conventional-git

作者: samber

Conventional Commits v1.0.0 分支命名、工作树命名及提交信息标准,适用于 GitHub 和 GitLab 项目。在创建分支、命名工作树、编写提交、生成提交信息、审查分支规范或设置变更日志自动化时使用。当项目需要一致的 Git 历史记录、基于语义化版本控制的发布、可解析的变更日志生成或自动关闭问题时应用。当用户询问如何命名工作树、创建 Git 工作树或...时触发。

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills --skill conventional-git

Conventional Commits & Branch Naming

Follow Conventional Commits v1.0.0 for both branch names and commit messages — consistent naming lets tools auto-generate changelogs, enforce SemVer bumps, and filter history by concern.

Branch Naming

Format: <type>/[issue-]<description> — lowercase, hyphens only, no special chars except /.

feat/user-authentication
feat/42-user-authentication
fix/login-race-condition
fix/87-login-race-condition
docs/api-reference-update
refactor/payment-module

Prefix with the issue number when one exists — GitHub and GitLab auto-link it and it makes git log immediately traceable to the tracker. Keep the description under 50 characters — most git UIs truncate branch names in lists around that length. Match the type to the work you're doing — this is the contract readers use to understand the branch purpose at a glance.

NEVER include worktree in a branch name — git worktrees are a local checkout mechanism, not a branch concept; the name would leak implementation details into the remote and confuse other contributors.

Worktree Naming

Worktrees are local checkout directories — they never appear in the remote. Place them under .claude/worktrees/ and name them by replacing the branch / separator with -.

git worktree add .claude/worktrees/feat-user-authentication feat/user-authentication
git worktree add .claude/worktrees/fix-87-login-race-condition fix/87-login-race-condition

The directory name mirrors the branch name so git worktree list stays readable and each worktree is immediately traceable to its branch without inspecting the checkout. Run git worktree list before creating a new one — reuse an existing worktree if it already covers the same branch.

Keep worktrees scoped to a single branch. Doing unrelated work inside someone else's worktree obscures which changes belong where and makes cleanup error-prone.

Remove the worktree once its branch is merged — either after a local merge or after the pull/merge request is closed on the remote. Stale worktrees accumulate and make git worktree list unreadable.

git worktree remove .claude/worktrees/feat-user-authentication   # branch merged locally
git worktree prune                                                # remove refs to already-deleted directories

Commit Message Format

<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]

Types:

TypeSemVerWhen
featMINORNew feature
fixPATCHBug fix
docsDocs only
styleFormatting, no logic change
refactorRestructure, no feature/fix
perfPerformance improvement
testAdd/fix tests
buildBuild system, deps
ciCI config
choreAnything else (not src/test)
revertReverts a previous commit

Rules:

  • Subject line ≤ 72 characters — git log and GitHub/GitLab UIs silently truncate longer subjects
  • Imperative mood: "add" not "added" — reads as an instruction, not a history log
  • No capital letter, no trailing period — enforces uniform parsing by changelog tools
  • Body separated by blank line — parsers split header/body at the first blank line
  • Breaking changes: use ! after type/scope, or add BREAKING CHANGE: footer (triggers MAJOR bump) — body-only descriptions are invisible to changelog tools
  • revert commits SHOULD include This reverts commit <hash>. in the body — git revert generates this automatically; don't strip it
  • NEVER add a Claude signature, AI agent attribution, or Co-authored-by trailer for Claude or any other AI agent to commits

Examples:

feat(auth): add JWT token refresh
fix: prevent race condition on concurrent requests

Introduce request ID and reference to latest request.
Dismiss responses from stale requests.
refactor!: drop support for Go 1.18

BREAKING CHANGE: Go 1.18 no longer supported; uses stdlib APIs from 1.21+

Closing Issues via Commit Messages

Both GitHub and GitLab detect keywords in commit messages and automatically close the referenced issue when the commit lands on the default branch. Place the reference in the footer (preferred — keeps the subject line clean).

Keywords: close, closes, closed, fix, fixes, fixed, resolve, resolves, resolved — case-insensitive.

GitHub:

fix(auth): prevent token expiry race condition

Closes #42
Closes owner/repo#99
  • Triggers when merged into the default branch (usually main)
  • Cross-repo: Closes owner/repo#42
  • Close multiple: Closes #42, closes #43
  • Works in PR descriptions too

GitLab:

feat: add dark mode support

Resolves #101
Closes group/project#42
  • Triggers when merged into the default branch (configurable per project)
  • Cross-project: Closes group/project#42
  • Close multiple: Closes #101, closes #102
  • Works in MR descriptions too

Tip: Pair with the commit type — fix: closing a bug issue, feat: closing a feature request — keeps the changelog semantically coherent.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
feat: Added login pagefeat: add login page — imperative, no capital
fix: fix bug.fix: fix bug — no trailing period
Subject over 72 charsShorten; move detail to body
Breaking change only in bodyAdd ! or BREAKING CHANGE: footer — tools won't detect body-only
feat(adding-auth): ...feat(auth): ... — scope is a noun, not a verb
Closes #42 in subject lineMove to footer — keeps subject clean and parseable

Best Practices

  • Align branch type and commit type — feat/auth-* branch → feat(auth): commits
  • One concern per branch — mixing fixes into feature branches obscures the changelog
  • Use scope consistently within a branch — feat(auth): throughout, not feat(user): mid-way
  • Squash merge: when squash-merging a PR/MR, the branch commits are collapsed into one — the PR/MR title becomes the commit message. If the title doesn't follow conventional commits format, changelog generation breaks silently. Always set the PR title before squashing.

来自 samber 的更多技能

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Idiomatic Golang design patterns — functional options, constructors, error flow and cascading, resource management and lifecycle, graceful shutdown, resilience, architecture, dependency injection, data handling, streaming, and more. Apply when explicitly choosing between architectural patterns, implementing functional options, designing constructor APIs, setting up graceful shutdown, applying resilience patterns, or asking which idiomatic Go pattern fits a specific problem.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang性能优化模式与方法论——若存在X瓶颈,则应用Y方案。涵盖分配减少、CPU效率、内存布局、GC调优、池化、缓存及热路径优化。适用于性能分析或基准测试已识别瓶颈时,需采用正确优化模式进行修复。亦适用于执行性能代码审查时,提出改进建议或可帮助快速识别性能增益的基准测试。不适用于测量方法论(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Security best practices and vulnerability prevention for Golang. Covers injection (SQL, command, XSS), cryptography, filesystem safety, network security, cookies, secrets management, memory safety, and logging. Apply when writing, reviewing, or auditing Go code for security, or when working on any risky code involving crypto, I/O, secrets management, user input handling, or authentication. Includes configuration of security tools.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go数据库访问全面指南——参数化查询、结构体扫描、可空列、事务、隔离级别、SELECT FOR UPDATE、连接池、批处理、上下文传播及迁移工具。适用于编写、审查或调试与PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL或SQLite交互的Golang代码;数据库测试;或关于database/sql、sqlx或pgx的问题。不生成数据库模式或迁移SQL。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang项目的lint最佳实践与golangci-lint配置——运行linter、配置.golangci.yml、使用nolint指令抑制警告、解读lint输出以及选择linter。适用于配置golangci-lint、询问lint警告或nolint抑制、设置代码质量工具或选择linter时使用。当用户提及golangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck或revive时也可使用。
developmentcode-reviewtesting