ai-research-reproduction

Orchestrateur en mode reproduction de RigorPilot pour la reproduction de dépôts d'apprentissage profond avec approche README-first. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite un flux de bout en bout minimal et fiable qui lit d'abord le dépôt, sélectionne la plus petite cible d'inférence ou d'évaluation documentée, coordonne la prise en charge, la configuration, l'exécution de confiance, l'entraînement de confiance optionnel, l'analyse de dépôt optionnelle et la résolution optionnelle des lacunes documentaires, applique des règles de correctif conservatrices, enregistre les preuves, les hypothèses, les écarts et les points de décision humaine,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward the smallest trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Preserve documented meaning; record assumptions, deviations and blockers instead of changing semantics to manufacture success. Load specialized references only for a concrete uncertainty.

Fast Path

For a routine bounded run, keep the control path short:

  1. Read the target README and only the target test/config/source needed to understand the documented command.
  2. Run scripts/orchestrate_repro.py --repo <repo> --plan-only --agent-output with any explicit user timeout bound (--timeout or --train-timeout) already supplied; review command_candidates, the selected cmd-XX, side-effect contract, selection fingerprint, and returned reviewed_run_args. With no --output-dir, later evidence goes to <repo>/repro_outputs regardless of caller cwd.
  3. Run the selected candidate, or another reviewed candidate, with --run-selected --command-id <cmd-XX> --plan-fingerprint <fingerprint> --agent-output plus requested timeout/metric/source-adjacent options. Preserve an explicit user command-timeout bound instead of silently making it stricter on a routine trusted run. --timeout limits the target command; do not wrap the whole orchestrator in an equal or shorter external timeout, because it still needs time to terminate children and write terminal evidence. A changed command set fails closed; setup/download commands are never target candidates.
  4. Run --verify-output --agent-output; inspect detailed evidence files only when verification fails or the result is partial/blocked.
  5. Deliver the bounded result and stop.

For a host with short tool-call deadlines, rerun planning with --include-agent-handoff and follow references/agent-job.md; otherwise keep the direct path above. Job completion is not task acceptance, and uncertain state is never a reason for automatic replay.

Do not inspect orchestrate_repro.py, annotate_readme.py, _bundled/, writers, or runtime internals on a normal success path. Inspect implementation only for a concrete blocker, unexpected side effect, bundle-integrity failure, or unresolved safety question. Use scripts/doctor.py for first-use environment/install diagnostics. Executed commands keep full lifecycle/log evidence under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/.

Fit

Use this skill for repository-grounded, multi-phase trusted reproduction where the goal is a small reproducible target. Do not use it for paper summaries, generic setup, isolated scanning, standalone commands, open-ended research design, or explicitly authorized candidate exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Treat README guidance as primary; extract and select the minimum trustworthy target.
  2. Use setup/assets only for target-specific prerequisites and analyze-project only when structural clarification is needed.
  3. Use minimal-run-and-audit for inference/evaluation/smoke and run-train for training startup, kickoff, or resume; direct execution is the default.
  4. Pause before fuller training or changes to dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or interpretation.
  5. Award result-match only against explicit expected metrics and tolerance; process success alone is not reproduction success.
  6. Write the evidence bundle, return the requested bounded result, and stop; optional stages are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and references/output-spec.md. Keep summaries short, commands copyable, machine state stable, and scientific/comparability changes explicit. ANNOTATED_README.md must preserve the source README byte-for-byte outside inserted evidence blocks and pass its strip/check round trip. Use --source-adjacent-readme only for an owned RIGORPILOT_README.md; never replace an unrelated file. Distinguish verified facts from inference.

Reference Loading

  • Workflow judgment: references/agent-operating-principles.md.
  • Human-readable output: references/language-policy.md.
  • Scientific/comparability judgment: references/research-rigor-principles.md and, when experiment details matter, references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md.
  • Protocol-sensitive changes: references/research-safety-principles.md and references/patch-policy.md.
  • Personal rigor and lessons are advisory only; keep specialized detail in references/scripts rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Plus de skills de lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text describes a skill for AI research exploration. We must preserve the name "ai-research-explore" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text includes technical terms like "Rigor Explore", "SOTA", "README-first", etc. We should keep those as is or translate appropriately? The instruction says "Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." So "Rigor Explore" might be a product name? It says "Rigor Explore compatible skill slug" - likely a proper name. "SOTA" is an acronym (state-of-the-art) - preserve. "README-first" is a term, preserve. "explore_outputs/" is a path, preserve. Also "current_research" is a variable-like term, preserve. We need to translate the rest naturally into French. The text is a description of when to use this skill. We'll produce a French translation that maintains the meaning and preserves the specified terms. Let's translate:
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Compétence en lecture seule Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit pour les dépôts de recherche en deep learning. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite lire et comprendre un dépôt, inspecter la structure du modèle et les points d'entrée d'entraînement ou d'inférence, examiner les configurations et les points d'insertion, ou signaler des schémas d'implémentation suspects sans modifier le code ni exécuter de tâches lourdes. Ne pas utiliser pour l'exécution active de commandes, le refactoring large, l'adaptation spéculative de code ou la correction automatique de bugs.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to French, preserving the name "explore-code" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-code" does not appear in the source text. So we just translate the text. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "backbone", "head", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". These should be kept as is or translated if appropriate? The instruction says "preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." "LoRA" is a technical term (Low-Rank Adaptation), likely keep as is. "adapter layers" might be translated? But it's a technical term, so keep as "adapter layers" or maybe "couches d'adaptation"?
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Compétence Rigor Run pour la reproduction de dépôt deep learning prioritaire au README. À utiliser lorsque la
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Compétence de configuration Rigor pour la reproduction d’un dépôt d’apprentissage profond prioritaire sur README. À utiliser lorsque la tâche consiste spécifiquement à préparer un environnement conda-first conservateur, des hypothèses de chemins de points de contrôle et de jeux de données, des indications d’emplacement de cache et des notes de configuration avant toute exécution sur un dépôt documenté par README. Ne pas utiliser pour l’analyse de dépôt, l’orchestration complète, l’interprétation d’articles, le rapport d’exécution final ou la configuration générique d’environnement non liée à une cible de reproduction spécifique.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given English text into French, preserving the name "explore-run" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not to include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" does appear in the source text? Let's check: The source text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - that includes "explore-run"? Actually it says "Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - "run" is separate. But the name to preserve is "explore-run". In the source, it appears as "explore-run"? No, it says "explore-run" in the instruction but not in the text. The text has "explore_outputs/" and "explore run" (two words). The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run". So we should preserve that exact string if it appears. It does not appear as a single hyphenated word in the text. However, the text has
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Compétence de débogage rigoureux / audit rigoureux pour les travaux de recherche en deep learning. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur colle un traceback, une erreur de terminal, une OOM CUDA, un échec de chargement de checkpoint, une incompatibilité de forme, un symptôme de perte NaN ou un échec d'entraînement et souhaite un diagnostic conservateur avant toute correction, avec des correctifs de débogage clairement séparés des contributions de recherche. Ne pas utiliser pour un refactoring large, une adaptation spéculative, un patching exploratoire automatique ou une familiarisation générale avec le dépôt.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Assistant contextuel Rigor Paper pour la reproduction de dépôts deep learning à lecture prioritaire du README. Utiliser uniquement lorsque le README et les fichiers du dépôt laissent un écart étroit et critique pour la reproduction, et que la tâche consiste à résoudre un détail spécifique d’un article tel que la division des ensembles de données, le prétraitement, le protocole d’évaluation, le mappage des points de contrôle ou une hypothèse d’exécution à partir des sources primaires de l’article, tout en enregistrant les conflits. Ne pas utiliser pour un résumé général d’article, une analyse de dépôt, une configuration d’environnement, une exécution de commande, une recherche d’article par titre uniquement, ou...
researchdocumentdata-analysis