nemoclaw-maintainer-refactor-docs

작성자: nvidia

메인테이너가 소유한 대형 NemoClaw Fern 문서 섹션을 간결한 산문과 여정 기반 구조의 집중된 단일 주제 페이지로 리팩토링하는 작업을 계획하고 실행합니다…

npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/nemoclaw --skill nemoclaw-maintainer-refactor-docs

Refactor NemoClaw Documentation

Refactor a bounded documentation section without changing product meaning. Improve findability while preserving every useful fact, one canonical owner per topic, and every supported published route.

Prerequisites

  • Work from the NemoClaw repository root.
  • Follow the shared Documentation Writing and Review contract before planning or editing.
  • Read the full target pages, their navigation entries in docs/index.yml, their redirects in fern/docs.yml, and their inbound links before editing.

Choose the Deliverable

  • Treat cross-section ownership, navigation hierarchy, and published URL changes as maintainer-owned decisions.
  • For a request to plan, audit, or propose a structure, stop after the information architecture, ownership map, and URL migration plan.
  • For a request to refactor, implement the plan, validate it, and report the completed migration.
  • Keep the work bounded to the named docs section. Report adjacent debt instead of folding unrelated cleanup into the refactor.
  • Allow a cross-section move when canonical ownership requires it, but identify the move explicitly in the plan and migration report.
  • Surface a choice only when it changes topic ownership, public URLs, supported variants, or user workflow. Use established repository conventions for routine details.

Load the phase that applies

  • For an audit or structure plan, use Structure and Ownership.
  • Before changing published routes or moving content, use Migration. A plan that changes URLs must include its route and anchor mapping.
  • For an implemented refactor, use Validation and Review. Repair findings and rerun affected checks before reporting completion.

Do not load execution-only detail for a plan-only request. A request to perform the refactor includes implementation and validation; it does not require a separate approval of routine layout choices within the accepted scope.

Completion Contract

For a plan-only request, completion means the ownership map, proposed structure, route migration plan, and unresolved decisions are recorded. The implementation checks and validation results below apply only when the refactor was performed.

For an implemented refactor, require all of these conditions:

  • Every visible TOC item that readers can select is a real topic page.
  • Every foldable grouping node is non-clickable and has no page content.
  • Each page owns one primary topic or task.
  • Every old section is mapped to a destination or intentionally removed with a stated reason.
  • Troubleshooting and reference guidance has one canonical owner.
  • No supported variant renders a link or redirect to an unpublished page.
  • Legacy URLs redirect directly to final published pages.
  • Shared content renders correctly for every applicable agent variant.
  • Source and generated variant pages have no unresolved oversized or multi-purpose prose blocks.
  • Simple lists remain compact.
  • The docs build, route checks, link checks, and diff check pass.

Report the Result

For a plan-only request, report the proposed structure, ownership, routes, and remaining decisions. For an implemented refactor, summarize:

  • The final journey-based TOC.
  • Pages created, moved, consolidated, and deleted.
  • Canonical troubleshooting and reference ownership decisions.
  • Redirects and legacy routes preserved.
  • Variant-specific differences.
  • Readability edits made to dense paragraph blocks.
  • Validation commands and results.
  • Any intentionally deferred adjacent cleanup.

Use the Inference section as the living example of this method when a concrete pattern is needed. Its structure separates About Inference Routing, choosing a provider and model, hosted/local/custom setup paths, management, validation, and canonical Reference troubleshooting. Copy the reasoning and consistency rules, not the inference-specific page names.

nvidia의 다른 스킬

fhir-basics
nvidia
에이전트에게 FHIR R4 API의 작동 방식, 사용 가능한 리소스, 검색 매개변수를 사용한 쿼리 방법, 모든 응답 형식을 올바르게 파싱하는 방법을 가르칩니다…
compileiq-validate-result
nvidia
검색이 완료된 후, 속도 향상을 청구하거나 ACF를 발송하기 전에 사용합니다. dump_results CSV를 로드하고, 상위 K개 후보(단일 목표)를 추출합니다…
changelog-audit
nvidia
릴리스 전에 Warp CHANGELOG.md를 감사합니다: 누락된 항목 복구, 사용자 영향별 정렬, 항목 언어 다듬기, 줄 바꿈, (릴리스 브랜치 모드) 비교 업데이트…
dgx-diagnose
nvidia
일반적인 DGX Station GB300 문제 진단 — CUDA 충돌, 잘못된 GPU 타겟팅, vLLM/SGLang 컨테이너 버그, MIG 상태 문제, NVLink/Fabric Manager 오류,…
aicr-managing-openvex
nvidia
Use when adding, updating, or removing CVE/GHSA suppressions in `.openvex.json` — the OpenVEX document consumed by the daily image vulnerability scan workflow.…
aicr-creating-slide-decks
nvidia
기술 개념이나 워크플로우에 대한 독립형 HTML 슬라이드 덱 또는 시각적 발표 자료(예: demos/*.html)를 만들 때 사용하세요. 전체 화면으로 표시하거나…
aicr-creating-guided-demos
nvidia
대화형 안내 데모 스크립트(demos/*.sh)를 라이브 또는 자기 주도 방식으로 Frame → Tell → Show → Close 패턴에 따라 구조화한다. "데모 스크립트", "안내…"와 같은 표현에 반응한다.
aicr-analyzing-snapshots
nvidia
AICR 스냅샷 YAML 파일을 분석하거나, 클러스터 상태를 검토하거나, 공급자 특성을 비교하거나, GPU/네트워크 토폴로지 인사이트를 추출할 때 사용합니다...