context: dispatch one research agent per tree — (a) docs/ persona trees, (b) root + agent docs, (c) demos/. Give each the five dimensions and the sources-of-truth list; ask for a concise (<600 word) report with file paths and concrete recommendations.
  2. Synthesize into one prioritized report. Lead with version/enum drift (highest value), then duplication consolidations, then bloat/gaps.
  3. Report, don't rewrite by default. If asked to fix: one focused PR per theme (e.g., "de-dup agent deployment", "trim SECURITY.md"), keep diffs reviewable, and after any change run make qualify (and note lychee is separate). Touching docs/** requires the lychee anchor check.

Common Mistakes

  • Flagging the AGENTS.mdCLAUDE.md mirror as duplication — it's intentional and CI-enforced.
  • Recommending a TOC "for navigation" — violates the auto-anchor rule.
  • Hand-fixing a version in an example — fix the pattern (mark illustrative, link to container-images.md) so it can't re-drift.
  • Editing generated files (container-images.md, docs/conformance/) directly instead of their generators.
  • Auditing one file in isolation — duplication only shows up across files; read the tree.

nvidiaのその他のスキル

compileiq-debug
nvidia
何かがおかしいときに使用:Search()がハングする、すべての評価がINVALID_SCOREを返す、スコアが改善しない、すべての設定が同じ数値を返す、ptxasエラー…
create-github-pr
nvidia
gh CLIを使用してGitHubのプルリクエストを作成します。ユーザーが新しいPRを作成したい、コードをレビューに提出したい、またはプルリクエストを開きたい場合に使用します。トリガーキーワード -…
nemoclaw-maintainer-cross-issue-sweep
nvidia
他のオープンなIssueをスキャンし、特定のPRが修正する可能性があるものや、誤って壊す可能性があるものを見つけます。隣接修正の機会や矛盾リスクをfile:line…と共に出力します。
fhir-basics
nvidia
エージェントにFHIR R4 APIの動作方法、利用可能なリソース、検索パラメータを使ったクエリ方法、およびすべてのレスポンス形式を正しく解析する方法を教えます…
compileiq-validate-result
nvidia
検索が完了した後、かつスピードアップの申請やACFの発送の前に使用します。dump_results CSVを読み込み、トップK候補(単一目的)を抽出します…
changelog-audit
nvidia
リリース前にWarp CHANGELOG.mdを監査:失われたエントリを復元、ユーザー影響で並べ替え、エントリの文言を洗練、行折り返し、および(リリースブランチモードで)比較をバンプ…
maintain-dynamic-plugins
nvidia
NeMo Relayの動的プラグインローダー、マニフェスト、RustネイティブSDK、gRPCワーカープロトコル、PythonワーカーSDK、ドキュメント、テスト、およびリリースワークフローのカバレッジを維持する
dgx-diagnose
nvidia
一般的なDGX Station GB300の問題(CUDAクラッシュ、誤ったGPUターゲット、vLLM/SGLangコンテナのバグ、MIG状態の問題、NVLink/Fabric Managerエラーなど)を診断します。