api-service-contracts

API & Service Communication Contracts

Analyze the project to document all services, API endpoints, communication patterns (sync/async), DTOs, and retry/circuit-breaker policies. Generate a Mermaid sequence diagram showing the primary request flow across services. Save to .github/modernize/assessment/engines/facts/api-service-contracts.md.

Input Parameters

• workspace-path (optional): Path to the project to analyze (defaults to current directory)

⚠ Mermaid Safety Constraints — read BEFORE you write the ```mermaid block

Mermaid sequenceDiagram is unforgiving in a few specific ways: one bad alias or one missing end crashes the whole diagram with Syntax error in text, not just the offending line. Stay strictly inside this subset for the sequence diagram in Step 7:

1. Chart kind. sequenceDiagram only. Never sequence-diagram, never sequence.

2. Participants. Always declare with the alias form participant <AlphaNumId> as "Display Label". The id must match [A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_]*. Never omit the id — even a one-word participant should be participant Client as "Client". This is the single biggest cause of past failures.

3. Arrows.

   • ->> synchronous request
   • -->> synchronous response (or async return)
   • -) async fire-and-forget
   • Message text goes after : and is plain text — keep it short and on one line.

4. Blocks. alt / else / opt / loop / par / critical MUST be closed by end on its own line. Every open block must have a matching end. Missing end is the #2 cause of past failures.

5. No line breaks anywhere. The escape \n was removed in modern Mermaid. Aliases, message text, and Note over content must all be single-line. Split a long note into multiple consecutive Note over lines; split a long message into multiple arrows. This is the #1 cause of past failures.

6. Banned characters inside participant aliases specifically (message text is more permissive — only \n is banned there):

   Banned in alias	Why it breaks	Replacement
   \n (literal two chars)	escape removed	drop
   " (a second double-quote)	closes the alias early	' (single quote)
   ` (backtick)	breaks alias quoting	drop
   smart quotes " " ' '	not ASCII	regular " and '
   :	confuses with message delimiter	rephrase, e.g. "REST API (port 8080)" not "REST API: port 8080"
   <br/>	not interpreted inside aliases	rephrase as shorter alias

7. Quote the alias. participant Svc as "Order Service" — never participant Svc as Order Service (unquoted multi-word aliases break).

Mandatory self-attestation

Immediately before writing the ```mermaid opening fence in Step 7, emit this exact one-line HTML comment in the markdown (it does not render — it is for your own visible attestation):

<!-- mermaid-checked: every participant uses `participant Id as "Label"`, no \n in aliases/messages/notes, every alt/opt/loop closed by end, no `:` inside any alias -->

If you cannot truthfully emit that comment, fix the diagram first.

Scope Boundaries — Avoid Redundancy with Other Skills

This skill is part of a set of four complementary assessment skills. To avoid content duplication across their output documents, observe these scope rules:

• Introduction: Write a 1-2 sentence intro focused on the API surface (number of endpoints, communication style). Do NOT restate the application's technology stack, database options, or architecture type — those are covered by other skills.
• Entity fields and persistence details are owned by the data-architecture skill. In the DTOs & Contracts section, list entity/DTO class names and their role in the API contract (request type, response type, immutability). Do NOT reproduce full field lists, ORM annotations (cascade, fetch strategy), or table names — reference data-architecture.md instead.
• Validation rules (e.g., @NotBlank, custom validators) are owned by the business-workflows skill. Mention validation only when it affects the API contract (e.g., "returns 400 if validation fails"). Do NOT enumerate individual field constraints.
• Caching implementation details (provider, TTL, configuration class) are owned by the data-architecture skill. In the sequence diagram, you may show cache hit/miss behavior, but do NOT repeat the cache provider name, configuration details, or rationale.
• Configuration properties and profiles (e.g., spring.jpa.*, database profiles) are owned by the configuration-inventory skill. Do NOT list property keys/values.
• Startup dependency chain details (readiness probes, K8s manifests, dockerize) are owned by the configuration-inventory skill. Mention startup order only if it directly affects API availability. Do NOT repeat probe paths or wait mechanisms.

