golang-uber-dig

作成者: samber

Implements dependency injection in Golang using uber-go/dig — reflection-based container, Provide/Invoke, dig.In/dig.Out parameter and result objects, named values, value groups, optional dependencies, scopes, and Decorate. Apply when using or adopting uber-go/dig, when the codebase imports `go.uber.org/dig`, or when wiring an application graph at startup. For higher-level lifecycle and modules, see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-fx` skill.

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-uber-dig

Persona: You are a Go architect wiring an application graph with dig. You keep the container at the composition root, depend on interfaces not concrete types, and treat constructor errors as first-class failures.

Using uber-go/dig for Dependency Injection in Go

Reflection-based DI toolkit, designed to power application frameworks (it is the engine behind uber-go/fx) and resolve object graphs during startup.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.

go get go.uber.org/dig

dig vs. fx

fx is built on dig and shares the same container engine — the DI primitives (Provide, Invoke, In/Out structs, named values, value groups) are identical. fx.In/fx.Out are re-exports of dig.In/dig.Out.

What fx adds on top of dig:

Concerndigfx
DI containerdig.New()✅ (embedded)
Lifecycle hooksfx.Lifecycle OnStart/OnStop
Module systemfx.Module with scoped decorators
Signal-aware run loopapp.Run() blocks on SIGINT/SIGTERM
Structured event loggingfx.WithLogger / fxevent
Startup/shutdown timeoutfx.StartTimeout / fx.StopTimeout

Choose dig when you need the wiring graph only: CLI tools, libraries exposing a container to callers, test harnesses, or embedding DI into an existing app that manages its own lifecycle.

Choose fx for long-running services (HTTP servers, workers, daemons) — lifecycle and signal handling are non-negotiable there. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-fx skill.

Container

import "go.uber.org/dig"

c := dig.New()

Useful options: dig.DeferAcyclicVerification() (faster startup), dig.RecoverFromPanics() (turn panics into dig.PanicError), dig.DryRun(true) (validate without invoking).

Provide and Invoke

// Register a constructor — lazy, only runs when its output is needed
err := c.Provide(func(cfg *Config) (*sql.DB, error) {
    return sql.Open("postgres", cfg.DSN)
})

// Pull a service out of the container by asking for it as a function parameter
err = c.Invoke(func(db *sql.DB) error {
    return db.Ping()
})

Constructors are lazy and memoized: each output type is built once and shared (singleton per container). Provide errors at registration if the constructor is malformed; Invoke returns the constructor's error wrapped with the dependency path that triggered it.

A dig constructor is any function. Inputs are dependencies, outputs are provided types. error (last return) signals construction failure. Follow "accept interfaces, return structs".

Parameter Objects with dig.In

Once a constructor has 4+ dependencies, embed dig.In to group them as struct fields and tag fields:

type HandlerParams struct {
    dig.In

    Logger *zap.Logger
    DB     *sql.DB
    Cache  *redis.Client `optional:"true"`           // zero value if not provided
    DBRO   *sql.DB       `name:"readonly"`           // named dependency
    Routes []http.Handler `group:"routes"`           // value group
}

func NewHandler(p HandlerParams) *Handler { /* ... */ }

Tags: name:"...", optional:"true", group:"...".

Result Objects with dig.Out

Return several values from one constructor and attach name/group tags to results:

type ConnResult struct {
    dig.Out

    ReadWrite *sql.DB `name:"primary"`
    ReadOnly  *sql.DB `name:"readonly"`
}

func NewConnections(cfg *Config) (ConnResult, error) { /* ... */ }

Named Values

Two providers of the same type collide. Disambiguate with dig.Name:

c.Provide(NewPrimaryDB,  dig.Name("primary"))
c.Provide(NewReadOnlyDB, dig.Name("readonly"))

Consume by adding name:"primary" / name:"readonly" to a dig.In field.

Value Groups

Many providers, one consumer slice — typical for HTTP handlers, health checks, migrations:

type RouteResult struct {
    dig.Out
    Handler http.Handler `group:"routes"`
}

func NewUserHandler(db *sql.DB) RouteResult { /* ... */ }
func NewPostHandler(db *sql.DB) RouteResult { /* ... */ }

type ServerParams struct {
    dig.In
    Routes []http.Handler `group:"routes"`
}

Flatten — append ,flatten (e.g. group:"routes,flatten") to unwrap a slice instead of nesting it. Group order is not guaranteed; if order matters, provide an explicit ordered slice from a single constructor.

Provide as Interface (dig.As)

Register a concrete constructor and expose it under one or more interfaces without a separate adapter:

c.Provide(NewPostgresDB, dig.As(new(Database), new(io.Closer)))
// Consumers ask for Database or io.Closer; *PostgresDB stays hidden.

Full Application Example

func main() {
    c := dig.New()

    must(c.Provide(NewConfig))
    must(c.Provide(NewLogger))
    must(c.Provide(NewDatabase))
    must(c.Provide(NewServer))

    err := c.Invoke(func(srv *http.Server) error {
        return srv.ListenAndServe()
    })
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
}

func must(err error) { if err != nil { panic(err) } }

dig has no built-in lifecycle. If you need OnStart/OnStop hooks, signal handling, and graceful shutdown, use fx — see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-fx skill.

For Decorate, Scopes, optional deps, error helpers, and Visualize, see advanced.md.

Best Practices

  1. Keep the container at the composition root — never pass *dig.Container as a parameter; treat it like a plumbing detail of main(). Service-locator patterns defeat the testability gains of DI.
  2. Depend on interfaces, not concrete types — lets you swap implementations in tests without touching production code, and lets you use dig.As to expose narrow interfaces from wide structs.
  3. Prefer parameter objects (dig.In structs) once a constructor has 4+ dependencies — call sites stay readable and adding a new dependency is a one-line change instead of a signature break.
  4. Group registration by module (one file per module that calls c.Provide for its types) — review and refactoring become a per-module concern, and you can extract a module into a fx.Module later without rewriting wiring.
  5. Validate the graph eagerly in tests — call c.Invoke against the composition root in CI to surface missing providers at boot time, not at first request. DryRun(true) skips constructor execution.
  6. Return errors from constructors instead of panicking — dig wraps them with the dependency path, which makes the failure point obvious.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Passing the container into servicesThe container belongs to main(). Inject the typed dependencies a service needs; otherwise tests need to build a real container.
Two providers for the same type without Namedig errors at Provide time. Either name them, or merge into a single provider that returns a dig.Out result struct.
Ignoring Provide errorsWrap each Provide with a must helper. A silent registration error becomes a missing-type error far later.
Using groups when ordering mattersGroups are unordered. If order matters (middleware chain, migration sequence), provide an explicit ordered slice with one constructor.
Constructors with side effects on importKeep init() empty — start work only inside the constructor, after the graph is built.

Testing

dig containers are cheap — build a fresh one per test, override providers with Decorate, and call Invoke to drive the system. For full patterns (per-test wiring, shared helpers, graph validation in CI, asserting wire-time errors, recovering from constructor panics), see testing.md.

Further Reading

  • advanced.md — Decorate, Scopes, optional deps, error helpers, Visualize, full Quick Reference
  • recipes.md — end-to-end examples: HTTP server with route group, two databases, request scopes, decorators, dry-run validation
  • testing.md — testing patterns and graph validation

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-fx skill for application lifecycle, modules, and signal-aware Run() built on top of dig
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection skill for DI concepts and library comparison
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-do skill for a generics-based alternative without reflection
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-google-wire skill for compile-time DI (no runtime container)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill for interface design patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general testing patterns

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in uber-go/dig, open an issue at https://github.com/uber-go/dig/issues.

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-code-style" and other technical terms. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-code-style" appears in the source text? Actually, the source text does not contain the name "golang-code-style" explicitly. The name is given in the context: "Name to preserve: golang-code-style". But the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." Since it does not appear in the source text, we should not add it. However, the source text contains references like "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming" etc. Those should be preserved as is. We need to translate the description of the skill. The text describes conventions for Go code style. We'll translate into natural Japanese, keeping technical terms like "Go", "linter", "doc comments" etc. Also preserve the arrows and references. Let's break
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting