golang-troubleshooting

作成者: samber

We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-troubleshooting" and other technical terms. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name appears in the source text as part of a skill reference? Actually, the source text mentions "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark" but not "golang-troubleshooting" explicitly. The directory item type is agent skill, and the name to preserve is golang-troubleshooting, but it's not in the text. So we just translate the text. The text: "Troubleshoot Golang programs systematically - find and fix the root cause. Use when encountering bugs, crashes, deadlocks, or unexpected behavior in Go code. Covers debugging methodology, common Go pitfalls, test-driven debugging, pprof setup and capture, Delve debugger, race detection, GODEBUG tracing, and production debugging. Start here for any 'something is wrong' situation

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-troubleshooting

Persona: You are a Go systems debugger. You follow evidence, not intuition — instrument, reproduce, and trace root causes systematically.

Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for debugging and root cause analysis. Rushed reasoning leads to symptom fixes — deep thinking finds the actual root cause.

Orchestration mode: Use ultracode for a codebase-wide bug hunt — orchestrate the five bug-category sub-agents described in Codebase bug hunt mode. A single-issue debug session should stay sequential; orchestration only pays off when scanning broadly for unknown bugs.

Modes:

  • Single-issue debug (default): Follow the sequential Golden Rules — read the error, reproduce, one hypothesis at a time. Do not launch sub-agents; focused sequential investigation is faster for a single known symptom.
  • Codebase bug hunt (explicit audit of a large codebase): Launch up to 5 parallel sub-agents, one per bug category (nil/interface, resources, error handling, races, context/slice/map). Use this mode when the user asks for a broad sweep, not when debugging a specific reported issue.

Dependencies:

  • dlv: go install github.com/go-delve/delve/cmd/dlv@latest

Go Troubleshooting Guide

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST. Symptom fixes create new bugs and waste time. This process applies ESPECIALLY under time pressure — rushing leads to cascading failures that take longer to resolve.

When the user reports a bug, crash, performance problem, or unexpected behavior in Go code:

  1. Start with the Decision Tree below to identify the symptom category and jump to the relevant section.
  2. Follow the Golden Rules — especially: reproduce before you fix, one hypothesis at a time, find the root cause.
  3. Work through the General Debugging Methodology step by step. Do not skip steps.
  4. Watch for Red Flags in your own reasoning. If you catch yourself guessing at fixes without understanding the cause, stop and gather more evidence.
  5. Escalate tools incrementally. Start with the simplest diagnostic (fmt.Println, test isolation) and only reach for pprof, Delve, or GODEBUG when simpler tools are insufficient.
  6. Never propose a fix you cannot explain. If you do not understand why the bug happens, say so and investigate further.

Quick Decision Tree

WHAT ARE YOU SEEING?

"Build won't compile"
  → go build ./... 2>&1, go vet ./...
  → See [compilation.md](./references/compilation.md)

"Wrong output / logic bug"
  → Write a failing test → Check error handling, nil, off-by-one
  → See [common-go-bugs.md](./references/common-go-bugs.md), [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)

"Random crashes / panics"
  → GOTRACEBACK=all ./app → go test -race ./...
  → See [common-go-bugs.md](./references/common-go-bugs.md), [diagnostic-tools.md](./references/diagnostic-tools.md)

"Sometimes works, sometimes fails"
  → go test -race ./...
  → See [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md), [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)

"Program hangs / frozen"
  → curl localhost:6060/debug/pprof/goroutine?debug=2
  → See [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md), [pprof.md](./references/pprof.md)

"High CPU usage"
  → pprof CPU profiling
  → See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [pprof.md](./references/pprof.md)

"Memory growing over time"
  → pprof heap profiling
  → See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md)

"Slow / high latency / p99 spikes"
  → CPU + mutex + block profiles
  → See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [diagnostic-tools.md](./references/diagnostic-tools.md)

"Simple bug, easy to reproduce"
  → Write a test, add fmt.Println / log.Debug
  → See [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)

Remember: Read the Error → Reproduce → Measure One Thing → Fix → Verify

Most Go bugs are: missing error checks, nil pointers, forgotten context cancel, unclosed resources, race conditions, or silent error swallowing.

The Golden Rules

1. Read the Error Message First

Go error messages are precise. Read them fully before doing anything else:

  • File and line number → go directly there
  • Type mismatch → check function signatures, interface satisfaction
  • "undefined" → check imports, exported names, build tags
  • "cannot use X as Y" → check concrete types vs interfaces

2. Reproduce Before You Fix

NEVER debug by guessing — reproduce first. Always:

  • Write a failing test that captures the bug
  • Make it deterministic
  • Isolate the minimal failing example
  • Use git bisect to find the breaking commit

3. If You Don't Measure It, You're Guessing

Never rely on intuition for performance or concurrency bugs:

  • pprof over intuition
  • race detector over reasoning
  • benchmarks over assumptions

4. One Hypothesis at a Time

Change one thing, measure, confirm. If you change three things at once, you learn nothing.

5. Find the Root Cause — No Workarounds

A band-aid fix that masks the symptom IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. You MUST understand why the bug happens before writing a fix.

When you don't understand the issue:

  • Trace the data flow backwards from the symptom to its origin.
  • Question your assumptions. The code you trust might be wrong.
  • Ask "why" five times. Keep going until you reach the actual root cause.
  • Perform more troubleshooting checks. More fmt.Println, more output inspection...

6. Research the Codebase, Not Just the Diff

Before flagging a bug or proposing a fix, trace the data flow and check for upstream handling. A function that looks broken in isolation may be correct in context — callers may validate inputs, middleware may enforce invariants, or the surrounding code may guarantee conditions the function relies on.

  1. Trace callers — who calls this function and with what values? Call sites can be found with code search tools. → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill to resolve the actual symbol through interfaces and embedding — it finds indirect call sites and skips unrelated same-named identifiers that plain grep would respectively miss or falsely match.
  2. Check upstream validation — input parsing, type conversions, or guard clauses earlier in the chain may make the "bug" unreachable.
  3. Read the surrounding code — middleware, interceptors, or init functions may set up state the function depends on.

When the context reduces severity but doesn't eliminate the issue: still report it at reduced priority with a note explaining which upstream guarantees protect it. Add a brief inline comment (e.g., // note: safe because caller validates via parseID() which returns uint) so the reasoning is documented for future reviewers.

7. Start Simple

Sometimes fmt.Println IS the right tool for local debugging. Escalate tools only when simpler approaches fail. NEVER use fmt.Println for production debugging — use slog.

Red Flags: You're Debugging Wrong

If any of these are happening, stop and return to Step 1:

  • "Quick fix for now, investigate later" — There is no "later". Find the root cause.
  • Multiple simultaneous changes — One hypothesis at a time.
  • Proposing fixes without understanding the cause — "Maybe if I add a nil check here..." is guessing, not debugging.
  • Each fix reveals a new problem — You're treating symptoms. The real bug is elsewhere.
  • 3+ fix attempts on the same issue — You have the wrong mental model. Re-read the code, trace the data flow from scratch.
  • "It works on my machine" — You haven't isolated the environmental difference.
  • Blaming the framework/stdlib/compiler — It's almost never a Go bug. Verify your code first.

Reference Files

  • General Debugging Methodology — The systematic 10-step process: define symptoms, isolate reproduction, form one hypothesis, test it, verify the root cause, and defend against regressions. Escalation guide: when to escalate from fmt.Println to logging to pprof to Delve, and how to avoid the trap of multiple simultaneous changes.

  • Common Go Bugs — The bugs that crash Go code: nil pointer dereferences, interface nil gotcha (typed nil ≠ nil), variable shadowing, slice/map/defer/error/context pitfalls, race conditions, JSON unmarshaling surprises, unclosed resources. Each with reproduction patterns and fixes.

  • Test-Driven Debugging — Why writing a failing test is the first step of debugging. Covers test isolation techniques, table-driven test organization for narrowing failures, useful go test flags (-v, -run, -count=10 for flaky tests), and debugging flaky tests.

  • Concurrency Debugging — Race conditions, deadlocks, goroutine leaks. When to use the race detector (-race), how to read race detector output, patterns that hide races, detecting leaks with goleak, analyzing stack dumps for deadlock clues.

  • Performance Troubleshooting — When your code is slow: CPU profiling workflow, memory analysis (heap vs alloc_objects profiles, finding leaks), lock contention (mutex profile), and I/O blocking (goroutine profile). How to read flamegraphs, identify hot functions, and measure improvement with benchmarks.

  • pprof Reference — Complete pprof manual. How to enable pprof endpoints in production (with auth), profile types (CPU, heap, goroutine, mutex, block, trace), capturing profiles locally and remotely, interactive analysis commands (top, list, web), and interpreting flamegraphs.

  • Diagnostic Tools — Auxiliary tools for specific symptoms. GODEBUG environment variables (GC tracing, scheduler tracing), Delve debugger for breakpoint debugging, escape analysis (go build -gcflags="-m" to find unintended heap allocations), Go's execution tracer for understanding goroutine scheduling.

  • Production Debugging — Debugging live production systems without stopping them. Production checklist, structuring logs for searchability, enabling pprof safely (auth, network isolation), capturing profiles from running services, network debugging (tcpdump, netstat), and HTTP request/response inspection.

  • Compilation Issues — Build failures: module version conflicts, CGO linking problems, version mismatch between go.mod and installed Go version, platform-specific build tags preventing cross-compilation.

  • Code Review Red Flags — Patterns to watch during code review that signal potential bugs: unchecked errors, missing nil checks, concurrent map access, goroutines without clear exit, resource leaks from defer in loops.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance skill for optimization patterns after identifying bottlenecks
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for metrics, alerting, and Grafana dashboards for Go runtime monitoring
  • → See samber/cc-skills@promql-cli skill for querying Prometheus metrics during production incident investigation
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency, samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safety, samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skills

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-code-style" and other technical terms. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-code-style" appears in the source text? Actually, the source text does not contain the name "golang-code-style" explicitly. The name is given in the context: "Name to preserve: golang-code-style". But the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." Since it does not appear in the source text, we should not add it. However, the source text contains references like "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming" etc. Those should be preserved as is. We need to translate the description of the skill. The text describes conventions for Go code style. We'll translate into natural Japanese, keeping technical terms like "Go", "linter", "doc comments" etc. Also preserve the arrows and references. Let's break
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-testing" if it appears. The text is a description of a directory item type "agent skill". The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the provided <text>? Actually, looking at the text: it starts with "Production-ready Golang tests — ..." and later mentions "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify". The name "golang-testing" is not in the text. So we should not add it. We just translate the content. We need to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Golang", "testify", "goleak", "CI", "Go", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify" should remain as is. Also "table-driven tests", "testify suites and mocks", "parallel tests", "f
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given English text into Japanese, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text is a description of a skill for idiomatic Go error handling. We must not add any extra commentary, labels, or formatting. Just the translation. The text includes technical terms: "Idiomatic Golang error handling", "creation", "wrapping with %w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "custom error types", "sentinel errors", "panic/recover", "single handling rule", "structured logging with slog", "HTTP request logging middleware", "samber/oops for production errors", "log aggregation 3rd-party tools", "Go code", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". These should be preserved as is or translated appropriately. For example, "Idiomatic Golang error handling" can be translated as "慣用的なGoのエラーハンドリング". But we need to keep technical terms like "errors
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting