golang-uber-fx

作成者: samber

G

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-uber-fx

Persona: You are a Go architect building a long-running service with fx. You wire the graph at the composition root, push lifecycle into hooks instead of init(), and treat modules as the unit of reuse.

Using uber-go/fx for Application Wiring in Go

Application framework combining a reflection-based DI container (built on uber-go/dig) with a lifecycle, module system, signal-aware run loop, and structured event logging. For long-running services where boot order, graceful shutdown, and modular composition matter.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

go get go.uber.org/fx

fx vs. dig

fx is built on top of dig and shares the same reflection-based container engine. The DI primitives (Provide, Invoke, In/Out structs, named values, value groups) are identical — fx.In/fx.Out are re-exports of dig.In/dig.Out.

What fx adds on top:

Concerndigfx
DI containerdig.New()✅ (embedded)
Lifecycle hooksfx.Lifecycle OnStart/OnStop
Module systemfx.Module with scoped decorators
Signal-aware run loopapp.Run() blocks on SIGINT/SIGTERM
Structured event loggingfx.WithLogger / fxevent
Startup/shutdown timeoutfx.StartTimeout / fx.StopTimeout

Choose fx for long-running services (HTTP servers, workers, daemons) — lifecycle and signal handling are mandatory there, and modules make large service graphs manageable.

Choose raw dig when you need wiring without a framework: CLI tools, libraries that expose a container to callers, test harnesses, or embedding DI into an existing app that manages its own lifecycle. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-dig skill.

The Application

import "go.uber.org/fx"

app := fx.New(
    fx.Provide(NewLogger, NewDatabase, NewServer),
    fx.Invoke(RegisterRoutes),
)
app.Run() // blocks until SIGINT/SIGTERM, then runs OnStop hooks

Boot stages: fx.New validates types (constructors do not run); app.Start(ctx) runs each fx.Invoke and fires OnStart hooks in topological order; main blocks on app.Done(); app.Stop(ctx) fires OnStop hooks in reverse order. Default timeout is 15 seconds — override with fx.StartTimeout / fx.StopTimeout.

Provide and Invoke

fx.New(
    fx.Provide(NewLogger, NewDatabase, NewServer),  // lazy
    fx.Invoke(RegisterRoutes, StartMetricsExporter), // always run during Start
)

fx.Provide registers constructors; fx.Invoke is the trigger — without an Invoke (directly or transitively) referencing a type, its constructor never runs.

Lifecycle Hooks

Inject fx.Lifecycle and append hooks. Constructors should return quickly; long-running work belongs in OnStart.

func NewHTTPServer(lc fx.Lifecycle, log *zap.Logger, cfg *Config) *http.Server {
    srv := &http.Server{Addr: cfg.Addr}

    lc.Append(fx.Hook{
        OnStart: func(ctx context.Context) error {
            ln, err := net.Listen("tcp", srv.Addr)
            if err != nil { return err }
            go srv.Serve(ln)         // blocking work in a goroutine
            return nil
        },
        OnStop: func(ctx context.Context) error {
            return srv.Shutdown(ctx)
        },
    })
    return srv
}

Both callbacks receive a context bounded by StartTimeout/StopTimeout — respect cancellation. OnStart must return quickly — spawn a goroutine for blocking work; otherwise startup hangs and dependent hooks never fire.

fx.StartHook / fx.StopHook / fx.StartStopHook adapt simpler signatures (no context, no error, or both):

lc.Append(fx.StartStopHook(srv.Start, srv.Stop))   // matched pair

Parameter and Result Objects

fx re-exports dig's dig.In / dig.Out as fx.In / fx.Out. Use them when a constructor has 4+ dependencies, or when you need name/group/optional tags.

type ServerParams struct {
    fx.In

    Logger *zap.Logger
    DB     *sql.DB
    Cache  *redis.Client     `optional:"true"`
    Routes []http.Handler    `group:"routes"`
}

func NewServer(p ServerParams) *Server { /* ... */ }

fx.Annotate

fx.Annotate wraps a constructor to add tags or interface bindings without a fx.Out struct. Prefer it for ergonomic name/group/As bindings:

fx.Provide(
    fx.Annotate(NewPrimaryDB, fx.ResultTags(`name:"primary"`)),
    fx.Annotate(NewPostgresDB, fx.As(new(Database))),    // expose interface
    fx.Annotate(NewUserHandler,
        fx.As(new(http.Handler)),
        fx.ResultTags(`group:"routes"`),
    ),
)

Value Groups

Many constructors, one consumer slice — typical for routes, health checks, metrics collectors:

type RouteResult struct {
    fx.Out
    Handler http.Handler `group:"routes"`
}

type ServerParams struct {
    fx.In
    Routes []http.Handler `group:"routes"`
}

Append ,flatten (group:"routes,flatten") to unwrap a slice instead of nesting it. Order is not guaranteed — provide an explicit ordered slice when sequence matters.

fx.Module

fx.Module groups providers, invokes, and decorators under a name. Modules scope decorators to themselves and their children — a logger renamed in fx.Module("db", ...) only appears renamed for code inside that module.

var DatabaseModule = fx.Module("database",
    fx.Provide(NewConnection, NewUserRepository),
    fx.Decorate(func(log *zap.Logger) *zap.Logger {
        return log.Named("db")
    }),
)

func main() {
    fx.New(
        fx.Provide(NewConfig, NewLogger),
        DatabaseModule,
        HTTPModule,
    ).Run()
}

Treat each module as a small library that can be lifted into another app — its public surface is the types it Provides.

For fx.Supply/fx.Replace/fx.Decorate, optional deps, custom logging, manual lifecycle, and Quick Reference, see advanced.md.

Best Practices

  1. Keep main() thin — providers, modules, and a single Run(). Push real work into modules so each can be tested in isolation.
  2. Use lifecycle hooks instead of init() or goroutines launched from constructors — Start/Stop ordering depends on graph topology, but init() goroutines do not, which leads to races and leaks.
  3. OnStart must return promptly — long work goes in a goroutine inside the hook. A blocking OnStart hangs the rest of the boot.
  4. Respect ctx.Done() in hooks — a hook that ignores cancellation is reported as a timeout failure but its goroutine continues, leaking resources.
  5. Group by module, not by layer — a module owns the providers, lifecycle, and decorators for one concern (HTTP, DB, metrics).
  6. Use fx.Annotate for tags rather than wrapping a constructor in an fx.Out struct — keeps the constructor reusable outside fx.
  7. Replace fx.Provide with fx.Supply for pre-built values (config, command-line flags). Shorter, signals intent.
  8. Validate the graph in CI by booting under fx.New(...).Err() — catches missing providers and cycles before deploy.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Long-running work directly in OnStartSpawn a goroutine inside OnStart; the hook itself must return quickly so dependent hooks can run.
fx.Provide something that should be fx.SupplyPre-built values (config, secrets) belong in fx.Supply — clearer and avoids a no-op constructor.
Module decorator leaking to siblingsDecorate inside fx.Module(...) — decorators flow only to descendants. A top-level fx.Decorate is global.
Group order assumedGroups are unordered. If order matters, provide an ordered slice from one constructor.
Constructors with side effectsSide effects belong in OnStart — constructors should be cheap and pure-ish, since they may run concurrently and lazily.
Forgotten fx.InvokeWithout an Invoke (or downstream consumer), constructors never run. Add at least one Invoke per app.

Testing

Use go.uber.org/fx/fxtest to integrate fx with *testing.T (failures call t.Fatal, RequireStop registers as t.Cleanup). fx.Populate(&target) pulls values out of the graph; fx.Replace swaps real dependencies for fakes. Full patterns in testing.md.

Further Reading

  • advanced.md — Supply/Replace/Decorate, optional deps, custom event logging, manual lifecycle, full Quick Reference
  • recipes.md — full HTTP service with database/metrics, background workers with graceful drain, multiple impls of the same interface, manual lifecycle for CLI embedding
  • testing.md — fxtest patterns, fx.Replace, fx.Populate, isolated lifecycle tests, CI graph validation

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-dig skill for the underlying container, dig.In/dig.Out, and DI without lifecycle
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection skill for DI concepts and library comparison
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-do skill for a generics-based alternative without reflection
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-google-wire skill for compile-time DI (no runtime container)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill for interface design patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-context skill for context propagation in OnStart/OnStop hooks
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general testing patterns

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in uber-go/fx, open an issue at https://github.com/uber-go/fx/issues.

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-code-style" and other technical terms. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-code-style" appears in the source text? Actually, the source text does not contain the name "golang-code-style" explicitly. The name is given in the context: "Name to preserve: golang-code-style". But the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." Since it does not appear in the source text, we should not add it. However, the source text contains references like "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming" etc. Those should be preserved as is. We need to translate the description of the skill. The text describes conventions for Go code style. We'll translate into natural Japanese, keeping technical terms like "Go", "linter", "doc comments" etc. Also preserve the arrows and references. Let's break
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-testing" if it appears. The text is a description of a directory item type "agent skill". The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the provided <text>? Actually, looking at the text: it starts with "Production-ready Golang tests — ..." and later mentions "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify". The name "golang-testing" is not in the text. So we should not add it. We just translate the content. We need to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Golang", "testify", "goleak", "CI", "Go", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify" should remain as is. Also "table-driven tests", "testify suites and mocks", "parallel tests", "f
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given English text into Japanese, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text is a description of a skill for idiomatic Go error handling. We must not add any extra commentary, labels, or formatting. Just the translation. The text includes technical terms: "Idiomatic Golang error handling", "creation", "wrapping with %w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "custom error types", "sentinel errors", "panic/recover", "single handling rule", "structured logging with slog", "HTTP request logging middleware", "samber/oops for production errors", "log aggregation 3rd-party tools", "Go code", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". These should be preserved as is or translated appropriately. For example, "Idiomatic Golang error handling" can be translated as "慣用的なGoのエラーハンドリング". But we need to keep technical terms like "errors
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting