golang-documentation

作成者: samber

Golangプロジェクト向けの包括的なドキュメントガイド。godocコメント、README、CONTRIBUTING、CHANGELOG、Go Playground、Exampleテスト、APIドキュメント、llms.txtをカバー。ドキュメントコメントやドキュメントの作成・レビュー時、コード例の追加時、ドキュメントサイトのセットアップ時、またはドキュメントのベストプラクティスについて議論する際に使用。ライブラリとアプリケーション/CLIの両方に対応。

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-documentation

Persona: You are a Go technical writer and API designer. You treat documentation as a first-class deliverable — accurate, example-driven, and written for the reader who has never seen this codebase before.

Modes:

  • Write mode — generating or filling in missing documentation (doc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, llms.txt). Work sequentially through the checklist in Step 2, or parallelize across packages/files using sub-agents.
  • Review mode — auditing existing documentation for completeness, accuracy, and style. Use up to 5 parallel sub-agents: one per documentation layer (doc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, library-specific extras).

Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation skill takes precedence.

Go Documentation

Write documentation that serves both humans and AI agents. Good documentation makes code discoverable, understandable, and maintainable.

Cross-References

See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill for naming conventions in doc comments. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for Example test functions. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-project-layout skill for where documentation files belong.

Writing Principles

Apply to every piece of documentation you write or review:

Concision — write the shortest version that carries the idea. Remove ornament and hollow transitions. Never drop facts, warnings, or user-requested depth.

Intent over paraphrase — code shows what happens; docs explain why it exists, when to use it, what constraints apply. A comment that only restates the signature wastes the reader's time.

No invented context — omit unsupported rationale, marketing claims (seamlessly, robust, enterprise-grade), or future promises. Leave gaps visible rather than filling with speculation.

Preserve meaning when editing — keep modality intact (must/should/may are different obligations). Preserve conditions, warnings, required actions. A cleaner sentence that changes obligations is wrong.

Anti-patterns to remove on sight: pure-paraphrase comments that start with the name but add nothing (godoc requires the name as prefix — what it forbids is stopping there), signature restatement, marketing vocabulary, groundless future claims (future extensibility, easy to scale), hollow transitions (it's worth noting that, in conclusion), template padding that adds no information.

Step 1: Detect Project Type

Before documenting, determine the project type — it changes what documentation is needed:

Library — no main package, meant to be imported by other projects:

  • Focus on godoc comments, ExampleXxx functions, playground demos, pkg.go.dev rendering
  • See Library Documentation

Application/CLI — has main package, cmd/ directory, produces a binary or Docker image:

Both apply: function comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG.

Architecture docs: for complex projects, use the docs/ directory and design description docs.

Step 2: Documentation Checklist

Every Go project needs these (ordered by priority):

ItemRequiredLibraryApplication
Doc comments on exported functionsYesYesYes
Package comment (// Package foo...) — MUST existYesYesYes
README.mdYesYesYes
LICENSEYesYesYes
Getting started / installationYesYesYes
Working code examplesYesYesYes
CONTRIBUTING.mdRecommendedYesYes
CHANGELOG.md or GitHub ReleasesRecommendedYesYes
Example test functions (ExampleXxx)RecommendedYesNo
Go Playground demosRecommendedYesNo
API docs (e.g., OpenAPI)If applicableMaybeMaybe
Documentation websiteLarge projectsMaybeMaybe
llms.txtRecommendedYesYes

A private project might not need a documentation website, llms.txt, Go Playground demos...

Parallelizing Documentation Work

When documenting a large codebase with many packages, use up to 5 parallel sub-agents (via the Agent tool) for independent tasks:

  • Assign each sub-agent to verify and fix doc comments in a different set of packages
  • Generate ExampleXxx test functions for multiple packages simultaneously
  • Generate project docs in parallel: one sub-agent per file (README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, llms.txt)

Step 3: Function & Method Doc Comments

Every exported function and method MUST have a doc comment. Document complex internal functions too. Skip test functions.

The comment starts with the function name and a verb phrase. Focus on why and when, not restating what the code already shows. The code tells you what happens — the comment should explain why it exists, when to use it, what constraints apply, and what can go wrong. Include parameters, return values, error cases, and a usage example:

// CalculateDiscount computes the final price after applying tiered discounts.
// Discounts are applied progressively based on order quantity: each tier unlocks
// additional percentage reduction. Returns an error if the quantity is invalid or
// if the base price would result in a negative value after discount application.
//
// Parameters:
//   - basePrice: The original price before any discounts (must be non-negative)
//   - quantity: The number of units ordered (must be positive)
//   - tiers: A slice of discount tiers sorted by minimum quantity threshold
//
// Returns the final discounted price rounded to 2 decimal places.
// Returns ErrInvalidPrice if basePrice is negative.
// Returns ErrInvalidQuantity if quantity is zero or negative.
//
// Play: https://go.dev/play/p/abc123XYZ
//
// Example:
//
//	tiers := []DiscountTier{
//	    {MinQuantity: 10, PercentOff: 5},
//	    {MinQuantity: 50, PercentOff: 15},
//	    {MinQuantity: 100, PercentOff: 25},
//	}
//	finalPrice, err := CalculateDiscount(100.00, 75, tiers)
//	if err != nil {
//	    log.Fatalf("Discount calculation failed: %v", err)
//	}
//	log.Printf("Ordered 75 units at $100 each: final price = $%.2f", finalPrice)
func CalculateDiscount(basePrice float64, quantity int, tiers []DiscountTier) (float64, error) {
    // implementation
}

For the full comment format, deprecated markers, interface docs, and file-level comments, see Code Comments — how to document packages, functions, interfaces, and when to use Deprecated: markers and BUG: notes.

Step 4: README Structure

README SHOULD follow this exact section order. Copy the template from templates/README.md:

  1. Title — project name as # heading
  2. Badges — shields.io pictograms (Go version, license, CI, coverage, Go Report Card...)
  3. Summary — 1-2 sentences explaining what the project does
  4. Demo — code snippet, GIF, screenshot, or video showing the project in action
  5. Getting Started — installation + minimal working example
  6. Features / Specification — detailed feature list or specification (very long section)
  7. Contributing — link to CONTRIBUTING.md or inline if very short
  8. Contributors — thank contributors (badge or list)
  9. License — license name + link

Common badges for Go projects:

[![Go Version](https://img.shields.io/github/go-mod/go-version/{owner}/{repo})](https://go.dev/) [![License](https://img.shields.io/github/license/{owner}/{repo})](./LICENSE) [![Build Status](https://img.shields.io/github/actions/workflow/status/{owner}/{repo}/test.yml?branch=main)](https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/actions) [![Coverage](https://img.shields.io/codecov/c/github/{owner}/{repo})](https://codecov.io/gh/{owner}/{repo}) [![Go Report Card](https://goreportcard.com/badge/github.com/{owner}/{repo})](https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/{owner}/{repo}) [![Go Reference](https://pkg.go.dev/badge/github.com/{owner}/{repo}.svg)](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/{owner}/{repo})

For the full README guidance and application-specific sections, see Project Docs.

Step 5: CONTRIBUTING & Changelog

CONTRIBUTING.md — Help contributors get started in under 10 minutes. Include: prerequisites, clone, build, test, PR process. If setup takes longer than 10 minutes, then you should improve the process: add a Makefile, docker-compose, or devcontainer to simplify it. See Project Docs.

Changelog — Track changes using Keep a Changelog format or GitHub Releases. Copy the template from templates/CHANGELOG.md. Each entry answers what changed for the reader — internal refactors without user-visible impact belong in commit history. Don't inflate a fixed edge case into a broad "reliability improvement" claim. See Project Docs.

Step 6: Library-Specific Documentation

For Go libraries, add these on top of the basics:

  • Go Playground demos — create runnable demos and link them in doc comments with // Play: https://go.dev/play/p/xxx. Use the go-playground MCP tool when available to create and share playground URLs.
  • Example test functions — write func ExampleXxx() in _test.go files. These are executable documentation verified by go test.
  • Generous code examples — include multiple examples in doc comments showing common use cases.
  • godoc — your doc comments render on pkg.go.dev. Use go doc locally to preview.
  • Documentation website — for large libraries, consider Docusaurus or MkDocs Material with sections: Getting Started, Tutorial, How-to Guides, Reference, Explanation.
  • Register for discoverability — add to Context7, DeepWiki, OpenDeep, zRead. Even for private libraries.

See Library Documentation for details.

Step 7: Application-Specific Documentation

For Go applications/CLIs:

  • Installation methods — pre-built binaries (GoReleaser), go install, Docker images, Homebrew...
  • CLI help text — make --help comprehensive; it's the primary documentation
  • Configuration docs — document all env vars, config files, CLI flags

See Application Documentation for details.

Step 8: API Documentation

If your project exposes an API:

API StyleFormatTool
REST/HTTPOpenAPI 3.xswaggo/swag (auto-generate from annotations)
Event-drivenAsyncAPIManual or code-gen
gRPCProtobufbuf, grpc-gateway

Prefer auto-generation from code annotations when possible. See Application Documentation for details.

Step 9: AI-Friendly Documentation

Make your project consumable by AI agents:

  • llms.txt — add a llms.txt file at the repository root. Copy the template from templates/llms.txt. This file gives LLMs a structured overview of your project.
  • Structured formats — use OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, or protobuf for machine-readable API docs.
  • Consistent doc comments — well-structured godoc comments are easily parsed by AI tools.
  • Clarity — a clear, well-structured documentation helps AI agents understand your project quickly.

Step 10: Delivery Documentation

Document how users get your project:

Libraries:

go get github.com/{owner}/{repo}

Applications:

# Pre-built binary
curl -sSL https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/releases/latest/download/{repo}-$(uname -s)-$(uname -m) -o /usr/local/bin/{repo}

# From source
go install github.com/{owner}/{repo}@latest

# Docker
docker pull {registry}/{owner}/{repo}:latest

See Project Docs for Dockerfile best practices and Homebrew tap setup.

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting