node-rca-rcca

작성자: nvidia

NVIDIA Fleet Intelligence 노드 하나를 조사하고, 실시간 현재 및 과거 알림과 권위 있는… 데이터를 바탕으로 증거 기반의 HTML RCA/RCCA를 생성합니다.

npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/fleet-intelligence-client --skill node-rca-rcca

Node RCA/RCCA

Investigate one node and produce an evidence-backed offline HTML RCA/RCCA. Read the CLI contract, HTML theme, and workspace guide before collecting data.

Workflow

1. Resolve the inputs and profile

Require a hostname or node UUID and a profile. Ask a concise clarification when either is missing or ambiguous.

nvfleetint auth list --output json
nvfleetint auth status --profile <profile> --output json

Require connection equal to ok. Pass the same explicit --profile <profile> to every API-backed command.

2. Resolve exactly one node

For a hostname, search all identity pages and require one exact match. Ask the user to choose when a partial name returns multiple candidates.

nvfleetint node list --hostname <hostname> --agent-type inband --view basic --all \
  --profile <profile> --output json

For a UUID, or after resolving a hostname, verify and capture the node once:

nvfleetint node describe <node_uuid> --profile <profile> --output json

Use the saved description for hostname, health, placement, GPU, agent, integrity, firmware, and component context.

3. Collect current and historical alerts

Fetch current alerts and complete historical alerts:

nvfleetint alert node <node_uuid> --without-psirt --all \
  --profile <profile> --output json
nvfleetint alert node <node_uuid> --view historical --without-psirt --all \
  --profile <profile> --output json

Describe every unique current alert:

nvfleetint alert describe <alert_uuid> --node <node_uuid> --profile <profile> --output json

Run at most four describe calls concurrently. Use each description's timeline, messages, errors, incidents, and suggested actions to identify the exact issue; treat missing optional fields as unavailable evidence.

Treat the default node view as current active alerts. Aggregate current and historical alerts by component ID/display name and status, deduplicating the same alertUuid across both sets. For each current alert, count prior historical rows with the same component ID after excluding its own alertUuid, and record the most recent prior occurrence. Empty alert sets are valid evidence.

4. Determine the root cause

Validate every response with the CLI contract before analysis. Correlate node state, current alert descriptions, and historical alerts by component and time. State:

  • observed symptoms and impact;
  • the most specific supported root cause;
  • confidence as Confirmed, Likely, or Not confirmed;
  • competing explanations and missing evidence when they affect the conclusion.

Do not promote correlation to causation. If evidence is insufficient, report the root cause as not confirmed and identify the next evidence needed.

5. Research corrective actions

After forming the evidence-based RCA, search the web using only observed generic component names, error codes, firmware/driver versions, and root-cause terms. Never include hostname, node UUID, profile, tenant, or customer data in a query.

Prefer official NVIDIA documentation, release notes, support articles, and knowledge-base material. Use other primary vendor documentation only when no relevant NVIDIA source exists. Cite the source title and URL beside each supported recommendation.

Turn the research into containment, corrective, preventive, and validation actions. Keep sourced guidance distinct from fleet evidence and mark any environment-dependent recommendation for operator confirmation.

6. Build and deliver

Apply the shared HTML theme and workspace workflow. Summarize saved JSON rather than embedding raw payloads. Use these sections:

  1. Executive Summary: node, collection time, impact, root cause, and confidence.
  2. Node Details: relevant node metadata.
  3. Alert Evidence: first show aggregate current and historical counts grouped by component and status, then show a collapsed <details> breakdown for every current alert with its described issue, timeline evidence, status, component, timing, prior occurrence count, and most recent prior occurrence.
  4. Root Cause Analysis: reasoning, competing explanations, and evidence gaps.
  5. Corrective Action Plan: containment, corrective, preventive, and validation actions.
  6. References: cited corrective-action sources.
  7. Assumptions and Unknowns: assumptions and information still required.

Use section IDs summary, node-details, evidence, root-cause, corrective-actions, references, and unknowns, respectively.

Cross-check every headline claim against validated JSON or a cited source, then return the report path, resolved node, profile, and collection time.

nvidia의 다른 스킬

fhir-basics
nvidia
에이전트에게 FHIR R4 API의 작동 방식, 사용 가능한 리소스, 검색 매개변수를 사용한 쿼리 방법, 모든 응답 형식을 올바르게 파싱하는 방법을 가르칩니다…
compileiq-validate-result
nvidia
검색이 완료된 후, 속도 향상을 청구하거나 ACF를 발송하기 전에 사용합니다. dump_results CSV를 로드하고, 상위 K개 후보(단일 목표)를 추출합니다…
changelog-audit
nvidia
릴리스 전에 Warp CHANGELOG.md를 감사합니다: 누락된 항목 복구, 사용자 영향별 정렬, 항목 언어 다듬기, 줄 바꿈, (릴리스 브랜치 모드) 비교 업데이트…
dgx-diagnose
nvidia
일반적인 DGX Station GB300 문제 진단 — CUDA 충돌, 잘못된 GPU 타겟팅, vLLM/SGLang 컨테이너 버그, MIG 상태 문제, NVLink/Fabric Manager 오류,…
aicr-managing-openvex
nvidia
Use when adding, updating, or removing CVE/GHSA suppressions in `.openvex.json` — the OpenVEX document consumed by the daily image vulnerability scan workflow.…
aicr-creating-slide-decks
nvidia
기술 개념이나 워크플로우에 대한 독립형 HTML 슬라이드 덱 또는 시각적 발표 자료(예: demos/*.html)를 만들 때 사용하세요. 전체 화면으로 표시하거나…
aicr-creating-guided-demos
nvidia
대화형 안내 데모 스크립트(demos/*.sh)를 라이브 또는 자기 주도 방식으로 Frame → Tell → Show → Close 패턴에 따라 구조화한다. "데모 스크립트", "안내…"와 같은 표현에 반응한다.
aicr-analyzing-snapshots
nvidia
AICR 스냅샷 YAML 파일을 분석하거나, 클러스터 상태를 검토하거나, 공급자 특성을 비교하거나, GPU/네트워크 토폴로지 인사이트를 추출할 때 사용합니다...