golang-observability

作成者: samber

Go言語の日常的な可観測性 — 本番環境で常時オンとなるシグナル。slogによる構造化ログ、Prometheusメトリクス、OpenTelemetry分散トレーシング、pprof/Pyroscopeによる継続的プロファイリング、サーバーサイドRUMイベント追跡、アラート、Grafanaダッシュボードをカバー。Goサービスを本番監視用に計装する際、メトリクスやアラートを設定する際、OpenTelemetryトレーシングを追加する際、ログとトレースを関連付ける際、レガシーロガー(zap/logrus/zerolog)をslogに移行する際、追加する際に適用。

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-observability

Persona: You are a Go observability engineer. You treat every unobserved production system as a liability — instrument proactively, correlate signals to diagnose, and never consider a feature done until it is observable.

Orchestration mode: Use ultracode for auditing observability coverage across a codebase — orchestrate the five signal-specific sub-agents described in Audit mode (metrics, logging, tracing, profiling, RUM) and merge their coverage findings.

Modes:

  • Coding / instrumentation (default): Add observability to new or existing code — declare metrics, add spans, set up structured logging, wire pprof toggles. Follow the sequential instrumentation guide.
  • Review mode — reviewing a PR's instrumentation changes. Check that new code exports the expected signals (metrics declared, spans opened and closed, structured log fields consistent). Sequential.
  • Audit mode — auditing existing observability coverage across a codebase. Launch up to 5 parallel sub-agents — one per signal (metrics, logging, tracing, profiling, RUM) — to check coverage simultaneously.

Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill takes precedence.

Go Observability Best Practices

Observability is the ability to understand a system's internal state from its external outputs. In Go services, this means five complementary signals: logs, metrics, traces, profiles, and RUM. Each answers different questions, and together they give you full visibility into both system behavior and user experience.

When using observability libraries (Prometheus client, OpenTelemetry SDK, vendor integrations), refer to the library's official documentation and code examples for current API signatures.

Best Practices Summary

  1. Use structured logging with log/slog — production services MUST emit structured logs (JSON), not freeform strings
  2. Choose the right log level — Debug for development, Info for normal operations, Warn for degraded states, Error for failures requiring attention
  3. Log with context — use slog.InfoContext(ctx, ...) to correlate logs with traces
  4. Prefer Histogram over Summary for latency metrics — Histograms support server-side aggregation and percentile queries. Every HTTP endpoint MUST have latency and error rate metrics.
  5. Keep label cardinality low in Prometheus — NEVER use unbounded values (user IDs, full URLs) as label values
  6. Track percentiles (P50, P90, P99, P99.9) using Histograms + histogram_quantile() in PromQL
  7. Set up OpenTelemetry tracing on new projects — configure the TracerProvider early, then add spans everywhere
  8. Add spans to every meaningful operation — service methods, DB queries, external API calls, message queue operations
  9. Propagate context everywhere — context is the vehicle that carries trace_id, span_id, and deadlines across service boundaries
  10. Enable profiling via environment variables — toggle pprof and continuous profiling on/off without redeploying
  11. Correlate signals — inject trace_id into logs, use exemplars to link metrics to traces
  12. A feature is not done until it is observable — declare metrics, add proper logging, create spans
  13. awesome-prometheus-alerts provides ~500 ready-to-use alerting rules organized by technology for infrastructure and dependency monitoring

Cross-References

See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skill for the single handling rule. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting skill for using observability signals to diagnose production issues. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security skill for protecting pprof endpoints and avoiding PII in logs. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-context skill for propagating trace context across service boundaries. See samber/cc-skills@promql-cli skill for querying and exploring PromQL expressions against Prometheus from the CLI.

Go 1.26+: slog multi-handler

For simple fan-out to multiple slog handlers, prefer stdlib slog.NewMultiHandler before adding third-party handler-composition dependencies.

logger := slog.New(slog.NewMultiHandler(
    slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, nil),
    auditHandler,
))

Use third-party slog handler libraries only when the stdlib handler composition is insufficient.

The Five Signals

SignalQuestion it answersToolWhen to use
LogsWhat happened?log/slogDiscrete events, errors, audit trails
MetricsHow much / how fast?Prometheus clientAggregated measurements, alerting, SLOs
TracesWhere did time go?OpenTelemetryRequest flow across services, latency breakdown
ProfilesWhy is it slow / using memory?pprof, PyroscopeCPU hotspots, memory leaks, lock contention
RUMHow do users experience it?PostHog, SegmentProduct analytics, funnels, session replay

Detailed Guides

Each signal has a dedicated guide with full code examples, configuration patterns, and cost analysis:

  • Structured Logging — Why structured logging matters for log aggregation at scale. Covers log/slog setup, log levels (Debug/Info/Warn/Error) and when to use each, request correlation with trace IDs, context propagation with slog.InfoContext, request-scoped attributes, the slog ecosystem (handlers, formatters, middleware), and migration strategies from zap/logrus/zerolog.

  • Metrics Collection — Prometheus client setup and the four metric types (Counter for rate-of-change, Gauge for snapshots, Histogram for latency aggregation). Deep dive: why Histograms beat Summaries (server-side aggregation, supports histogram_quantile PromQL), naming conventions, the PromQL-as-comments convention (write queries above metric declarations for discoverability), production-grade PromQL examples, multi-window SLO burn rate alerting, and the high-cardinality label problem (why unbounded values like user IDs destroy performance).

  • Distributed Tracing — When and how to use OpenTelemetry SDK to trace request flows across services. Covers spans (creating, attributes, status recording), otelhttp middleware for HTTP instrumentation, error recording with span.RecordError(), trace sampling (why you can't collect everything at scale), propagating trace context across service boundaries, and cost optimization.

  • Profiling — On-demand profiling with pprof (CPU, heap, goroutine, mutex, block profiles) — how to enable it in production, secure it with auth, and toggle via environment variables without redeploying. Continuous profiling with Pyroscope for always-on performance visibility. Cost implications of each profiling type and mitigation strategies.

  • Real User Monitoring — Understanding how users actually experience your service. Covers product analytics (event tracking, funnels), Customer Data Platform integration, and critical compliance: GDPR/CCPA consent checks, data subject rights (user deletion endpoints), and privacy checklist for tracking. Server-side event tracking (PostHog, Segment) and identity key best practices.

  • Alerting — Proactive problem detection. Covers the four golden signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation), awesome-prometheus-alerts provides ~500 ready-to-use rules by technology, Go runtime alerts (goroutine leaks, GC pressure, OOM risk), severity levels, and common mistakes that break alerting (using irate instead of rate, missing for: duration to avoid flapping).

  • Grafana Dashboards — Prebuilt dashboards for Go runtime monitoring (heap allocation, GC pause frequency, goroutine count, CPU). Explains the standard dashboards to install, how to customize them for your service, and when each dashboard answers a different operational question.

Correlating Signals

Signals are most powerful when connected. A trace_id in your logs lets you jump from a log line to the full request trace. An exemplar on a metric links a latency spike to the exact trace that caused it.

Logs + Traces: otelslog bridge

import "go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/bridges/otelslog"

// Create a logger that automatically injects trace_id and span_id
logger := otelslog.NewHandler("my-service")
slog.SetDefault(slog.New(logger))

// Now every slog call with context includes trace correlation
slog.InfoContext(ctx, "order created", "order_id", orderID)
// Output includes: {"trace_id":"abc123", "span_id":"def456", "msg":"order created", ...}

Metrics + Traces: Exemplars

// When recording a histogram observation, attach the trace_id as an exemplar
// so you can jump from a P99 spike directly to the offending trace
obs := histogram.WithLabelValues("POST", "/orders")
if eo, ok := obs.(prometheus.ExemplarObserver); ok {
    eo.ObserveWithExemplar(duration, prometheus.Labels{"trace_id": traceID})
} else {
    obs.Observe(duration)
}

Migrating Legacy Loggers

If the project currently uses zap, logrus, or zerolog, migrate to log/slog. It is the standard library logger since Go 1.21, has a stable API, and the ecosystem has consolidated around it. Continuing with third-party loggers means maintaining an extra dependency for no benefit.

Migration strategy:

  1. Add slog as the new logger with slog.SetDefault()
  2. Bridge handlers during migration route slog output through the existing logger: samber/slog-zap, samber/slog-logrus, samber/slog-zerolog
  3. Gradually replace all zap.L().Info(...) / logrus.Info(...) / log.Info().Msg(...) calls with slog.Info(...)
  4. Once fully migrated, remove the bridge handler and the old logger dependency

Definition of Done for Observability

A feature is not production-ready until it is observable. Before marking a feature as done, verify:

  • Metrics declared — counters for operations/errors, histograms for latencies, gauges for saturation. Each metric var has PromQL queries and alert rules as comments above its declaration.
  • Logging is proper — structured key-value pairs with slog, context variants used (slog.InfoContext), no PII in logs, errors MUST be either logged OR returned (NEVER both).
  • Spans created — every service method, DB query, and external API call has a span with relevant attributes, errors recorded with span.RecordError().
  • Dashboards and alerts exist — the PromQL from your metric comments is wired into Grafana dashboards and Prometheus alerting rules. Ready-to-use alert rules for common infrastructure dependencies are available at awesome-prometheus-alerts.
  • RUM events tracked — key business events tracked server-side (PostHog/Segment), identity key is user_id (not email), consent checked before tracking.

Common Mistakes

// ✗ Bad — log AND return (error gets logged multiple times up the chain)
if err != nil {
    slog.Error("query failed", "error", err)
    return fmt.Errorf("query: %w", err)
}

// ✓ Good — return with context, log once at the top level
if err != nil {
    return fmt.Errorf("querying users: %w", err)
}
// ✗ Bad — high-cardinality label (unbounded user IDs)
httpRequests.WithLabelValues(r.Method, r.URL.Path, userID).Inc()

// ✓ Good — bounded label values only
httpRequests.WithLabelValues(r.Method, routePattern).Inc()
// ✗ Bad — not passing context (breaks trace propagation)
result, err := db.Query("SELECT ...")

// ✓ Good — context flows through, trace continues
result, err := db.QueryContext(ctx, "SELECT ...")
// ✗ Bad — using Summary for latency (can't aggregate across instances)
prometheus.NewSummary(prometheus.SummaryOpts{
    Name:       "http_request_duration_seconds",
    Objectives: map[float64]float64{0.99: 0.001},
})

// ✓ Good — use Histogram (aggregatable, supports histogram_quantile)
prometheus.NewHistogram(prometheus.HistogramOpts{
    Name:    "http_request_duration_seconds",
    Buckets: prometheus.DefBuckets,
})

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-code-style" and other technical terms. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-code-style" appears in the source text? Actually, the source text does not contain the name "golang-code-style" explicitly. The name is given in the context: "Name to preserve: golang-code-style". But the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." Since it does not appear in the source text, we should not add it. However, the source text contains references like "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming" etc. Those should be preserved as is. We need to translate the description of the skill. The text describes conventions for Go code style. We'll translate into natural Japanese, keeping technical terms like "Go", "linter", "doc comments" etc. Also preserve the arrows and references. Let's break
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-testing" if it appears. The text is a description of a directory item type "agent skill". The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the provided <text>? Actually, looking at the text: it starts with "Production-ready Golang tests — ..." and later mentions "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify". The name "golang-testing" is not in the text. So we should not add it. We just translate the content. We need to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Golang", "testify", "goleak", "CI", "Go", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify" should remain as is. Also "table-driven tests", "testify suites and mocks", "parallel tests", "f
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given English text into Japanese, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text is a description of a skill for idiomatic Go error handling. We must not add any extra commentary, labels, or formatting. Just the translation. The text includes technical terms: "Idiomatic Golang error handling", "creation", "wrapping with %w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "custom error types", "sentinel errors", "panic/recover", "single handling rule", "structured logging with slog", "HTTP request logging middleware", "samber/oops for production errors", "log aggregation 3rd-party tools", "Go code", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". These should be preserved as is or translated appropriately. For example, "Idiomatic Golang error handling" can be translated as "慣用的なGoのエラーハンドリング". But we need to keep technical terms like "errors
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting