customer-research

作者: coreyhaines31

当用户希望进行、分析或综合客户研究时使用。适用于用户提及“客户研究”、“ICP研究”、“与客户交谈”、“分析转录文本”、“客户访谈”、“调查分析”、“支持工单分析”、“客户之声”、“VOC”、“构建用户画像”、“客户画像”、“待完成工作”、“JTBD”、“客户在说什么”、“客户在为什么挣扎”、“Reddit挖掘”、“G2评论”、“评论挖掘”、“数字水坑”、“社区...”等场景。

npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill customer-research

Customer Research

You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.


Two Modes of Research

Mode 1: Analyze Existing Assets

You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.

Mode 2: Go Find Research

You need to gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites). Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.

Most engagements combine both. Establish which mode applies before proceeding.


Mode 1: Analyzing Existing Research Assets

Asset Types

Customer interview / sales call transcripts

  • Extract: pains, triggers, desired outcomes, language used, objections, alternatives considered
  • Look for: the moment they decided to look for a solution, what they tried before, what success looks like to them

Survey results

  • Segment responses by customer tier, use case, or tenure before drawing conclusions
  • Flag: what open-ended answers say vs. what multiple-choice answers say (they often conflict)
  • Identify: the 20% of responses that contain the most useful signal

Customer support conversations

  • Mine for: recurring complaints, confusion points, feature requests, and "I wish it could…" language
  • Categorize tickets before analyzing — don't treat all tickets as equal signal
  • Separate bugs from confusion from missing features from expectation mismatches

Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes

  • Wins: what tipped the decision? What almost made them choose a competitor?
  • Losses and churn: was it price, features, fit, timing, or something else?
  • Segment by reason — don't average across different churn causes

NPS responses

  • Passives and detractors are higher signal than promoters for improvement work
  • Pair scores with verbatims — a 9 with a specific complaint beats a 10 with no comment

Extraction Framework

For each asset, extract:

  1. Jobs to Be Done — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?

    • Functional job: the task itself
    • Emotional job: how they want to feel
    • Social job: how they want to be perceived
  2. Pain Points — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?

    • Prioritize pains mentioned unprompted and with emotional language
  3. Trigger Events — what changed that made them seek a solution?

    • Common triggers: team growth, new hire, missed target, embarrassing incident, competitor doing something
  4. Desired Outcomes — what does success look like in their words?

    • Capture exact quotes, not paraphrases
  5. Language and Vocabulary — exact words and phrases customers use

    • This is gold for copy. "We were drowning in spreadsheets" > "manual process inefficiency"
  6. Alternatives Considered — what else did they look at or try?

    • Includes doing nothing, hiring someone, or building internally

Synthesis Steps

After extracting from individual assets:

  1. Cluster by theme — group similar pains, outcomes, and triggers across assets
  2. Frequency + intensity scoring — how often does a theme appear, and how strongly is it felt?
  3. Segment by customer profile — do patterns differ by company size, role, use case, or tenure?
  4. Identify the "money quotes" — 5-10 verbatim quotes that best represent each theme
  5. Flag contradictions — where do customers say one thing but do another?

Research Quality Guardrails

Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:

ConfidenceCriteria
HighTheme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments
MediumTheme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment
LowSingle source; could be an outlier; needs validation

Recency window: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.

Sample bias checks:

  • Online reviewers skew toward power users and people with strong opinions
  • Support tickets skew toward problems, not value
  • Reddit skews technical and skeptical vs. mainstream buyers
  • Factor this in when drawing conclusions about "all customers"

Minimum viable sample: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.


Mode 2: Digital Watering Hole Research

Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.

Where to Look

Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read references/source-guides.md for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.

ICP TypePrimary Sources
B2B SaaS / technical buyersReddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro
SMB / foundersReddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro
Developer / DevOpsr/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers
B2C / consumerApp store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments
EnterpriseLinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro

Quick decision guide:

  • Have a product category? → Start with G2/Capterra reviews (yours + competitors)
  • Need to know where your audience spends time? → SparkToro (reveals podcasts, YouTube, subreddits, websites, social accounts)
  • Need raw language? → Reddit and YouTube comments
  • Need trigger events? → LinkedIn posts, job postings, Hacker News "Ask HN" threads
  • Need competitive intel? → Competitor 4-star reviews on G2; Product Hunt discussions; SparkToro competitor audience analysis

What to Extract from Each Source

For every piece of content you find:

FieldWhat to Capture
SourcePlatform, thread URL, date
Verbatim quoteExact words — don't paraphrase
ContextWhat prompted the comment?
SentimentPositive / negative / neutral / frustrated
Theme tagPain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language
Customer profile signalsRole, company size, industry hints from the post

Research Synthesis Template

After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:

## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)

### Theme 1: [Name]
**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
**Representative quotes**:
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning

### Theme 2: ...

Persona Generation

Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.

Persona Structure

## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]

**Profile**
- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
- Industry: [if narrow]
- Reports to: [who]
- Team size managed: [if relevant]

**Primary Job to Be Done**
[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]

**Trigger Events**
What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
- [trigger 1]
- [trigger 2]

**Top Pains**
1. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2. [Pain]
3. [Pain]

**Desired Outcomes**
- [What success looks like to them]
- [How they measure it]
- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]

**Objections and Fears**
- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]

**Alternatives They Consider**
- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]

**Key Vocabulary**
Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
- "[phrase]"
- "[phrase]"

**How to Reach Them**
- Channels: [where they spend time]
- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]

Persona Anti-Patterns

  • Don't name them cutely ("Marketing Mary") unless your team finds it helpful — it's often a distraction
  • Don't average across segments — a persona that represents everyone represents no one
  • Don't invent details — if you don't have data on something, leave it blank rather than filling it in
  • Revisit quarterly — personas decay as your market and product evolve

Deliverable Formats

Depending on what the user needs, offer:

  1. Research synthesis report — themes, quotes, patterns, and implications
  2. VOC quote bank — organized verbatim quotes by theme, for use in copy
  3. Persona document — 1-3 personas built from the research
  4. Jobs-to-be-done map — functional, emotional, and social jobs by segment
  5. Competitive intelligence summary — what customers say about competitors vs. you
  6. Research gap analysis — what you still don't know and how to find it

Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.


Questions to Ask Before Proceeding

If context is unclear:

  1. What's the goal? Improve messaging? Build personas? Find product gaps? Understand churn?
  2. What do you already have? (transcripts, surveys, tickets, G2 reviews, nothing)
  3. Who is the target segment? (all customers, a specific tier, churned users, prospects who didn't buy)
  4. What's your product? (if not in the product marketing context file)
  5. What do you want delivered? (synthesis report, persona, quote bank, competitive intel)

Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.


Related Skills

When to hand offSkill
Writing copy informed by the researchcopywriting
Optimizing a page using VOC insightscro
Building a competitor comparison pagecompetitors
Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn researchchurn-prevention
Planning paid ads informed by researchads
Writing cold email using research on pain/triggercold-email
Translating customer research into an ICP for outboundprospecting
Planning content based on discovered topicscontent-strategy
Rolling research into a comprehensive marketing planmarketing-plan

