ai-research-reproduction

द्वारा lllllllama

RigorPilot पुनरुत्पादन-मोड ऑर्केस्ट्रेटर README-प्रथम गहन शिक्षण रिपॉजिटरी पुनरुत्पादन के लिए। उपयोग करें जब उपयोगकर्ता एक अंत-से-अंत, न्यूनतम-विश्वसनीय प्रवाह चाहता है जो पहले रिपॉजिटरी पढ़ता है, सबसे छोटा दस्तावेजीकृत अनुमान या मूल्यांकन लक्ष्य चुनता है, इनटेक, सेटअप, विश्वसनीय निष्पादन, वैकल्पिक विश्वसनीय प्रशिक्षण, वैकल्पिक रिपॉजिटरी विश्लेषण, और वैकल्प

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward the smallest trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Preserve documented meaning; record assumptions, deviations and blockers instead of changing semantics to manufacture success. Load specialized references only for a concrete uncertainty.

Fast Path

For a routine bounded run, keep the control path short:

  1. Read the target README and only the target test/config/source needed to understand the documented command.
  2. Run scripts/orchestrate_repro.py --repo <repo> --plan-only --agent-output with any explicit user timeout bound (--timeout or --train-timeout) already supplied; review command_candidates, the selected cmd-XX, side-effect contract, selection fingerprint, and returned reviewed_run_args. With no --output-dir, later evidence goes to <repo>/repro_outputs regardless of caller cwd.
  3. Run the selected candidate, or another reviewed candidate, with --run-selected --command-id <cmd-XX> --plan-fingerprint <fingerprint> --agent-output plus requested timeout/metric/source-adjacent options. Preserve an explicit user command-timeout bound instead of silently making it stricter on a routine trusted run. --timeout limits the target command; do not wrap the whole orchestrator in an equal or shorter external timeout, because it still needs time to terminate children and write terminal evidence. A changed command set fails closed; setup/download commands are never target candidates.
  4. Run --verify-output --agent-output; inspect detailed evidence files only when verification fails or the result is partial/blocked.
  5. Deliver the bounded result and stop.

For a host with short tool-call deadlines, rerun planning with --include-agent-handoff and follow references/agent-job.md; otherwise keep the direct path above. Job completion is not task acceptance, and uncertain state is never a reason for automatic replay.

Do not inspect orchestrate_repro.py, annotate_readme.py, _bundled/, writers, or runtime internals on a normal success path. Inspect implementation only for a concrete blocker, unexpected side effect, bundle-integrity failure, or unresolved safety question. Use scripts/doctor.py for first-use environment/install diagnostics. Executed commands keep full lifecycle/log evidence under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/.

Fit

Use this skill for repository-grounded, multi-phase trusted reproduction where the goal is a small reproducible target. Do not use it for paper summaries, generic setup, isolated scanning, standalone commands, open-ended research design, or explicitly authorized candidate exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Treat README guidance as primary; extract and select the minimum trustworthy target.
  2. Use setup/assets only for target-specific prerequisites and analyze-project only when structural clarification is needed.
  3. Use minimal-run-and-audit for inference/evaluation/smoke and run-train for training startup, kickoff, or resume; direct execution is the default.
  4. Pause before fuller training or changes to dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or interpretation.
  5. Award result-match only against explicit expected metrics and tolerance; process success alone is not reproduction success.
  6. Write the evidence bundle, return the requested bounded result, and stop; optional stages are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and references/output-spec.md. Keep summaries short, commands copyable, machine state stable, and scientific/comparability changes explicit. ANNOTATED_README.md must preserve the source README byte-for-byte outside inserted evidence blocks and pass its strip/check round trip. Use --source-adjacent-readme only for an owned RIGORPILOT_README.md; never replace an unrelated file. Distinguish verified facts from inference.

Reference Loading

  • Workflow judgment: references/agent-operating-principles.md.
  • Human-readable output: references/language-policy.md.
  • Scientific/comparability judgment: references/research-rigor-principles.md and, when experiment details matter, references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md.
  • Protocol-sensitive changes: references/research-safety-principles.md and references/patch-policy.md.
  • Personal rigor and lessons are advisory only; keep specialized detail in references/scripts rather than expanding this entrypoint.

lllllllama की और Skills

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore संगत कौशल स्लग, सार्थक और संभावित नवीन गहन शिक्षण अनुसंधान उम्मीदवारों के लिए। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब शोधकर्ता ने कार्य परिवार, डेटासेट, बेंचमार्क, मूल्यांकन विधि च
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit केवल पढ़ने योग्य कौशल है जो गहन शिक्षण अनुसंधान रिपॉजिटरी के लिए है। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब उपयोगकर्ता किसी रिपॉजिटरी को पढ़ना और समझना चाहता है, मॉडल संरचना और प्रशिक्षण या अनुमान प्रवेश बिंदुओं का निरीक्षण करना चाहता है, कॉन्फ़िगरेशन और सम्मिलन बिंदुओं की समीक्षा करना चाहता है, या कोड को संशोधित किए बिना या भारी कार्य चलाए बिना संदिग्ध कार्यान्वयन पैटर्न को चिह्न
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into Hindi. The text describes a skill called "explore-code" but the instruction says to preserve the name only if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-code" does not appear in the provided text. So we just translate the text inside <text>. The text is a description of a skill for rigorous improvement implementation in deep learning research repositories. We need to preserve technical terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "backbone", "head", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". Also preserve URLs if any (none here). Numbers: none. Protocol names: none. Product names: none. We translate into Hindi, keeping technical terms as is or with transliteration if needed. The instruction says "preserve" so likely keep them in English. But for Hindi translation, we can write them in English script within Hindi text. Also note: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we don't add "explore-code".
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text to Hindi. The text describes a skill called "Rigor Run skill" for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. It specifies when to use it and when not to use it. We must preserve the name "minimal-run-and-audit" but it's not in the text, so we ignore. Also preserve technical terms like "README-first", "deep learning", "repro_outputs/", "patch notes", etc. No extra commentary. Just translation. Let's translate sentence by sentence: "Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction." -> "README-first डीप लर्निंग रिपॉजिटरी पुनरुत्पादन के लिए Rigor Run कौशल।" (Note: "Rigor Run" is a name, keep as is? The text says "Rigor Run skill" - it's a skill name. Should we translate? The instruction says preserve product names, protocol names, etc. "Rigor Run" might be a
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
README-प्रथम डीप लर्निंग रिपॉजिटरी पुनरुत्पादन के लिए रिगोर सेटअप कौशल। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब कार्य विशेष रूप से README-दस्तावेजित रिपॉजिटरी पर कोई रन करने से पहले एक रूढ़िवादी कोंडा-प्रथम वातावरण, चेकपॉइंट और डेटासेट पथ धारणाएं, कैश स्थान संकेत और सेटअप नोट्स तैयार करना हो। रिपॉजिटरी स्कैनिंग, पूर्ण ऑर्केस्ट्रेशन, पेपर व्याख्या, अंतिम रन रिपोर्टिंग, या सामान्य
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into Hindi. The text describes a skill called "explore-run" but the instruction says to preserve the name only if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" does appear in the source text? Actually, the source text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - so "explore-run" is not explicitly written as a single word; it's "Rigor Explore run". But the name to preserve is "explore-run". However, the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-run" does not appear as such. The source has "Rigor Explore run" which might be interpreted as the skill name. But the user says "Name to preserve: explore-run". I think we should not add it if not in source. The source text includes "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - so "Rigor Explore run" is part of the text. We need to translate that. But the instruction says
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
गहन शिक्षण अनुसंधान कार्य के लिए रिगोर डिबग / रिगोर ऑडिट कौशल। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब उपयोगकर्ता ट्रेसबैक, टर्मिनल त्रुटि, CUDA OOM, चेकपॉइंट लोड विफलता, आकार बेमेल, NaN हानि लक्षण, या प्रशिक्षण विफलता पेस्ट करता है और किसी भी पैचिंग से पहले रूढ़िवादी निदान चाहता है, जिसमें डिबग फिक्स को शोध योगदान से स्पष्ट रूप से अलग किया गया हो। व्यापक रीफैक्टरिंग, अनुमानात्मक अनु
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
README-प्रथम गहन शिक्षण रिपॉजिटरी पुनरुत्पादन के लिए रिगर पेपर संदर्भ सहायक। केवल तब उपयोग करें जब README और रिपॉजिटरी फ़ाइलें एक संकीर्ण पुनरुत्पादन-महत्वपूर्ण अंतर छोड़ती हैं और कार्य प्राथमिक पेपर स्रोतों से डेटासेट विभाजन, प्रीप्रोसेसिंग, मूल्यांकन प्रोटोकॉल, चेकपॉइंट मैपिंग, या रनटाइम धारणा जैसे किसी विशिष्ट पेपर विवरण को हल करना है, साथ ही विरोधाभासों को र
researchdocumentdata-analysis