nemoclaw-maintainer-find-review-pr

Find PR to Review

Search for open PRs labeled security whose Project Priority is Urgent or High, associate each with its linked issue, detect duplicates (multiple PRs targeting the same issue), and present a clean summary so you can decide what to review or close.

Prerequisites

• gh (GitHub CLI) must be installed and authenticated.
• The active gh token must have read:project scope.
• You must be in a GitHub repository (or the user must specify OWNER/REPO).

Step 1: Fetch candidate PRs

Read the NemoClaw Development Tracker and select open PRs that carry the canonical security label and have Project Priority Urgent or High:

gh project item-list 199 --owner NVIDIA --limit 1000 --format json \
  | jq '[.items[]
    | select(.content.repository == "NVIDIA/NemoClaw")
    | select(.content.type == "PullRequest")
    | select(((.labels // []) | index("security")) != null)
    | select(.priority == "Urgent" or .priority == "High")
    | {number: .content.number, title: .content.title, url: .content.url,
       priority: .priority, status: .status}]'

Discard entries whose PR is no longer open. Fetch PR body, author, branch, labels, and creation time for the remaining numbers with gh pr view. If the result is empty, report that there are no matching PRs and stop.

Step 2: Extract linked issues

For each PR, parse the body for linked issue references. Look for these patterns (case-insensitive):

• Fixes #NNN, Closes #NNN, Resolves #NNN
• Related Issue / Linked Issue section containing #NNN
• Issue number in the PR title, e.g. (#NNN) suffix
• Branch name containing an issue number, e.g. fix/something-NNN

Build a mapping: PR# → [issue numbers].

If a PR has no detectable linked issue, mark it as (no linked issue).

Step 3: Detect duplicates

Group PRs by linked issue number. Any issue with two or more open PRs is a duplicate group.

For each duplicate group, fetch a brief summary of each competing PR to help the user decide which to keep:

gh pr view <number> --json number,title,author,createdAt,additions,deletions,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup --jq '{number,title,author: .author.login,created: .createdAt,additions,deletions,review: .reviewDecision,checks: [.statusCheckRollup[]?.conclusion] | unique}'

Step 4: Check for superseded PRs

Also flag PRs whose body contains phrases like:

• follow-up to #NNN / supersedes #NNN / replaces #NNN / folds in #NNN

where #NNN is another open PR number in the candidate list. These indicate one PR has absorbed another.

Step 5: Present results

Duplicates / Superseded

If duplicates or superseded PRs exist, present them first in a table:

### Duplicate PRs (same issue)

| Issue | PR | Author | Title | +/- | Status |
|-------|-----|--------|-------|-----|--------|
| #804  | #1121 | user1 | ...  | +50/-10 | Checks passing |
| #804  | #1300 | user2 | ...  | +80/-20 | Checks failing |

**Recommendation:** #1121 is smaller and passing checks — consider closing #1300.

For superseded PRs:

### Superseded PRs

- #1416 supersedes/folds in #1392 (shell-quote sandboxName)
  → Consider closing #1392 if #1416 covers its scope.

Clean candidates

Present non-duplicate PRs in a table:

### Review candidates (no duplicates)

| PR | Issue | Priority | Title | Author | Age |
|----|-------|----------|-------|--------|-----|
| #1476 | #577 | Urgent | disable remote uninstall fallback | user1 | 2d |
| #1121 | #804 | High | Landlock read-only /sandbox | user2 | 6d |

Summary line

End with a one-line recommendation of which PR to review first, preferring:

1. Project Priority (Urgent before High)
2. Older PRs (waiting longest)
3. PRs with passing checks
4. PRs with smaller diff size (easier to review)

Notes

• Do NOT automatically close any PRs. Only present findings and recommendations.
• If the user specifies additional filters (e.g., a specific scope label like OpenShell), apply them.
• If the user asks for a different priority, filter the Project Priority field. Never use or create a priority label.