bootstrap-realtime-eval

作者: openai

在此cookbook仓库中,通过从examples/evals/realtime_evals选择正确的harness,搭建提示词/工具/数据等脚手架,来引导创建一个新的实时评估文件夹。

npx skills add https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook --skill bootstrap-realtime-eval

Bootstrap Realtime Eval

Use this skill when the user wants a new realtime eval scaffold under examples/evals/realtime_evals/.

This skill is repo-specific. Do not copy harness code into the generated folder. The generated eval should point at the shared harnesses already in:

  • examples/evals/realtime_evals/crawl_harness
  • examples/evals/realtime_evals/walk_harness
  • examples/evals/realtime_evals/run_harness

Inputs To Collect

Always ask the user for the minimum set needed to choose and scaffold the eval before you create files, run the scaffold script, or author starter data. Do not skip this just because you can infer a default.

Ask for:

  • Eval name
  • Goal or scenario
  • Harness choice, or enough context to recommend one
  • System prompt path or inline text
  • Tools JSON path or tool descriptions
  • Data path or source materials
  • Desired graders

If the user does not know which harness they want, explain the options briefly and recommend one. See references/harness-selection.md.

When the user asks for synthetic audio but does not specify a harness, default to crawl text-to-TTS unless they need the generated audio to carry particular noise, telephony artifacts, speaker characteristics, or other replay-specific properties. Use walk for those cases.

Keep the questions concise and grouped into one short batch whenever possible.

If the user only provides user_text or a short task description, still ask the questions above first. If they answer only partially, then infer the remaining low-risk details, call out the assumptions, and make the scaffold easy to revise later.

Workflow

  1. Ask the user for the required inputs first.

    • Do this before making files or selecting a final harness.
    • If the user already supplied some of the inputs, ask only for the missing ones.
    • If you recommend a harness, wait for the user response before scaffolding.
  2. Pick the harness.

    • crawl: single-turn text-to-TTS.
    • walk: replay saved audio or generate audio from text rows.
    • run: multi-turn simulation with tool mocks and judge criteria.
    • If the user wants synthetic audio but does not care about replay-specific audio characteristics, prefer crawl over walk.
  3. Normalize the inputs.

    • If the user gives inline prompt or tool content, write it into the generated folder.
    • If the user gives CSV data, inspect it with pandas before wiring it in.
    • If the data is not yet harness-ready, scaffold the files and then have you author the starter dataset directly in those files.
    • If the user only gives user_text, infer example_id values and leave optional grading fields blank unless you have enough signal to fill them.
    • Ground the starter data in the use case, prompts, tools, and any other material the user provided.
    • Make the starter data realistic. Put yourself in the shoes of the end user in that use case and craft datapoints that a real user would plausibly say or do.
  4. Be proactive when data is missing.

    • crawl: you should author 3 starter rows covering one happy path and a couple of nearby variants or edge cases.
    • walk: you should author 3 source CSV rows and prepare the audio-generation step so the user can create audio immediately.
    • run: you should author 2 starter simulations, not 1.
    • Do not rely on deterministic script-generated samples for use-case-specific starter data.
    • Show the generated starter samples to the user, ask for a quick greenlight or correction, then expand only after feedback when the task calls for more coverage.
  5. Run the scaffold script:

python examples/evals/realtime_evals/skills/bootstrap-realtime-eval/scripts/bootstrap_realtime_eval.py --name "<eval_name>" --harness "<crawl|walk|run>"

Add flags for prompt, tools, data, graders, and run-specific fields as needed. Read the script help if you need the exact flag names.

  1. Review the generated folder.

    • Confirm the README is accurate for the selected harness.
    • Confirm the system prompt, tools, and data files point at the generated folder.
    • If the user provided real data, make sure it is wired in instead of leaving starter placeholders.
    • If you authored inferred starter data, show the user the generated rows or simulations before scaling up.
  2. Enrich the scaffold.

    • For crawl and walk, make the CSV realistic and ensure the expected tool columns are present.
    • For walk, if the dataset lacks audio_path, use the shared walk_harness/generate_audio.py flow described in the README.
    • For run, make sure simulations.csv and the starter sim_*.json file reflect the user’s scenario, tool mocks, and graders.
  3. Validate before returning.

    • Run a smoke eval for the generated folder.
    • If the smoke eval succeeds, automatically run the full eval for the generated folder in the same turn.
    • If the smoke eval fails, stop and fix or report the blocker before attempting the full eval.
    • Run pytest examples/evals/realtime_evals/tests -q.
    • Inspect the generated README and at least one generated data file.

Hard Rules

  • Keep the generated folder inside examples/evals/realtime_evals/.
  • Ask the user for the missing setup information before scaffolding. Do not jump straight to building a default eval when the request is to create a new eval.
  • Do not duplicate the main harness scripts into the generated folder.
  • Do not write generic placeholder starter data when the use case provides enough context to do better.
  • Use the prompt, tools, and scenario details to make the initial datapoints feel like a real user interaction.
  • The README must include:
    • why this harness was chosen
    • which files to edit first
    • smoke and full run commands
    • data contract notes
    • troubleshooting notes
  • Prefer assistant-specific flags for run harness commands:
    • --assistant-system-prompt-file
    • --assistant-tools-file

Completion Criteria

Treat the task as complete only when:

  • the folder exists under examples/evals/realtime_evals/<name>_realtime_eval/
  • README.md, system_prompt.txt, and tools.json exist
  • harness-specific starter data exists, authored by you when the user did not provide it
  • the smoke command has been run or is blocked for a clear reason
  • if the smoke command succeeded, the full eval command has also been run or is blocked for a clear reason
  • pytest examples/evals/realtime_evals/tests -q has been run

Learnings

When this skill uncovers a reusable workflow or harness constraint that should guide future bootstrap work, add a short note here.

Keep learnings concise and action-oriented:

  • Problem -> Fix -> Why

Only add items that are likely to help future realtime-eval scaffolding in this repo. Remove stale items when they no longer apply.

  • gpt-realtime temperature is unsupported -> Do not add a temperature field or CLI flag when scaffolding gpt-realtime evals -> Avoids invalid config and keeps runs aligned with the realtime harness constraints.
  • Starter samples should come from the model, not the scaffold script -> Use the script to create the folder structure and template files, then have you author the initial rows or simulations from the user’s use case -> Produces more relevant starter data and makes iteration easier with the user.
  • Synthetic audio can be overfit to the wrong harness -> Default unspecified synthetic-audio requests to crawl text-to-TTS and reserve walk for replay-specific audio characteristics like noise or telephony artifacts -> Keeps the bootstrap path simpler unless audio realism is the actual target.
  • Smoke-only validation can leave scaffolds half-proven -> After a successful smoke run, automatically run the full eval before declaring the bootstrap complete -> Catches dataset-wide or late-row failures that a one-example smoke test misses.

来自 openai 的更多技能

user-context
openai
加载或管理数据分析插件的持久化源路由偏好、引导逻辑、设置进度及语义层注册表。
official
notion-research-documentation
openai
研究Notion内容,并将其综合成带有引用的结构化简报、报告或对比。通过定向查询搜索并获取Notion页面,然后按主题组织发现,附带内联来源引用和参考文献部分。根据范围和用户目标,从四种输出格式(快速简报、研究摘要、对比、综合报告)中选择。使用内置模板创建和更新Notion页面;直接链接来源,并在新信息到达时跟踪变更...
official
rcsb-pdb-skill
openai
提交紧凑的RCSB PDB请求以获取核心元数据、Search API查询和FASTA下载。当用户需要简洁的RCSB摘要时使用;保存原始JSON或…
official
pdf
openai
PDF的读取、创建与验证,支持可视化渲染与程序化生成。使用Poppler(pdftoppm)将PDF页面渲染为PNG,以便在交付前直观检查布局、间距与排版;通过reportlab程序化生成PDF,确保格式可靠;利用pdfplumber或pypdf提取文本与元数据。执行质量标准:无文本裁剪、元素重叠、表格损坏或渲染伪影;仅使用ASCII连字符,引用内容需可读。使用...
official
test-coverage-improver
openai
改进OpenAI Agents JS mon
official
playwright
openai
基于终端驱动的浏览器自动化,支持元素快照与交互式UI工作流。通过playwright-cli包装脚本运行(需npx),支持无头模式与有头模式进行可视化调试。核心工作流:打开页面、获取快照以稳定元素引用、使用引用进行交互、在导航或DOM变更后重新快照。包含表单填写、点击、输入、多标签页管理、截图/PDF捕获及用于流程调试的追踪记录。元素引用(如e3、e15)...
official
ukb-topmed-phewas-skill
openai
通过接受rsID、GRCh37或GRCh38输入并解析为所需的GRCh38查询,获取单个变体的紧凑型UKB-TOPMed PheWAS摘要。当需要…时使用。
official
code-review-context
openai
模型可见上下文
official