golang-samber-oops

作成者: samber

Golangにおけるsamber/oopsを使用した構造化エラーハンドリング — エラービルダー、スタックトレース、エラーコード、エラーコンテキスト、エラーラッピング、エラー属性、ユーザー向けメッセージと開発者向けメッセージ、パニックリカバリ、ロガー統合。samber/oopsを使用または採用する場合、またはコードベースが既にgithub.com/samber/oopsをインポートしている場合に適用します。

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-samber-oops

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats errors as structured data. Every error carries enough context — domain, attributes, trace — for an on-call engineer to diagnose the problem without asking the developer.

samber/oops Structured Error Handling

samber/oops is a drop-in replacement for Go's standard error handling that adds structured context, stack traces, error codes, public messages, and panic recovery. Variable data goes in .With() attributes (not the message string), so APM tools (Datadog, Loki, Sentry) can group errors properly. Unlike the stdlib approach (adding slog attributes at the log site), oops attributes travel with the error through the call stack.

Why use samber/oops

Standard Go errors lack context — you see connection failed but not which user triggered it, what query was running, or the full call stack. samber/oops provides:

  • Structured context — key-value attributes on any error
  • Stack traces — automatic call stack capture
  • Error codes — machine-readable identifiers
  • Public messages — user-safe messages separate from technical details
  • Low-cardinality messages — variable data in .With() attributes, not the message string, so APM tools group errors properly

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

Core pattern: Error builder chain

All oops errors use a fluent builder pattern:

err := oops.
    In("user-service").           // domain/feature
    Tags("database", "postgres").  // categorization
    Code("network_failure").       // machine-readable identifier
    User("user-123", "email", "foo@bar.com").  // user context
    With("query", query).          // custom attributes
    Errorf("failed to fetch user: %s", "timeout")

Terminal methods:

  • .Errorf(format, args...) — create a new error
  • .Wrap(err) — wrap an existing error
  • .Wrapf(err, format, args...) — wrap with a message
  • .Join(err1, err2, ...) — combine multiple errors
  • .Recover(fn) / .Recoverf(fn, format, args...) — convert panic to error

Error builder methods

MethodsUse case
.With("key", value)Add custom key-value attribute (lazy func() any values supported)
.WithContext(ctx, "key1", "key2")Extract values from Go context into attributes (lazy values supported)
.In("domain")Set the feature/service/domain
.Tags("auth", "sql")Add categorization tags (query with err.HasTag("tag"))
.Code("iam_authz_missing_permission")Set machine-readable error identifier/slug
.Public("Could not fetch user.")Set user-safe message (separate from technical details)
.Hint("Runbook: https://doc.acme.org/doc/abcd.md")Add debugging hint for developers
.Owner("team/slack")Identify responsible team/owner
.User(id, "k", "v")Add user identifier and attributes
.Tenant(id, "k", "v")Add tenant/organization context and attributes
.Trace(id)Add trace / correlation ID (default: ULID)
.Span(id)Add span ID representing a unit of work/operation (default: ULID)
.Time(t)Override error timestamp (default: time.Now())
.Since(t)Set duration based on time since t (exposed via err.Duration())
.Duration(d)Set explicit error duration
.Request(req, includeBody)Attach *http.Request (optionally including body)
.Response(res, includeBody)Attach *http.Response (optionally including body)
oops.FromContext(ctx)Start from an OopsErrorBuilder stored in a Go context

Common scenarios

Database/repository layer

func (r *UserRepository) FetchUser(id string) (*User, error) {
    query := "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1"
    row, err := r.db.Query(query, id)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, oops.
            In("user-repository").
            Tags("database", "postgres").
            With("query", query).
            With("user_id", id).
            Wrapf(err, "failed to fetch user from database")
    }
    // ...
}

HTTP handler layer

func (h *Handler) CreateUser(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    userID := getUserID(r)

    err := h.service.CreateUser(r.Context(), userID)
    if err != nil {
        err = oops.
            In("http-handler").
            Tags("endpoint", "/users").
            Request(r, false).
            User(userID).
            Wrapf(err, "create user failed")
        http.Error(w, oops.GetPublic(err, "Internal server error"), http.StatusInternalServerError)
        return
    }

    w.WriteHeader(http.StatusCreated)
}

Service layer with reusable builder

func (s *UserService) CreateOrder(ctx context.Context, req CreateOrderRequest) error {
    builder := oops.
        In("order-service").
        Tags("orders", "checkout").
        Tenant(req.TenantID, "plan", req.Plan).
        User(req.UserID, "email", req.UserEmail)

    product, err := s.catalog.GetProduct(ctx, req.ProductID)
    if err != nil {
        return builder.
            With("product_id", req.ProductID).
            Wrapf(err, "product lookup failed")
    }

    if product.Stock < req.Quantity {
        return builder.
            Code("insufficient_stock").
            Public("Not enough items in stock.").
            With("requested", req.Quantity).
            With("available", product.Stock).
            Errorf("insufficient stock for product %s", req.ProductID)
    }

    return nil
}

Error wrapping best practices

DO: Wrap directly, no nil check needed

// ✓ Good — Wrap returns nil if err is nil
return oops.Wrapf(err, "operation failed")

// ✗ Bad — unnecessary nil check
if err != nil {
    return oops.Wrapf(err, "operation failed")
}
return nil

DO: Add context at each layer

Each architectural layer SHOULD add context via Wrap/Wrapf — at least once per package boundary (not necessarily at every function call).

// ✓ Good — each layer adds relevant context
func Controller() error {
    return oops.In("controller").Trace(traceID).Wrapf(Service(), "user request failed")
}

func Service() error {
    return oops.In("service").With("op", "create_user").Wrapf(Repository(), "db operation failed")
}

func Repository() error {
    return oops.In("repository").Tags("database", "postgres").Errorf("connection timeout")
}

DO: Keep error messages low-cardinality

Error messages MUST be low-cardinality for APM aggregation. Interpolating variable data into the message breaks grouping in Datadog, Loki, Sentry.

// ✗ Bad — high-cardinality, breaks APM grouping
oops.Errorf("failed to process user %s in tenant %s", userID, tenantID)

// ✓ Good — static message + structured attributes
oops.With("user_id", userID).With("tenant_id", tenantID).Errorf("failed to process user")

Panic recovery

oops.Recover() MUST be used in goroutine boundaries. Convert panics to structured errors:

func ProcessData(data string) (err error) {
    return oops.
        In("data-processor").
        Code("panic_recovered").
        Hint("Check input data format and dependencies").
        With("input_data", data).
        Recover(func() {
            riskyOperation(data)
        })
}

Accessing error information

samber/oops errors implement the standard error interface. Access additional info:

if oopsErr, ok := err.(oops.OopsError); ok {
    fmt.Println("Code:", oopsErr.Code())
    fmt.Println("Domain:", oopsErr.Domain())
    fmt.Println("Tags:", oopsErr.Tags())
    fmt.Println("Context:", oopsErr.Context())
    fmt.Println("Stacktrace:", oopsErr.Stacktrace())
}

// Get public-facing message with fallback
publicMsg := oops.GetPublic(err, "Something went wrong")

Output formats

fmt.Printf("%+v\n", err)       // verbose with stack trace
bytes, _ := json.Marshal(err)  // JSON for logging
slog.Error(err.Error(), slog.Any("error", err))  // slog integration

Context propagation

Carry error context through Go contexts:

func middleware(next http.Handler) http.Handler {
    return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
        builder := oops.
            In("http").
            Request(r, false).
            Trace(r.Header.Get("X-Trace-ID"))

        ctx := oops.WithBuilder(r.Context(), builder)
        next.ServeHTTP(w, r.WithContext(ctx))
    })
}

func handler(ctx context.Context) error {
    return oops.FromContext(ctx).Tags("handler", "users").Errorf("something failed")
}

For assertions, configuration, and additional logger examples, see Advanced patterns.

References

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skill for general error handling patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for logger integration and structured logging

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-code-style" and other technical terms. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-code-style" appears in the source text? Actually, the source text does not contain the name "golang-code-style" explicitly. The name is given in the context: "Name to preserve: golang-code-style". But the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." Since it does not appear in the source text, we should not add it. However, the source text contains references like "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming" etc. Those should be preserved as is. We need to translate the description of the skill. The text describes conventions for Go code style. We'll translate into natural Japanese, keeping technical terms like "Go", "linter", "doc comments" etc. Also preserve the arrows and references. Let's break
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-testing" if it appears. The text is a description of a directory item type "agent skill". The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the provided <text>? Actually, looking at the text: it starts with "Production-ready Golang tests — ..." and later mentions "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify". The name "golang-testing" is not in the text. So we should not add it. We just translate the content. We need to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Golang", "testify", "goleak", "CI", "Go", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify" should remain as is. Also "table-driven tests", "testify suites and mocks", "parallel tests", "f
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given English text into Japanese, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text is a description of a skill for idiomatic Go error handling. We must not add any extra commentary, labels, or formatting. Just the translation. The text includes technical terms: "Idiomatic Golang error handling", "creation", "wrapping with %w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "custom error types", "sentinel errors", "panic/recover", "single handling rule", "structured logging with slog", "HTTP request logging middleware", "samber/oops for production errors", "log aggregation 3rd-party tools", "Go code", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". These should be preserved as is or translated appropriately. For example, "Idiomatic Golang error handling" can be translated as "慣用的なGoのエラーハンドリング". But we need to keep technical terms like "errors
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting