optimization-mode-router

작성자: nvidia

빠른 직접 cuOpt 해결과 재생 가능 또는 감사 가능한 모델 아티팩트 모드 중에서 선택하세요.

npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/cuopt-examples --skill optimization-mode-router

Optimization Mode Router

Use this skill when a user asks a question that may be answered by solving an optimization problem from uploaded or provided data, and you need to decide whether to:

  • proceed with a fast direct-to-cuOpt solve, or
  • offer a replayable/auditable path that preserves a structured model artifact for later reruns, review, export, or audit.

This skill is about mode selection, not full formulation. Its purpose is to keep the common path fast while surfacing stronger reproducibility only when it is actually useful.

Read this when

Read this skill when all of the following are true:

  1. The user appears to be asking a question that could become an LP, MILP, QP, or routing problem.
  2. The user has provided data, or is expected to provide data.
  3. You need to decide whether to:
    • go straight to a direct cuOpt solve, or
    • preserve a replayable/auditable artifact as part of the workflow.

Do not use this skill for

  • Pure formulation work after the execution mode has already been chosen.
  • Pure cuOpt API usage when the user has already clearly chosen fast vs replayable mode.
  • Non-optimization analytics questions.

Default behavior

  • Default to Fast mode.
  • Default to direct cuOpt solve for one-off requests from uploaded CSVs (schedule, assignment, allocation, routing) — proceed to cuopt-model-mapper without asking fast vs replayable unless the user signals audit/export/rerun.
  • Do not ask about replayability/auditability unless there is a real signal that it matters.
  • Avoid turning a straightforward optimization request into a heavy upfront questionnaire.
  • NemoClaw sandbox: Fast mode means cuOpt after cuopt-sandbox gates — never a custom greedy/heuristic builder as the solve path.

Two modes

Fast mode

Use Fast mode when the user appears to want the quickest route to an answer.

Behavior:

  • inspect the provided data
  • identify whether the request is LP, MILP, QP, or routing
  • ask only the minimum necessary clarifying questions
  • build the model directly in cuOpt
  • solve and explain the result
  • do not preserve a replayable model artifact unless requested

Replayable / Auditable mode

Use this mode when the user wants reuse, traceability, or formal review.

Behavior:

  • capture explicit assumptions
  • record data-to-model mappings
  • preserve a structured model specification or equivalent reusable artifact
  • solve with cuOpt
  • return both the answer and reusable/reviewable model metadata

When to ask the mode-selection question

Ask the user to choose between Fast mode and Replayable/Auditable mode if any of the following are true:

  1. The user explicitly asks for any of these:

    • save the model
    • rerun on new data
    • replay later
    • recurring or scheduled runs
    • audit trail
    • export the model
    • document assumptions
    • review the formulation
    • show how the data maps into the model
  2. The request appears operational or recurring rather than one-off:

    • daily / weekly / monthly planning
    • production workflow
    • repeated scenario analysis
    • future datasets are expected
  3. The user indicates a need for traceability or justification:

    • compliance
    • internal or external review
    • reproducibility
    • explicit explanation of assumptions or mappings

When not to ask

Do not ask the mode-selection question when the request is clearly:

  • one-off
  • exploratory
  • ad hoc
  • speed-oriented

In those cases, proceed in Fast mode unless the user later asks for replayability, audit, export, or model persistence.

Recommended user-facing phrasing

Preferred short form:

Should I treat this as a one-off solve, or make it replayable/auditable too?

Alternative longer form:

I can do this in two ways: Fast mode for the quickest answer, or Replayable mode that also keeps a structured spec for reruns, audit, and reuse. Which do you want?

Decision rule

  • If there is no meaningful signal for replayability/auditability → use Fast mode silently.
  • If there is a meaningful signal → ask the mode-selection clarifier early.
  • If the user chooses replayable/auditable mode → preserve the structured artifact and proceed.
  • If the user chooses fast mode → proceed directly to cuOpt.

Handoff guidance

After selecting a mode, hand off based on problem type:

  • If the request is LP / MILP:

    • use numerical-optimization-formulation
    • then use cuopt-numerical-optimization-api-python (or cuopt-numerical-optimization-api-cli for MPS inputs)
    • in sandbox contexts, follow cuopt-sandbox (gates + selected gRPC path) before any LP/MILP solve
  • If the request is QP:

    • use numerical-optimization-formulation
    • then use cuopt-numerical-optimization-api-python
    • in sandbox contexts, follow cuopt-sandbox (gates + selected gRPC path) before any QP solve
  • If the request is routing (VRP / TSP / PDP):

    • use routing-formulation
    • then use cuopt-routing-api-python
    • in sandbox contexts, follow cuopt-sandbox (gates + REST) before any routing solve
  • If the user is asking about server usage or deployment rather than solving a model directly:

    • use cuopt-server-common or cuopt-server-api-python as appropriate
  • In all cuOpt user tasks:

    • follow cuopt-user-rules

Operational notes

  • This skill is about execution mode selection, not full mathematical modeling.
  • Keep the user experience lightweight by default.
  • Prefer direct-to-cuOpt for one-off work.
  • Use replayable/auditable mode only when the user’s needs justify the extra structure.

nvidia의 다른 스킬

fhir-basics
nvidia
에이전트에게 FHIR R4 API의 작동 방식, 사용 가능한 리소스, 검색 매개변수를 사용한 쿼리 방법, 모든 응답 형식을 올바르게 파싱하는 방법을 가르칩니다…
compileiq-validate-result
nvidia
검색이 완료된 후, 속도 향상을 청구하거나 ACF를 발송하기 전에 사용합니다. dump_results CSV를 로드하고, 상위 K개 후보(단일 목표)를 추출합니다…
changelog-audit
nvidia
릴리스 전에 Warp CHANGELOG.md를 감사합니다: 누락된 항목 복구, 사용자 영향별 정렬, 항목 언어 다듬기, 줄 바꿈, (릴리스 브랜치 모드) 비교 업데이트…
dgx-diagnose
nvidia
일반적인 DGX Station GB300 문제 진단 — CUDA 충돌, 잘못된 GPU 타겟팅, vLLM/SGLang 컨테이너 버그, MIG 상태 문제, NVLink/Fabric Manager 오류,…
aicr-managing-openvex
nvidia
Use when adding, updating, or removing CVE/GHSA suppressions in `.openvex.json` — the OpenVEX document consumed by the daily image vulnerability scan workflow.…
aicr-creating-slide-decks
nvidia
기술 개념이나 워크플로우에 대한 독립형 HTML 슬라이드 덱 또는 시각적 발표 자료(예: demos/*.html)를 만들 때 사용하세요. 전체 화면으로 표시하거나…
aicr-creating-guided-demos
nvidia
대화형 안내 데모 스크립트(demos/*.sh)를 라이브 또는 자기 주도 방식으로 Frame → Tell → Show → Close 패턴에 따라 구조화한다. "데모 스크립트", "안내…"와 같은 표현에 반응한다.
aicr-analyzing-snapshots
nvidia
AICR 스냅샷 YAML 파일을 분석하거나, 클러스터 상태를 검토하거나, 공급자 특성을 비교하거나, GPU/네트워크 토폴로지 인사이트를 추출할 때 사용합니다...