nemoclaw-community-contributor-examples

NemoClaw Community Contributor Examples

Use this skill to keep the example catalog navigable as it grows without changing an example's runtime or security boundaries accidentally.

Workflow

1. Read references/example-taxonomy.md. For issue and pull request metadata, also read the canonical maintainer taxonomy.
2. Before drafting or reviewing a new top-level example README, follow the canonical Example README Template. Treat it as the required information contract instead of copying the template into this skill.
3. Read the target example's README and nearby deployment documentation before classifying or naming it.
4. Select the artifact type first. For recipes, select contributor provenance second. Use an outcome-oriented leaf name.
5. When moving or renaming an existing example, also read references/restructure-checklist.md and inventory every repository reference before editing.
6. Preserve contributor attribution, deployment behavior, security policy, credential handling, teardown behavior, and Compose/Helm parity.
7. Update the public catalog, repository links, contribution commands, notices, submodule configuration, and external-document follow-ups in the same change.
8. Run the smallest relevant example checks, then the repository-wide checks required by CONTRIBUTING.md.

Boundaries

• Treat directory placement as navigation, not a support or maturity promise.
• Do not classify provenance from technology usage alone. Require explicit attribution or repository history.
• Do not broaden egress, permissions, credential exposure, host access, or agent authority as part of a catalog change.
• Do not retain duplicate compatibility directories. Document path migrations and update callers.
• Base README commands, results, compatibility, support, security, and performance claims on repository evidence. Do not draft from an issue alone.
• Keep public drafts sanitized. Do not include secrets, internal links, tenant details, private paths, or nonpublic environment names. Use obvious placeholders for private values.
• Require a human contributor to review and correct coding-agent drafts before submission.
• Ask maintainers when ownership or artifact type remains ambiguous after inspecting the example.