Execution Steps

Step 1: Generate Service Catalog Section

Identify all independently deployable services/modules and produce the complete ## Service Catalog section:

• Multi-module builds: Maven modules (pom.xml <modules>), Gradle subprojects (settings.gradle), .NET solutions (.sln → .csproj projects), monorepo workspaces (package.json workspaces)
• Docker Compose services (docker-compose.yml service definitions) — note third-party containers vs source-built services
• Kubernetes deployments, Helm charts, or IaC definitions

For each service extract:

• Service name and Maven module / project name
• Port number (from config files, docker-compose.yml, or application.properties/appsettings.json)
• Category: API Layer (gateways, BFFs), Business (domain services), Infrastructure (config, discovery, admin), Observability (tracing, metrics, dashboards)
• Purpose (one-line description)
• Key framework dependencies (from pom.xml, .csproj, package.json)

Step 2: Generate API Endpoints Inventory Section

Scan source code for API endpoint definitions and produce the complete ## API Endpoints Inventory section:

• Java (Spring): @RestController, @Controller, @GetMapping, @PostMapping, @PutMapping, @DeleteMapping, @RequestMapping
• Java (Jakarta EE): @Path, @GET, @POST, @PUT, @DELETE (JAX-RS)
• .NET (ASP.NET Core): [ApiController], [HttpGet], [HttpPost], [HttpPut], [HttpDelete], [Route]
• JavaScript/TypeScript: Express routes (app.get, app.post, router.get), Fastify routes, NestJS decorators (@Get, @Post)

For each endpoint extract:

• HTTP method (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH)
• URL path (including path parameters)
• Request type (body/query/path parameters, DTO class name)
• Response type (DTO class name, status codes)
• API versioning scheme if present (URL path, header, query parameter)
• Which service/controller it belongs to

Step 3: Generate Management & Observability Endpoints Section

Identify management and observability endpoints and produce the complete ## Management & Observability Endpoints section:

• Spring Boot Actuator endpoints (/actuator/health, /actuator/info, /actuator/metrics, /actuator/prometheus)
• .NET health checks (/health, /healthz), Swagger UI (/swagger)
• Custom metrics annotations: @Timed (Micrometer), [Meter], custom metric registrations — note the metric name and which service exposes it

Step 4: Generate DTOs & Contracts Section

Analyze DTO and contract definitions and produce the complete ## DTOs & Contracts section:

• Find DTO / request / response model classes (records, POJOs, C# records/classes). List class names and their API role (request body, response, path/query param). Do NOT reproduce full field lists or ORM annotations — those belong in data-architecture.md.
• Distinguish gateway-level DTOs (aggregation/composition models that combine data from multiple services) from service-level domain entities (owned by a single service)
• Note which DTOs are immutable (Lombok @Value, Java records, C# records, frozen data classes)
• Identify OpenAPI/Swagger specifications (openapi.yaml, swagger.json, Springdoc/Swashbuckle annotations)
• Check for protobuf schemas (.proto files) or GraphQL schemas
• Note serialization configuration (Jackson, System.Text.Json, custom serializers)

Step 5: Generate Communication Patterns Section

Identify inter-service and intra-service communication and produce the complete ## Communication Patterns section:

• Synchronous: REST (HttpClient, RestTemplate, WebClient, Feign), gRPC, direct method calls
• Asynchronous: Message queues (Kafka, RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus, SQS), event-driven patterns, pub/sub
• Resilience patterns: Circuit breaker (Resilience4j, Polly, Spring Retry), retry policies, timeout configuration, bulkhead patterns — note specific timeout values and fallback behavior
• Service discovery: Eureka, Consul, Kubernetes DNS, Azure Service Discovery — note whether services register by logical name or hardcoded URL
• API gateway: Spring Cloud Gateway, Ocelot, Kong, custom gateway patterns
• Gateway aggregation/composition: Document how the gateway combines responses from multiple backend services (e.g., fetching owner details from one service and visit history from another, then merging them into a single response). Note the composition logic and fallback behavior when a downstream service is unavailable.
• Client-side load balancing: Spring Cloud LoadBalancer, Ribbon, or framework-provided balancing
• Startup dependency chain: Briefly note the service startup order if it affects API availability. For full details (probes, wait mechanisms, timeouts), refer to configuration-inventory.md.
• Security posture: Note whether transport security (HTTPS/TLS), authentication (JWT, OAuth2, Basic Auth, Spring Security), or authorization (RBAC, @PreAuthorize, role checks) are implemented at the API level. If absent, state it explicitly — e.g., "No authentication or TLS configured; all endpoints are publicly accessible with no authorization checks." Do NOT duplicate CWE security scan findings; focus only on presence or absence at the API contract level.

Step 6: Generate Service Technology Matrix Section

For each service, identify which cross-cutting capabilities it uses and produce the complete ## Service Technology Matrix section:

• Web framework (MVC, Reactive/WebFlux, Minimal API)
• Data access (JPA, EF Core, Mongoose, etc.)
• Service discovery (client, server, or none)
• Gateway functionality
• Actuator/health checks
• Caching layer
• Metrics export (Prometheus, Application Insights, etc.)

