golang-samber-do

作成者: samber

Golangでsamber/doを使用した依存性注入 — サービスコンテナ、ライフサイクル管理、スコープ、ヘルスチェック、グレースフルシャットダウン、モジュール構成。samber/doを使用または採用する場合、コードベースがgithub.com/samber/doまたはgithub.com/samber/do/v2をインポートしている場合、または手動のコンストラクタインジェクションをDIコンテナにリファクタリングする場合に適用します。

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-samber-do

Persona: You are a Go architect setting up dependency injection. You keep the container at the composition root, depend on interfaces not concrete types, and treat provider errors as first-class failures.

Using samber/do for Dependency Injection in Go

Type-safe dependency injection toolkit for Go based on Go 1.18+ generics.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

DO NOT USE v1 OF THIS LIBRARY. INSTALL v2 INSTEAD:

go get -u github.com/samber/do/v2

Core Concepts

The Injector (Container)

import "github.com/samber/do/v2"

injector := do.New()

Service Types

  • Lazy (default): Created when first requested
  • Eager: Created immediately when the container starts
  • Transient: New instance created on every request
  • Value: Pre-created value, no instantiation

Provider Functions

Services MUST be registered via provider functions:

type Provider[T any] func(i Injector) (T, error)

Basic Usage

1. Define and Register Services

Follow "Accept Interfaces, Return Structs":

// Register a service (lazy by default)
do.Provide(injector, func(i do.Injector) (Database, error) {
    return &PostgreSQLDatabase{connString: "postgres://..."}, nil
})

// Register a pre-created value
do.ProvideValue(injector, &Config{Port: 8080})

// Register a transient service (new instance each time)
do.ProvideTransient(injector, func(i do.Injector) (*Logger, error) {
    return &Logger{}, nil
})

// Register an eager service (created immediately at startup)
do.ProvideValue(injector, &Config{Port: 8080})

2. Invoke Services

The container MUST only be accessed at the composition root:

// Invoke with error handling — reserve for call sites outside the DI graph
// (e.g. an HTTP handler that must degrade gracefully instead of crashing)
db, err := do.Invoke[Database](injector)

// MustInvoke panics on error — preferred in providers, recovered by do.Invoke on the parent call
db := do.MustInvoke[Database](injector)

Inside a provider function, always use do.MustInvoke (or MustInvokeAs/MustInvokeNamed/MustInvokeStruct) rather than the error-returning variant. A provider already returns (T, error), so propagating a dependency failure with do.Invoke costs an extra if err != nil { return nil, err } on every call. do.MustInvoke panics instead, but samber/do correctly catches and recovers that panic at the enclosing Invoke call and converts it back into a regular error — this recover happens inside the library itself, not in caller code, so MustInvoke is safe to use inside providers. The failure still surfaces as an error at the composition root, just without the manual boilerplate in every provider.

3. Service Dependencies

func NewUserService(i do.Injector) (UserService, error) {
    db := do.MustInvoke[Database](i)
    cache := do.MustInvoke[Cache](i)
    return &userService{db: db, cache: cache}, nil
}

do.Provide(injector, NewUserService)

4. Implicit Aliasing (Preferred)

Register a concrete type and invoke as an interface without explicit aliasing:

// Register concrete type
do.Provide(injector, func(i do.Injector) (*PostgreSQLDatabase, error) {
    return &PostgreSQLDatabase{}, nil
})

// Invoke directly as interface (implicit aliasing)
db := do.MustInvokeAs[Database](injector)

5. Named Services

Register multiple services of the same type:

do.ProvideNamed(injector, "primary-db", func(i do.Injector) (*Database, error) {
    return &Database{URL: "postgres://primary..."}, nil
})

mainDB := do.MustInvokeNamed[*Database](injector, "primary-db")

Package Organization

Use do.Package() to organize service registration by module:

// infrastructure/package.go
var Package = do.Package(
    do.Lazy(func(i do.Injector) (*postgres.DB, error) {
        cfg := do.MustInvoke[*Config](i)
        return postgres.Connect(cfg.DatabaseURL)
    }),
    do.Lazy(func(i do.Injector) (*redis.Client, error) {
        cfg := do.MustInvoke[*Config](i)
        return redis.NewClient(cfg.RedisURL), nil
    }),
)

// main.go
injector := do.New(infrastructure.Package, service.Package)

Full Application Setup

func main() {
    injector := do.New(
        infrastructure.Package,
        repository.Package,
        service.Package,
        transport.Package,
    )

    server := do.MustInvoke[*http.Server](injector)
    go server.ListenAndServe()

    _ = injector.ShutdownOnSignalsWithContext(context.Background(), os.Interrupt)
}

Best Practices

  1. Depend on interfaces, not concrete types — lets you swap implementations in tests without touching production code
  2. Each service should have one job — services with multiple responsibilities are harder to test and harder to replace
  3. Keep dependency trees shallow — chains beyond 3-4 levels make initialization order fragile and errors harder to trace
  4. Handle errors in provider functions — a silently failing provider creates a broken service that crashes later in unexpected places
  5. Use scopes to organize services by lifecycle — request-scoped services prevent leaks, global services prevent redundant initialization
  6. Use do.MustInvoke* inside provider functions instead of do.Invoke* — samber/do correctly catches and recovers the panic at the outer Invoke call, turning it back into a returned error, so it's safe to use inside providers and you get the same error propagation without the boilerplate

For scopes, lifecycle management, struct injection, and debugging, see Advanced Usage.

For testing patterns (cloning, overrides, mocks), see Testing.

Quick Reference

Registration

FunctionPurpose
do.Provide[T]()Register lazy service (default)
do.ProvideNamed[T]()Register named lazy service
do.ProvideValue[T]()Register pre-created value
do.ProvideNamedValue[T]()Register named value
do.ProvideTransient[T]()Register new instance each time
do.ProvideNamedTransient[T]()Register named transient service
do.Package()Group service registrations

Invocation

FunctionPurpose
do.Invoke[T]()Get service (with error)
do.InvokeNamed[T]()Get named service
do.InvokeAs[T]()Get first service matching interface
do.InvokeStruct[T]()Inject into struct fields using tags
do.MustInvoke[T]()Get service (panic on error)
do.MustInvokeNamed[T]()Get named service (panic on error)
do.MustInvokeAs[T]()Get service by interface (panic on error)
do.MustInvokeStruct[T]()Inject into struct (panic on error)

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection skill for DI concepts, comparison, and when to adopt a DI library
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill for interface design patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general testing patterns

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-code-style" and other technical terms. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-code-style" appears in the source text? Actually, the source text does not contain the name "golang-code-style" explicitly. The name is given in the context: "Name to preserve: golang-code-style". But the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." Since it does not appear in the source text, we should not add it. However, the source text contains references like "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming" etc. Those should be preserved as is. We need to translate the description of the skill. The text describes conventions for Go code style. We'll translate into natural Japanese, keeping technical terms like "Go", "linter", "doc comments" etc. Also preserve the arrows and references. Let's break
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-testing" if it appears. The text is a description of a directory item type "agent skill". The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the provided <text>? Actually, looking at the text: it starts with "Production-ready Golang tests — ..." and later mentions "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify". The name "golang-testing" is not in the text. So we should not add it. We just translate the content. We need to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Golang", "testify", "goleak", "CI", "Go", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify" should remain as is. Also "table-driven tests", "testify suites and mocks", "parallel tests", "f
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given English text into Japanese, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text is a description of a skill for idiomatic Go error handling. We must not add any extra commentary, labels, or formatting. Just the translation. The text includes technical terms: "Idiomatic Golang error handling", "creation", "wrapping with %w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "custom error types", "sentinel errors", "panic/recover", "single handling rule", "structured logging with slog", "HTTP request logging middleware", "samber/oops for production errors", "log aggregation 3rd-party tools", "Go code", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". These should be preserved as is or translated appropriately. For example, "Idiomatic Golang error handling" can be translated as "慣用的なGoのエラーハンドリング". But we need to keep technical terms like "errors
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting