ai-research-reproduction

Orchestrateur en mode reproduction de RigorPilot pour la reproduction de dépôts d'apprentissage profond avec approche README-first. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite un flux de bout en bout minimal et fiable qui lit d'abord le dépôt, sélectionne la plus petite cible d'inférence ou d'évaluation documentée, coordonne la prise en charge, la configuration, l'exécution de confiance, l'entraînement de confiance optionnel, l'analyse de dépôt optionnelle et la résolution optionnelle des lacunes documentaires, applique des règles de correctif conservatrices, enregistre les preuves, les hypothèses, les écarts et les points de décision humaine,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; faithfully read the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then record results and deviations. Start with references/agent-operating-principles.md; load references/research-rigor-principles.md and references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning or experiment details are at stake.

For first-use problems, run scripts/doctor.py with the intended Python (read-only; optional --repo and --require-module). The deterministic entrypoint is scripts/orchestrate_repro.py with a self-contained _bundled/ runtime, so this skill works when installed alone; separately installed companion skills remain optional reusable entrypoints. Use the entrypoint and --help for routine runs; inspect its implementation when a concrete blocker or safety question requires it. Executed commands persist lifecycle state, append-only events, and full streamed stdout/stderr under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/. A CANCEL file in the active run directory requests process-tree cancellation. For recovery, queues or model gates, read references/runtime-and-model-adapter.md; for the optional model/tool loop, read references/agent-runner.md and use scripts/run_agent.py.

Fit

Use this skill when all are true:

  • The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or documented commands.
  • The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution, training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
  • The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.

Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Read the README and nearby repo signals.
  2. Run the bundled repo-intake-and-plan stage to extract commands and targets.
  3. Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
  4. Run env-and-assets-bootstrap only for target-specific environment, checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
  5. Run analyze-project only when structure, insertion points, or suspicious implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
  6. Use minimal-run-and-audit for documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or sanity execution. Keep direct execution as the default; native shell syntax requires explicit review and authorization.
  7. Use run-train instead when the selected trusted target is training startup, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
  8. Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
  9. Award result-match only when explicit expected metrics are compared under a recorded tolerance; observed metrics alone prove execution, not reproduction. Then write the standardized outputs and a concise final note in the user's language when practical.
  10. Once the requested target and evidence checks are complete, return the bounded result and stop. Optional stages and further README commands are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.

  • Put the shortest high-value summary in SUMMARY.md.
  • Put copyable commands in COMMANDS.md.
  • Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in LOG.md.
  • Put scientific meaning and change effects in SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md.
  • Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md.
  • Put durable machine-readable state in status.json.
  • Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md when needed.
  • Put the researcher's at-a-glance view in ANNOTATED_README.md: the README replayed byte-for-byte—including its image, GIF, video, and HTML markup—with exactly one marked color annotation after every heading block. Never extract a text-only surrogate. Generation must pass the built-in strip/check round trip before the file is kept.
  • For original relative media/file context, use --source-adjacent-readme to also write RIGORPILOT_README.md beside the source README; inspect the reported path/status and never replace an unrelated existing file. See references/output-spec.md.
  • Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.

Reference Loading

  • Load references/language-policy.md when writing human-readable outputs.
  • Load references/research-rigor-principles.md before making comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
  • Load references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when dataset, split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
  • Consult ~/.rigorpilot/PERSONAL_RIGOR.md if present, under references/continuous-learning-policy.md (advisory only; core wins).
  • Failed and later-resolved runs are auto-recorded as lessons via shared/scripts/lessons_store.py (RIGORPILOT_LESSONS=0 disables).
  • Load references/research-safety-principles.md before protocol-sensitive decisions.
  • Load references/patch-policy.md before modifying repository files.
  • Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Plus de skills de lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text describes a skill for AI research exploration. We must preserve the name "ai-research-explore" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text includes technical terms like "Rigor Explore", "SOTA", "README-first", etc. We should keep those as is or translate appropriately? The instruction says "Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." So "Rigor Explore" might be a product name? It says "Rigor Explore compatible skill slug" - likely a proper name. "SOTA" is an acronym (state-of-the-art) - preserve. "README-first" is a term, preserve. "explore_outputs/" is a path, preserve. Also "current_research" is a variable-like term, preserve. We need to translate the rest naturally into French. The text is a description of when to use this skill. We'll produce a French translation that maintains the meaning and preserves the specified terms. Let's translate:
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Compétence en lecture seule Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit pour les dépôts de recherche en deep learning. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite lire et comprendre un dépôt, inspecter la structure du modèle et les points d'entrée d'entraînement ou d'inférence, examiner les configurations et les points d'insertion, ou signaler des schémas d'implémentation suspects sans modifier le code ni exécuter de tâches lourdes. Ne pas utiliser pour l'exécution active de commandes, le refactoring large, l'adaptation spéculative de code ou la correction automatique de bugs.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to French, preserving the name "explore-code" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-code" does not appear in the source text. So we just translate the text. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "backbone", "head", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". These should be kept as is or translated if appropriate? The instruction says "preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." "LoRA" is a technical term (Low-Rank Adaptation), likely keep as is. "adapter layers" might be translated? But it's a technical term, so keep as "adapter layers" or maybe "couches d'adaptation"?
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Compétence Rigor Run pour la reproduction de dépôt deep learning prioritaire au README. À utiliser lorsque la
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Compétence de configuration Rigor pour la reproduction d’un dépôt d’apprentissage profond prioritaire sur README. À utiliser lorsque la tâche consiste spécifiquement à préparer un environnement conda-first conservateur, des hypothèses de chemins de points de contrôle et de jeux de données, des indications d’emplacement de cache et des notes de configuration avant toute exécution sur un dépôt documenté par README. Ne pas utiliser pour l’analyse de dépôt, l’orchestration complète, l’interprétation d’articles, le rapport d’exécution final ou la configuration générique d’environnement non liée à une cible de reproduction spécifique.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into French, preserving the name "explore-run" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not to include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" does appear in the source text? Let's check: The source text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - that includes "explore-run"? Actually it says "Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - "run" is separate. But the name to preserve is "explore-run". In the source, it appears as "explore-run"? No, it says "explore-run" in the instruction but not in the text. The text has "explore_outputs/" and "explore run" (two words). The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run". So we should preserve that exact string if it appears. It does not appear as a single hyphenated word in the text. However, the text has
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Compétence de débogage rigoureux / audit rigoureux pour les travaux de recherche en deep learning. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur colle un traceback, une erreur de terminal, une OOM CUDA, un échec de chargement de checkpoint, une incompatibilité de forme, un symptôme de perte NaN ou un échec d'entraînement et souhaite un diagnostic conservateur avant toute correction, avec des correctifs de débogage clairement séparés des contributions de recherche. Ne pas utiliser pour un refactoring large, une adaptation spéculative, un patching exploratoire automatique ou une familiarisation générale avec le dépôt.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Assistant contextuel Rigor Paper pour la reproduction de dépôts deep learning à lecture prioritaire du README. Utiliser uniquement lorsque le README et les fichiers du dépôt laissent un écart étroit et critique pour la reproduction, et que la tâche consiste à résoudre un détail spécifique d’un article tel que la division des ensembles de données, le prétraitement, le protocole d’évaluation, le mappage des points de contrôle ou une hypothèse d’exécution à partir des sources primaires de l’article, tout en enregistrant les conflits. Ne pas utiliser pour un résumé général d’article, une analyse de dépôt, une configuration d’environnement, une exécution de commande, une recherche d’article par titre uniquement, ou...
researchdocumentdata-analysis