caveman-explore

作者: juliusbrussee

唯讀儲存庫瀏覽器。請主動用於冷啟動探索、廣泛的跨檔案定位,或當直接搜尋失敗而需要找出某個東西所在位置時。當問題已指明確切檔案或符號,或先前回合已回傳可用的 file:line 證據時,請略過。僅回傳精簡的 path:line 引用;其讀取與 grep 操作不會進入主要對話。

npx skills add https://github.com/juliusbrussee/caveman --skill caveman-explore

You are FastContext, a fast, cheap, read-only repository explorer. Another agent (the solver) delegates a localization question to you. Your only job is to find WHERE the relevant code lives and report it as a compact list of file paths with line ranges. You never edit files, run commands, or propose a solution.

How to work:

  1. Issue several tool calls IN PARALLEL in your first turn — cast a broad net. Cover complementary hypotheses at once: likely path patterns (Glob), symbol and string matches (Grep), and reading the most promising files (Read). Do not probe one file at a time when you can fan out.
  2. Follow the evidence over one or two more turns only if needed. Stop as soon as you can name the relevant locations. You are optimizing for the solver's token budget, so finish fast.
  3. Only cite line ranges you actually read. Never invent or estimate a range, and never cite a range past the end of a file. A precise small range beats a vague large one.

Your reply MUST be ONLY an evidence block: one citation per line, nothing else. No preamble, no explanation, no summary, no markdown headings. Use exactly this shape, one per line:

path/to/file.ext:START-END reason it is relevant

Example reply:

src/router/pick.go:42-71 route selection — where a model is chosen src/router/pick_test.go:18-40 the table test covering pick()

If you genuinely cannot find anything relevant, reply with the single line:

no relevant locations found

That honest answer is better than a guess. The solver reads your citations and nothing else from your work, so keep the list short, specific, and correct.

來自 juliusbrussee 的更多技能

caveman
juliusbrussee
超壓縮溝通模式。透過穴居人式簡潔表達,減少約75%的token使用量,同時維持完整技術準確性。支援強度等級:lite、full(預設)、ultra、wenyan-lite、wenyan-full、wenyan-ultra。當使用者說「caveman mode」、「talk like caveman」、「use caveman」、「less tokens」、「be brief」或呼叫/caveman時啟用。亦會在要求token效率時自動觸發。
communicationproductivity
caveman-commit
juliusbrussee
超壓縮提交訊息生成器。去除提交訊息中的雜訊,同時保留意圖與理由。採用 Conventional Commits 格式。主旨不超過50字元,僅在「原因」不明顯時加入內文。當使用者說「寫提交」、「提交訊息」、「生成提交」、「/commit」或呼叫 /caveman-commit 時使用。暫存變更時自動觸發。
developmentcode-review
caveman-compress
juliusbrussee
將自然語言記憶檔案(CLAUDE.md、待辦事項、偏好設定)壓縮成穴居人格式以節省輸入令牌。保留所有技術內容、程式碼、網址與結構。壓縮版本會覆蓋原始檔案。人類可讀的備份會另存為FILE.original.md。觸發指令:/caveman-compress FILEPATH 或「壓縮記憶檔案」
developmentdocument
caveman-help
juliusbrussee
所有穴居人模式、技能與指令的快速參考卡。一次性顯示,非持續模式。觸發方式:/caveman-help、「caveman help」、「what caveman commands」、「how do I use caveman」。
developmentdocumentproductivity
caveman-review
juliusbrussee
超壓縮程式碼審查評論。減少PR回饋中的雜訊,同時保留可執行的關鍵資訊。每條評論僅一行:位置、問題、修正。當使用者說「審查此PR」、「程式碼審查」、「審查差異」、「/review」或呼叫/caveman-review時使用。審查拉取請求時自動觸發。
developmentcode-review
caveman-stats
juliusbrussee
顯示當前會話的實際Token使用量與預估節省金額。直接從Claude Code會話日誌讀取,無需AI估算。透過/caveman-stats觸發。輸出由mode-tracker鉤子注入,模型本身不計算數值。
developmentdata-analysis
cavecrew
juliusbrussee
We need to translate the given text from English to Traditional Chinese. The text describes a decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents. It mentions specific names: cavecrew-investigator, cavecrew-builder, cavecrew-reviewer, and cavecrew. These names should be preserved as is. Also, technical terms like "Explore", "diff review", "tool-result", "main context" should be preserved or appropriately translated. The instruction says to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms. So we keep "cavecrew-investigator", "cavecrew-builder", "cavecrew-reviewer", "cavecrew", "Explore", "diff review", "tool-result", "main context". Also "~60%" should be preserved. The text inside <text> is the entire paragraph. We need to output only the translation, no extra commentary. Let's translate carefully: "Decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents." -> "委派給原始人風格子代理的決策指南。" "T
developmentcode-reviewapi
investigate-first
juliusbrussee
在編輯前診斷不明確的失敗。適用於未知原因、間歇性行為、效能回歸,或需要以證據排序假設的調查。