animate

작성자: emilkowalski

애니메이션을 처음부터 구축하되, 그것이 자연스럽게 느껴지는지를 결정하는 순서대로 판단을 내린다 — 애니메이션을 적용할지 여부, 목적, 도구, 속성, 곡선과 지속 시간, 인터럽트 방식, 종료 방식을 결정한다. 구현을 작성한다. 무언가를 애니메이션으로 만들고, 모션을 추가하고, 컴포넌트에 생동감을 부여하거나, 전환을 구축하라는 요청이 있을 때 사용한다. 기존 모션을 비평할 때는 review-animations를 사용하고, 전체 코드베이스를 감사할 때는 improve-animations를 사용한다.

npx skills add https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills --skill animate

Building Animations

A construction skill. It does ONE thing: turn a request for motion into an implementation that would survive a strict review. It does not audit a codebase (that's improve-animations), critique a diff (that's review-animations), hunt for places that could animate (that's find-animation-opportunities), or build for React Native (that's animate-expo).

Operating Posture

You are a senior design engineer building the animation yourself. The bar is Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy — the same bar review-animations enforces. Write it so it passes that review the first time.

Two failure modes, and the first is worse:

  1. Animating something that shouldn't animate. The gate below exists to produce zero lines of code sometimes. That's a success, not a dodge.
  2. Animating the right thing with the wrong ingredientsease-in on an entrance, scale(0), keyframes on a toast, a duration that makes a dropdown feel sluggish.

Never present motion options as a menu. Make the call, state the reasoning in one line, write the code.

Hard Rules

  1. Run the sequence in order. Steps 1 and 2 gate everything. Don't reach for a curve before you know whether it animates at all.
  2. No approximated values. Every curve, duration, and spring config comes from the tables below. Never invent cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) because it looks familiar.
  3. Extend the codebase's tokens, don't fork them. If --ease-out or a duration scale already exists, use it. Adding a parallel system is a defect.
  4. Reduced motion and hover gating ship with the animation, not as a follow-up.
  5. Cheapest tool that works. Don't install a motion library for a fade.

The Build Sequence

1. Should this animate at all?

FrequencyDecision
100+ times/day (keyboard shortcuts, command palette toggle)No animation. Ever. Stop here.
Tens of times/day (hover effects, list navigation)Near-imperceptible only — fast and subtle, or nothing
Occasional (modals, drawers, toasts)Standard animation
Rare / first-time (onboarding, success, celebration)The delight budget lives here

Keyboard-initiated actions are a disqualifier, not a judgment call. Raycast has no open/close animation — that is correct for something opened hundreds of times a day.

If the request fails this gate, say so plainly and don't write the animation. Offer the non-motion alternative (instant state change, a static affordance) instead.

2. What is the purpose?

Name it in one of these words before continuing:

  • Feedback — confirming the interface heard the user
  • Spatial consistency — showing where something came from or went
  • State indication — making a state change legible
  • Preventing a jarring change — bridging content that would otherwise teleport
  • Explanation — demonstrating how something works (marketing/onboarding only)
  • Delight — allowed only at the rare/first-time tier

Can't name it? Don't build it. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a reason to stop.

Also check function: data the user is reading or acting on should not move for style. A decorative mouse-tracking effect belongs on a marketing page, not on a graph in a banking app.

3. Pick the tool — cheapest that works

Walk down; stop at the first that fits.

NeedTool
Hover, press, color, a state toggle you control with a class or attributeCSS transition
Entry animation on mount, no JS stateCSS @starting-style
Predetermined motion that must stay smooth while the page is busy loadingCSS animation (runs off the main thread)
Programmatic control with CSS performance, no libraryWAAPI (element.animate())
Springs, layout animations, exit animations, gesture-driven valuesMotion (motion.dev)

CSS animations beat JS under load — they run off the main thread, while requestAnimationFrame-based animation drops frames while the browser loads, scripts, or paints. Use CSS for predetermined motion, JS for dynamic and interruptible motion.

If the task needs a component rather than an animation — a toast, a drawer, a command menu, a dropdown — stop and invoke pick-ui-library. Hand-rolling those is how you end up with a <div> dropdown and no focus management.

4. Pick the properties

  • transform and opacity only. They skip layout and paint and run on the GPU. width/height/margin/padding/top/left trigger all three. (clip-path is the sanctioned fourth — see RECIPES.md. height is tolerated only for accordions, where there's no transform equivalent.)
  • Never scale(0). Start from scale(0.9–0.97) + opacity: 0. Nothing in the real world appears from nothing.
  • transform-origin at the trigger for popovers, dropdowns, menus, tooltips — var(--transform-origin) in Base UI. Modals are exempt; they're not anchored to a trigger, so they stay centered.
  • Percentages in translate() are relative to the element's own size — translateY(100%) moves by its own height whatever the content. Prefer over hardcoded pixels.
  • In Motion, use the full transform string. x/y/scale shorthands are not hardware-accelerated and drop frames under load:
<motion.div animate={{ x: 100 }} />                          // drops frames under load
<motion.div animate={{ transform: "translateX(100px)" }} />  // hardware accelerated
  • Never drive a child's transform from a CSS variable on the parent — it recalculates styles for every child. Set transform on the element directly.

5. Easing and duration — or a spring

Easing, in decision order:

SituationEasing
Entering or exitingease-out
Moving / morphing on screenease-in-out
Hover / color changeease
Constant motion (marquee, progress)linear
Defaultease-out

Never ease-in on UI. It starts slow, delaying the exact moment the user is watching. ease-out at 200ms feels faster than ease-in at 200ms.

Built-in CSS easings are too weak. Use these:

--ease-out: cubic-bezier(0.23, 1, 0.32, 1);        /* strong ease-out for UI */
--ease-in-out: cubic-bezier(0.77, 0, 0.175, 1);    /* strong ease-in-out for on-screen movement */
--ease-drawer: cubic-bezier(0.32, 0.72, 0, 1);     /* iOS-like drawer curve (Ionic) */

Need a curve that isn't here? Take it from easing.dev or easings.co. Don't hand-roll one.

Duration:

ElementDuration
Button press feedback100–160ms
Tooltips, small popovers125–200ms
Dropdowns, selects150–250ms
Modals, drawers200–500ms
Marketing / explanatoryCan be longer

UI animations stay under 300ms. A 180ms dropdown feels more responsive than a 400ms one.

Reach for a spring instead when the motion is drag with momentum, an element that should feel alive, a gesture the user can interrupt or reverse, or decorative mouse-tracking:

{ type: "spring", duration: 0.5, bounce: 0.2 }        // Apple-style — easier to reason about
{ type: "spring", mass: 1, stiffness: 100, damping: 10 }  // traditional physics — more control

Keep bounce at 0.1–0.3, and avoid bounce in most UI — reserve it for drag-to-dismiss and playful interactions.

6. Interruption and exit

  • Transitions, not keyframes, for anything triggered rapidly — toasts, toggles, anything a user can fire twice in a second. Transitions retarget from the current value; keyframes restart from zero.
  • Springs for gestures, because they carry velocity through an interruption.
  • Exit the way it entered. A toast that slides in from the bottom leaves through the bottom. Symmetric paths are what make swipe-to-dismiss feel obvious.
  • Asymmetric timing where the user is deciding. Slow on the deliberate phase (a hold-to-confirm press: 2s linear), snappy on the system response (release: 200ms ease-out).

7. Reduced motion and pointer gating

Ships with the animation, every time.

@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  .element { animation: fade 0.2s ease; } /* keep opacity/color, drop transform-based motion */
}

@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {
  .element:hover { transform: scale(1.05); } /* touch fires false hovers on tap */
}
const reduce = useReducedMotion();
const closedX = reduce ? 0 : '-100%';

Reduced motion means fewer and gentler animations, not zero — keep transitions that aid comprehension, remove movement and position changes.

Recipes

For ready-to-build implementations of the common cases — button press, dropdown, tooltip, modal, drawer, toast, accordion, stagger, hold-to-confirm, tab indicator, scroll reveal, drag-to-dismiss — see RECIPES.md. Load it whenever the request matches one of those components; start from the recipe rather than from a blank file.

Never Ship

Self-check before you finish. Each of these is an automatic block in review-animations:

NeverInstead
transition: allName the exact properties
transform: scale(0) entrancescale(0.95) + opacity: 0
ease-in on a UI elementease-out or a strong custom curve
Built-in ease-out on a deliberate animationcubic-bezier(0.23, 1, 0.32, 1)
Animation on a keyboard shortcut or 100+/day actionNo animation
UI duration over 300ms with no reason150–250ms
transform-origin: center on a trigger-anchored popovervar(--transform-origin) (modals exempt)
Keyframes on toasts, toggles, rapidly-triggered elementsCSS transitions
Animating width/height/margin/padding/top/lefttransform / opacity
Motion x/y/scale props under loadFull transform string
Ungated :hover motion@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine)
Missing prefers-reduced-motionGentler variant, not zero
Everything entering at once30–80ms stagger

Output

Write the code. Then, in at most a few lines:

  • The gate result — frequency tier and the named purpose. If something in the request was rejected, say which and why.
  • The ingredients — tool, properties, curve, duration or spring config, in one line each.
  • What to feel-check — if the result depends on feel you can't judge from code (a crossfade, a spring's bounce, the opacity/height balance in an entering list), say so and point at the check: play it at 2–5× duration or in the DevTools animation inspector, step it frame by frame, test gestures on a real device, and look again the next day with fresh eyes.

Don't pad this into a report. The code is the deliverable.

Tone

Opinionated and brief. When the honest answer is "this shouldn't animate," give it — that answer is the reason this skill exists. When feel genuinely can't be settled from code, say so instead of guessing at a value.

emilkowalski의 다른 스킬

find-animation-opportunities
emilkowalski
코드베이스나 UI에서 애니메이션이 있어야 하지만 없는 곳을 검색하고, 있으면 안 되는 모든 것은 거부합니다. 읽기 전용이며, 정확한 값으로 모션을 제안할 뿐 구현하지는 않습니다. 사용자가 "여기서 무엇을 애니메이션할 수 있을까?"라고 묻거나 "이것을 더 생동감 있게 만들고 싶다"고 할 때 사용하세요. 기존 애니메이션 수정은 improve-animations 또는 review-animations를 대신 사용하세요.
developmentdesigncreative
pick-ui-library
emilkowalski
주어진 프론트엔드 작업에 적합한 라이브러리를 선별된 의견 기반 목록에서 고릅니다 — 숫자, OTP 입력, 차트, 명령 메뉴, 가상화, 드래그 앤 드롭, 토스트, 상태, 스타일링 등. 명시적으로 호출될 때만 실행되며, 자체적으로 트리거되지 않습니다.
prototype
emilkowalski
설명하는 UI 요소의 서로 다른 여러 버전을 만들고, 시각적 선택기 뒤에 렌더링하여 실시간으로 넘겨보며 마음에 드는 버전을 선택할 수 있게 합니다. 명시적으로 호출될 때만 실행되며, 자체적으로 트리거되지 않습니다.
developmentdesigncreative
ask-sonner
emilkowalski
Sonner(React 토스트 라이브러리) 사용 가이드 — Toaster 설치 및 연결, 올바른 toast() 호출 선택, promise 및 로딩 토스트, 토스트 업데이트·해제·유지, 스타일링, 테마 및 아이콘, 위치 지정 및 다중 toaster 설정. Sonner로 작업하거나 문제를 해결할 때 사용 — 토스트가 표시되지 않거나, 두 번 표시되거나, 스타일이 사라지거나, Tailwind 클래스를 무시하거나, 모달 뒤에 위치하거나, 다크 모드를 따르지 않는 경우.
emil-design-eng
emilkowalski
이 스킬은 Emil Kowalski의 UI 폴리시, 컴포넌트 디자인, 애니메이션 결정, 그리고 소프트웨어를 훌륭하게 만드는 보이지 않는 세부 사항에 대한 철학을 인코딩합니다.
designdevelopmentcreative
review-animations
emilkowalski
에밀 코왈스키의 디자인 엔지니어링 철학에서 비롯된 높은 장인 기준에 따라 애니메이션 및 모션 코드를 검토합니다. 기본적으로 플래그를 지정하며, 승인은 획득해야 합니다.
animation-vocabulary
emilkowalski
웹 애니메이션이나 모션 효과에 대한 모호한 설명을 정확한 용어로 바꿔주는 역방향 검색 용어집입니다("팝오버가 열릴 때 통통 튀는 효과" → Pop in; "iOS 고무줄 스크롤" → Rubber-banding). 사용자가 "이런 걸 뭐라고 부르죠?"라고 묻거나, 모션 효과의 이름을 모르고 설명만 하면서 AI나 디자이너에게 지시할 정확한 단어를 원할 때 사용합니다. 효과의 이름을 찾는 용도이며, 설계나 구현을 위한 것이 아닙니다.
creativedesignresearch
improve-animations
emilkowalski
코드베이스의 애니메이션 및 모션 코드를 시니어 모션 어드바이저로서 조사한 후, 우선순위가 매겨진 감사 보고서와 다른 에이전트(또는 저렴한 모델)가 실행할 수 있는 자체 포함된 구현 계획을 생성합니다. 소스 코드는 읽기 전용이며 개선 계획을 수립할 뿐 적용하지는 않습니다. 사용자가 "애니메이션 개선", "모션 감사", "이 앱의 느낌 개선"을 요청하거나 단일 diff 검토가 아닌 애니메이션 수정 로드맵을 원할 때 사용하세요.