Step 7: Generate Service Communication Sequence Section

Create a Mermaid sequenceDiagram and produce the complete ## Service Communication Sequence section (re-read the Safety Constraints above before writing):

• Show key actors: Client, API Gateway (if present), Controllers, Services, External Services, Message Brokers
• Annotate synchronous calls with solid arrows and asynchronous calls with dashed arrows
• Include request/response types where relevant
• Show error handling paths for critical flows (circuit breaker, retry)
• For gateway aggregation flows, show how multiple downstream calls are composed

Reference example (this block satisfies every Safety Constraint — match its shape):

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as "Client"
    participant Gateway as "API Gateway"
    participant CustSvc as "Customers Service"
    participant VisitSvc as "Visits Service"
    participant DB as "Database"

    Client->>Gateway: GET /api/gateway/owners/1
    Gateway->>CustSvc: GET /owners/1
    CustSvc->>DB: findById(1)
    DB-->>CustSvc: Owner + Pets
    CustSvc-->>Gateway: OwnerDetails(pets=[Pet1,Pet2])
    Gateway->>VisitSvc: GET /pets/visits?petId=1,2
    alt Visits Service Available
        VisitSvc->>DB: findByPetIdIn([1,2])
        DB-->>VisitSvc: Visits list
        VisitSvc-->>Gateway: Visits(items=[...])
    else Circuit Breaker Open
        Gateway-->>Gateway: Fallback - empty visits
    end
    Gateway->>Gateway: Merge visits into pets
    Gateway-->>Client: 200 OwnerDetails + Visits

Step 8: Save Output

Save to .github/modernize/assessment/engines/facts/api-service-contracts.md with this exact structure:

# API & Service Communication Contracts

A brief introduction (1-2 sentences) summarizing the API surface and communication patterns found.

## Service Catalog

[Table: Service | Port | Category | Purpose]

## API Endpoints Inventory

[Table: Service | Method | Path | Request Type | Response Type]

## Management & Observability Endpoints

[Table: Service | Endpoint | Custom Metrics (if any)]

## DTOs & Contracts

[Description of gateway-level DTOs vs service-level entities, immutability, serialization]

## Communication Patterns

[Description of sync/async patterns, gateway aggregation/composition logic, circuit breaker/retry policies with timeout values, service discovery, startup dependency chain, and security posture (authentication/authorization/TLS — or explicit statement that none is configured)]

## Service Technology Matrix

[Table: Service | Web | Data Access | Discovery | Gateway | Actuator | Cache | Metrics]

## Service Communication Sequence

< Mermaid sequenceDiagram here >

Scaling Rules

• If the project has more than 30 endpoints, group by service/controller and show representative endpoints per group
• Keep the sequence diagram under 40 participants and messages to ensure readability and GitHub rendering compatibility
• For multi-module projects, focus on inter-module communication in the sequence diagram and list all endpoints in the table
• Aggregate similar endpoints (e.g., CRUD operations on the same resource) into one table row if needed for brevity
• For the service technology matrix, use checkmarks or short labels; omit columns where no service uses the capability

Common failure patterns observed in past runs

Each row below is something the model actually produced that crashed the diagram. Use the ✅ form.

Error Handling

• Unsupported project type: Output a single line: > ERROR: Unsupported project type. This skill supports Java, .NET, JavaScript, and TypeScript projects only.
• No API endpoints found: Output: > ERROR: No recognized API endpoints found at workspace-path. Verify the path is correct.
• Insufficient info: Generate a best-effort document from available data. Add a note: > Note: Some endpoints or communication patterns could not be fully identified.

Success Criteria

• Service catalog table lists all discovered services with ports, categories, and purposes
• API endpoints table lists all discovered endpoints with HTTP method, path, and types
• Management/observability endpoints are cataloged with custom metric names
• Gateway aggregation/composition patterns are documented with fallback behavior
• Service technology matrix shows per-service capabilities
• Communication patterns section describes sync/async patterns, resilience policies, and security posture (authentication, authorization, TLS — explicitly stating if none is configured)
• Mermaid sequence diagram renders correctly showing primary request flow with aggregation and fallback
• The ```mermaid block is preceded by the <!-- mermaid-checked: ... --> attestation comment
• File saved to .github/modernize/assessment/engines/facts/api-service-contracts.md