golang-stretchr-testify

作者: samber

全面指南,涵盖stretchr/testify在Golang测试中的使用,深入介绍assert、require、mock和suite包。适用于使用testify编写测试、创建mock、设置测试套件或选择assert与require时。涵盖testify断言、mock期望、参数匹配器、调用验证、套件生命周期以及Eventually、JSONEq和自定义匹配器等高级模式。当代码库导入github.com/stretchr/testify时适用。

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-stretchr-testify

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior and make failures self-explanatory — not to hit coverage targets.

Modes:

  • Write mode — adding new tests or mocks to a codebase.
  • Review mode — auditing existing test code for testify misuse.

stretchr/testify

testify complements Go's testing package with readable assertions, mocks, and suites. It does not replace testing — always use *testing.T as the entry point.

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

assert vs require

Both offer identical assertions. The difference is failure behavior:

  • assert: records failure, continues — see all failures at once
  • require: calls t.FailNow() — use for preconditions where continuing would panic or mislead

Use assert.New(t) / require.New(t) for readability. Name them is and must:

func TestParseConfig(t *testing.T) {
    is := assert.New(t)
    must := require.New(t)

    cfg, err := ParseConfig("testdata/valid.yaml")
    must.NoError(err)    // stop if parsing fails — cfg would be nil
    must.NotNil(cfg)

    is.Equal("production", cfg.Environment)
    is.Equal(8080, cfg.Port)
    is.True(cfg.TLS.Enabled)
}

Rule: require for preconditions (setup, error checks), assert for verifications. Never mix randomly.

Core Assertions

is := assert.New(t)

// Equality
is.Equal(expected, actual)              // DeepEqual + exact type
is.NotEqual(unexpected, actual)
is.EqualValues(expected, actual)        // converts to common type first
is.EqualExportedValues(expected, actual)

// Nil / Bool / Emptiness
is.Nil(obj)                  is.NotNil(obj)
is.True(cond)                is.False(cond)
is.Empty(collection)         is.NotEmpty(collection)
is.Len(collection, n)

// Contains (strings, slices, map keys)
is.Contains("hello world", "world")
is.Contains([]int{1, 2, 3}, 2)
is.Contains(map[string]int{"a": 1}, "a")

// Comparison
is.Greater(actual, threshold)     is.Less(actual, ceiling)
is.Positive(val)                  is.Negative(val)
is.Zero(val)

// Errors
is.Error(err)                     is.NoError(err)
is.ErrorIs(err, ErrNotFound)      // walks error chain
is.ErrorAs(err, &target)
is.ErrorContains(err, "not found")

// Type
is.IsType(&User{}, obj)
is.Implements((*io.Reader)(nil), obj)

Argument order: always (expected, actual) — swapping produces confusing diff output.

Advanced Assertions

is.ElementsMatch([]string{"b", "a", "c"}, result)             // unordered comparison
is.InDelta(3.14, computedPi, 0.01)                            // float tolerance
is.JSONEq(`{"name":"alice"}`, `{"name": "alice"}`)             // ignores whitespace/key order
is.WithinDuration(expected, actual, 5*time.Second)
is.Regexp(`^user-[a-f0-9]+$`, userID)

// Async polling
is.Eventually(func() bool {
    status, _ := client.GetJobStatus(jobID)
    return status == "completed"
}, 5*time.Second, 100*time.Millisecond)

// Async polling with rich assertions
is.EventuallyWithT(func(c *assert.CollectT) {
    resp, err := client.GetOrder(orderID)
    assert.NoError(c, err)
    assert.Equal(c, "shipped", resp.Status)
}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond)

testify/mock

Mock interfaces to isolate the unit under test. Embed mock.Mock, implement methods with m.Called(), always verify with AssertExpectations(t).

Key matchers: mock.Anything, mock.AnythingOfType("T"), mock.MatchedBy(func). Call modifiers: .Once(), .Times(n), .Maybe(), .Run(func).

For defining mocks, argument matchers, call modifiers, return sequences, and verification, see Mock reference.

testify/suite

Suites group related tests with shared setup/teardown.

