filtering-bot-traffic
在PostHog网站和产品分析中,使用流量分类界面(isLikelyBot…)识别、衡量并排除机器人/爬虫/AI代理流量。
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/ai-plugin --skill filtering-bot-trafficFiltering and measuring bot traffic
PostHog classifies every request by user agent so you can tell humans apart from bots, crawlers, and AI agents anywhere HogQL runs — the SQL editor, insights, trends, and Web analytics breakdowns. This skill teaches you (the agent) how to use that classification to:
- exclude bots so analytics reflect human traffic only
- measure how much traffic is automated, and which bots / operators are responsible
- separate AI-agent traffic (worth measuring) from noise (worth dropping)
- pick the right surface — virtual properties for the insight builder, functions for raw SQL
For real-time ("right now", last 30 min) bot questions and the Live tab tiles, use the exploring-live-traffic skill instead. This skill is for historical windows, saved insights, dashboards, and filtering.
When to use this skill
Use it when the user wants to:
- exclude or filter out bots ("remove bots from my pageviews", "humans only")
- quantify automated traffic ("what % of traffic is bots?", "how much is AI crawlers?")
- find which bots hit them ("which crawlers visit us?", "is ChatGPT reading our docs?")
- break a trend down by traffic type or bot name
- measure AI-agent / AI-search traffic specifically (AEO / answer-engine visibility)
Do not use it for the Live tab, real-time numbers, or the per-minute bot charts — that is exploring-live-traffic.
The classification surface
Two equivalent ways to reach the same classification. Prefer virtual properties in the insight builder and filters; use functions in hand-written SQL or when you need a value the virtual properties don't expose.
Virtual properties (insight builder, filters, breakdowns)
These read the user agent for you (falling back from $raw_user_agent to $user_agent),
so you don't pass anything in. Available wherever you pick an event property.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
$virt_is_bot | boolean — true for bots / crawlers / automation |
$virt_traffic_type | Regular, AI Agent, Bot, or Automation |
$virt_traffic_category | finer category, e.g. ai_crawler, ai_search, ai_assistant, search_crawler, seo_crawler, social_crawler, monitoring, http_client, headless_browser, no_user_agent, regular |
$virt_bot_name | display name, e.g. Googlebot, GPTBot, ClaudeBot |
$virt_bot_operator | company behind the bot, e.g. Google, OpenAI, Anthropic |
HogQL functions (raw SQL)
Pass the user agent explicitly. Use coalesce(nullIf(properties.$raw_user_agent, ''), properties.$user_agent)
to cover both server-side ($raw_user_agent) and JS SDK ($user_agent) captures. The nullIf
keeps an empty $raw_user_agent from shadowing a real $user_agent and being misread as a bot —
this mirrors the expression the virtual properties use internally.
| Function | Returns |
|---|---|
isLikelyBot(ua) | true if the UA matches a bot/automation pattern (empty UA counts as a bot) |
getTrafficType(ua) | AI Agent / Bot / Automation / Regular |
getTrafficCategory(ua) | subcategory; regular for humans |
getBotType(ua) | same subcategory but empty string for humans — handy for filtering |
getBotName(ua) | bot name; empty for humans |
getBotOperator(ua) | operator/company; empty for humans |
Traffic types — what to keep vs drop
getTrafficType / $virt_traffic_type sorts every request into four buckets. The default
move differs per bucket — don't treat them all as noise:
| Type | What it is | Default move |
|---|---|---|
Regular | Human visitors | Keep |
AI Agent | AI crawlers, AI search, AI assistants (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, ChatGPT-User) | Often measure, don't drop — these are how AI tools find and cite content |
Bot | Search crawlers, SEO tools, social previews, monitoring (Googlebot, AhrefsBot, Pingdom) | Exclude from human metrics; track separately for SEO |
Automation | HTTP clients and headless browsers (curl, python-requests, Puppeteer) | Usually noise — exclude |
Recipes
Exclude bots from an insight (humans only)
Add a property filter $virt_is_bot exact false:
{ "key": "$virt_is_bot", "value": ["false"], "operator": "exact", "type": "event" }
Drop it into any TrendsQuery / FunnelsQuery / etc. properties. Visitor, session, and
pageview counts then reflect human traffic only, without changing stored data.
To exclude a narrower slice (e.g. keep AI agents but drop monitoring + automation), filter
on $virt_traffic_type or $virt_traffic_category with operator: is_not instead.
What share of traffic is automated
Break a pageview trend down by $virt_traffic_type:
{
"kind": "TrendsQuery",
"dateRange": { "date_from": "-30d" },
"series": [{ "kind": "EventsNode", "event": "$pageview", "math": "total" }],
"breakdownFilter": { "breakdown": "$virt_traffic_type", "breakdown_type": "event" },
"trendsFilter": { "display": "ActionsBarValue" }
}
Which bots / operators are hitting us
Filter to bots and break down by name (or $virt_bot_operator for company-level):
{
"kind": "TrendsQuery",
"dateRange": { "date_from": "-30d" },
"series": [{ "kind": "EventsNode", "event": "$pageview", "math": "total" }],
"properties": [{ "key": "$virt_is_bot", "value": ["true"], "operator": "exact", "type": "event" }],
"breakdownFilter": { "breakdown": "$virt_bot_name", "breakdown_type": "event", "breakdown_limit": 25 },
"trendsFilter": { "display": "ActionsBarValue" }
}
Measure AI-agent traffic specifically
Filter $virt_traffic_type exact AI Agent, break down by $virt_bot_operator to see
which tools (OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, …) read your site and which pages they hit.
Raw SQL equivalents
-- human pageviews only
SELECT count() AS human_pageviews
FROM events
WHERE event = '$pageview'
AND NOT isLikelyBot(coalesce(nullIf(properties.$raw_user_agent, ''), properties.$user_agent))
-- top bots by hits
SELECT
getBotName(coalesce(nullIf(properties.$raw_user_agent, ''), properties.$user_agent)) AS bot,
getBotOperator(coalesce(nullIf(properties.$raw_user_agent, ''), properties.$user_agent)) AS operator,
count() AS hits
FROM events
WHERE event = '$pageview'
AND isLikelyBot(coalesce(nullIf(properties.$raw_user_agent, ''), properties.$user_agent))
GROUP BY bot, operator
ORDER BY hits DESC
Seeing bots that don't run JavaScript
Most crawlers and AI agents never execute JS, so posthog-js never fires a $pageview for
them — they're invisible to client-side analytics. To measure them, the project must forward
server access logs as $http_log events carrying $raw_user_agent. If a user asks "why
don't I see GPTBot when I know it's crawling us?", the answer is almost always: no $http_log
ingestion. Point them at server-side capture (the Vercel logs source, an edge worker, or
the capture API) before building bot insights.
Gotchas
- Needs a captured user agent. Classification is computed at query time from the event's
$raw_user_agent/$user_agent, so it works on any historical event — there's no need to restrictdateRange.date_from. The one requirement is that a user agent was captured; events from sources that never set one can't be classified (and empty UAs fall through toAutomation/no_user_agent, below). isLikelyBotis "likely". Detection is a user-agent heuristic — some bots spoof real browser UAs, and some legit tools use bot-like ones. Treat it as best-effort, not ground truth.- Empty user agent = bot. Requests with no UA (server-to-server, misconfigured SDKs)
classify as
Automation/no_user_agent, soisLikelyBotreturnstrue. - Don't silently drop the host filter. If the user is scoped to one domain, inherit
$hostinproperties— leaving it out changes the answer. - Bot definitions evolve. The detected-bot list changes over time, so re-running the
same query later can classify older events differently. Definitions live in
products/web_analytics/backend/hogql_queries/bot_definitions.py.