competitors

作者: coreyhaines31

当用户想要创建竞争对手对比或替代页面以用于SEO和销售赋能时使用。当用户提及“替代页面”、“对比页面”、“竞争对手对比”、“比较页面”、“[产品] vs [产品]”、“[产品]替代”、“竞争性落地页”、“我们与X相比如何”、“战斗卡”或“竞争对手拆解”时也适用。用于任何将您的产品与竞争对手进行定位的内容。涵盖四种格式:单一替代、多个替代、...

npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill competitors

Competitor & Alternative Pages

You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before creating competitor pages, understand:

  1. Your Product

    • Core value proposition
    • Key differentiators
    • Ideal customer profile
    • Pricing model
    • Strengths and honest weaknesses
  2. Competitive Landscape

    • Direct competitors
    • Indirect/adjacent competitors
    • Market positioning of each
    • Search volume for competitor terms
  3. Goals

    • SEO traffic capture
    • Sales enablement
    • Conversion from competitor users
    • Brand positioning

Core Principles

1. Honesty Builds Trust

  • Acknowledge competitor strengths
  • Be accurate about your limitations
  • Don't misrepresent competitor features
  • Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims

2. Depth Over Surface

  • Go beyond feature checklists
  • Explain why differences matter
  • Include use cases and scenarios
  • Show, don't just tell

3. Help Them Decide

  • Different tools fit different needs
  • Be clear about who you're best for
  • Be clear about who competitor is best for
  • Reduce evaluation friction

4. Modular Content Architecture

  • Competitor data should be centralized
  • Updates propagate to all pages
  • Single source of truth per competitor

Page Formats

Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)

Search intent: User is actively looking to switch from a specific competitor

URL pattern: /alternatives/[competitor] or /[competitor]-alternative

Target keywords: "[Competitor] alternative", "alternative to [Competitor]", "switch from [Competitor]"

Page structure:

  1. Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)
  2. Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)
  3. Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)
  4. Who should switch (and who shouldn't)
  5. Migration path
  6. Social proof from switchers
  7. CTA

Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)

Search intent: User is researching options, earlier in journey

URL pattern: /alternatives/[competitor]-alternatives

Target keywords: "[Competitor] alternatives", "best [Competitor] alternatives", "tools like [Competitor]"

Page structure:

  1. Why people look for alternatives (common pain points)
  2. What to look for in an alternative (criteria framework)
  3. List of alternatives (you first, but include real options)
  4. Comparison table (summary)
  5. Detailed breakdown of each alternative
  6. Recommendation by use case
  7. CTA

Important: Include 4-7 real alternatives. Being genuinely helpful builds trust and ranks better.


Format 3: You vs [Competitor]

Search intent: User is directly comparing you to a specific competitor

URL pattern: /vs/[competitor] or /compare/[you]-vs-[competitor]

Target keywords: "[You] vs [Competitor]", "[Competitor] vs [You]"

Page structure:

  1. TL;DR summary (key differences in 2-3 sentences)
  2. At-a-glance comparison table
  3. Detailed comparison by category (Features, Pricing, Support, Ease of use, Integrations)
  4. Who [You] is best for
  5. Who [Competitor] is best for (be honest)
  6. What customers say (testimonials from switchers)
  7. Migration support
  8. CTA

Format 4: [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]

Search intent: User comparing two competitors (not you directly)

URL pattern: /compare/[competitor-a]-vs-[competitor-b]

Page structure:

  1. Overview of both products
  2. Comparison by category
  3. Who each is best for
  4. The third option (introduce yourself)
  5. Comparison table (all three)
  6. CTA

Why this works: Captures search traffic for competitor terms, positions you as knowledgeable.


Essential Sections

TL;DR Summary

Start every page with a quick summary for scanners—key differences in 2-3 sentences.

Paragraph Comparisons

Go beyond tables. For each dimension, write a paragraph explaining the differences and when each matters.

Feature Comparison

For each category: describe how each handles it, list strengths and limitations, give bottom line recommendation.

Pricing Comparison

Include tier-by-tier comparison, what's included, hidden costs, and total cost calculation for sample team size.

Who It's For

Be explicit about ideal customer for each option. Honest recommendations build trust.

Migration Section

Cover what transfers, what needs reconfiguration, support offered, and quotes from customers who switched.

For detailed templates: See references/templates.md


Content Architecture

Centralized Competitor Data

Create a single source of truth for each competitor with:

  • Positioning and target audience
  • Pricing (all tiers)
  • Feature ratings
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Best for / not ideal for
  • Common complaints (from reviews)
  • Migration notes

For data structure and examples: See references/content-architecture.md


Research Process

Deep Competitor Research

For each competitor, gather:

  1. Product research: Sign up, use it, document features/UX/limitations
  2. Pricing research: Current pricing, what's included, hidden costs
  3. Review mining: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius for common praise/complaint themes
  4. Customer feedback: Talk to customers who switched (both directions)
  5. Content research: Their positioning, their comparison pages, their changelog

Ongoing Updates

  • Quarterly: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes
  • When notified: Customer mentions competitor change
  • Annually: Full refresh of all competitor data

SEO Considerations

Keyword Targeting

FormatPrimary Keywords
Alternative (singular)[Competitor] alternative, alternative to [Competitor]
Alternatives (plural)[Competitor] alternatives, best [Competitor] alternatives
You vs Competitor[You] vs [Competitor], [Competitor] vs [You]
Competitor vs Competitor[A] vs [B], [B] vs [A]

Internal Linking

  • Link between related competitor pages
  • Link from feature pages to relevant comparisons
  • Create hub page linking to all competitor content

Schema Markup

Consider FAQ schema for common questions like "What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?"


Output Format

Competitor Data File

Complete competitor profile in YAML format for use across all comparison pages.

Page Content

For each page: URL, meta tags, full page copy organized by section, comparison tables, CTAs.

Page Set Plan

Recommended pages to create with priority order based on search volume.


Task-Specific Questions

  1. What are common reasons people switch to you?
  2. Do you have customer quotes about switching?
  3. What's your pricing vs. competitors?
  4. Do you offer migration support?

Related Skills

  • programmatic-seo: For building competitor pages at scale
  • copywriting: For writing compelling comparison copy
  • seo-audit: For optimizing competitor pages
  • schema: For FAQ and comparison schema
  • sales-enablement: For internal sales collateral, decks, and objection docs

来自 coreyhaines31 的更多技能

copywriting
coreyhaines31
当用户想要撰写、重写或改进任何页面的营销文案时,包括首页、落地页、定价页、功能页、关于页或产品页。也适用于用户说“为……写文案”、“改进这段文案”、“重写这个页面”、“营销文案”、“标题帮助”、“CTA文案”、“价值主张”、“标语”、“副标题”、“首屏文案”、“折叠区以上内容”、“这段文案太弱”、“让这个更有吸引力”或“帮我描述产品”时。使用此……
marketingcreativecommunication
seo-audit
coreyhaines31
当用户想要审计、审查或诊断其网站的SEO问题时使用。也适用于用户提及"SEO审计"、"技术SEO"、"为什么没有排名"、"SEO问题"、"页面SEO"、"元标签审查"、"SEO健康检查"、"流量下降"、"排名丢失"、"未出现在谷歌中"、"网站没有排名"、"谷歌更新影响了我"、"页面速度"、"核心网页指标"、"抓取错误"或"索引问题"时。即使用户只是模糊地说"我的SEO很差"或"帮帮我..."等情况也适用。
marketingresearchdata-analysis
marketing-psychology
coreyhaines31
当用户希望将心理学原理、思维模型或行为科学应用于营销时使用。也适用于用户提及"心理学"、"思维模型"、"认知偏差"、"说服"、"行为科学"、"人们为何购买"、"决策"、"消费者行为"、"锚定效应"、"社会认同"、"稀缺性"、"损失厌恶"、"框架效应"或"助推"等概念。每当有人想要理解或利用人们在营销情境中的思考与决策方式时使用此技能。用于应用...
marketingresearch
content-strategy
coreyhaines31
当用户想要规划内容策略、决定创作什么内容,或确定要覆盖哪些主题时使用。当用户提到“内容策略”、“我应该写什么”、“内容创意”、“博客策略”、“主题集群”、“内容规划”、“编辑日历”、“内容营销”、“内容路线图”、“我应该创作什么内容”、“博客主题”、“内容支柱”或“我不知道写什么”时也适用。每当有人需要帮助决定要创作什么内容时使用此技能。
marketingresearchcreative
ai-seo
coreyhaines31
当用户想要优化内容以适应AI搜索引擎、被大语言模型引用、或出现在AI生成的回答中时使用。也适用于用户提及以下术语时:'AI SEO'、'AEO'、'GEO'、'LLMO'、'答案引擎优化'、'生成式引擎优化'、'大语言模型优化'、'AI概览'、'针对ChatGPT优化'、'针对Perplexity优化'、'AI引用'、'AI可见性'、'零点击搜索'、'如何出现在AI回答中'、'大语言模型提及'、或'针对Claude/Gemini优化'。当有人提及相关内容时均可使用。
marketingresearch
programmatic-seo
coreyhaines31
当用户希望使用模板和数据大规模创建SEO驱动页面时使用。当用户提及“程序化SEO”、“模板页面”、“规模化页面”、“目录页面”、“地理位置页面”、“[关键词] + [城市] 页面”、“对比页面”、“集成页面”、“为SEO构建大量页面”、“pSEO”、“生成100个页面”、“数据驱动页面”或“模板化着陆页”时也可使用。每当有人想要创建针对不同关键词或地点的多个相似页面时,请使用此技能。用于...
marketingdata-analysisweb-scraping
marketing-ideas
coreyhaines31
当用户需要为其SaaS或软件产品寻找营销创意、灵感或策略时使用。也适用于用户询问“营销创意”、“增长思路”、“如何营销”、“营销策略”、“营销战术”、“推广方法”、“增长点子”、“还能尝试什么”、“我不知道如何营销这个”、“头脑风暴营销”或“应该做什么营销”等情况。每当用户陷入困境或寻求增长灵感时,以此作为起点。针对具体...
marketing
copy-editing
coreyhaines31
当用户想要编辑、审阅或改进现有的营销文案,或刷新过时内容时使用。也适用于用户提及“编辑这段文案”、“审阅我的文案”、“文案反馈”、“校对”、“润色”、“改进这段内容”、“文案梳理”、“精简这段”、“读起来别扭”、“清理这段文字”、“太啰嗦”、“强化信息传达”、“刷新内容”、“更新页面”、“内容过时”或“内容审计”等表述。当用户已有文案并希望对其进行处理时使用。
documentcommunicationmarketing