golang-grpc

作成者: samber

Golangマイクロサービス向けのgRPC利用ガイドライン、protobuf構成、および本番対応パターンを提供します。gRPCサーバー/クライアントの実装、レビュー、デバッグ時、protoファイルの作成、インターセプターの設定、ステータスコードを用いたgRPCエラー処理、TLS/mTLSの構成、bufconnを用いたテスト、ストリーミングRPCの操作時に使用します。

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-grpc

Persona: You are a Go distributed systems engineer. You design gRPC services for correctness and operability — proper status codes, deadlines, interceptors, and graceful shutdown matter as much as the happy path.

Modes:

  • Build mode — implementing a new gRPC server or client from scratch.
  • Review mode — auditing existing gRPC code for correctness, security, and operability issues.

Dependencies:

  • protoc: brew install protobuf
  • protoc-gen-go: go install google.golang.org/protobuf/cmd/protoc-gen-go@latest
  • protoc-gen-go-grpc: go install google.golang.org/grpc/cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc@latest

Go gRPC Best Practices

Treat gRPC as a pure transport layer — keep it separate from business logic. The official Go implementation is google.golang.org/grpc.

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

Quick Reference

ConcernPackage / Tool
Service definitionprotoc or buf with .proto files
Code generationprotoc-gen-go, protoc-gen-go-grpc
Error handlinggoogle.golang.org/grpc/status with codes
Rich error detailsgoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc/errdetails
Interceptorsgrpc.ChainUnaryInterceptor, grpc.ChainStreamInterceptor
Middleware ecosystemgithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware
Testinggoogle.golang.org/grpc/test/bufconn
TLS / mTLSgoogle.golang.org/grpc/credentials
Health checksgoogle.golang.org/grpc/health

Proto File Organization

Organize by domain with versioned directories (proto/user/v1/). Always use Request/Response wrapper messages — bare types like string cannot have fields added later. Generate with buf generate or protoc.

Proto & code generation reference

Server Implementation

  • Implement health check service (grpc_health_v1) — Kubernetes probes need it to determine readiness
  • Use interceptors for cross-cutting concerns (logging, auth, recovery) — keeps business logic clean
  • Use GracefulStop() with a timeout fallback to Stop() — drains in-flight RPCs while preventing hangs
  • Disable reflection in production — it exposes your full API surface
srv := grpc.NewServer(
    grpc.ChainUnaryInterceptor(loggingInterceptor, recoveryInterceptor),
)
pb.RegisterUserServiceServer(srv, svc)
healthpb.RegisterHealthServer(srv, health.NewServer())

go srv.Serve(lis)

// On shutdown signal:
stopped := make(chan struct{})
go func() { srv.GracefulStop(); close(stopped) }()
select {
case <-stopped:
case <-time.After(15 * time.Second):
    srv.Stop()
}

Interceptor Pattern

func loggingInterceptor(ctx context.Context, req any, info *grpc.UnaryServerInfo, handler grpc.UnaryHandler) (any, error) {
    start := time.Now()
    resp, err := handler(ctx, req)
    log.Printf("method=%s duration=%s code=%s", info.FullMethod, time.Since(start), status.Code(err))
    return resp, err
}

Client Implementation

  • Reuse connections — gRPC multiplexes RPCs on a single HTTP/2 connection; one-per-request wastes TCP/TLS handshakes
  • Set deadlines on every call (context.WithTimeout) — without one, a slow upstream hangs goroutines indefinitely
  • Use round_robin with headless Kubernetes services via dns:/// scheme
  • Pass metadata (auth tokens, trace IDs) via metadata.NewOutgoingContext
conn, err := grpc.NewClient("dns:///user-service:50051",
    grpc.WithTransportCredentials(creds),
    grpc.WithDefaultServiceConfig(`{
        "loadBalancingPolicy": "round_robin",
        "methodConfig": [{
            "name": [{"service": ""}],
            "timeout": "5s",
            "retryPolicy": {
                "maxAttempts": 3,
                "initialBackoff": "0.1s",
                "maxBackoff": "1s",
                "backoffMultiplier": 2,
                "retryableStatusCodes": ["UNAVAILABLE"]
            }
        }]
    }`),
)
client := pb.NewUserServiceClient(conn)

Error Handling

Always return gRPC errors using status.Error with a specific code — a raw error becomes codes.Unknown, telling the client nothing actionable. Clients use codes to decide retry vs fail-fast vs degrade.

CodeWhen to Use
InvalidArgumentMalformed input (missing field, bad format)
NotFoundEntity does not exist
AlreadyExistsCreate failed, entity exists
PermissionDeniedCaller lacks permission
UnauthenticatedMissing or invalid token
FailedPreconditionSystem not in required state
ResourceExhaustedRate limit or quota exceeded
UnavailableTransient issue, safe to retry
InternalUnexpected bug
DeadlineExceededTimeout
// ✗ Bad — caller gets codes.Unknown, can't decide whether to retry
return nil, fmt.Errorf("user not found")

// ✓ Good — specific code lets clients act appropriately
if errors.Is(err, ErrNotFound) {
    return nil, status.Errorf(codes.NotFound, "user %q not found", req.UserId)
}
return nil, status.Errorf(codes.Internal, "lookup failed: %v", err)

For field-level validation errors, attach errdetails.BadRequest via status.WithDetails.

Streaming

PatternUse Case
Server streamingServer sends a sequence (log tailing, result sets)
Client streamingClient sends a sequence, server responds once (file upload, batch)
BidirectionalBoth send independently (chat, real-time sync)

Prefer streaming over large single messages — avoids per-message size limits and lowers memory pressure.

func (s *server) ListUsers(req *pb.ListUsersRequest, stream pb.UserService_ListUsersServer) error {
    for _, u := range users {
        if err := stream.Send(u); err != nil {
            return err
        }
    }
    return nil
}

Testing

Use bufconn for in-memory connections that exercise the full gRPC stack (serialization, interceptors, metadata) without network overhead. Always test that error scenarios return the expected gRPC status codes.

Testing patterns and examples

Security

  • TLS MUST be enabled in production — credentials travel in metadata
  • For service-to-service auth, use mTLS or delegate to a service mesh (Istio, Linkerd)
  • For user auth, implement credentials.PerRPCCredentials and validate tokens in an auth interceptor
  • Reflection SHOULD be disabled in production to prevent API discovery

Performance

SettingPurposeTypical Value
keepalive.ServerParameters.TimePing interval for idle connections30s
keepalive.ServerParameters.TimeoutPing ack timeout10s
grpc.MaxRecvMsgSizeOverride 4 MB default for large payloads16 MB
Connection poolingMultiple conns for high-load streaming4 connections

Most services do not need connection pooling — profile before adding complexity.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Returning raw errorBecomes codes.Unknown — client can't decide whether to retry. Use status.Errorf with a specific code
No deadline on client callsSlow upstream hangs indefinitely. Always context.WithTimeout
New connection per requestWastes TCP/TLS handshakes. Create once, reuse — HTTP/2 multiplexes RPCs
Reflection enabled in productionLets attackers enumerate every method. Enable only in dev/staging
codes.Internal for all errorsWrong codes break client retry logic. Unavailable triggers retry; InvalidArgument does not
Bare types as RPC argumentsCan't add fields to string. Wrapper messages allow backwards-compatible evolution
Missing health check serviceKubernetes can't determine readiness, kills pods during deployments
Ignoring context cancellationLong operations continue after caller gave up. Check ctx.Err()

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-context skill for deadline and cancellation patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skill for gRPC error to Go error mapping
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for gRPC interceptors (logging, tracing, metrics)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for gRPC testing with bufconn

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-code-style" and other technical terms. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-code-style" appears in the source text? Actually, the source text does not contain the name "golang-code-style" explicitly. The name is given in the context: "Name to preserve: golang-code-style". But the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." Since it does not appear in the source text, we should not add it. However, the source text contains references like "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming" etc. Those should be preserved as is. We need to translate the description of the skill. The text describes conventions for Go code style. We'll translate into natural Japanese, keeping technical terms like "Go", "linter", "doc comments" etc. Also preserve the arrows and references. Let's break
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Japanese, preserving the name "golang-testing" if it appears. The text is a description of a directory item type "agent skill". The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the provided <text>? Actually, looking at the text: it starts with "Production-ready Golang tests — ..." and later mentions "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify". The name "golang-testing" is not in the text. So we should not add it. We just translate the content. We need to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Golang", "testify", "goleak", "CI", "Go", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify" should remain as is. Also "table-driven tests", "testify suites and mocks", "parallel tests", "f
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given English text into Japanese, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text is a description of a skill for idiomatic Go error handling. We must not add any extra commentary, labels, or formatting. Just the translation. The text includes technical terms: "Idiomatic Golang error handling", "creation", "wrapping with %w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "custom error types", "sentinel errors", "panic/recover", "single handling rule", "structured logging with slog", "HTTP request logging middleware", "samber/oops for production errors", "log aggregation 3rd-party tools", "Go code", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". These should be preserved as is or translated appropriately. For example, "Idiomatic Golang error handling" can be translated as "慣用的なGoのエラーハンドリング". But we need to keep technical terms like "errors
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting