ai-research-reproduction

द्वारा lllllllama

RigorPilot पुनरुत्पादन-मोड ऑर्केस्ट्रेटर README-प्रथम गहन शिक्षण रिपॉजिटरी पुनरुत्पादन के लिए। उपयोग करें जब उपयोगकर्ता एक अंत-से-अंत, न्यूनतम-विश्वसनीय प्रवाह चाहता है जो पहले रिपॉजिटरी पढ़ता है, सबसे छोटा दस्तावेजीकृत अनुमान या मूल्यांकन लक्ष्य चुनता है, इनटेक, सेटअप, विश्वसनीय निष्पादन, वैकल्पिक विश्वसनीय प्रशिक्षण, वैकल्पिक रिपॉजिटरी विश्लेषण, और वैकल्प

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; faithfully read the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then record results and deviations. Start with references/agent-operating-principles.md; load references/research-rigor-principles.md and references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning or experiment details are at stake.

For first-use problems, run scripts/doctor.py with the intended Python (read-only; optional --repo and --require-module). The deterministic entrypoint is scripts/orchestrate_repro.py with a self-contained _bundled/ runtime, so this skill works when installed alone; separately installed companion skills remain optional reusable entrypoints. Use the entrypoint and --help for routine runs; inspect its implementation when a concrete blocker or safety question requires it. Executed commands persist lifecycle state, append-only events, and full streamed stdout/stderr under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/. A CANCEL file in the active run directory requests process-tree cancellation. For recovery, queues or model gates, read references/runtime-and-model-adapter.md; for the optional model/tool loop, read references/agent-runner.md and use scripts/run_agent.py.

Fit

Use this skill when all are true:

  • The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or documented commands.
  • The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution, training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
  • The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.

Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Read the README and nearby repo signals.
  2. Run the bundled repo-intake-and-plan stage to extract commands and targets.
  3. Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
  4. Run env-and-assets-bootstrap only for target-specific environment, checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
  5. Run analyze-project only when structure, insertion points, or suspicious implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
  6. Use minimal-run-and-audit for documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or sanity execution. Keep direct execution as the default; native shell syntax requires explicit review and authorization.
  7. Use run-train instead when the selected trusted target is training startup, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
  8. Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
  9. Award result-match only when explicit expected metrics are compared under a recorded tolerance; observed metrics alone prove execution, not reproduction. Then write the standardized outputs and a concise final note in the user's language when practical.
  10. Once the requested target and evidence checks are complete, return the bounded result and stop. Optional stages and further README commands are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.

  • Put the shortest high-value summary in SUMMARY.md.
  • Put copyable commands in COMMANDS.md.
  • Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in LOG.md.
  • Put scientific meaning and change effects in SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md.
  • Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md.
  • Put durable machine-readable state in status.json.
  • Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md when needed.
  • Put the researcher's at-a-glance view in ANNOTATED_README.md: the README replayed byte-for-byte—including its image, GIF, video, and HTML markup—with exactly one marked color annotation after every heading block. Never extract a text-only surrogate. Generation must pass the built-in strip/check round trip before the file is kept.
  • For original relative media/file context, use --source-adjacent-readme to also write RIGORPILOT_README.md beside the source README; inspect the reported path/status and never replace an unrelated existing file. See references/output-spec.md.
  • Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.

Reference Loading

  • Load references/language-policy.md when writing human-readable outputs.
  • Load references/research-rigor-principles.md before making comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
  • Load references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when dataset, split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
  • Consult ~/.rigorpilot/PERSONAL_RIGOR.md if present, under references/continuous-learning-policy.md (advisory only; core wins).
  • Failed and later-resolved runs are auto-recorded as lessons via shared/scripts/lessons_store.py (RIGORPILOT_LESSONS=0 disables).
  • Load references/research-safety-principles.md before protocol-sensitive decisions.
  • Load references/patch-policy.md before modifying repository files.
  • Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather than expanding this entrypoint.

lllllllama की और Skills

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore संगत कौशल स्लग, सार्थक और संभावित नवीन गहन शिक्षण अनुसंधान उम्मीदवारों के लिए। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब शोधकर्ता ने कार्य परिवार, डेटासेट, बेंचमार्क, मूल्यांकन विधि च
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit केवल पढ़ने योग्य कौशल है जो गहन शिक्षण अनुसंधान रिपॉजिटरी के लिए है। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब उपयोगकर्ता किसी रिपॉजिटरी को पढ़ना और समझना चाहता है, मॉडल संरचना और प्रशिक्षण या अनुमान प्रवेश बिंदुओं का निरीक्षण करना चाहता है, कॉन्फ़िगरेशन और सम्मिलन बिंदुओं की समीक्षा करना चाहता है, या कोड को संशोधित किए बिना या भारी कार्य चलाए बिना संदिग्ध कार्यान्वयन पैटर्न को चिह्न
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into Hindi. The text describes a skill called "explore-code" but the instruction says to preserve the name only if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-code" does not appear in the provided text. So we just translate the text inside <text>. The text is a description of a skill for rigorous improvement implementation in deep learning research repositories. We need to preserve technical terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "backbone", "head", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". Also preserve URLs if any (none here). Numbers: none. Protocol names: none. Product names: none. We translate into Hindi, keeping technical terms as is or with transliteration if needed. The instruction says "preserve" so likely keep them in English. But for Hindi translation, we can write them in English script within Hindi text. Also note: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we don't add "explore-code".
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text to Hindi. The text describes a skill called "Rigor Run skill" for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. It specifies when to use it and when not to use it. We must preserve the name "minimal-run-and-audit" but it's not in the text, so we ignore. Also preserve technical terms like "README-first", "deep learning", "repro_outputs/", "patch notes", etc. No extra commentary. Just translation. Let's translate sentence by sentence: "Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction." -> "README-first डीप लर्निंग रिपॉजिटरी पुनरुत्पादन के लिए Rigor Run कौशल।" (Note: "Rigor Run" is a name, keep as is? The text says "Rigor Run skill" - it's a skill name. Should we translate? The instruction says preserve product names, protocol names, etc. "Rigor Run" might be a
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
README-प्रथम डीप लर्निंग रिपॉजिटरी पुनरुत्पादन के लिए रिगोर सेटअप कौशल। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब कार्य विशेष रूप से README-दस्तावेजित रिपॉजिटरी पर कोई रन करने से पहले एक रूढ़िवादी कोंडा-प्रथम वातावरण, चेकपॉइंट और डेटासेट पथ धारणाएं, कैश स्थान संकेत और सेटअप नोट्स तैयार करना हो। रिपॉजिटरी स्कैनिंग, पूर्ण ऑर्केस्ट्रेशन, पेपर व्याख्या, अंतिम रन रिपोर्टिंग, या सामान्य
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into Hindi. The text describes a skill called "explore-run" but the instruction says to preserve the name only if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" does appear in the source text? Actually, the source text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - so "explore-run" is not explicitly written as a single word; it's "Rigor Explore run". But the name to preserve is "explore-run". However, the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-run" does not appear as such. The source has "Rigor Explore run" which might be interpreted as the skill name. But the user says "Name to preserve: explore-run". I think we should not add it if not in source. The source text includes "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - so "Rigor Explore run" is part of the text. We need to translate that. But the instruction says
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
गहन शिक्षण अनुसंधान कार्य के लिए रिगोर डिबग / रिगोर ऑडिट कौशल। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब उपयोगकर्ता ट्रेसबैक, टर्मिनल त्रुटि, CUDA OOM, चेकपॉइंट लोड विफलता, आकार बेमेल, NaN हानि लक्षण, या प्रशिक्षण विफलता पेस्ट करता है और किसी भी पैचिंग से पहले रूढ़िवादी निदान चाहता है, जिसमें डिबग फिक्स को शोध योगदान से स्पष्ट रूप से अलग किया गया हो। व्यापक रीफैक्टरिंग, अनुमानात्मक अनु
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
README-प्रथम गहन शिक्षण रिपॉजिटरी पुनरुत्पादन के लिए रिगर पेपर संदर्भ सहायक। केवल तब उपयोग करें जब README और रिपॉजिटरी फ़ाइलें एक संकीर्ण पुनरुत्पादन-महत्वपूर्ण अंतर छोड़ती हैं और कार्य प्राथमिक पेपर स्रोतों से डेटासेट विभाजन, प्रीप्रोसेसिंग, मूल्यांकन प्रोटोकॉल, चेकपॉइंट मैपिंग, या रनटाइम धारणा जैसे किसी विशिष्ट पेपर विवरण को हल करना है, साथ ही विरोधाभासों को र
researchdocumentdata-analysis