caveman-setup

作者: juliusbrussee

將當前儲存庫透過 Caveman Cloud 閘道連接,使每個 LLM 請求都被測量——成本、token、延遲——且行為零變更。當使用者貼上 Caveman 設定提示、說「set up caveman」或想要為應用程式新增 LLM 花費可觀測性時使用。需要閘道 URL 和 Cave API 金鑰(設定提示中兩者皆有)。

npx skills add https://github.com/juliusbrussee/caveman --skill caveman-setup

You are wiring this repository through the Caveman gateway. Caveman is a byte-preserving LLM proxy: in record mode it measures what your app sends and what it costs, and changes nothing else. Your job is a minimal, verified integration — not a refactor.

The prompt that sent you here provides four values. Refer to them as:

  • GATEWAY — the gateway base URL (e.g. https://gateway.caveman.so or http://127.0.0.1:8787)
  • CAVE_API_KEY — the gateway auth secret (treat like any API key: env var only, never committed, never printed in full)
  • PROVIDER_KEYSstored (provider keys live encrypted in Caveman Cloud) or byok (this app sends its own provider key per request)
  • DASHBOARD — the dashboard base URL (e.g. https://app.caveman.so)

If any value is missing, stop and ask for it. Do not guess a URL or mint a key.

Rules (non-negotiable)

  1. Coherent integration. Wire every live LLM callsite through existing configuration and responsible seams. Touch each layer correctness requires. No drive-by refactors or formatting sweeps; add an abstraction only when it clarifies ownership or lowers lifecycle cost.
  2. Secrets stay in env vars. CAVE_API_KEY goes into the env file the repo already uses (.env, .env.local, …). If that file isn't gitignored, add it to .gitignore and say so. Never hardcode the key in source.
  3. Report only what you observed. The final report states the HTTP status and usage numbers from the real verification response — never assumed success. If verification fails, report the failure template instead.
  4. Record mode only. You are adding measurement. You do not enable any optimization, and you do not claim any savings — verified savings are $0 until an optimizer is explicitly turned on and passes its eval gate.
  5. Provider keys are not your business. With PROVIDER_KEYS: stored you never see one. With byok, the app's existing provider key stays exactly where it already is.

Step 1 — Find every live LLM callsite

Read dependency files (package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, go.mod, lockfiles) and search the source for LLM clients:

  • SDK imports: openai, @anthropic-ai/sdk, anthropic, ai + @ai-sdk/* (Vercel), langchain*, litellm, google-genai / @google/genai, crewai, pydantic_ai, openai-agents / agents
  • Raw HTTP to api.openai.com, api.anthropic.com, generativelanguage.googleapis.com
  • Existing base-URL env vars: OPENAI_BASE_URL, OPENAI_API_BASE, ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, GEMINI_BASE_URL, GOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL

List what you found (file:line per callsite) before changing anything. If you find no LLM callsites, stop and report the "nothing to wire" template at the end of this file — do not invent an integration.

Step 2 — Pick the app slug

One slug names this app in the gateway path: GATEWAY/w/<app>. Derive it from the package/module name (e.g. support-bot, acme-api). Grammar: lowercase [a-z0-9] first, then [a-z0-9._-], max 64 chars. Spend for this whole app groups under that slug on the dashboard.

Step 3 — Wire each callsite

The pattern is always the same: base URL → the gateway with /w/<app>, plus one auth header. Gateway auth is x-cave-api-key: CAVE_API_KEY (Authorization: Bearer CAVE_API_KEY also works where a header is awkward). With PROVIDER_KEYS: byok, also send x-cave-upstream-key: <the provider key the app already uses>.

Two facts that make the wiring safe (both are gateway-enforced, not hopes): the gateway rebuilds upstream auth headers from scratch, so a client's Authorization/x-api-key value is never forwarded to the provider; and with stored, upstream auth comes from the encrypted connection server-side. So in stored mode, where an SDK insists on an api-key parameter, set it to the Cave key — it authenticates the gateway and goes no further.

Exact shapes (use the one matching each callsite — these are the product's published recipes, not suggestions):

OpenAI SDK (TS) — Chat Completions and Responses both route through:

const client = new OpenAI({
  baseURL: `${process.env.CAVE_GATEWAY_URL}/w/<app>/openai/v1`,
  apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY,           // byok: unchanged · stored: use CAVE_API_KEY
  defaultHeaders: {
    "x-cave-api-key": process.env.CAVE_API_KEY!,
    // byok only:
    "x-cave-upstream-key": process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY!,
  },
});

OpenAI SDK (Python) — same shape: base_url=f"{gw}/w/<app>/openai/v1", default_headers={"x-cave-api-key": ..., "x-cave-upstream-key": ...}.

Anthropic SDK (TS/Python) — the SDK appends /v1/messages itself. The x-cave-api-key header is required here in both modes (this SDK's own key param rides x-api-key, which is not a gateway-auth header):

client = anthropic.Anthropic(
    base_url=f"{os.environ['CAVE_GATEWAY_URL']}/w/<app>",
    api_key=os.environ["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"],      # byok: unchanged · stored: use CAVE_API_KEY
    default_headers={
        "x-cave-api-key": os.environ["CAVE_API_KEY"],
        # byok only:
        "x-cave-upstream-key": os.environ["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"],
    },
)

Vercel AI SDKcreateOpenAICompatible({ baseURL: ${gw}/w//openai/v1, headers: { "x-cave-api-key": ... } }); Anthropic models via createAnthropic({ baseURL: ${gw}/w//v1, headers: { ... } }).

LangChain / LangGraphChatOpenAI(base_url=f"{gw}/w/<app>/openai/v1", default_headers={...}); ChatAnthropic(base_url=f"{gw}/w/<app>", default_headers={...}). LangGraph inherits whatever model you pass it.

LiteLLM — per call api_base=f"{gw}/w/<app>/openai/v1" + extra_headers={...}, or fleet-wide in the LiteLLM proxy config.yaml.

Raw HTTP / anything else — swap the host, keep the provider's native path: GATEWAY/w/<app>/v1/chat/completions (OpenAI protocol) or GATEWAY/w/<app>/v1/messages (Anthropic protocol), add the header(s).

Concretely, with slug support-bot and the hosted gateway, an OpenAI-SDK base URL reads https://gateway.caveman.so/w/support-bot/openai/v1. And in stored mode, drop every x-cave-upstream-key line entirely — it is byok-only.

For frameworks not listed (google-genai, crewai, pydantic-ai, openai-agents), fetch the matching page under <docs origin>/docs/integrations/ — same origin this skill came from — and follow it.

Add to the repo's env file (and reference from code — no literals):

CAVE_GATEWAY_URL=<GATEWAY>
CAVE_API_KEY=<CAVE_API_KEY>

Step 4 — Verify with one real request

The user pasted the setup prompt to authorize exactly this: one small verification request. Send it now — do not pause to ask permission for it. An integration that ends unverified because you hesitated is a worse outcome than one tiny request; finishing the verification and the report autonomously is the point of this skill.

Send one minimal request through the wiring you just built — the app's own cheapest path if it has a script for it, otherwise curl on the path matching the protocol you just wired with the app's own model and a small cap (max_tokens ≤ 32):

# OpenAI-protocol wiring:
curl -sS "$CAVE_GATEWAY_URL/w/<app>/v1/chat/completions" \
  -H "x-cave-api-key: $CAVE_API_KEY" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model":"<model the repo already uses>","max_tokens":16,"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"ping"}]}'

# Anthropic-protocol wiring:
curl -sS "$CAVE_GATEWAY_URL/w/<app>/v1/messages" \
  -H "x-cave-api-key: $CAVE_API_KEY" \
  -H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model":"<model the repo already uses>","max_tokens":16,"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"ping"}]}'

(byok: add -H "x-cave-upstream-key: $PROVIDER_KEY".) This is one real, billable provider request — that is the point: real traffic, real measurement.

Read the response. Success = HTTP 200 with a usage block. Anything else = the matching failure template below.

Step 5 — Report

End with exactly this shape, values filled from what you actually did and saw:

## Caveman is live in this repo

Wired: <n> callsite(s) in <n> file(s)
  - <file> — <one-line what changed>
App slug: <app> — spend for this app groups under it
Verified: HTTP 200 · model <model> · <in> in / <out> out tokens (one real request)
Mode: record — measured only. No model-visible bytes changed, no optimization
enabled. Verified savings are $0 until you turn an optimizer on and it passes
its eval gate. That honesty is the product.

See the dollars: <DASHBOARD>/traces — your request is the top row, priced from
the public catalog. <DASHBOARD>/getting-started flips to "First request received."

Want spend split by workflow (e.g. support-reply vs nightly-digest), not just
by app? Say "discover workflows" — I'll fetch <docs origin>/docs/discover-workflows.md
and label every callsite by the job it does.

Failure templates (use verbatim, filled in — never soften)

  • Nothing to wire: "I found no LLM callsites in this repo (searched SDKs, raw provider HTTP, base-URL env vars). If this repo runs a coding agent rather than shipping LLM code, use caveman wrap <agent> instead — see /getting-started."
  • Gateway unreachable: "The verification request could not reach GATEWAY (). Wiring is in place but unverified — nothing will be measured until the gateway is reachable. Check the URL and network, then re-run the verification curl above."
  • 401 cave_invalid_api_key: "The gateway rejected CAVE_API_KEY. Mint a new key at /getting-started and update the env file; the wiring itself is unchanged."
  • 404 cave_route_not_found: "The gateway matched no route — usually a malformed /w/ slug (lowercase [a-z0-9] first, then [a-z0-9._-], max 64) or a path that doesn't match the SDK's protocol. Fix the URL and re-verify."
  • Provider error (4xx/5xx via gateway): report status + body verbatim; the gateway is reachable and auth passed, the upstream call failed — usually a provider key or model-name issue in the app itself.

Never report success on any of these. An unverified integration is reported as unverified.

來自 juliusbrussee 的更多技能

caveman
juliusbrussee
超壓縮溝通模式。透過穴居人式簡潔表達,減少約75%的token使用量,同時維持完整技術準確性。支援強度等級:lite、full(預設)、ultra、wenyan-lite、wenyan-full、wenyan-ultra。當使用者說「caveman mode」、「talk like caveman」、「use caveman」、「less tokens」、「be brief」或呼叫/caveman時啟用。亦會在要求token效率時自動觸發。
communicationproductivity
caveman-commit
juliusbrussee
超壓縮提交訊息生成器。去除提交訊息中的雜訊,同時保留意圖與理由。採用 Conventional Commits 格式。主旨不超過50字元,僅在「原因」不明顯時加入內文。當使用者說「寫提交」、「提交訊息」、「生成提交」、「/commit」或呼叫 /caveman-commit 時使用。暫存變更時自動觸發。
developmentcode-review
caveman-compress
juliusbrussee
將自然語言記憶檔案(CLAUDE.md、待辦事項、偏好設定)壓縮成穴居人格式以節省輸入令牌。保留所有技術內容、程式碼、網址與結構。壓縮版本會覆蓋原始檔案。人類可讀的備份會另存為FILE.original.md。觸發指令:/caveman-compress FILEPATH 或「壓縮記憶檔案」
developmentdocument
caveman-help
juliusbrussee
所有穴居人模式、技能與指令的快速參考卡。一次性顯示,非持續模式。觸發方式:/caveman-help、「caveman help」、「what caveman commands」、「how do I use caveman」。
developmentdocumentproductivity
caveman-review
juliusbrussee
超壓縮程式碼審查評論。減少PR回饋中的雜訊,同時保留可執行的關鍵資訊。每條評論僅一行:位置、問題、修正。當使用者說「審查此PR」、「程式碼審查」、「審查差異」、「/review」或呼叫/caveman-review時使用。審查拉取請求時自動觸發。
developmentcode-review
caveman-stats
juliusbrussee
顯示當前會話的實際Token使用量與預估節省金額。直接從Claude Code會話日誌讀取,無需AI估算。透過/caveman-stats觸發。輸出由mode-tracker鉤子注入,模型本身不計算數值。
developmentdata-analysis
cavecrew
juliusbrussee
We need to translate the given text from English to Traditional Chinese. The text describes a decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents. It mentions specific names: cavecrew-investigator, cavecrew-builder, cavecrew-reviewer, and cavecrew. These names should be preserved as is. Also, technical terms like "Explore", "diff review", "tool-result", "main context" should be preserved or appropriately translated. The instruction says to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms. So we keep "cavecrew-investigator", "cavecrew-builder", "cavecrew-reviewer", "cavecrew", "Explore", "diff review", "tool-result", "main context". Also "~60%" should be preserved. The text inside <text> is the entire paragraph. We need to output only the translation, no extra commentary. Let's translate carefully: "Decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents." -> "委派給原始人風格子代理的決策指南。" "T
developmentcode-reviewapi
caveman-explore
juliusbrussee
唯讀儲存庫瀏覽器。請主動用於冷啟動探索、廣泛的跨檔案定位,或當直接搜尋失敗而需要找出某個東西所在位置時。當問題已指明確切檔案或符號,或先前回合已回傳可用的 file:line 證據時,請略過。僅回傳精簡的 path:line 引用;其讀取與 grep 操作不會進入主要對話。