salesforce-apex-quality

作成者: github

Apexコード品質ガードレール(Salesforce開発向け)。バルクセーフティルール(ループ内でのSOQL/DML禁止)、共有モデル要件、CRUD/FLSセキュリティ、SOQL…を強制します。

npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill salesforce-apex-quality

Salesforce Apex Quality Guardrails

Apply these checks to every Apex class, trigger, and test file you write or review.

Step 1 — Governor Limit Safety Check

Scan for these patterns before declaring any Apex file acceptable:

SOQL and DML in Loops — Automatic Fail

// ❌ NEVER — causes LimitException at scale
for (Account a : accounts) {
    List<Contact> contacts = [SELECT Id FROM Contact WHERE AccountId = :a.Id]; // SOQL in loop
    update a; // DML in loop
}

// ✅ ALWAYS — collect, then query/update once
Set<Id> accountIds = new Map<Id, Account>(accounts).keySet();
Map<Id, List<Contact>> contactsByAccount = new Map<Id, List<Contact>>();
for (Contact c : [SELECT Id, AccountId FROM Contact WHERE AccountId IN :accountIds]) {
    if (!contactsByAccount.containsKey(c.AccountId)) {
        contactsByAccount.put(c.AccountId, new List<Contact>());
    }
    contactsByAccount.get(c.AccountId).add(c);
}
update accounts; // DML once, outside the loop

Rule: if you see [SELECT or Database.query, insert, update, delete, upsert, merge inside a for loop body — stop and refactor before proceeding.

Step 2 — Sharing Model Verification

Every class must declare its sharing intent explicitly. Undeclared sharing inherits from the caller — unpredictable behaviour.

DeclarationWhen to use
public with sharing class FooDefault for all service, handler, selector, and controller classes
public without sharing class FooOnly when the class must run elevated (e.g. system-level logging, trigger bypass). Requires a code comment explaining why.
public inherited sharing class FooFramework entry points that should respect the caller's sharing context

If a class does not have one of these three declarations, add it before writing anything else.

Step 3 — CRUD / FLS Enforcement

Apex code that reads or writes records on behalf of a user must verify object and field access. The platform does not enforce FLS or CRUD automatically in Apex.

// Check before querying a field
if (!Schema.sObjectType.Contact.fields.Email.isAccessible()) {
    throw new System.NoAccessException();
}

// Or use WITH USER_MODE in SOQL (API 56.0+)
List<Contact> contacts = [SELECT Id, Email FROM Contact WHERE AccountId = :accId WITH USER_MODE];

// Or use Database.query with AccessLevel
List<Contact> contacts = Database.query('SELECT Id, Email FROM Contact', AccessLevel.USER_MODE);

Rule: any Apex method callable from a UI component, REST endpoint, or @InvocableMethod must enforce CRUD/FLS. Internal service methods called only from trusted contexts may use with sharing instead.

Step 4 — SOQL Injection Prevention

// ❌ NEVER — concatenates user input into SOQL string
String soql = 'SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name = \'' + userInput + '\'';

// ✅ ALWAYS — bind variable
String soql = [SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name = :userInput];

// ✅ For dynamic SOQL with user-controlled field names — validate against a whitelist
Set<String> allowedFields = new Set<String>{'Name', 'Industry', 'AnnualRevenue'};
if (!allowedFields.contains(userInput)) {
    throw new IllegalArgumentException('Field not permitted: ' + userInput);
}

Step 5 — Modern Apex Idioms

Prefer current language features (API 62.0 / Winter '25+):

Old patternModern replacement
if (obj != null) { x = obj.Field__c; }x = obj?.Field__c;
x = (y != null) ? y : defaultVal;x = y ?? defaultVal;
System.assertEquals(expected, actual)Assert.areEqual(expected, actual)
System.assert(condition)Assert.isTrue(condition)
[SELECT ... WHERE ...] with no sharing context[SELECT ... WHERE ... WITH USER_MODE]

Step 6 — PNB Test Coverage Checklist

Every feature must be tested across all three paths. Missing any one of these is a quality failure:

Positive Path

  • Expected input → expected output.
  • Assert the exact field values, record counts, or return values — not just that no exception was thrown.

Negative Path

  • Invalid input, null values, empty collections, and error conditions.
  • Assert that exceptions are thrown with the correct type and message.
  • Assert that no records were mutated when the operation should have failed cleanly.

Bulk Path

  • Insert/update/delete 200–251 records in a single test transaction.
  • Assert that all records processed correctly — no partial failures from governor limits.
  • Use Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest() to isolate governor limit counters for async work.

Test Class Rules

@isTest(SeeAllData=false)   // Required — no exceptions without a documented reason
private class AccountServiceTest {

    @TestSetup
    static void makeData() {
        // Create all test data here — use a factory if one exists in the project
    }

    @isTest
    static void givenValidInput_whenProcessAccounts_thenFieldsUpdated() {
        // Positive path
        List<Account> accounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 10];
        Test.startTest();
        AccountService.processAccounts(accounts);
        Test.stopTest();
        // Assert meaningful outcomes — not just no exception
        List<Account> updated = [SELECT Status__c FROM Account WHERE Id IN :accounts];
        Assert.areEqual('Processed', updated[0].Status__c, 'Status should be Processed');
    }
}

Step 7 — Trigger Architecture Checklist

  • One trigger per object. If a second trigger exists, consolidate into the handler.
  • Trigger body contains only: context checks, handler invocation, and routing logic.
  • No business logic, SOQL, or DML directly in the trigger body.
  • If a trigger framework (Trigger Actions Framework, ff-apex-common, custom base class) is already in use — extend it. Do not create a parallel pattern.
  • Handler class is with sharing unless the trigger requires elevated access.

Quick Reference — Hardcoded Anti-Patterns Summary

PatternAction
SOQL inside for loopRefactor: query before the loop, operate on collections
DML inside for loopRefactor: collect mutations, DML once after the loop
Class missing sharing declarationAdd with sharing (or document why without sharing)
escape="false" on user data (VF)Remove — auto-escaping enforces XSS prevention
Empty catch blockAdd logging and appropriate re-throw or error handling
String-concatenated SOQL with user inputReplace with bind variable or whitelist validation
Test with no assertionAdd a meaningful Assert.* call
System.assert / System.assertEquals styleUpgrade to Assert.isTrue / Assert.areEqual
Hardcoded record ID ('001...')Replace with queried or inserted test record ID

githubのその他のスキル

debugging-workflows
github
GitHubのエージェンティックワークフローをデバッグするためのガイド - ログの分析、実行の監査、問題のトラブルシューティング
go-codemod
github
gh aw fix コマンド用のGoコードモッドを実装およびテストする。
acreadiness-policy
github
ユーザーがAgentRCポリシーを選択、作成、または適用するのを支援します。ポリシーは、関連性のないチェックを無効にしたり、影響度/レベルを上書きしたり、設定することで、レディネススコアリングをカスタマイズします。
ai-ready
github
あらゆるリポジトリをAI対応にします。コードベースを分析し、AGENTS.md、copilot-instructions.md、CIワークフロー、Issueテンプレートなどを生成します。PRレビューを解析し…
create-oo-component-documentation
github
オブジェクト指向コンポーネント向けに、業界のベストプラクティスとアーキテクチャ文書化標準に従った、包括的で標準化されたドキュメントを作成します。
dependabot
github
DependabotはGitHubに組み込まれた依存関係管理ツールであり、3つの主要機能を備えています。
doublecheck
github
AI出力のための3層検証パイプライン。検証可能な主張を抽出し、ウェブ検索で支持または反証する情報源を見つけ、敵対的レビューを実行…
foundry-agent-sync
github
ローカルのJSONマニフェストから、REST APIを介してAzure AI Foundry内でプロンプトベースのAIエージェントを直接作成および同期します。スキャフォールディングスキルとは異なり、単に…