agent-host-e2e-tests

Utiliser lors de l'écriture, de l'enregistrement, de la mise à jour ou du dépannage des tests de bout en bout de l'hôte agent sous src/vs/platform/agentHost/test/node/protocol (tests boîte noire…

npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/vscode --skill agent-host-e2e-tests

Agent host end-to-end tests

These tests run the whole agent host end-to-end (real server, real bundled provider SDK/CLI, real AHP protocol) while replaying recorded model traffic from committed YAML fixtures — deterministic and tokenless.

Before doing anything, read the architecture + troubleshooting reference: src/vs/platform/agentHost/test/node/e2e/README.md

It documents the mental model, the fixture format, every config flag, and a symptom→cause→fix troubleshooting table. This skill is only the workflows; the README is the source of truth for how it works.

When validating an upstream provider/runtime fix, use ci-artifact-testing to check for a compatible CI artifact before building locally. Run the same strict replay against the bundled baseline and candidate; preserve the test assertions and existing cross-platform validation requirements.

Core invariants

  1. Replay is default and strict. No env var serves committed fixtures without a token or network. An unrecorded request is a hard cache miss.
  2. Fixture names derive from test titles. Renaming a model-backed test orphans ${provider}-${slug}.yaml; re-record after a rename. Tests registered with conformanceTest(...) or providerHostOnlyTest(...) share captures/empty.yaml.
  3. Recording is intentional and credentialed. AGENT_HOST_REPLAY_RECORD=1 talks to real CAPI and needs GITHUB_TOKEN or gh auth token. Keep prompts trivial and read-only in temporary directories.
  4. Fixtures are generated, never hand-edited. Fix normalization or redaction and re-record if a capture contains unstable or sensitive data.
  5. Disabled variants stay accountable. Record every gate in e2e/KNOWN_ISSUES.md with its scope, expected and observed behavior, and focused reproduction command.
  6. Azure validation is required. Every new Agent Host E2E or real-provider integration test must pass a focused build from VS Code pipeline definition 111 before merge.

Basic workflow: write and evaluate an E2E test

  1. Choose the boundary and tier. Put provider-invariant AHP behavior in conformance, provider behavior in parity, and use providerHostOnlyTest(...) only when provider-specific behavior must not cross the model boundary.
  2. Add the test to the closest suite. Create and register a focused suite module only when the behavior is distinct. Keep provider-specific assertions in the provider's *.integrationTest.ts.
  3. Implement the smallest deterministic scenario. Keep prompts minimal, drive behavior over AHP, wait for the exact prerequisite and completion states, and drain every model-backed turn.
  4. Assert the contract's primary observable result. Check the real protocol result or external side effect; snapshot additional traffic only when ordering, routing, or lifecycle is part of the contract.
  5. Record every enabled provider fixture. Host-only tests use the shared strict empty fixture. Follow the recording workflow below for model-backed tests.
  6. Review generated artifacts. Check fixture and snapshot diffs for the intended behavior, normalized paths, no credentials or usernames, and no unintended model or request changes.
  7. Evaluate locally. Run the focused test in strict replay, run adjacent tests when helpers or shared state changed, repeat timing- or lifecycle-sensitive scenarios, then run the full deterministic suite and required coverage, type-check, hygiene, and layer checks from the E2E README.
  8. Evaluate in CI. Open or update a draft PR and complete the cross-platform Azure validation below. Timing, process-lifecycle, filesystem-watching, reconnect, restart, and worktree tests require two clean executions on every supported platform.

General best practices and mistakes to avoid

Keep this section curated. Add or refine a principle only when root-cause analysis reveals a pattern likely to improve other tests; keep failure-specific commands, logs, and mechanics in the E2E README or investigation report.

  • Wait for the contract state, not a proxy. Existence, discovery, or an emitted intermediate action may not mean a dependency is operational. For example, wait for the target chat's MCP server to report Ready, not merely for its plugin child to appear.
  • Assert primary outcomes before secondary effects. A hook, notification, assistant response, or persisted record can be downstream of the behavior under test. First prove the actual tool result or external side effect succeeded.
  • Do not confuse replay success with execution success. Replay controls model traffic; live tools, MCP servers, hooks, commands, and filesystem operations can still fail. Recorded assistant text is not an oracle for those operations.
  • Synchronize on observable state, never elapsed time. Use protocol notifications or exact state polling instead of sleeps, timeout increases, or existence-only checks.
  • Respect scope and lifecycle. Readiness can belong to a specific chat, session, provider process, or workspace. Exercise reconfiguration before the first turn as well as after established history: a running provider process does not prove a resumable conversation exists. Materialize and observe the same scope the operation will use, drain work before teardown, and clean up owned resources. Keep temporary workspaces outside instruction-bearing ancestors: changing their location can inject unrelated repository customizations into a provider's model request.
  • Separate storage semantics from device latency. RAM-backed files can retain real SQLite transactions, close/reopen, and host-restart behavior; keep required disk-backed lifecycle coverage separately. Compare unchanged workloads on the same worker and inspect phase timings, not just pass counts, before attributing a timeout to physical storage.
  • Centralize recurring lifecycle barriers. If several tests need the same multi-step prerequisite, encode it in a shared helper so tests cannot choose a weaker intermediate condition.
  • Gate genuine nondeterminism narrowly. Use record-only or provider/platform gates only for behavior that cannot replay deterministically or is unsupported; never use a gate to hide an unexplained failure.

Record or re-record fixtures

Re-record when you add a test, or when a bundled SDK/CLI bump changes its wire behavior (new endpoint, different turn count, changed tool schema).

  1. Ensure a token is available: gh auth token (or export GITHUB_TOKEN).
  2. Record per provider:
    AGENT_HOST_REPLAY_RECORD=1 ./scripts/test-integration.sh --run \
      src/vs/platform/agentHost/test/node/e2e/providers/claudeAgentHostE2E.integrationTest.ts
    
    Repeat for copilotAgentHostE2E / codexAgentHostE2E as needed.
  3. Review git diff on the fixtures: no local usernames/absolute paths, no tokens, no unreleased model ids. If something leaked, the fix is to extend normalization/redaction in capiReplayProxy.ts (_normalize + the *_RE redactors) and re-record — not to edit the fixture.
  4. Run plain replay (no env var) to confirm green, then commit.

If an SDK now hits a new ancillary/bootstrap endpoint (a probe, not a real model turn), add it to capiStubs.ts (served, not recorded) instead of recording it — see how /models/session is handled.

Gate a variant that cannot replay deterministically

Real-time streaming, mid-turn aborts, and POSIX-specific local execution (shell tools, pwd, git worktrees) don't replay reliably. Gate them precisely so you keep coverage where it works:

  • Record-only (no deterministic replay at all): (RECORD ? test : test.skip)('…') — see can abort a running turn.
  • Subagent fixtures stale after an SDK bump: re-record them (AGENT_HOST_REPLAY_RECORD=1 …). Subagent flows are the most SDK-version-sensitive (parent + child share one /v1/messages sequence), but replay reliably once re-recorded, so no gating is needed.
  • POSIX-only (fails on Windows): gate with !isWindows, or a targeted per-provider flag when only one provider diverges. See the worktree and subagent-reopen tests.
  • Provider/OS-specific replay: add a targeted config gate that still permits recording and unaffected platforms. See the Codex shell-tool Linux gate.

Always add a comment explaining why the gate exists. Also add or update the corresponding entry in e2e/KNOWN_ISSUES.md. When the variant is enabled again, remove or update the entry in the same change.

Cross-platform Azure validation

New Agent Host E2E and real-provider integration tests are not ready to merge after local or GitHub pull-request CI alone. Push the branch, open or update a draft PR, then use the azure-pipelines skill to validate the real packaged Electron integration-test path.

  1. Queue the VS Code CI pipeline, definition 727, on the branch. It runs the Windows, Linux, and macOS CI test jobs and never publishes. The azure-pipelines skill contains the canonical command.
  2. Monitor jobs as they finish. Inspect a failed platform's Agent Host E2E Tests (Electron) job and its 🧪 Run Agent Host E2E tests (Electron) task (test ID integration-agent-host-e2e) immediately rather than waiting for unrelated stages to complete.
  3. Treat the Agent Host E2E result as accepted only when the 🧪 Run Agent Host E2E tests (Electron) task succeeds on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  4. Rerun an apparently unrelated or pre-existing failure in isolation before attributing it to the PR.
  5. After a platform-specific fix, rerun at least that platform. Rerun all three platforms when the fix can affect shared behavior, provider fixtures, process lifecycle, or cross-platform paths.
  6. Cancel obsolete builds after pushing a replacement commit.

Verifying & troubleshooting

  • Run a single provider in replay: ./scripts/test-integration.sh --run <path> (no env var).
  • Filter to one test: add --grep "<test title fragment>".
  • On a hang / timeout, read the runtime log first. For the Copilot provider, a failed test tails the most recent Copilot runtime (copilot-runtime from @github/copilot-sdk-<platform>) process-*.log into the test output ([agent-host-e2e] # … lines) — the SDK/CLI's own account of startup, auth, the model request, and the turn lifecycle. It runs at --log trace. A turn that never produced a model response, a panic, or an out-of-order/protocol error points at the SDK/CLI (re-record if a bump left the fixture stale; otherwise it's a real regression). Claude/Codex use their own runtimes and are not captured here. See the README's "A turn hangs or times out with no OS pattern".
  • For any failure (cache miss, missing fixture, per-OS timeout, leaked PII, subagent staleness, accidental real-CAPI contact), go to the Troubleshooting section of the README — it maps each symptom to its cause and fix.

Plus de skills de microsoft

oss-growth
microsoft
Persona de growth hacker OSS
agent-framework-azure-ai-py
microsoft
Créez des agents Azure AI Foundry à l’aide du SDK Python Microsoft Agent Framework (agent-framework-azure-ai). À utiliser lors de la création d’agents persistants avec AzureAIAgentsProvider, de l’utilisation d’outils hébergés (interpréteur de code, recherche de fichiers, recherche web), de l’intégration de serveurs MCP, de la gestion de fils de conversation ou de l’implémentation de réponses en streaming. Couvre les outils de fonction, les sorties structurées et les agents multi-outils.
development
airunway-aks-setup
microsoft
Configurez AI Runway sur AKS — du cluster nu au modèle en cours d'exécution. Couvre la vérification du cluster, l'installation du contrôleur, l'évaluation GPU, la configuration du fournisseur et le premier déploiement. QUAND : « configurer AI Runway », « intégrer un cluster AKS », « installer AI Runway », « configuration airunway », « déployer un modèle sur AKS », « inférence GPU sur AKS », « configuration KAITO sur AKS », « exécuter LLM sur AKS », « vLLM sur AKS », « configurer le service de modèles sur AKS », « contrôleur AI Runway ».
devops
appinsights-instrumentation
microsoft
Conseils pour instrumenter les applications web avec Azure Application Insights. Fournit des modèles de télémétrie, la configuration du SDK et des références de configuration. QUAND : comment instrumenter une application, SDK App Insights, modèles de télémétrie, qu'est-ce qu'App Insights, conseils sur Application Insights, exemples d'instrumentation, bonnes pratiques APM.
devops
applicationinsights-web-ts
microsoft
Instrumentez les applications navigateur/web avec le SDK JavaScript Application Insights (@microsoft/applicationinsights-web). Utilisez-le pour la surveillance des utilisateurs réels (RUM) — vues de page, clics, dépendances AJAX/fetch, exceptions, événements personnalisés et traces d’agents GenAI côté navigateur corrélées aux traces OpenTelemetry backend. Couvre le script de chargement du SDK et la configuration npm, les extensions de framework (React, React Native, Angular), Click Analytics, les initialiseurs de télémétrie et les conventions sémantiques OTel GenAI pour les spans d’agents/outils/modèles émises depuis le navigateur.
devops
azure-ai-anomalydetector-java
microsoft
Créez des applications de détection d'anomalies avec le SDK Azure AI Anomaly Detector pour Java. Utilisez-le lors de l'implémentation de la détection d'anomalies univariées/multivariées, de l'analyse de séries temporelles ou de la surveillance basée sur l'IA.
development
azure-ai-language-conversations-py
microsoft
Implémentez la compréhension du langage conversationnel (CLU) à l’aide du SDK Python azure-ai-language-conversations. Utilisez-le lorsque vous travaillez avec ConversationAnalysisClient pour analyser l’intention et les entités d’une conversation, créer des fonctionnalités de NLP ou intégrer la compréhension du langage dans des applications.
development
azure-ai-ml-py
microsoft
SDK v2 d’Azure Machine Learning pour Python. Utiliser pour les espaces de travail ML, les tâches, les modèles, les jeux de données, le calcul et les pipelines. Déclencheurs : « azure-ai-ml », « MLClient », « espace de travail », « registre de modèles », « tâches d’entraînement », « jeux de données ».
development