cuopt-numerical-optimization-api

par nvidia

LP, MILP et QP (bêta) avec cuOpt — Python, C et CLI. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur résout un problème LP, MILP ou QP avec une interface cuOpt.

npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/cuopt --skill cuopt-numerical-optimization-api

cuOpt Numerical Optimization API

Model and solve LP, MILP, and QP problems using NVIDIA cuOpt's GPU-accelerated solver.

Interface Selection

Choose the reference for the user's interface:

InterfaceWhen to useReference
PythonUser is writing Python codereferences/python_api.md
C / C++User is embedding in a C/C++ applicationreferences/c_api.md
CLIUser is solving from MPS files on the command linereferences/cli_api.md

If the interface is not yet clear, ask before writing any code.

Already using a modeling language? cuOpt also works as a solver backend for third-party modeling tools — AMPL, GAMS / GAMSPy, PuLP, JuMP, Pyomo, and CVXPY — with near-zero code changes (point the model's solver at cuOpt). CVXPY additionally covers convex QP and, in beta, QCQP / SOCP. Prefer this when the user already has a model in one of these tools rather than porting it to the cuOpt API. See Third-Party Modeling Languages.

Choosing LP vs MILP vs QP

Decide from the objective and variables:

If the objective is...And variables are...Use
Linear (sum of c_i * x_i)All continuousLP
LinearSome integer or binaryMILP
Has squared (x*x) or cross (x*y) termsContinuous (integer QP not supported)QP (beta)

Prefer LP when the problem allows it. LP solves faster and has stronger optimality guarantees. Use MILP only when the problem logically requires whole numbers or yes/no decisions. Use QP only when the objective is genuinely quadratic (variance, squared error, kinetic energy).

  • Use LP when every quantity can meaningfully be fractional: flows, proportions, rates, dollars, hours, tonnes of material, etc.
  • Use MILP when the problem mentions counts of discrete entities, yes/no choices, or either/or decisions (e.g. open a facility or not, assign a person to a shift, number of trucks).
  • Use QP when the objective minimizes variance, squared error, or any expression with x*x or x*y terms (portfolio optimization, least squares, regularized regression).

Integer vs Continuous from Wording

Problem wording / conceptVariable typeExamples
Discrete entities (counts)INTEGERWorkers, cars, trucks, machines, pilots, facilities, units to manufacture
Yes/no or on/offINTEGER (binary, lb=0 ub=1)Open a facility, run a machine, assign a person to a shift
Amounts that can be fractionalCONTINUOUSTonnes, litres, dollars, hours, kWh, proportion of capacity
Rates or fractionsCONTINUOUSUtilization, percentage, share of budget

Rule of thumb: "How many things" → INTEGER. "How much" → CONTINUOUS.

QP Rules (all interfaces)

  • MINIMIZE only — the solver rejects MAXIMIZE for quadratic objectives. To maximize f(x), minimize -f(x) and negate the reported objective value.
  • Continuous variables only — integer QP is not supported.
  • Q should be positive semi-definite for a convex, well-posed problem.
  • Beta — API may evolve; treat as production-capable for typical convex QP.

Dual Values

Duals and reduced costs are available for LP and QP only:

  • MILP — no duals (integer optima are not continuous).
  • Quadratic constraints — duals unavailable even for LP/QP; all values return NaN.
  • PDLP warmstart — LP only; MILP solves do not accept a PDLP warmstart.

Common Issues (all interfaces)

ProblemLikely causeFix
InfeasibleConflicting constraintsCheck constraint logic and bounds
UnboundedMissing boundsAdd variable bounds
Slow solveLarge problemSet time limit; increase gap tolerance
QP rejected with MAXIMIZEQP only supports MINIMIZENegate the objective; negate the result
QP returns non-optimalQ not PSD or badly scaledCheck Q is PSD; rescale variables

Solver Settings (concepts)

SettingPurpose
time_limitStop after N seconds
mip_relative_gapStop MILP when within X% of optimal
mip_absolute_toleranceAbsolute MIP gap stop
log_to_consoleEnable solver logging

Syntax varies by interface — see the interface reference file.

Plus de skills de nvidia

compileiq-debug
nvidia
Utilisez quand quelque chose ne va pas : Search() bloque, toutes les évaluations retournent INVALID_SCORE, les scores ne s'améliorent pas, chaque configuration retourne le même nombre, erreurs ptxas…
create-github-pr
nvidia
Créer des pull requests GitHub en utilisant l'interface en ligne de commande gh. Utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite créer une nouvelle PR, soumettre du code pour révision, ou ouvrir une pull request. Mots-clés de déclenchement -…
nemoclaw-maintainer-cross-issue-sweep
nvidia
Analyse les autres problèmes ouverts pour trouver ceux qu’une PR donnée pourrait également corriger ou casser accidentellement. Génère des opportunités de correctifs adjacents et des risques de contradiction avec fichier:ligne…
fhir-basics
nvidia
Apprend aux agents comment fonctionnent les API FHIR R4, quelles ressources sont disponibles, comment les interroger avec des paramètres de recherche, et comment analyser correctement tous les formats de réponse…
compileiq-validate-result
nvidia
Utiliser APRÈS qu'une recherche soit terminée et AVANT de réclamer un accélérateur ou d'expédier un ACF. Charge le CSV dump_results, extrait les K meilleurs candidats (mono-objectif)…
changelog-audit
nvidia
Auditer le CHANGELOG.md de Warp avant une publication : récupérer les entrées perdues, trier par impact utilisateur, affiner le langage des entrées, ajuster les retours à la ligne et (en mode branche de publication) mettre à jour la comparaison…
maintain-dynamic-plugins
nvidia
Maintenir les chargeurs de plugins dynamiques NeMo Relay, les manifestes, les SDK natifs Rust, le protocole worker gRPC, le SDK worker Python, la documentation, les tests et la couverture du workflow de publication
dgx-diagnose
nvidia
Diagnostiquer les problèmes courants du DGX Station GB300 — plantages CUDA, ciblage incorrect du GPU, bugs de conteneur vLLM/SGLang, problèmes d'état MIG, erreurs NVLink/Fabric Manager,…