conventional-git

作成者: samber

Conventional Commits v1.0.0に基づくブランチ命名、ワークツリー命名、およびGitHub・GitLabプロジェクト向けのコミットメッセージ標準。ブランチ作成、ワークツリー命名、コミット作成、コミットメッセージ生成、ブランチ規約のレビュー、またはチェンジログ自動化の設定時に使用します。一貫性のあるGit履歴、SemVer駆動のリリース、解析可能なチェンジログ生成、または自動Issueクローズが必要なプロジェクトに適用します。ユーザーがワークツリーの命名方法、git worktreeの作成方法などを尋ねたときに起動します。

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills --skill conventional-git

Conventional Commits & Branch Naming

Follow Conventional Commits v1.0.0 for both branch names and commit messages — consistent naming lets tools auto-generate changelogs, enforce SemVer bumps, and filter history by concern.

Branch Naming

Format: <type>/[issue-]<description> — lowercase, hyphens only, no special chars except /.

feat/user-authentication
feat/42-user-authentication
fix/login-race-condition
fix/87-login-race-condition
docs/api-reference-update
refactor/payment-module

Prefix with the issue number when one exists — GitHub and GitLab auto-link it and it makes git log immediately traceable to the tracker. Keep the description under 50 characters — most git UIs truncate branch names in lists around that length. Match the type to the work you're doing — this is the contract readers use to understand the branch purpose at a glance.

NEVER include worktree in a branch name — git worktrees are a local checkout mechanism, not a branch concept; the name would leak implementation details into the remote and confuse other contributors.

Worktree Naming

Worktrees are local checkout directories — they never appear in the remote. Place them under .claude/worktrees/ and name them by replacing the branch / separator with -.

git worktree add .claude/worktrees/feat-user-authentication feat/user-authentication
git worktree add .claude/worktrees/fix-87-login-race-condition fix/87-login-race-condition

The directory name mirrors the branch name so git worktree list stays readable and each worktree is immediately traceable to its branch without inspecting the checkout. Run git worktree list before creating a new one — reuse an existing worktree if it already covers the same branch.

Keep worktrees scoped to a single branch. Doing unrelated work inside someone else's worktree obscures which changes belong where and makes cleanup error-prone.

Remove the worktree once its branch is merged — either after a local merge or after the pull/merge request is closed on the remote. Stale worktrees accumulate and make git worktree list unreadable.

git worktree remove .claude/worktrees/feat-user-authentication   # branch merged locally
git worktree prune                                                # remove refs to already-deleted directories

Commit Message Format

<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]

Types:

TypeSemVerWhen
featMINORNew feature
fixPATCHBug fix
docsDocs only
styleFormatting, no logic change
refactorRestructure, no feature/fix
perfPerformance improvement
testAdd/fix tests
buildBuild system, deps
ciCI config
choreAnything else (not src/test)
revertReverts a previous commit

Rules:

  • Subject line ≤ 72 characters — git log and GitHub/GitLab UIs silently truncate longer subjects
  • Imperative mood: "add" not "added" — reads as an instruction, not a history log
  • No capital letter, no trailing period — enforces uniform parsing by changelog tools
  • Body separated by blank line — parsers split header/body at the first blank line
  • Breaking changes: use ! after type/scope, or add BREAKING CHANGE: footer (triggers MAJOR bump) — body-only descriptions are invisible to changelog tools
  • revert commits SHOULD include This reverts commit <hash>. in the body — git revert generates this automatically; don't strip it
  • NEVER add a Claude signature, AI agent attribution, or Co-authored-by trailer for Claude or any other AI agent to commits

Examples:

feat(auth): add JWT token refresh
fix: prevent race condition on concurrent requests

Introduce request ID and reference to latest request.
Dismiss responses from stale requests.
refactor!: drop support for Go 1.18

BREAKING CHANGE: Go 1.18 no longer supported; uses stdlib APIs from 1.21+

Closing Issues via Commit Messages

Both GitHub and GitLab detect keywords in commit messages and automatically close the referenced issue when the commit lands on the default branch. Place the reference in the footer (preferred — keeps the subject line clean).

Keywords: close, closes, closed, fix, fixes, fixed, resolve, resolves, resolved — case-insensitive.

GitHub:

fix(auth): prevent token expiry race condition

Closes #42
Closes owner/repo#99
  • Triggers when merged into the default branch (usually main)
  • Cross-repo: Closes owner/repo#42
  • Close multiple: Closes #42, closes #43
  • Works in PR descriptions too

GitLab:

feat: add dark mode support

Resolves #101
Closes group/project#42
  • Triggers when merged into the default branch (configurable per project)
  • Cross-project: Closes group/project#42
  • Close multiple: Closes #101, closes #102
  • Works in MR descriptions too

Tip: Pair with the commit type — fix: closing a bug issue, feat: closing a feature request — keeps the changelog semantically coherent.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
feat: Added login pagefeat: add login page — imperative, no capital
fix: fix bug.fix: fix bug — no trailing period
Subject over 72 charsShorten; move detail to body
Breaking change only in bodyAdd ! or BREAKING CHANGE: footer — tools won't detect body-only
feat(adding-auth): ...feat(auth): ... — scope is a noun, not a verb
Closes #42 in subject lineMove to footer — keeps subject clean and parseable

Best Practices

  • Align branch type and commit type — feat/auth-* branch → feat(auth): commits
  • One concern per branch — mixing fixes into feature branches obscures the changelog
  • Use scope consistently within a branch — feat(auth): throughout, not feat(user): mid-way
  • Squash merge: when squash-merging a PR/MR, the branch commits are collapsed into one — the PR/MR title becomes the commit message. If the title doesn't follow conventional commits format, changelog generation breaks silently. Always set the PR title before squashing.

samberのその他のスキル

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
慣用的なGo言語のデザインパターン — 関数型オプション、コンストラクタ、エラーフローとカスケード、リソース管理とライフサイクル、グレースフルシャットダウン、耐障害性、アーキテクチャ、依存性注入、データ処理、ストリーミングなど。アーキテクチャパターンを明示的に選択する際、関数型オプションを実装する際、コンストラクタAPIを設計する際、グレースフルシャットダウンを設定する際、耐障害性パターンを適用する際、または特定の問題に適合する慣用的なGoパターンを尋ねる際に適用します。
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golangのパフォーマンス最適化パターンと方法論 - XのボトルネックがあればYを適用。アロケーション削減、CPU効率、メモリレイアウト、GCチューニング、プーリング、キャッシング、ホットパス最適化をカバー。プロファイリングやベンチマークでボトルネックが特定され、それを修正するための適切な最適化パターンが必要な場合に使用。また、パフォーマンスコードレビューを行い、改善点や迅速なパフォーマンス向上を特定するのに役立つベンチマークを提案する場合にも使用。測定方法論には使用しない(→...)
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golangのセキュリティベストプラクティスと脆弱性防止。インジェクション(SQL、コマンド、XSS)、暗号化、ファイルシステムの安全性、ネットワークセキュリティ、クッキー、シークレット管理、メモリ安全性、ログ記録をカバー。Goコードのセキュリティに関する作成、レビュー、監査時、または暗号、I/O、シークレット管理、ユーザー入力処理、認証を含むリスクのあるコードに取り組む際に適用。セキュリティツールの設定を含む。
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Goデータベースアクセスの包括的ガイド — パラメータ化クエリ、構造体スキャン、NULL許容カラム、トランザクション、分離レベル、SELECT FOR UPDATE、コネクションプール、バッチ処理、コンテキスト伝搬、マイグレーションツール。PostgreSQL、MariaDB、MySQL、SQLiteと連携するGolangコードの作成、レビュー、デバッグ時、データベーステスト時、またはdatabase/sql、sqlx、pgxに関する質問時に使用します。データベーススキーマやマイグレーションSQLは生成しません。
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
GolangプロジェクトにおけるLintのベストプラクティスとgolangci-lintの設定 — リンターの実行、.golangci.ymlの設定、nolintディレクティブによる警告の抑制、Lint出力の解釈、リンターの選択。golangci-lintの設定時、Lint警告やnolint抑制について質問がある時、コード品質ツールのセットアップ時、またはリンターを選択する時に使用します。また、ユーザーがgolangci-lint、go vet、staticcheck、reviveに言及した場合にも使用します。
developmentcode-reviewtesting