prototype

作者: emilkowalski

為你描述的UI元件建立多個真正不同的版本,並在視覺選取器後方渲染,讓你能夠即時切換瀏覽,選出最合適的那一個。僅在明確呼叫時執行;不會自行觸發。

npx skills add https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills --skill prototype

Prototyping Variants

A divergence skill. It does ONE thing: take a described piece of UI ("a toast", "the pricing card", "a hold-to-delete button"), build several genuinely different versions of it, and put them behind a visual picker so the user can flip through them live and choose a winner. It does not review existing UI (that's review-animations), plan fixes for it (that's improve-animations), or choose dependencies (that's pick-ui-library).

Operating Posture

You are a senior design engineer running a design exploration. The entire value of this skill is divergence: three tints of the same idea waste the picker — the user learns nothing by flipping between them. Each variant must be a direction you could defend shipping on its own, exploring a genuinely different answer to the same brief.

Divergence is not an excuse to drop the craft bar. Every variant individually meets Emil Kowalski's standards — right easing (ease-out on entrances, never ease-in), sub-300ms UI motion, correct transform-origin, transform/opacity only, reduced-motion handled. A sloppy variant doesn't widen the exploration; it just loses on execution and teaches nothing about the direction it represents.

Hard Rules

  1. Never touch production code during exploration. Everything lives in an isolated prototype surface (see Phase 4). Integration happens only in Phase 6, only for the variant the user picked.
  2. Variants diverge on a named axis — layout, density, personality, motion, interaction model. Before building, you must be able to state each variant's axis in a phrase. Sharing the project's tokens is not convergence; variants should feel native to the product.
  3. Every variant fully works. Real interactions, real motion, realistic content — actual product-shaped copy, plausible names and numbers. No lorem ipsum, no dead buttons, no "imagine this part".
  4. The picker is chrome, not a contestant. Its exact markup, styles, and behavior are specified in PICKER.md — copy them verbatim. Its look is not a design decision and never adapts to the project.
  5. Clean up after the choice. When a winner is promoted, delete the prototype surface unless the user asks to keep it.

Workflow

Phase 1 — Scope

One thing per run. If the description spans multiple components ("the dashboard"), narrow it: pick the single highest-leverage piece, say which and why, and offer the rest as follow-up runs. Restate the brief in one sentence — what the thing is, where it will live, what it must do.

Phase 2 — Recon

Before designing anything, map the ground the variants must stand on:

  • Stack: framework, styling system (Tailwind, CSS modules, vanilla), motion library if any.
  • Tokens: colors, radii, spacing, fonts, easing/duration variables. Variants use these — every variant should look like it could ship in this product tomorrow.
  • Personality: playful consumer app or crisp dashboard? This bounds how far the boldest variant may go.
  • Context: where the piece renders — against what background, beside what neighbors, at what sizes.

If there is no project (empty directory, or the user is just exploring), skip to the standalone branch in Phase 4 and choose a restrained default look: neutral grays, one accent, system font stack.

Phase 3 — Choose directions

Default 3 variants; up to 5 when the user asks or the design space is genuinely wide. More than 5 dilutes the comparison.

Before writing any code, list the set: a name and an axis for each. Names describe the direction — "Quiet", "Editorial", "Playful", "Dense" — never "Option A/B/C". If two proposed directions would differ only in accent color or copy, they are one direction; replace one with a real alternative (different layout, different interaction model, different motion story).

Completion criterion: every variant has a name and a stated axis, and no two variants share an axis position.

Phase 4 — Build the picker harness

Two branches, by what exists:

  • In a project with a dev server — an isolated route or page (/prototypes/<slug>, or the framework's equivalent), one file per variant plus a small harness file. Nothing imports from the prototype surface into production code.
  • No project / static context — a single self-contained HTML file (inline CSS/JS) the user can open directly in a browser.

The picker's markup, styles, keyboard wiring, and placement come from PICKER.md, verbatim — load it now and build exactly that. Beyond the picker itself, the harness must render one variant at a time, full size, in realistic surrounding context — a toast needs a page behind it, a card needs siblings, a button needs a form. Side-by-side thumbnails distort spacing and scale; never judge UI at postage-stamp size. Switching is instant — flipping is a 100+/session action; by the frequency rule the variant swap gets no animation.

Phase 5 — Verify and hand off

Run the harness. Confirm every variant renders, every interaction responds, and the console is clean — flip through all of them yourself before showing the user. If browser tooling is available, screenshot each variant.

Then present the set and stop — the choice belongs to the user:

#VariantAxisWhen it's the right choiceIts cost
1QuietMinimal motion, borders over shadowsThe product is a daily-use toolLeast memorable
2EditorialLarge type, generous whitespaceThe moment deserves weightEats vertical space

Close with where the picker is running (URL or file path) and the keys to flip.

Completion criterion: every variant is reachable from the picker and behaves correctly; no console errors; the table names each variant's tradeoff honestly.

Phase 6 — Promote on selection

When the user picks: integrate that variant where it belongs, following the project's existing conventions (file layout, naming, token usage), then delete the prototype surface per Hard Rule 5. If the user instead wants another round, keep the harness and run Phase 3 again, diverging around the direction they gravitated to.

Invocation Variants

InvocationBehavior
<description>Full workflow: scope → recon → 3 variants → picker → wait for choice
<description> x5Same, with that many variants (capped at 5)
riff <variant>New round: keep the harness, generate a fresh set diverging around the named variant's direction
keep <variant>Promote that variant into the codebase and delete the prototype surface
keep <variant>, leave the pickerPromote, but keep the prototype surface around

Tone

Sell each variant honestly — one line on when it wins, one on what it costs. Never pre-pick a favorite in the table; if the user asks which you'd choose, answer with a reason rooted in the product's personality and frequency of use, not aesthetics alone. If two variants converged while you built them, cut one and say so: a picker with two truly distinct directions beats one padded to three.

來自 emilkowalski 的更多技能

find-animation-opportunities
emilkowalski
搜尋程式碼庫或 UI 中應該有動畫但沒有的地方,並排除所有不應該有動畫的部分。唯讀;它會提出具有精確數值的動畫建議,但不會實際實作。當使用者詢問「這裡可以加入什麼動畫?」或想要「讓這個感覺更有生命力」時使用。若要修復現有的動畫,請改用 improve-animations 或 review-animations。
developmentdesigncreative
animate
emilkowalski
從零開始建立動畫,依序做出決定,以判斷整體是否自然流暢——是否該有動畫、目的為何、選用哪種工具、哪些屬性、哪條曲線與時長、如何打斷、如何結束。並撰寫實作內容。當被要求為某個東西加上動畫、增添動態感、讓元件更有生命力,或建立轉場效果時使用。若要評論現有動態效果,請使用 review-animations;若要審查整個程式碼庫,請使用 improve-animations。
pick-ui-library
emilkowalski
從精心策劃且具主觀推薦的清單中,為指定的前端任務挑選合適的函式庫——涵蓋數字、OTP輸入、圖表、指令選單、虛擬化、拖放、提示訊息、狀態管理、樣式等。僅在明確呼叫時執行;不會自行觸發。
ask-sonner
emilkowalski
Sonner(React toast 函式庫)使用指南——安裝並接上 Toaster、選用正確的 toast() 呼叫、promise 與 loading toast、更新、關閉及持久化 toast、樣式、主題與圖示、定位與多個 toaster。適用於使用 Sonner 或排解其問題時——例如 toast 未出現、出現兩次、失去樣式、忽略 Tailwind 類別、位於 modal 後方,或未跟隨深色模式。
emil-design-eng
emilkowalski
此技能編碼了 Emil Kowalski 關於 UI 打磨、元件設計、動畫決策,以及那些讓軟體體驗出色的隱形細節的設計哲學。
designdevelopmentcreative
review-animations
emilkowalski
根據 Emil Kowalski 的設計工程哲學所建立的高標準,審查動畫與動態程式碼。預設為標記問題;需主動爭取才能獲得核准。
animation-vocabulary
emilkowalski
反向查詢詞彙表,將模糊描述的網頁動畫或動態效果轉換為精確術語(例如:「彈出視窗開啟時的彈跳效果」→ Pop in;「iOS橡皮筋滾動」→ Rubber-banding)。適用於使用者詢問「那個叫什麼…」或描述某個動態效果卻不知其名稱,並希望獲得正確詞彙以提示AI或設計師時使用。此功能僅用於命名效果,而非設計或實作。
creativedesignresearch
improve-animations
emilkowalski
以資深動畫顧問的身份,審查程式碼庫中的動畫與動態程式碼,產出優先排序的稽核報告與可獨立執行的實作計畫,供其他代理(或較低成本模型)執行。僅對原始碼進行唯讀操作——負責規劃改進,不實際套用。適用於使用者要求「改善動畫」、「稽核動態」、「讓這個應用程式感覺更好」,或希望獲得動畫修正路線圖(而非單一差異審查)時。