golang-benchmark

作者: samber

Golang基准测试、性能剖析与性能测量。适用于编写、运行或比较Go基准测试,使用pprof对热点路径进行性能剖析,解读CPU/内存/追踪性能分析结果,使用benchstat分析结果,设置CI基准测试回归检测,或通过Prometheus运行时指标调查生产环境性能。当开发者需要对特定性能指标进行深入分析时也可使用——该技能提供测量方法论,同时...

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-benchmark

Persona: You are a Go performance measurement engineer. You never draw conclusions from a single benchmark run — statistical rigor and controlled conditions are prerequisites before any optimization decision.

Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for benchmark analysis, profile interpretation, and performance comparison tasks. Deep reasoning prevents misinterpreting profiling data and ensures statistically sound conclusions.

Dependencies:

  • benchstat: go install golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat@latest

Go Benchmarking & Performance Measurement

Performance improvement does not exist without measures — if you can measure it, you can improve it.

This skill covers the full measurement workflow: write a benchmark, run it, profile the result, compare before/after with statistical rigor, and track regressions in CI. For optimization patterns to apply after measurement, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance skill. For pprof setup on running services, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting skill.

Writing Benchmarks

b.Loop() (Go 1.24+) — preferred

For Go 1.24+, prefer b.Loop() for new benchmarks. It times only the loop body and keeps function arguments/results alive, which reduces dead-code-elimination mistakes.

func BenchmarkParse(b *testing.B) {
    data := loadFixture("large.json") // setup — excluded from timing
    for b.Loop() {
        Parse(data)  // compiler cannot eliminate this call
    }
}

Legacy b.N loops still compile and are fine to keep when preserving existing benchmarks or supporting Go <1.24. They are easier to get wrong: setup may need b.ResetTimer(), and results may need a sink if the compiler can eliminate the work. Go 1.26 fixed an earlier b.Loop() inlining limitation — benchmarks on 1.24–1.25 already benefit from b.Loop() but may miss inlining optimizations that 1.26 delivers.

Memory tracking

func BenchmarkAlloc(b *testing.B) {
    b.ReportAllocs() // or run with -benchmem flag
    var sink []byte
    for b.Loop() {
        sink = make([]byte, 1024)
    }
    _ = sink
}

b.ReportMetric() adds custom metrics (e.g., throughput):

b.ReportMetric(float64(totalBytes)/b.Elapsed().Seconds(), "bytes/s") // b.Elapsed() is only valid inside b.Loop()

Sub-benchmarks and table-driven

func BenchmarkEncode(b *testing.B) {
    for _, size := range []int{64, 256, 4096} {
        b.Run(fmt.Sprintf("size=%d", size), func(b *testing.B) {
            data := make([]byte, size)
            for b.Loop() {
                Encode(data)
            }
        })
    }
}

Running Benchmarks

go test -bench=BenchmarkEncode -benchmem -count=10 ./pkg/... | tee bench.txt
FlagPurpose
-bench=.Run all benchmarks (regexp filter)
-benchmemReport allocations (B/op, allocs/op)
-count=10Run 10 times for statistical significance
-benchtime=3sMinimum time per benchmark (default 1s)
-cpu=1,2,4Run with different GOMAXPROCS values
-cpuprofile=cpu.profWrite CPU profile
-memprofile=mem.profWrite memory profile
-trace=trace.outWrite execution trace

Output format: BenchmarkEncode/size=64-8 5000000 230.5 ns/op 128 B/op 2 allocs/op — the -8 suffix is GOMAXPROCS, ns/op is time per operation, B/op is bytes allocated per op, allocs/op is heap allocation count per op.

Documenting Results in Commits

Paste benchstat output in the commit body when the change has a measurable performance impact. This documents why an optimization was made, prevents future readers from reverting it, and lets reviewers verify the claim without re-running benchmarks.

Commit format:

perf(parser): reduce Parse allocations 50% with sync.Pool

Replace per-call []byte allocation with a pooled buffer.

goos: linux / goarch: amd64 / cpu: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
          │    old     │              new               │
          │  sec/op    │  sec/op     vs base            │
Parse-32    4.592µ ± 2%  3.041µ ± 1%  -33.78% (p=0.000 n=10)

          │   old    │             new              │
          │   B/op   │   B/op     vs base           │
Parse-32   1.024Ki ± 0%  0.512Ki ± 0%  -50.00% (p=0.000 n=10)

          │ old  │            new             │
          │ allocs/op │ allocs/op  vs base    │
Parse-32   12.00 ± 0%   6.000 ± 0%  -50.00% (p=0.000 n=10)

Rules:

  • Only include benchmarks directly affected by the change — strip unrelated rows
  • Never paste results with ~ (no statistical significance) — the improvement cannot be claimed
  • Include the hardware context line (goos/goarch/cpu) so results are reproducible
  • Use perf(scope): commit type for performance-only changes

Profiling from Benchmarks

Generate profiles directly from benchmark runs — no HTTP server needed:

# CPU profile
go test -bench=BenchmarkParse -cpuprofile=cpu.prof ./pkg/parser
go tool pprof cpu.prof

# Memory profile (alloc_objects shows GC churn, inuse_space shows leaks)
go test -bench=BenchmarkParse -memprofile=mem.prof ./pkg/parser
go tool pprof -alloc_objects mem.prof

# Execution trace
go test -bench=BenchmarkParse -trace=trace.out ./pkg/parser
go tool trace trace.out

For full pprof CLI reference (all commands, non-interactive mode, profile interpretation), see pprof Reference. For execution trace interpretation, see Trace Reference. For statistical comparison, see benchstat Reference.

Reference Files

  • pprof Reference — Interactive and non-interactive analysis of CPU, memory, and goroutine profiles. Full CLI commands, profile types (CPU vs allocobjects vs inuse_space), web UI navigation, and interpretation patterns. Use this to dive deep into _where time and memory are being spent in your code.

  • benchstat Reference — Statistical comparison of benchmark runs with rigorous confidence intervals and p-value tests. Covers output reading, filtering old benchmarks, interleaving results for visual clarity, and regression detection. Use this when you need to prove a change made a meaningful performance difference, not just a lucky run.

  • Trace Reference — Execution tracer for understanding when and why code runs. Visualizes goroutine scheduling, garbage collection phases, network blocking, and custom span annotations. Use this when pprof (which shows where CPU goes) isn't enough — you need to see the timeline of what happened.

  • Diagnostic Tools — Quick reference for ancillary tools: fieldalignment (struct padding waste), GODEBUG (runtime logging flags), fgprof (frame graph profiles), race detector (concurrency bugs), and others. Use this when you have a specific symptom and need a focused diagnostic — don't reach for pprof if a simpler tool already answers your question.

  • Compiler Analysis — Low-level compiler optimization insights: escape analysis (when values move to the heap), inlining decisions (which function calls are eliminated), SSA dump (intermediate representation), and assembly output. Use this when benchmarks show allocations you didn't expect, or when you want to verify the compiler did what you intended.

  • CI Regression Detection — Automated performance regression gating in CI pipelines. Covers three tools (benchdiff for quick PR comparisons, cob for strict threshold-based gating, gobenchdata for long-term trend dashboards), noisy neighbor mitigation strategies (why cloud CI benchmarks vary 5-10% even on quiet machines), and self-hosted runner tuning to make benchmarks reproducible. Use this when you want to ensure pull requests don't silently slow down your codebase — detecting regressions early prevents shipping performance debt.

  • Investigation Session — Production performance troubleshooting workflow combining Prometheus runtime metrics (heap size, GC frequency, goroutine counts), PromQL queries to correlate metrics with code changes, runtime configuration flags (GODEBUG env vars to enable GC logging), and cost warnings (when you're hitting performance tax). Use this when production benchmarks look good but real traffic behaves differently.

  • Prometheus Go Metrics Reference — Complete listing of Go runtime metrics actually exposed as Prometheus metrics by prometheus/client_golang. Covers 30 default metrics, 40+ optional metrics (Go 1.17+), process metrics, and common PromQL queries. Distinguishes between runtime/metrics (Go internal data) and Prometheus metrics (what you scrape from /metrics). Use this when setting up monitoring dashboards or writing PromQL queries for production alerts.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance skill for optimization patterns to apply after measuring ("if X bottleneck, apply Y")
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting skill for pprof setup on running services (enable, secure, capture), Delve debugger, GODEBUG flags, root cause methodology
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for everyday always-on monitoring, continuous profiling (Pyroscope), distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general testing practices
  • → See samber/cc-skills@promql-cli skill for querying Prometheus runtime metrics in production to validate benchmark findings

来自 samber 的更多技能

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
惯用的Go设计模式——函数选项、构造函数、错误流与级联、资源管理与生命周期、优雅关闭、弹性、架构、依赖注入、数据处理、流式处理等。适用于在架构模式间明确选择、实现函数选项、设计构造函数API、设置优雅关闭、应用弹性模式,或询问哪种惯用Go模式适合特定问题时。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang性能优化模式与方法论——若存在X瓶颈,则应用Y方案。涵盖分配减少、CPU效率、内存布局、GC调优、池化、缓存及热路径优化。适用于性能分析或基准测试已识别瓶颈时,需采用正确优化模式进行修复。亦适用于执行性能代码审查时,提出改进建议或可帮助快速识别性能增益的基准测试。不适用于测量方法论(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golang的安全最佳实践与漏洞防护,涵盖注入(SQL、命令、XSS)、密码学、文件系统安全、网络安全、Cookie、密钥管理、内存安全及日志记录。适用于编写、审查或审计Go代码的安全性,或处理涉及加密、I/O、密钥管理、用户输入处理或身份验证的高风险代码。包含安全工具的配置。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go数据库访问全面指南——参数化查询、结构体扫描、可空列、事务、隔离级别、SELECT FOR UPDATE、连接池、批处理、上下文传播及迁移工具。适用于编写、审查或调试与PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL或SQLite交互的Golang代码;数据库测试;或关于database/sql、sqlx或pgx的问题。不生成数据库模式或迁移SQL。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang项目的lint最佳实践与golangci-lint配置——运行linter、配置.golangci.yml、使用nolint指令抑制警告、解读lint输出以及选择linter。适用于配置golangci-lint、询问lint警告或nolint抑制、设置代码质量工具或选择linter时使用。当用户提及golangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck或revive时也可使用。
developmentcode-reviewtesting