来自 coreyhaines31 的更多技能

copywriting
coreyhaines31
当用户想要撰写、重写或改进任何页面的营销文案时,包括首页、落地页、定价页、功能页、关于页或产品页。也适用于用户说“为……写文案”、“改进这段文案”、“重写这个页面”、“营销文案”、“标题帮助”、“CTA文案”、“价值主张”、“标语”、“副标题”、“首屏文案”、“折叠区以上内容”、“这段文案太弱”、“让这个更有吸引力”或“帮我描述产品”时。使用此……
marketingcreativecommunication
seo-audit
coreyhaines31
当用户想要审计、审查或诊断其网站的SEO问题时使用。也适用于用户提及"SEO审计"、"技术SEO"、"为什么没有排名"、"SEO问题"、"页面SEO"、"元标签审查"、"SEO健康检查"、"流量下降"、"排名丢失"、"未出现在谷歌中"、"网站没有排名"、"谷歌更新影响了我"、"页面速度"、"核心网页指标"、"抓取错误"或"索引问题"时。即使用户只是模糊地说"我的SEO很差"或"帮帮我..."等情况也适用。
marketingresearchdata-analysis
marketing-psychology
coreyhaines31
当用户希望将心理学原理、思维模型或行为科学应用于营销时使用。也适用于用户提及"心理学"、"思维模型"、"认知偏差"、"说服"、"行为科学"、"人们为何购买"、"决策"、"消费者行为"、"锚定效应"、"社会认同"、"稀缺性"、"损失厌恶"、"框架效应"或"助推"等概念。每当有人想要理解或利用人们在营销情境中的思考与决策方式时使用此技能。用于应用...
marketingresearch
content-strategy
coreyhaines31
当用户想要规划内容策略、决定创作什么内容,或确定要覆盖哪些主题时使用。当用户提到“内容策略”、“我应该写什么”、“内容创意”、“博客策略”、“主题集群”、“内容规划”、“编辑日历”、“内容营销”、“内容路线图”、“我应该创作什么内容”、“博客主题”、“内容支柱”或“我不知道写什么”时也适用。每当有人需要帮助决定要创作什么内容时使用此技能。
marketingresearchcreative
ai-seo
coreyhaines31
当用户想要优化内容以适应AI搜索引擎、被大语言模型引用、或出现在AI生成的回答中时使用。也适用于用户提及以下术语时:'AI SEO'、'AEO'、'GEO'、'LLMO'、'答案引擎优化'、'生成式引擎优化'、'大语言模型优化'、'AI概览'、'针对ChatGPT优化'、'针对Perplexity优化'、'AI引用'、'AI可见性'、'零点击搜索'、'如何出现在AI回答中'、'大语言模型提及'、或'针对Claude/Gemini优化'。当有人提及相关内容时均可使用。
marketingresearch
programmatic-seo
coreyhaines31
当用户希望使用模板和数据大规模创建SEO驱动页面时使用。当用户提及“程序化SEO”、“模板页面”、“规模化页面”、“目录页面”、“地理位置页面”、“[关键词] + [城市] 页面”、“对比页面”、“集成页面”、“为SEO构建大量页面”、“pSEO”、“生成100个页面”、“数据驱动页面”或“模板化着陆页”时也可使用。每当有人想要创建针对不同关键词或地点的多个相似页面时,请使用此技能。用于...
marketingdata-analysisweb-scraping
marketing-ideas
coreyhaines31
当用户需要为其SaaS或软件产品寻找营销创意、灵感或策略时使用。也适用于用户询问“营销创意”、“增长思路”、“如何营销”、“营销策略”、“营销战术”、“推广方法”、“增长点子”、“还能尝试什么”、“我不知道如何营销这个”、“头脑风暴营销”或“应该做什么营销”等情况。每当用户陷入困境或寻求增长灵感时,以此作为起点。针对具体...
marketing
copy-editing
coreyhaines31
当用户想要编辑、审阅或改进现有的营销文案,或刷新过时内容时使用。也适用于用户提及“编辑这段文案”、“审阅我的文案”、“文案反馈”、“校对”、“润色”、“改进这段内容”、“文案梳理”、“精简这段”、“读起来别扭”、“清理这段文字”、“太啰嗦”、“强化信息传达”、“刷新内容”、“更新页面”、“内容过时”或“内容审计”等表述。当用户已有文案并希望对其进行处理时使用。
documentcommunicationmarketing