explore-run
We need to translate the given English text into Hindi. The text describes a skill called "explore-run" but the instruction says to preserve the name only if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" does appear in the source text? Actually, the source text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - so "explore-run" is not explicitly written as a single word; it's "Rigor Explore run". But the name to preserve is "explore-run". However, the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-run" does not appear as such. The source has "Rigor Explore run" which might be interpreted as the skill name. But the user says "Name to preserve: explore-run". I think we should not add it if not in source. The source text includes "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - so "Rigor Explore run" is part of the text. We need to translate that. But the instruction says
npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill explore-runexplore-run
Use this as the Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill. The installed slug
remains explore-run for compatibility.
Use the shared operating principles in
../../references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide
candidate run planning while preserving model judgment about the active repo.
When to apply
- When the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs.
- When the task is a small-subset validation, short-cycle training probe, batch sweep, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trial.
- When the output should rank candidate runs rather than certify trusted success.
When not to apply
- When the user wants trusted training execution or conservative verification.
- When there is no explicit exploratory authorization.
- When the task is repository setup, intake, or debugging.
Clear boundaries
- This skill owns exploratory execution planning and summary only.
- Use
ai-research-exploreinstead when the task spans both current_research coordination and exploratory code changes. - It may hand off actual command execution to
minimal-run-and-auditorrun-train. - It should keep experiment state isolated from the trusted baseline.
- It should prefer small-subset and short-cycle checks before heavier exploratory runs.
- It should label run results as bounded evidence and explain when a comparison is not directly fair.
Ranking Semantics
- Pre-execution candidate selection uses three factors:
cost,success_rate, andexpected_gain. - Default weights should stay conservative unless the researcher explicitly provides
selection_weights. - Budget pruning still applies after scoring through
max_variantsandmax_short_cycle_runs. - If runs are executed later, downstream ranking should switch to real execution evidence, not stay purely heuristic.
Variant Spec Hints
- Use
variant_axesto define the candidate dimension grid. - Use
subset_sizesandshort_run_stepsto express exploratory run scale. - Use
selection_weightsto rebalancecost,success_rate, andexpected_gain. - Use
primary_metricandmetric_goalso downstream ranking can order executed candidates consistently.
Output expectations
explore_outputs/CHANGESET.mdexplore_outputs/SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.mdexplore_outputs/COMPARABILITY_REPORT.mdexplore_outputs/TOP_RUNS.mdexplore_outputs/status.json
Notes
Use references/execution-policy.md, ../../references/explore-variant-spec.md, ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md, scripts/plan_variants.py, and scripts/write_outputs.py.