rpi-quick

RPI

Goal

Coordinate one task through evidence, planning, execution, review, and explicit follow-up without duplicating the phase skills' detailed responsibilities.

Flow

1. Assess research readiness from caller-supplied research, task details, decisions, and plan inputs.
   1. Activate rpi-research only when evidence is missing, stale, contradictory, insufficient for planning, or when complexity, uncertainty, dependencies, risk, or a decision-critical question warrants investigation. Record Research disposition executed and consume the primary artifact's Planning Readiness.
   2. When evidence is adequate, record disposition reused or satisfied-and-skipped with the evidence that supports it.
   3. Apply the rpi-research continuation contract. Continue to Plan without another stage-start command only when either an executed Research primary artifact records Planning Readiness Ready, or reused or satisfied-and-skipped evidence is adequate, and all applicable gates pass, blockers clear, and required confirmations are explicit.
   4. When Research is Blocked, Needs clarification, or Not ready, or another transition requirement is not met, stop in Research and record the blocker or next action.
2. Run rpi-plan to create or revise the ordinary Markdown plan and phase details. Its rpi-plan-critique gate is internal to planning and returns its disposition to the planning parent.
3. Run rpi-implement for approved Pxx and Pxx-Txx work. Consume its return, including completed and remaining markers, validation coverage, blockers, plan and detail updates, follow-up items, and readiness or the reason work is awaiting a significant or divergent user decision.
4. Run rpi-review once after Implementation returns and no affected work awaits a user decision. Compare the current plan, details, critique, descriptive changes record, and validation evidence. Record execution status separately from outcome.
5. Follow-up: route defects, decision gaps, research gaps, and residual work to their correct next destination.

When Review finds open work, route it to the appropriate later stage or distinct follow-up item. Do not execute it or run Review again inside the current lifecycle.

Delegation crosswalk

• Research readiness -> assess existing evidence, then use rpi-research only for a demonstrated investigation need
• Plan -> rpi-plan, which may use RPI Planner for one exact phase and rpi-plan-critique for an independent critique
• Implement -> rpi-implement
• Review -> rpi-review
• Follow-up -> handled by the parent from the review record

Inputs

• task: primary task description or inferred task context
• evidence: caller-supplied research, task details, decisions, and plan inputs to assess for research readiness
• continue: resume an active task from its durable artifacts
• followUp: select a distinct review follow-up item

Success criteria

• One task identity, date, and task slug link any durable artifacts.
• Research readiness records the executed, reused, or satisfied-and-skipped disposition, Planning Readiness or adequacy evidence, and the gates or confirmations that permit or stop continuation.
• Each phase uses the matching RPI skill rather than duplicating its workflow.
• Planning uses marker-addressed plain Markdown artifacts and exactly one independent critique. Confirmed user requests and answers remain authoritative over critique advice.
• Implementation returns descriptive evidence, current plan and detail updates, validation coverage, blockers, and follow-up items. A significant or divergent change pauses affected work until the user decision and plan state are current; critique is not repeated.
• Review separates execution status from outcome and routes every open item.
• Follow-up identifies whether work returns to research, planning, implementation, or a distinct future item.

Constraints

• Keep this skill as a sequencing layer, not a duplicate of phase protocols.
• Use the smallest appropriate stage action. Do not create process work solely to satisfy a lifecycle label.
• Treat caller-supplied research, task details, decisions, and plan inputs as evidence to assess, not as a requirement to repeat Research.
• Keep internal tracking paths out of production code, code comments, documentation strings, and commit messages.
• Treat unresolved product decisions and decision-critical evidence gaps as hard stops for the affected stage.

Conversation guidance

• During material orchestration work, provide concise updates at stage boundaries. Explain the current stage and why it is eligible, what changed or was learned, key decisions, blockers, results, relevant artifact links, and one important point the user might otherwise miss. Do not narrate low-level actions.
• Before a user question or required confirmation, state the decision context, viable choices and consequences, an evidence-backed recommendation when available, blockers, and relevant Markdown links.
• Use a small status marker such as ✅, ⚠️, or ⛔ only when it improves scanning, and pair it with text.
• At closeout, separate lifecycle execution or session status from outcome or decision state. Summarize results, important updates, decisions, blockers or open items, and anything the user might otherwise miss.
• Advise /compact only when stale tool output, superseded reasoning, or completed-stage detail outweighs useful current context and the durable phase artifacts are current. When advising it, name the state and artifact pointers to retain. Otherwise omit compaction guidance.
• rpi-quick is an explicit parent orchestration context. Continue automatically to each eligible stage without waiting for a new user command, while honoring every stage gate, blocker, risky-action confirmation, and user-owned decision. State when a blocker or confirmation returns control to the user.
• For every relevant existing artifact, use the two-cell row | [actual/workspace-relative/path.ext](actual/workspace-relative/path.ext) | Short description |, using that artifact's actual workspace-relative path as both link text and destination; omit unavailable files and render the table immediately before the final ## Next Steps section. End with ## Next Steps: state the exact eligible user command, active-parent action, blocker-clearing action, follow-up choice, or that no user action is required. When compaction is warranted, tell the user to run /compact before the next RPI command; otherwise omit compaction guidance.

Stop rules

• Stop the active stage when its needed evidence, decision, or dependency is unavailable. Pause affected dependent implementation when a significant or divergent revision awaits a user decision.
• Do not claim an accepted outcome while critical review findings remain open.
• Route Review findings to the earliest appropriate later stage or a distinct follow-up without executing another stage in the current lifecycle.

Handoff

As the explicit parent, use the rpi-research continuation contract. Activate Research only when the research-readiness assessment warrants investigation; otherwise record the reused or satisfied-and-skipped disposition and adequacy evidence. Continue to Plan only through the contract's eligible Research outcome. Continue through rpi-implement and rpi-review only when their prerequisites are met. Follow-up routes to the earliest affected stage or a distinct next task. Do not wait for another user command between eligible stages, but pause for a blocker or required confirmation.

Final response contract

Return lifecycle execution or session status separately from the research-readiness and review outcome state. Include phase status, durable artifact paths, validation coverage, blockers, routed follow-up items, conditional compaction advice when warranted, and whether the parent continues automatically or awaits a required confirmation. End with the final next steps required by Conversation guidance after the linked artifact table.