Lifecycle

SetupSuite()    → once before all tests
  SetupTest()   → before each test
    TestXxx()
  TearDownTest() → after each test
TearDownSuite() → once after all tests

Example

type TokenServiceSuite struct {
    suite.Suite
    store   *MockTokenStore
    service *TokenService
}

func (s *TokenServiceSuite) SetupTest() {
    s.store = new(MockTokenStore)
    s.service = NewTokenService(s.store)
}

func (s *TokenServiceSuite) TestGenerate_ReturnsValidToken() {
    s.store.On("Save", mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil)
    token, err := s.service.Generate("user-42")
    s.NoError(err)
    s.NotEmpty(token)
    s.store.AssertExpectations(s.T())
}

// Required launcher
func TestTokenServiceSuite(t *testing.T) {
    suite.Run(t, new(TokenServiceSuite))
}

Suite methods like s.Equal() behave like assert. For require: s.Require().NotNil(obj).

Common Mistakes

  • Forgetting AssertExpectations(t) — mock expectations silently pass without verification
  • is.Equal(ErrNotFound, err) — fails on wrapped errors. Use is.ErrorIs to walk the chain
  • Swapped argument order — testify assumes (expected, actual). Swapping produces backwards diffs
  • assert for guards — test continues after failure and panics on nil dereference. Use require
  • Missing suite.Run() — without the launcher function, zero tests execute silently
  • Comparing pointersis.Equal(ptr1, ptr2) compares addresses. Dereference or use EqualExportedValues

Linters

Use testifylint to catch wrong argument order, assert/require misuse, and more. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general test patterns, table-driven tests, and CI
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for testifylint configuration

来自 samber 的更多技能

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Simplified Chinese. The instruction says: preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms. Do not add claims, explanations, Markdown, bullets, links, labels, prefixes, or extra commentary. Also, do not include the name "golang-testing" unless it appears in the source text. The source text does not include the name, so we don't add it. The text is a description of a skill for Go testing. It lists various testing techniques and tools. We need to translate the entire text inside <text> tags. Let's break it down: "Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming." Translation: "生产就绪的 Golang 测试 — 表格驱动测试、testify 套件和模拟、并行测试、模糊测试、夹具、使用 goleak 进行 goroutine
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
惯用的Go设计模式——函数选项、构造函数、错误流与级联、资源管理与生命周期、优雅关闭、弹性、架构、依赖注入、数据处理、流式处理等。适用于在架构模式间明确选择、实现函数选项、设计构造函数API、设置优雅关闭、应用弹性模式,或询问哪种惯用Go模式适合特定问题时。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang性能优化模式与方法论——若存在X瓶颈,则应用Y方案。涵盖分配减少、CPU效率、内存布局、GC调优、池化、缓存及热路径优化。适用于性能分析或基准测试已识别瓶颈时,需采用正确优化模式进行修复。亦适用于执行性能代码审查时,提出改进建议或可帮助快速识别性能增益的基准测试。不适用于测量方法论(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golang的安全最佳实践与漏洞防护,涵盖注入(SQL、命令、XSS)、密码学、文件系统安全、网络安全、Cookie、密钥管理、内存安全及日志记录。适用于编写、审查或审计Go代码的安全性,或处理涉及加密、I/O、密钥管理、用户输入处理或身份验证的高风险代码。包含安全工具的配置。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go数据库访问全面指南——参数化查询、结构体扫描、可空列、事务、隔离级别、SELECT FOR UPDATE、连接池、批处理、上下文传播及迁移工具。适用于编写、审查或调试与PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL或SQLite交互的Golang代码;数据库测试;或关于database/sql、sqlx或pgx的问题。不生成数据库模式或迁移SQL。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang项目的lint最佳实践与golangci-lint配置——运行linter、配置.golangci.yml、使用nolint指令抑制警告、解读lint输出以及选择linter。适用于配置golangci-lint、询问lint警告或nolint抑制、设置代码质量工具或选择linter时使用。当用户提及golangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck或revive时也可使用。
developmentcode-reviewtesting