csharp-mstest

par github

Tests unitaires modernes avec MSTest 3.x/4.x utilisant les API actuelles et les meilleures pratiques. Couvre la structure des classes de test, la gestion du cycle de vie et le modèle AAA (Arrange-Act-Assert) avec des classes sealed et une initialisation basée sur le constructeur. Fournit des API d'assertion complètes incluant l'égalité, les vérifications nulles, les tests d'exception (Throws/ThrowsExactly), les collections, les chaînes, les comparaisons et les assertions de type. Prend en charge les tests pilotés par les données via DataRow et DynamicData avec ValueTuple et TestDataRow pour le type...

npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill csharp-mstest

MSTest Best Practices (MSTest 3.x/4.x)

Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with modern MSTest, using current APIs and best practices.

Project Setup

  • Use a separate test project with naming convention [ProjectName].Tests
  • Reference MSTest 3.x+ NuGet packages (includes analyzers)
  • Consider using MSTest.Sdk for simplified project setup
  • Run tests with dotnet test

Test Class Structure

  • Use [TestClass] attribute for test classes
  • Seal test classes by default for performance and design clarity
  • Use [TestMethod] for test methods (prefer over [DataTestMethod])
  • Follow Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
  • Name tests using pattern MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior
[TestClass]
public sealed class CalculatorTests
{
    [TestMethod]
    public void Add_TwoPositiveNumbers_ReturnsSum()
    {
        // Arrange
        var calculator = new Calculator();

        // Act
        var result = calculator.Add(2, 3);

        // Assert
        Assert.AreEqual(5, result);
    }
}

Test Lifecycle

  • Prefer constructors over [TestInitialize] - enables readonly fields and follows standard C# patterns
  • Use [TestCleanup] for cleanup that must run even if test fails
  • Combine constructor with async [TestInitialize] when async setup is needed
[TestClass]
public sealed class ServiceTests
{
    private readonly MyService _service;  // readonly enabled by constructor

    public ServiceTests()
    {
        _service = new MyService();
    }

    [TestInitialize]
    public async Task InitAsync()
    {
        // Use for async initialization only
        await _service.WarmupAsync();
    }

    [TestCleanup]
    public void Cleanup() => _service.Reset();
}

Execution Order

  1. Assembly Initialization - [AssemblyInitialize] (once per test assembly)
  2. Class Initialization - [ClassInitialize] (once per test class)
  3. Test Initialization (for every test method):
    1. Constructor
    2. Set TestContext property
    3. [TestInitialize]
  4. Test Execution - test method runs
  5. Test Cleanup (for every test method):
    1. [TestCleanup]
    2. DisposeAsync (if implemented)
    3. Dispose (if implemented)
  6. Class Cleanup - [ClassCleanup] (once per test class)
  7. Assembly Cleanup - [AssemblyCleanup] (once per test assembly)

Modern Assertion APIs

MSTest provides three assertion classes: Assert, StringAssert, and CollectionAssert.

Assert Class - Core Assertions

// Equality
Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual);
Assert.AreNotEqual(notExpected, actual);
Assert.AreSame(expectedObject, actualObject);      // Reference equality
Assert.AreNotSame(notExpectedObject, actualObject);

// Null checks
Assert.IsNull(value);
Assert.IsNotNull(value);

// Boolean
Assert.IsTrue(condition);
Assert.IsFalse(condition);

// Fail/Inconclusive
Assert.Fail("Test failed due to...");
Assert.Inconclusive("Test cannot be completed because...");

Exception Testing (Prefer over [ExpectedException])

// Assert.Throws - matches TException or derived types
var ex = Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => Method(null));
Assert.AreEqual("Value cannot be null.", ex.Message);

// Assert.ThrowsExactly - matches exact type only
var ex = Assert.ThrowsExactly<InvalidOperationException>(() => Method());

// Async versions
var ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(async () => await client.GetAsync(url));
var ex = await Assert.ThrowsExactlyAsync<InvalidOperationException>(async () => await Method());

Collection Assertions (Assert class)

Assert.Contains(expectedItem, collection);
Assert.DoesNotContain(unexpectedItem, collection);
Assert.ContainsSingle(collection);  // exactly one element
Assert.HasCount(5, collection);
Assert.IsEmpty(collection);
Assert.IsNotEmpty(collection);

String Assertions (Assert class)

Assert.Contains("expected", actualString);
Assert.StartsWith("prefix", actualString);
Assert.EndsWith("suffix", actualString);
Assert.DoesNotStartWith("prefix", actualString);
Assert.DoesNotEndWith("suffix", actualString);
Assert.MatchesRegex(@"\d{3}-\d{4}", phoneNumber);
Assert.DoesNotMatchRegex(@"\d+", textOnly);

Comparison Assertions

Assert.IsGreaterThan(lowerBound, actual);
Assert.IsGreaterThanOrEqualTo(lowerBound, actual);
Assert.IsLessThan(upperBound, actual);
Assert.IsLessThanOrEqualTo(upperBound, actual);
Assert.IsInRange(actual, low, high);
Assert.IsPositive(number);
Assert.IsNegative(number);

Type Assertions

// MSTest 3.x - uses out parameter
Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyClass>(obj, out var typed);
typed.DoSomething();

// MSTest 4.x - returns typed result directly
var typed = Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyClass>(obj);
typed.DoSomething();

Assert.IsNotInstanceOfType<WrongType>(obj);

Assert.That (MSTest 4.0+)

Assert.That(result.Count > 0);  // Auto-captures expression in failure message

StringAssert Class

Note: Prefer Assert class equivalents when available (e.g., Assert.Contains("expected", actual) over StringAssert.Contains(actual, "expected")).

StringAssert.Contains(actualString, "expected");
StringAssert.StartsWith(actualString, "prefix");
StringAssert.EndsWith(actualString, "suffix");
StringAssert.Matches(actualString, new Regex(@"\d{3}-\d{4}"));
StringAssert.DoesNotMatch(actualString, new Regex(@"\d+"));

CollectionAssert Class

Note: Prefer Assert class equivalents when available (e.g., Assert.Contains).

// Containment
CollectionAssert.Contains(collection, expectedItem);
CollectionAssert.DoesNotContain(collection, unexpectedItem);

// Equality (same elements, same order)
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(expectedCollection, actualCollection);
CollectionAssert.AreNotEqual(unexpectedCollection, actualCollection);

// Equivalence (same elements, any order)
CollectionAssert.AreEquivalent(expectedCollection, actualCollection);
CollectionAssert.AreNotEquivalent(unexpectedCollection, actualCollection);

// Subset checks
CollectionAssert.IsSubsetOf(subset, superset);
CollectionAssert.IsNotSubsetOf(notSubset, collection);

// Element validation
CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreInstancesOfType(collection, typeof(MyClass));
CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreNotNull(collection);
CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreUnique(collection);

Data-Driven Tests

DataRow

[TestMethod]
[DataRow(1, 2, 3)]
[DataRow(0, 0, 0, DisplayName = "Zeros")]
[DataRow(-1, 1, 0, IgnoreMessage = "Known issue #123")]  // MSTest 3.8+
public void Add_ReturnsSum(int a, int b, int expected)
{
    Assert.AreEqual(expected, Calculator.Add(a, b));
}

DynamicData

The data source can return any of the following types:

  • IEnumerable<(T1, T2, ...)> (ValueTuple) - preferred, provides type safety (MSTest 3.7+)
  • IEnumerable<Tuple<T1, T2, ...>> - provides type safety
  • IEnumerable<TestDataRow> - provides type safety plus control over test metadata (display name, categories)
  • IEnumerable<object[]> - least preferred, no type safety

Note: When creating new test data methods, prefer ValueTuple or TestDataRow over IEnumerable<object[]>. The object[] approach provides no compile-time type checking and can lead to runtime errors from type mismatches.

[TestMethod]
[DynamicData(nameof(TestData))]
public void DynamicTest(int a, int b, int expected)
{
    Assert.AreEqual(expected, Calculator.Add(a, b));
}

// ValueTuple - preferred (MSTest 3.7+)
public static IEnumerable<(int a, int b, int expected)> TestData =>
[
    (1, 2, 3),
    (0, 0, 0),
];

// TestDataRow - when you need custom display names or metadata
public static IEnumerable<TestDataRow<(int a, int b, int expected)>> TestDataWithMetadata =>
[
    new((1, 2, 3)) { DisplayName = "Positive numbers" },
    new((0, 0, 0)) { DisplayName = "Zeros" },
    new((-1, 1, 0)) { DisplayName = "Mixed signs", IgnoreMessage = "Known issue #123" },
];

// IEnumerable<object[]> - avoid for new code (no type safety)
public static IEnumerable<object[]> LegacyTestData =>
[
    [1, 2, 3],
    [0, 0, 0],
];

TestContext

The TestContext class provides test run information, cancellation support, and output methods. See TestContext documentation for complete reference.

Accessing TestContext

// Property (MSTest suppresses CS8618 - don't use nullable or = null!)
public TestContext TestContext { get; set; }

// Constructor injection (MSTest 3.6+) - preferred for immutability
[TestClass]
public sealed class MyTests
{
    private readonly TestContext _testContext;

    public MyTests(TestContext testContext)
    {
        _testContext = testContext;
    }
}

// Static methods receive it as parameter
[ClassInitialize]
public static void ClassInit(TestContext context) { }

// Optional for cleanup methods (MSTest 3.6+)
[ClassCleanup]
public static void ClassCleanup(TestContext context) { }

[AssemblyCleanup]
public static void AssemblyCleanup(TestContext context) { }

Cancellation Token

Always use TestContext.CancellationToken for cooperative cancellation with [Timeout]:

[TestMethod]
[Timeout(5000)]
public async Task LongRunningTest()
{
    await _httpClient.GetAsync(url, TestContext.CancellationToken);
}

Test Run Properties

TestContext.TestName              // Current test method name
TestContext.TestDisplayName       // Display name (3.7+)
TestContext.CurrentTestOutcome    // Pass/Fail/InProgress
TestContext.TestData              // Parameterized test data (3.7+, in TestInitialize/Cleanup)
TestContext.TestException         // Exception if test failed (3.7+, in TestCleanup)
TestContext.DeploymentDirectory   // Directory with deployment items

Output and Result Files

// Write to test output (useful for debugging)
TestContext.WriteLine("Processing item {0}", itemId);

// Attach files to test results (logs, screenshots)
TestContext.AddResultFile(screenshotPath);

// Store/retrieve data across test methods
TestContext.Properties["SharedKey"] = computedValue;

Advanced Features

Retry for Flaky Tests (MSTest 3.9+)

[TestMethod]
[Retry(3)]
public void FlakyTest() { }

Conditional Execution (MSTest 3.10+)

Skip or run tests based on OS or CI environment:

// OS-specific tests
[TestMethod]
[OSCondition(OperatingSystems.Windows)]
public void WindowsOnlyTest() { }

[TestMethod]
[OSCondition(OperatingSystems.Linux | OperatingSystems.MacOS)]
public void UnixOnlyTest() { }

[TestMethod]
[OSCondition(ConditionMode.Exclude, OperatingSystems.Windows)]
public void SkipOnWindowsTest() { }

// CI environment tests
[TestMethod]
[CICondition]  // Runs only in CI (default: ConditionMode.Include)
public void CIOnlyTest() { }

[TestMethod]
[CICondition(ConditionMode.Exclude)]  // Skips in CI, runs locally
public void LocalOnlyTest() { }

Parallelization

// Assembly level
[assembly: Parallelize(Workers = 4, Scope = ExecutionScope.MethodLevel)]

// Disable for specific class
[TestClass]
[DoNotParallelize]
public sealed class SequentialTests { }

Work Item Traceability (MSTest 3.8+)

Link tests to work items for traceability in test reports:

// Azure DevOps work items
[TestMethod]
[WorkItem(12345)]  // Links to work item #12345
public void Feature_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior() { }

// Multiple work items
[TestMethod]
[WorkItem(12345)]
[WorkItem(67890)]
public void Feature_CoversMultipleRequirements() { }

// GitHub issues (MSTest 3.8+)
[TestMethod]
[GitHubWorkItem("https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/42")]
public void BugFix_Issue42_IsResolved() { }

Work item associations appear in test results and can be used for:

  • Tracing test coverage to requirements
  • Linking bug fixes to regression tests
  • Generating traceability reports in CI/CD pipelines

Common Mistakes to Avoid

// ❌ Wrong argument order
Assert.AreEqual(actual, expected);
// ✅ Correct
Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual);

// ❌ Using ExpectedException (obsolete)
[ExpectedException(typeof(ArgumentException))]
// ✅ Use Assert.Throws
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => Method());

// ❌ Using LINQ Single() - unclear exception
var item = items.Single();
// ✅ Use ContainsSingle - better failure message
var item = Assert.ContainsSingle(items);

// ❌ Hard cast - unclear exception
var handler = (MyHandler)result;
// ✅ Type assertion - shows actual type on failure
var handler = Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyHandler>(result);

// ❌ Ignoring cancellation token
await client.GetAsync(url, CancellationToken.None);
// ✅ Flow test cancellation
await client.GetAsync(url, TestContext.CancellationToken);

// ❌ Making TestContext nullable - leads to unnecessary null checks
public TestContext? TestContext { get; set; }
// ❌ Using null! - MSTest already suppresses CS8618 for this property
public TestContext TestContext { get; set; } = null!;
// ✅ Declare without nullable or initializer - MSTest handles the warning
public TestContext TestContext { get; set; }

Test Organization

  • Group tests by feature or component
  • Use [TestCategory("Category")] for filtering
  • Use [TestProperty("Name", "Value")] for custom metadata (e.g., [TestProperty("Bug", "12345")])
  • Use [Priority(1)] for critical tests
  • Enable relevant MSTest analyzers (MSTEST0020 for constructor preference)

Mocking and Isolation

  • Use Moq or NSubstitute for mocking dependencies
  • Use interfaces to facilitate mocking
  • Mock dependencies to isolate units under test

Plus de skills de github

console-rendering
github
Instructions pour utiliser le système de rendu console basé sur les tags de struct en Go
official
acquire-codebase-knowledge
github
Utilisez cette compétence lorsque l'utilisateur demande explicitement de cartographier, documenter ou s'intégrer dans une base de code existante. Déclenchez-la pour des requêtes comme "cartographier cette base de code", "documenter…
official
acreadiness-assess
github
Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc…
official
acreadiness-generate-instructions
github
Génère des fichiers d'instructions d'agent IA personnalisés via la commande d'instructions AgentRC. Produit .github/copilot-instructions.md (par défaut, recommandé pour Copilot dans VS…
official
acreadiness-policy
github
Aider l'utilisateur à choisir, rédiger ou appliquer une politique AgentRC. Les politiques personnalisent le score de préparation en désactivant les vérifications non pertinentes, en remplaçant l'impact/niveau, en définissant…
official
add-educational-comments
github
Ajouter des commentaires pédagogiques aux fichiers de code pour les transformer en ressources d'apprentissage efficaces. Adapte la profondeur et le ton des explications à trois niveaux de connaissances configurables : débutant, intermédiaire et avancé. Demande automatiquement un fichier si aucun n'est fourni, avec une liste numérotée pour une sélection rapide. Étend les fichiers jusqu'à 125 % en utilisant uniquement des commentaires pédagogiques (limite stricte : 400 nouvelles lignes ; 300 pour les fichiers de plus de 1 000 lignes). Préserve l'encodage du fichier, le style d'indentation, la correction syntaxique et...
official
adobe-illustrator-scripting
github
Rédigez, déboguez et optimisez des scripts d'automatisation Adobe Illustrator en utilisant ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Utilisez lors de la création ou de la modification de scripts qui manipulent…
official
agent-governance
github
Politiques déclaratives, classification d'intention et pistes d'audit pour contrôler l'accès et le comportement des outils d'agents IA. Des politiques de gouvernance composables définissent les outils autorisés/bloqués, les filtres de contenu, les limites de débit et les exigences d'approbation — stockées en tant que configuration, pas de code. La classification d'intention sémantique détecte les invites dangereuses (exfiltration de données, escalade de privilèges, injection d'invite) avant l'exécution des outils à l'aide de signaux basés sur des motifs. Le décorateur de gouvernance au niveau des outils applique les politiques au niveau de la fonction...
official