golang-uber-fx

作者: samber

我们要求翻译一段文本,目标语言是简体中文。需要保留产品名、协议名、URL、数字、技术术语。不要添加声明、解释、Markdown、项目符号、链接、标签、前缀或额外评论。只翻译<text>内的内容。注意不要包含名称"golang-uber-fx"除非它在源文本中出现。源文本中出现了"golang-uber-fx"吗?在最后一句提到了"samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-dig",但没有直接出现"golang-uber-fx"作为名称。但指令说"Name to preserve: golang-uber-fx",但源文本中没有这个名称,所以不需要特意保留。只需翻译文本。 翻译时注意技术术语:uber-go/fx, fx.New, fx.Provide, fx.Invoke, fx.Module, fx.Lifecycle hooks, fx.Annotate (name/group/As), fx.Decorate, fx.Supply, fx.Replace, fx.WithLogger, Run(), go.uber.org/fx,

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-uber-fx

Persona: You are a Go architect building a long-running service with fx. You wire the graph at the composition root, push lifecycle into hooks instead of init(), and treat modules as the unit of reuse.

Using uber-go/fx for Application Wiring in Go

Application framework combining a reflection-based DI container (built on uber-go/dig) with a lifecycle, module system, signal-aware run loop, and structured event logging. For long-running services where boot order, graceful shutdown, and modular composition matter.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

go get go.uber.org/fx

fx vs. dig

fx is built on top of dig and shares the same reflection-based container engine. The DI primitives (Provide, Invoke, In/Out structs, named values, value groups) are identical — fx.In/fx.Out are re-exports of dig.In/dig.Out.

What fx adds on top:

Concerndigfx
DI containerdig.New()✅ (embedded)
Lifecycle hooksfx.Lifecycle OnStart/OnStop
Module systemfx.Module with scoped decorators
Signal-aware run loopapp.Run() blocks on SIGINT/SIGTERM
Structured event loggingfx.WithLogger / fxevent
Startup/shutdown timeoutfx.StartTimeout / fx.StopTimeout

Choose fx for long-running services (HTTP servers, workers, daemons) — lifecycle and signal handling are mandatory there, and modules make large service graphs manageable.

Choose raw dig when you need wiring without a framework: CLI tools, libraries that expose a container to callers, test harnesses, or embedding DI into an existing app that manages its own lifecycle. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-dig skill.

The Application

import "go.uber.org/fx"

app := fx.New(
    fx.Provide(NewLogger, NewDatabase, NewServer),
    fx.Invoke(RegisterRoutes),
)
app.Run() // blocks until SIGINT/SIGTERM, then runs OnStop hooks

Boot stages: fx.New validates types (constructors do not run); app.Start(ctx) runs each fx.Invoke and fires OnStart hooks in topological order; main blocks on app.Done(); app.Stop(ctx) fires OnStop hooks in reverse order. Default timeout is 15 seconds — override with fx.StartTimeout / fx.StopTimeout.

Provide and Invoke

fx.New(
    fx.Provide(NewLogger, NewDatabase, NewServer),  // lazy
    fx.Invoke(RegisterRoutes, StartMetricsExporter), // always run during Start
)

fx.Provide registers constructors; fx.Invoke is the trigger — without an Invoke (directly or transitively) referencing a type, its constructor never runs.

Lifecycle Hooks

Inject fx.Lifecycle and append hooks. Constructors should return quickly; long-running work belongs in OnStart.

func NewHTTPServer(lc fx.Lifecycle, log *zap.Logger, cfg *Config) *http.Server {
    srv := &http.Server{Addr: cfg.Addr}

    lc.Append(fx.Hook{
        OnStart: func(ctx context.Context) error {
            ln, err := net.Listen("tcp", srv.Addr)
            if err != nil { return err }
            go srv.Serve(ln)         // blocking work in a goroutine
            return nil
        },
        OnStop: func(ctx context.Context) error {
            return srv.Shutdown(ctx)
        },
    })
    return srv
}

Both callbacks receive a context bounded by StartTimeout/StopTimeout — respect cancellation. OnStart must return quickly — spawn a goroutine for blocking work; otherwise startup hangs and dependent hooks never fire.

fx.StartHook / fx.StopHook / fx.StartStopHook adapt simpler signatures (no context, no error, or both):

lc.Append(fx.StartStopHook(srv.Start, srv.Stop))   // matched pair

Parameter and Result Objects

fx re-exports dig's dig.In / dig.Out as fx.In / fx.Out. Use them when a constructor has 4+ dependencies, or when you need name/group/optional tags.

type ServerParams struct {
    fx.In

    Logger *zap.Logger
    DB     *sql.DB
    Cache  *redis.Client     `optional:"true"`
    Routes []http.Handler    `group:"routes"`
}

func NewServer(p ServerParams) *Server { /* ... */ }

fx.Annotate

fx.Annotate wraps a constructor to add tags or interface bindings without a fx.Out struct. Prefer it for ergonomic name/group/As bindings:

fx.Provide(
    fx.Annotate(NewPrimaryDB, fx.ResultTags(`name:"primary"`)),
    fx.Annotate(NewPostgresDB, fx.As(new(Database))),    // expose interface
    fx.Annotate(NewUserHandler,
        fx.As(new(http.Handler)),
        fx.ResultTags(`group:"routes"`),
    ),
)

Value Groups

Many constructors, one consumer slice — typical for routes, health checks, metrics collectors:

type RouteResult struct {
    fx.Out
    Handler http.Handler `group:"routes"`
}

type ServerParams struct {
    fx.In
    Routes []http.Handler `group:"routes"`
}

Append ,flatten (group:"routes,flatten") to unwrap a slice instead of nesting it. Order is not guaranteed — provide an explicit ordered slice when sequence matters.

fx.Module

fx.Module groups providers, invokes, and decorators under a name. Modules scope decorators to themselves and their children — a logger renamed in fx.Module("db", ...) only appears renamed for code inside that module.

var DatabaseModule = fx.Module("database",
    fx.Provide(NewConnection, NewUserRepository),
    fx.Decorate(func(log *zap.Logger) *zap.Logger {
        return log.Named("db")
    }),
)

func main() {
    fx.New(
        fx.Provide(NewConfig, NewLogger),
        DatabaseModule,
        HTTPModule,
    ).Run()
}

Treat each module as a small library that can be lifted into another app — its public surface is the types it Provides.

For fx.Supply/fx.Replace/fx.Decorate, optional deps, custom logging, manual lifecycle, and Quick Reference, see advanced.md.

Best Practices

  1. Keep main() thin — providers, modules, and a single Run(). Push real work into modules so each can be tested in isolation.
  2. Use lifecycle hooks instead of init() or goroutines launched from constructors — Start/Stop ordering depends on graph topology, but init() goroutines do not, which leads to races and leaks.
  3. OnStart must return promptly — long work goes in a goroutine inside the hook. A blocking OnStart hangs the rest of the boot.
  4. Respect ctx.Done() in hooks — a hook that ignores cancellation is reported as a timeout failure but its goroutine continues, leaking resources.
  5. Group by module, not by layer — a module owns the providers, lifecycle, and decorators for one concern (HTTP, DB, metrics).
  6. Use fx.Annotate for tags rather than wrapping a constructor in an fx.Out struct — keeps the constructor reusable outside fx.
  7. Replace fx.Provide with fx.Supply for pre-built values (config, command-line flags). Shorter, signals intent.
  8. Validate the graph in CI by booting under fx.New(...).Err() — catches missing providers and cycles before deploy.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Long-running work directly in OnStartSpawn a goroutine inside OnStart; the hook itself must return quickly so dependent hooks can run.
fx.Provide something that should be fx.SupplyPre-built values (config, secrets) belong in fx.Supply — clearer and avoids a no-op constructor.
Module decorator leaking to siblingsDecorate inside fx.Module(...) — decorators flow only to descendants. A top-level fx.Decorate is global.
Group order assumedGroups are unordered. If order matters, provide an ordered slice from one constructor.
Constructors with side effectsSide effects belong in OnStart — constructors should be cheap and pure-ish, since they may run concurrently and lazily.
Forgotten fx.InvokeWithout an Invoke (or downstream consumer), constructors never run. Add at least one Invoke per app.

Testing

Use go.uber.org/fx/fxtest to integrate fx with *testing.T (failures call t.Fatal, RequireStop registers as t.Cleanup). fx.Populate(&target) pulls values out of the graph; fx.Replace swaps real dependencies for fakes. Full patterns in testing.md.

Further Reading

  • advanced.md — Supply/Replace/Decorate, optional deps, custom event logging, manual lifecycle, full Quick Reference
  • recipes.md — full HTTP service with database/metrics, background workers with graceful drain, multiple impls of the same interface, manual lifecycle for CLI embedding
  • testing.md — fxtest patterns, fx.Replace, fx.Populate, isolated lifecycle tests, CI graph validation

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-dig skill for the underlying container, dig.In/dig.Out, and DI without lifecycle
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection skill for DI concepts and library comparison
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-do skill for a generics-based alternative without reflection
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-google-wire skill for compile-time DI (no runtime container)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill for interface design patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-context skill for context propagation in OnStart/OnStop hooks
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general testing patterns

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in uber-go/fx, open an issue at https://github.com/uber-go/fx/issues.

来自 samber 的更多技能

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Simplified Chinese. The instruction says: preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms. Do not add claims, explanations, Markdown, bullets, links, labels, prefixes, or extra commentary. Also, do not include the name "golang-testing" unless it appears in the source text. The source text does not include the name, so we don't add it. The text is a description of a skill for Go testing. It lists various testing techniques and tools. We need to translate the entire text inside <text> tags. Let's break it down: "Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming." Translation: "生产就绪的 Golang 测试 — 表格驱动测试、testify 套件和模拟、并行测试、模糊测试、夹具、使用 goleak 进行 goroutine
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
惯用的Go设计模式——函数选项、构造函数、错误流与级联、资源管理与生命周期、优雅关闭、弹性、架构、依赖注入、数据处理、流式处理等。适用于在架构模式间明确选择、实现函数选项、设计构造函数API、设置优雅关闭、应用弹性模式,或询问哪种惯用Go模式适合特定问题时。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang性能优化模式与方法论——若存在X瓶颈,则应用Y方案。涵盖分配减少、CPU效率、内存布局、GC调优、池化、缓存及热路径优化。适用于性能分析或基准测试已识别瓶颈时,需采用正确优化模式进行修复。亦适用于执行性能代码审查时,提出改进建议或可帮助快速识别性能增益的基准测试。不适用于测量方法论(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golang的安全最佳实践与漏洞防护,涵盖注入(SQL、命令、XSS)、密码学、文件系统安全、网络安全、Cookie、密钥管理、内存安全及日志记录。适用于编写、审查或审计Go代码的安全性,或处理涉及加密、I/O、密钥管理、用户输入处理或身份验证的高风险代码。包含安全工具的配置。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go数据库访问全面指南——参数化查询、结构体扫描、可空列、事务、隔离级别、SELECT FOR UPDATE、连接池、批处理、上下文传播及迁移工具。适用于编写、审查或调试与PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL或SQLite交互的Golang代码;数据库测试;或关于database/sql、sqlx或pgx的问题。不生成数据库模式或迁移SQL。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang项目的lint最佳实践与golangci-lint配置——运行linter、配置.golangci.yml、使用nolint指令抑制警告、解读lint输出以及选择linter。适用于配置golangci-lint、询问lint警告或nolint抑制、设置代码质量工具或选择linter时使用。当用户提及golangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck或revive时也可使用。
developmentcode-reviewtesting