run-train

We need to translate the given English text into French. The text describes a skill called "Rigor Train skill" but the name to preserve is "run-train". However, the instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The source text includes "Rigor Train skill" but not "run-train". The name to preserve is "run-train" but it's not in the source. So we should not add it. We just translate the text as is. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Rigor Train skill" might be a product name? It says "Rigor Train skill" - likely a proper name. Should we preserve it? The instruction says preserve product names. So keep "Rigor Train skill" as is? But it's in English. Possibly translate "skill" to "compétence"? But product names should be preserved. I think "Rigor Train" is a product name, so keep it. Also "train

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill run-train

run-train

Use this as the Rigor Train skill. The installed slug remains run-train for compatibility.

Use the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should keep training evidence bounded while leaving repository-specific monitoring details to the model.

When to apply

  • When the training command has already been selected and should be executed conservatively.
  • When the researcher wants startup verification, short-run verification, full training kickoff, or resume handling.
  • When the run needs structured training status, checkpoint, and metric reporting.

When not to apply

  • When the main task is environment setup or asset download.
  • When the researcher wants inference-only or evaluation-only execution.
  • When the task is speculative exploration, multi-variant sweeps, or autonomous idea implementation.
  • When the user still needs repository intake or paper gap resolution.

Clear boundaries

  • This skill executes a selected training command and normalizes the resulting evidence.
  • It does not choose the overall research goal on its own.
  • It does not own exploratory branching or speculative code adaptation.
  • It should record partial, blocked, resumed, and kicked-off states clearly.
  • It should preserve reproducibility context such as configs, seeds, checkpoints, logs, metrics, and runtime assumptions when available.

Input expectations

  • selected training goal
  • runnable training command
  • environment and asset assumptions
  • run mode such as startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume

Output expectations

  • train_outputs/SUMMARY.md
  • train_outputs/COMMANDS.md
  • train_outputs/LOG.md
  • train_outputs/SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
  • train_outputs/COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
  • train_outputs/status.json

Notes

Use references/training-policy.md, ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md, scripts/run_training.py, and scripts/write_outputs.py.

Plus de skills de lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text describes a skill for AI research exploration. We must preserve the name "ai-research-explore" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text includes technical terms like "Rigor Explore", "SOTA", "README-first", etc. We should keep those as is or translate appropriately? The instruction says "Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." So "Rigor Explore" might be a product name? It says "Rigor Explore compatible skill slug" - likely a proper name. "SOTA" is an acronym (state-of-the-art) - preserve. "README-first" is a term, preserve. "explore_outputs/" is a path, preserve. Also "current_research" is a variable-like term, preserve. We need to translate the rest naturally into French. The text is a description of when to use this skill. We'll produce a French translation that maintains the meaning and preserves the specified terms. Let's translate:
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Compétence en lecture seule Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit pour les dépôts de recherche en deep learning. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite lire et comprendre un dépôt, inspecter la structure du modèle et les points d'entrée d'entraînement ou d'inférence, examiner les configurations et les points d'insertion, ou signaler des schémas d'implémentation suspects sans modifier le code ni exécuter de tâches lourdes. Ne pas utiliser pour l'exécution active de commandes, le refactoring large, l'adaptation spéculative de code ou la correction automatique de bugs.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
ai-research-reproduction
lllllllama
Orchestrateur en mode reproduction de RigorPilot pour la reproduction de dépôts d'apprentissage profond avec approche README-first. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite un flux de bout en bout minimal et fiable qui lit d'abord le dépôt, sélectionne la plus petite cible d'inférence ou d'évaluation documentée, coordonne la prise en charge, la configuration, l'exécution de confiance, l'entraînement de confiance optionnel, l'analyse de dépôt optionnelle et la résolution optionnelle des lacunes documentaires, applique des règles de correctif conservatrices, enregistre les preuves, les hypothèses, les écarts et les points de décision humaine,...
researchdevelopmentdocument
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to French, preserving the name "explore-code" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-code" does not appear in the source text. So we just translate the text. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "backbone", "head", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". These should be kept as is or translated if appropriate? The instruction says "preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." "LoRA" is a technical term (Low-Rank Adaptation), likely keep as is. "adapter layers" might be translated? But it's a technical term, so keep as "adapter layers" or maybe "couches d'adaptation"?
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Compétence Rigor Run pour la reproduction de dépôt deep learning prioritaire au README. À utiliser lorsque la
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Compétence de configuration Rigor pour la reproduction d’un dépôt d’apprentissage profond prioritaire sur README. À utiliser lorsque la tâche consiste spécifiquement à préparer un environnement conda-first conservateur, des hypothèses de chemins de points de contrôle et de jeux de données, des indications d’emplacement de cache et des notes de configuration avant toute exécution sur un dépôt documenté par README. Ne pas utiliser pour l’analyse de dépôt, l’orchestration complète, l’interprétation d’articles, le rapport d’exécution final ou la configuration générique d’environnement non liée à une cible de reproduction spécifique.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into French, preserving the name "explore-run" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not to include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" does appear in the source text? Let's check: The source text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - that includes "explore-run"? Actually it says "Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - "run" is separate. But the name to preserve is "explore-run". In the source, it appears as "explore-run"? No, it says "explore-run" in the instruction but not in the text. The text has "explore_outputs/" and "explore run" (two words). The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run". So we should preserve that exact string if it appears. It does not appear as a single hyphenated word in the text. However, the text has
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Compétence de débogage rigoureux / audit rigoureux pour les travaux de recherche en deep learning. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur colle un traceback, une erreur de terminal, une OOM CUDA, un échec de chargement de checkpoint, une incompatibilité de forme, un symptôme de perte NaN ou un échec d'entraînement et souhaite un diagnostic conservateur avant toute correction, avec des correctifs de débogage clairement séparés des contributions de recherche. Ne pas utiliser pour un refactoring large, une adaptation spéculative, un patching exploratoire automatique ou une familiarisation générale avec le dépôt.
developmenttestingcode-review