rpi-implement

RPI Implement

Goal

Deliver the approved outcome using the current plan and phase details as evidence. Keep task completion, implementation evidence, plan maintenance, and validation trustworthy for the caller.

Flow

1. Resolve the exact plan at .copilot-tracking/plans/{{YYYY-MM-DD}}/{{task_slug}}-plan.md, related plan details, and declared invocation scope: the full plan, one Pxx phase, or one Pxx-Txx task. The declared scope limits completion claims and active implementation.
2. Create or continue .copilot-tracking/changes/{{YYYY-MM-DD}}/{{task_slug}}-changes.md using templates/changes-log.md. Record material evidence under descriptive headings tied to plan areas or markers, not per-entry formal IDs.
3. Before substantive source edits or implementation, update the plan checklist, changes log, and any related state tracking artifacts.
   • Send the implementation opening defined in references/implementation.md.
4. Start with the first unchecked dependency-ready plan item in declared scope, then execute eligible items in plan order.
   • Delegate only a whole Pxx phase when it is in declared scope, dependency-ready, independent, parallelizable, and write-disjoint. Its scope, dependencies, disjoint write boundary, and expected evidence return must be clear. The primary implementation agent executes individual Pxx-Txx tasks, consumes phase returns, and retains plan order, plan and changes-record reconciliation, implementation-time plan updates, and completion markers.
   • When stated task completion evidence exists, immediately check the completed Pxx-Txx marker in scope. Check a Pxx phase immediately only when that phase is in scope and completion evidence exists for every task in the phase. Do not check markers outside declared scope.
5. When declared scope finishes, ensure its changes, blockers, completion markers, remaining work, and validation state are current. Report active plan markers outside the scope as remaining work. Report full-plan completion only when the full plan was declared and all of its markers have completion evidence.
6. Classify new implementation information using references/implementation.md: retain ordinary local judgment, apply immediately relevant current-state updates that preserve approved intent, record unrelated work as follow-up-only, and treat a discovery as material only when it requires a new user decision or planning reconsideration.
7. Ask for the smallest decision-critical user input only when available evidence cannot support a responsible user-owned decision. Persist the result in current planning state and the changes record. If the accepted plan must change, pause only affected dependent work and return the current evidence to planning. The confirmed user decision remains authoritative; do not run another critique.
8. Run validation expected by the plan or changed behavior after the approved source or correction batch is complete. Record checks, results, and explicit skip reasons without treating validation alone as permission to resume paused dependent work.
9. Before handing a full-plan or review-ready scope to Review, reconcile plan markers, phase details, completed-work evidence, handoff prose, blockers, remaining work, follow-up items, and validation state.
10. Return the current implementation result to the caller using the return contract below.

Inputs

• Approved plan path or task context
• Optional declared scope: full plan, exact Pxx phase, or exact Pxx-Txx task
• Phase details, supplied evidence, latest critique disposition, and prior changes record when available

Success criteria

• The implementation follows the approved plan or records a material discovery and its current state explicitly.
• The first unchecked dependency-ready item in declared scope starts execution, and later dependent work does not bypass plan order.
• Completed Pxx-Txx tasks are checked immediately after completion evidence exists. A Pxx phase is checked immediately after every task in that in-scope phase has completion evidence.
• A bounded Pxx or Pxx-Txx result confirms only its declared scope and reports remaining active-plan markers without claiming full-plan completion.
• Only a whole declared-scope Pxx phase that is dependency-ready, independent, parallelizable, and write-disjoint may be delegated. It returns expected evidence for primary-agent reconciliation, and individual Pxx-Txx tasks are never delegated.
• The changes record uses descriptive evidence headings and plan or task markers, with no second per-entry identity scheme.
• Implementation discoveries are classified as local judgment, immediately relevant current-state update, follow-up-only work, or material decision, with the detailed record required by the reference.
• Affected dependent work resumes after the significant or divergent user decision is reflected in the current plan and details. The task's critique is not repeated.
• Validation evidence or an explicit skip reason is available for changed behavior.
• A later invocation may implement applicable Review findings as ordinary work without a correction run type or mandatory second Review.
• Plan markers, phase details, changes evidence, handoff prose, blockers, remaining work, follow-up items, and validation state are reconciled before Review.
• The caller receives the current execution status, evidence paths, current plan and detail state, validation coverage, blockers, remaining work, and follow-up items.

Constraints

• Use references/implementation.md for detailed execution evidence, current-state reconciliation, material-discovery handling, questions, resumption, and rendered conversation mechanics.
• Do not expand active scope. Place unrelated work in an explicit follow-up item.
• Do not use line numbers, separate legacy log artifacts, or retired dedicated RPI execution workers.
• Keep .copilot-tracking/ references out of production code, code comments, documentation strings, and commit messages.

Conversation guidance

• Follow the detailed opening, continual-update, pre-question, and closeout protocol in references/implementation.md. That reference is the authority for the rendered message templates.
• Persist canonical state before the opening, any material update, decision question, handoff, or closeout. Chat is a concise projection of that state, never a second history or delivery log.
• In a standalone invocation, do not invoke rpi-review. State /rpi-review only when review prerequisites are met. In an active rpi-quick or confirmed automatic RPI Agent context, return current artifacts and scope facts to the parent for eligible continuation.

Stop rules

• Stop as Blocked when the approved plan, required details, or a dependency prevents credible execution.
• Stop as Blocked when a decision-critical user answer needed for a major plan change, blocker, or workaround is unavailable.
• Pause affected dependent work only when a significant or divergent decision changes assessed requirements, scope, architecture, acceptance criteria, dependency model, or evidence boundary. Return current artifacts to planning when needed, preserve the existing critique as historical evidence, and resume after the user decision and plan state are current.
• Stop after a caller-bounded Pxx phase or Pxx-Txx task once its declared-scope plan state and changes evidence are current. Do not require or imply completion of work outside that scope.

Return to Caller

Return the changes-record path, implementation execution status, completed and remaining Pxx or Pxx-Txx items, validation coverage, blockers, current plan and detail updates, follow-up items, and review readiness or the explicit reason affected work awaits a user decision. Follow the Conversation guidance section for standalone or parent-orchestrated continuation, conditional compaction advice, the linked artifact table, and final next steps.