golang-code-style

作者: samber

Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-style

Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-code-style skill takes precedence.

Go Code Style

Style rules that require human judgment — linters handle formatting, this skill handles clarity. For naming see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill; for design patterns see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns skill; for struct/interface design see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill.

"Clear is better than clever." — Go Proverbs

When ignoring a rule, add a comment to the code.

Line Length & Breaking

No rigid line limit, but lines beyond ~120 characters MUST be broken. Break at semantic boundaries, not arbitrary column counts. Function calls with 4+ arguments MUST use one argument per line — even when the prompt asks for single-line code:

// Good — each argument on its own line, closing paren separate
mux.HandleFunc("/api/users", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    handleUsers(
        w,
        r,
        serviceName,
        cfg,
        logger,
        authMiddleware,
    )
})

When a function signature is too long, the real fix is often fewer parameters (use an options struct) rather than better line wrapping. For multi-line signatures, put each parameter on its own line.

Variable Declarations

SHOULD use := for non-zero values, var for zero-value initialization. The form signals intent: var means "this starts at zero."

var count int              // zero value, set later
name := "default"          // non-zero, := is appropriate
var buf bytes.Buffer       // zero value is ready to use

Slice & Map Initialization

Slices and maps MUST be initialized explicitly, never nil. Nil maps panic on write; nil slices serialize to null in JSON (vs [] for empty slices), surprising API consumers.

users := []User{}                       // always initialized
m := map[string]int{}                   // always initialized
users := make([]User, 0, len(ids))      // preallocate when capacity is known
m := make(map[string]int, len(items))   // preallocate when size is known

Do not preallocate speculatively — make([]T, 0, 1000) wastes memory when the common case is 10 items.

Composite Literals

Composite literals MUST use field names — positional fields break when the type adds or reorders fields:

srv := &http.Server{
    Addr:         ":8080",
    ReadTimeout:  5 * time.Second,
    WriteTimeout: 10 * time.Second,
}

Control Flow

Reduce Nesting

Errors and edge cases MUST be handled first (early return). Keep the happy path at minimal indentation:

func process(data []byte) (*Result, error) {
    if len(data) == 0 {
        return nil, errors.New("empty data")
    }

    parsed, err := parse(data)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("parsing: %w", err)
    }

    return transform(parsed), nil
}

Eliminate Unnecessary else

When the if body ends with return/break/continue, the else MUST be dropped. Use default-then-override for simple assignments — assign a default, then override with independent conditions or a switch:

// Good — default-then-override with switch (cleanest for mutually exclusive overrides)
level := slog.LevelInfo
switch {
case debug:
    level = slog.LevelDebug
case verbose:
    level = slog.LevelWarn
}

// Bad — else-if chain hides that there's a default
if debug {
    level = slog.LevelDebug
} else if verbose {
    level = slog.LevelWarn
} else {
    level = slog.LevelInfo
}

Complex Conditions & Init Scope

When an if condition has 3+ operands, MUST extract into named booleans — a wall of || is unreadable and hides business logic. Keep expensive checks inline for short-circuit benefit. Details

// Good — named booleans make intent clear
isAdmin := user.Role == RoleAdmin
isOwner := resource.OwnerID == user.ID
isPublicVerified := resource.IsPublic && user.IsVerified
if isAdmin || isOwner || isPublicVerified || permissions.Contains(PermOverride) {
    allow()
}

Scope variables to if blocks when only needed for the check:

if err := validate(input); err != nil {
    return err
}

Switch Over If-Else Chains

When comparing the same variable multiple times, prefer switch:

switch status {
case StatusActive:
    activate()
case StatusInactive:
    deactivate()
default:
    panic(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected status: %d", status))
}

Function Design

  • Functions SHOULD be short and focused — one function, one job.
  • Functions SHOULD have ≤4 parameters. Beyond that, use an options struct (see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns skill).
  • Parameter order: context.Context first, then inputs, then output destinations.
  • Naked returns help in very short functions (1-3 lines) where return values are obvious, but become confusing when readers must scroll to find what's returned — name returns explicitly in longer functions.
func FetchUser(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error)
func SendEmail(ctx context.Context, msg EmailMessage) error  // grouped into struct

Prefer range for Iteration

SHOULD use range over index-based loops. Use range n (Go 1.22+) for simple counting.

for _, user := range users {
    process(user)
}

Value vs Pointer Arguments

Pass small types (string, int, bool, time.Time) by value. Use pointers when mutating, for large structs (~128+ bytes), or when nil is meaningful. Details

Code Organization Within Files

  • Group related declarations: type, constructor, methods together
  • Order: package doc, imports, constants, types, constructors, methods, helpers
  • One primary type per file when it has significant methods
  • Blank imports (_ "pkg") register side effects (init functions). Restricting them to main and test packages makes side effects visible at the application root, not hidden in library code
  • Dot imports pollute the namespace and make it impossible to tell where a name comes from — never use in library code
  • Unexport aggressively — you can always export later; unexporting is a breaking change

String Handling

Use strconv for simple conversions (faster), fmt.Sprintf for complex formatting. Use %q in error messages to make string boundaries visible. Use strings.Builder for loops, + for simple concatenation.

Type Conversions

Prefer explicit, narrow conversions. Use generics over any when a concrete type will do:

func Contains[T comparable](slice []T, target T) bool  // not []any

Philosophy

  • "A little copying is better than a little dependency"
  • Use slices and maps standard packages; for filter/group-by/chunk, use github.com/samber/lo
  • "Reflection is never clear" — avoid reflect unless necessary
  • Don't abstract prematurely — extract when the pattern is stable
  • Minimize public surface — every exported name is a commitment

Parallelizing Code Style Reviews

When reviewing code style across a large codebase, use up to 5 parallel sub-agents (via the Agent tool), each targeting an independent style concern (e.g. control flow, function design, variable declarations, string handling, code organization).

Enforce with Linters

Many rules are enforced automatically: gofmt, gofumpt, goimports, gocritic, revive, wsl_v5. → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill.

Cross-References

  • → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill for identifier naming conventions
  • → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill for pointer vs value receivers, interface design
  • → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns skill for functional options, builders, constructors
  • → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for automated formatting enforcement
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration skill for automated AI-driven code review in CI using these guidelines

来自 samber 的更多技能

golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
惯用的Go设计模式——函数选项、构造函数、错误流与级联、资源管理与生命周期、优雅关闭、弹性、架构、依赖注入、数据处理、流式处理等。适用于在架构模式间明确选择、实现函数选项、设计构造函数API、设置优雅关闭、应用弹性模式,或询问哪种惯用Go模式适合特定问题时。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang性能优化模式与方法论——若存在X瓶颈,则应用Y方案。涵盖分配减少、CPU效率、内存布局、GC调优、池化、缓存及热路径优化。适用于性能分析或基准测试已识别瓶颈时,需采用正确优化模式进行修复。亦适用于执行性能代码审查时,提出改进建议或可帮助快速识别性能增益的基准测试。不适用于测量方法论(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golang的安全最佳实践与漏洞防护,涵盖注入(SQL、命令、XSS)、密码学、文件系统安全、网络安全、Cookie、密钥管理、内存安全及日志记录。适用于编写、审查或审计Go代码的安全性,或处理涉及加密、I/O、密钥管理、用户输入处理或身份验证的高风险代码。包含安全工具的配置。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go数据库访问全面指南——参数化查询、结构体扫描、可空列、事务、隔离级别、SELECT FOR UPDATE、连接池、批处理、上下文传播及迁移工具。适用于编写、审查或调试与PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL或SQLite交互的Golang代码;数据库测试;或关于database/sql、sqlx或pgx的问题。不生成数据库模式或迁移SQL。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang项目的lint最佳实践与golangci-lint配置——运行linter、配置.golangci.yml、使用nolint指令抑制警告、解读lint输出以及选择linter。适用于配置golangci-lint、询问lint警告或nolint抑制、设置代码质量工具或选择linter时使用。当用户提及golangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck或revive时也可使用。
developmentcode-reviewtesting
golang-troubleshooting
samber
Troubleshoot Golang programs systematically - find and fix the root cause. Use when encountering bugs, crashes, deadlocks, or unexpected behavior in Go code. Covers debugging methodology, common Go pitfalls, test-driven debugging, pprof setup and capture, Delve debugger, race detection, GODEBUG tracing, and production debugging. Start here for any 'something is wrong' situation. Not for interpreting profiles or benchmarking (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark` skill) or applying...
developmenttesting