ai-research-reproduction

Orchestrateur en mode reproduction de RigorPilot pour la reproduction de dépôts d'apprentissage profond avec approche README-first. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite un flux de bout en bout minimal et fiable qui lit d'abord le dépôt, sélectionne la plus petite cible d'inférence ou d'évaluation documentée, coordonne la prise en charge, la configuration, l'exécution de confiance, l'entraînement de confiance optionnel, l'analyse de dépôt optionnelle et la résolution optionnelle des lacunes documentaires, applique des règles de correctif conservatrices, enregistre les preuves, les hypothèses, les écarts et les points de décision humaine,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Use this as the Rigor Reproduce compatible skill slug for README-first deep learning repository reproduction. The installed slug remains ai-research-reproduction for compatibility. The skill guides the agent toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence; it should not micromanage implementation details that the model can infer from the repository. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; it means faithfully reading the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then recording results and deviations.

Start from the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md, then load ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md and ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning, comparability, or experiment details are at stake.

Fit

Use this skill when all are true:

  • The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or documented commands.
  • The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution, training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
  • The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.

Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Read the README and nearby repo signals.
  2. Use repo-intake-and-plan to extract documented commands and candidate targets.
  3. Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
  4. Use env-and-assets-bootstrap only for target-specific environment, checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
  5. Use analyze-project only when structure, insertion points, or suspicious implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
  6. Use minimal-run-and-audit for documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or sanity execution.
  7. Use run-train instead when the selected trusted target is training startup, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
  8. Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
  9. Write the standardized outputs and give a concise final note in the user's language when practical.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.

  • Put the shortest high-value summary in SUMMARY.md.
  • Put copyable commands in COMMANDS.md.
  • Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in LOG.md.
  • Put scientific meaning and change effects in SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md.
  • Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md.
  • Put durable machine-readable state in status.json.
  • Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md when needed.
  • Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.

Reference Loading

  • Load references/language-policy.md when writing human-readable outputs.
  • Load ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md before making comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
  • Load ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when dataset, split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
  • Load references/research-safety-principles.md before protocol-sensitive decisions.
  • Load references/patch-policy.md before modifying repository files.
  • Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Plus de skills de lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding,...
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Compétence en lecture seule Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit pour les dépôts de recherche en deep learning. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur souhaite lire et comprendre un dépôt, inspecter la structure du modèle et les points d'entrée d'entraînement ou d'inférence, examiner les configurations et les points d'insertion, ou signaler des schémas d'implémentation suspects sans modifier le code ni exécuter de tâches lourdes. Ne pas utiliser pour l'exécution active de commandes, le refactoring large, l'adaptation spéculative de code ou la correction automatique de bugs.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted...
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Compétence de configuration Rigor pour la reproduction d’un dépôt d’apprentissage profond prioritaire sur README. À utiliser lorsque la tâche consiste spécifiquement à préparer un environnement conda-first conservateur, des hypothèses de chemins de points de contrôle et de jeux de données, des indications d’emplacement de cache et des notes de configuration avant toute exécution sur un dépôt documenté par README. Ne pas utiliser pour l’analyse de dépôt, l’orchestration complète, l’interprétation d’articles, le rapport d’exécution final ou la configuration générique d’environnement non liée à une cible de reproduction spécifique.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill for bounded exploratory evidence in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs such as small-subset validation, short-cycle guess-and-check, batch sweeps, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trials, with fair-comparison caveats and no-overclaim summaries in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline...
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Compétence de débogage rigoureux / audit rigoureux pour les travaux de recherche en deep learning. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur colle un traceback, une erreur de terminal, une OOM CUDA, un échec de chargement de checkpoint, une incompatibilité de forme, un symptôme de perte NaN ou un échec d'entraînement et souhaite un diagnostic conservateur avant toute correction, avec des correctifs de débogage clairement séparés des contributions de recherche. Ne pas utiliser pour un refactoring large, une adaptation spéculative, un patching exploratoire automatique ou une familiarisation générale avec le dépôt.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Assistant contextuel Rigor Paper pour la reproduction de dépôts deep learning à lecture prioritaire du README. Utiliser uniquement lorsque le README et les fichiers du dépôt laissent un écart étroit et critique pour la reproduction, et que la tâche consiste à résoudre un détail spécifique d’un article tel que la division des ensembles de données, le prétraitement, le protocole d’évaluation, le mappage des points de contrôle ou une hypothèse d’exécution à partir des sources primaires de l’article, tout en enregistrant les conflits. Ne pas utiliser pour un résumé général d’article, une analyse de dépôt, une configuration d’environnement, une exécution de commande, une recherche d’article par titre uniquement, ou...
researchdocumentdata-analysis