golang-spf13-cobra

作者: samber

使用spf13/cobra的Golang CLI命令树库——cobra.Command、RunE与Run、PersistentPreRunE钩子链、Args验证器(NoArgs、ExactArgs、MatchAll、自定义)、持久标志与局部标志、

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-spf13-cobra

Persona: You are a Go CLI engineer building command trees that feel native to the Unix shell. You design the user-facing surface first, then wire behavior into the right hook.

Modes:

  • Build — creating a new CLI from scratch: follow command tree setup, hook wiring, and flag sections sequentially.
  • Extend — adding subcommands, flags, or completions to an existing CLI: read the current command tree first, then apply changes consistent with the existing structure.
  • Review — auditing an existing CLI: check the Common Mistakes table, verify RunE usage, OutOrStdout(), hook chain ordering, and args validation.

Using spf13/cobra for CLI command trees in Go

Cobra is the de facto standard for Go CLI applications. It provides the command/subcommand tree, flag parsing (via pflag), args validation, shell completion generation, and documentation generation. It does not handle configuration layering — that's viper's job.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

go get github.com/spf13/cobra@latest

Cobra vs. viper

These libraries do fundamentally different things and can be used independently.

Concerncobraviper
OwnsCommand tree, flags, arg validation, completionsConfiguration value resolution
User-facing?Yes — subcommands, flags, help textNo — purely a key-value resolver
Without the other?Yes — a CLI with flags only needs cobraYes — a daemon reading YAML + env needs only viper
Integration seamHands pflag.Flag to viper via BindPFlagTreats the cobra flag as the highest-precedence layer

Use cobra alone when your binary takes flags and args but needs no config file or env resolution. Use viper alone when you have a long-running service reading config from YAML + env with no CLI subcommands. Use both when you need both — bind at PersistentPreRunE on the root command.

→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-viper for the viper side of this integration.

Command tree

Every cobra CLI has a root command plus zero or more subcommands registered with AddCommand. The root command name is the binary name.

var rootCmd = &cobra.Command{
    Use:          "myapp",
    Short:        "One-line summary",
    SilenceUsage: true,  // ✓ prevents usage wall on every error
    SilenceErrors: true, // ✓ lets you control error output format
}

Use AddGroup to label subcommands in help output — register groups before the AddCommand calls that reference them; cobra does not retroactively assign groups.

The Run* family

Cobra commands have five run hooks executed in order:

PersistentPreRunE → PreRunE → RunE → PostRunE → PersistentPostRunE

Always use *E variants — the non-E forms cannot return errors. Key rules:

  • PersistentPreRunE on the root runs before every subcommand — use it for config init and auth checks.
  • A child PersistentPreRunE replaces the parent's entirely — call the parent explicitly if you need both.
  • PostRunE runs only if RunE succeeded.

For the full lifecycle and inheritance rules, see commands-and-args.md.

Args validators

Cobra validates positional arguments before RunE runs. Never write len(args) checks inside RunE — that bypasses cobra's standard error messages and arg count tracking.

Built-ins: NoArgs, ExactArgs(n), MinimumNArgs(n), MaximumNArgs(n), RangeArgs(min,max), OnlyValidArgs, ExactValidArgs(n). Compose with MatchAll(v1, v2). Custom validator: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error.

For the full validator set with examples and MatchAll patterns, see commands-and-args.md.

Flags primer

Cobra delegates flag parsing to pflag. Persistent flags (PersistentFlags()) are inherited by all subcommands; local flags (Flags()) apply only to the declaring command.

rootCmd.PersistentFlags().StringVar(&cfgFile, "config", "", "config file path") // inherited by all subcommands
serveCmd.Flags().IntVar(&port, "port", 8080, "listen port")                     // local to serveCmd only
serveCmd.MarkFlagRequired("port")
serveCmd.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive("json", "yaml")

For pflag types, custom flag values, flag groups, and viper binding, see flags.md.

Completions primer

Cobra generates shell completions automatically. Extend them with:

  • ValidArgs []string — static positional arg completion.
  • ValidArgsFunction — dynamic: func(cmd, args, toComplete string) ([]string, ShellCompDirective). Return ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp to suppress file fallback.
  • RegisterFlagCompletionFunc(name, fn) — flag value completion.

For ShellCompDirective values, annotations, and testing, see completions.md.

Testing commands

Test commands by executing them programmatically. Never use os.Stdout / os.Stderr directly in command handlers — use cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr() so tests can redirect output.

func TestServeCmd(t *testing.T) {
    buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
    rootCmd.SetOut(buf)
    rootCmd.SetArgs([]string{"serve", "--port", "9090"})
    require.NoError(t, rootCmd.Execute())
    assert.Contains(t, buf.String(), "listening on :9090")
}

Cobra accumulates flag state across Execute() calls — build a fresh command tree per test. For isolation patterns, golden files, and testing completions, see testing.md.

Best Practices

  1. Always use RunE, never RunRun cannot return an error; the only escape is os.Exit or panic, bypassing defers.
  2. Put config initialization in PersistentPreRunE — it runs before every subcommand; the right place for viper binding and auth checks.
  3. Validate positional args with Args, not inside RunEArgs gives cobra's standard error messages; MatchAll composes validators.
  4. Use cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr() for all output — direct os.Stdout writes cannot be captured by tests.
  5. Re-create the command tree per test — cobra accumulates flag state across Execute() calls on the same instance.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy it failsFix
Using Run instead of RunECannot return an error — only escape is os.Exit or panic, bypassing defersUse RunE — return the error, let cobra handle the exit
Writing len(args) checks in RunEBypasses cobra's standard error messages ("accepts 1 arg, received 2")Declare Args: cobra.ExactArgs(1) on the command
Writing to os.Stdout directlyTests cannot capture output — os-level file handles can't be redirectedUse cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr()
Child PersistentPreRunE silently drops parent'sCobra does not chain — the child replaces the parent's hook entirelyCall parent.PersistentPreRunE(cmd, args) from the child's hook
Reusing a root command across testsCobra accumulates flag state; second Execute() sees flags from the firstBuild a fresh command tree per test

Further Reading

  • commands-and-args.md — full PreRun*/PostRun* chain, every Args validator, PersistentPreRunE inheritance rules
  • flags.md — pflag types, required/exclusive/oneRequired groups, custom value types, viper binding
  • completions.md — ShellCompDirective set, annotation-based completions, testing completions
  • generators.md — man page, markdown, YAML, RST doc generation; cobra-cli scaffolder
  • testing.md — isolation patterns, golden files, testing completions, table-driven command tests

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-cli skill for general CLI architecture — project layout, exit codes, signal handling, I/O patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-viper skill for configuration layering alongside cobra (flag → env → file → default precedence)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general Go testing patterns

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in spf13/cobra, open an issue at https://github.com/spf13/cobra/issues.

来自 samber 的更多技能

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Simplified Chinese. The instruction says: preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms. Do not add claims, explanations, Markdown, bullets, links, labels, prefixes, or extra commentary. Also, do not include the name "golang-testing" unless it appears in the source text. The source text does not include the name, so we don't add it. The text is a description of a skill for Go testing. It lists various testing techniques and tools. We need to translate the entire text inside <text> tags. Let's break it down: "Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming." Translation: "生产就绪的 Golang 测试 — 表格驱动测试、testify 套件和模拟、并行测试、模糊测试、夹具、使用 goleak 进行 goroutine
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
惯用的Go设计模式——函数选项、构造函数、错误流与级联、资源管理与生命周期、优雅关闭、弹性、架构、依赖注入、数据处理、流式处理等。适用于在架构模式间明确选择、实现函数选项、设计构造函数API、设置优雅关闭、应用弹性模式,或询问哪种惯用Go模式适合特定问题时。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang性能优化模式与方法论——若存在X瓶颈,则应用Y方案。涵盖分配减少、CPU效率、内存布局、GC调优、池化、缓存及热路径优化。适用于性能分析或基准测试已识别瓶颈时,需采用正确优化模式进行修复。亦适用于执行性能代码审查时,提出改进建议或可帮助快速识别性能增益的基准测试。不适用于测量方法论(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golang的安全最佳实践与漏洞防护,涵盖注入(SQL、命令、XSS)、密码学、文件系统安全、网络安全、Cookie、密钥管理、内存安全及日志记录。适用于编写、审查或审计Go代码的安全性,或处理涉及加密、I/O、密钥管理、用户输入处理或身份验证的高风险代码。包含安全工具的配置。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go数据库访问全面指南——参数化查询、结构体扫描、可空列、事务、隔离级别、SELECT FOR UPDATE、连接池、批处理、上下文传播及迁移工具。适用于编写、审查或调试与PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL或SQLite交互的Golang代码;数据库测试;或关于database/sql、sqlx或pgx的问题。不生成数据库模式或迁移SQL。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang项目的lint最佳实践与golangci-lint配置——运行linter、配置.golangci.yml、使用nolint指令抑制警告、解读lint输出以及选择linter。适用于配置golangci-lint、询问lint警告或nolint抑制、设置代码质量工具或选择linter时使用。当用户提及golangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck或revive时也可使用。
developmentcode-reviewtesting