triage

作者: mattpocock

通过由分类角色驱动的状态机对问题进行分类。当用户想要创建问题、分类问题、审查传入的缺陷或功能请求、为AFK代理准备问题或管理工作流程时使用。

npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill triage

Triage

Move issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.

Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage must start with this disclaimer:

> *This was generated by AI during triage.*

Reference docs

Roles

Two category roles:

  • bug — something is broken
  • enhancement — new feature or improvement

Five state roles:

  • needs-triage — maintainer needs to evaluate
  • needs-info — waiting on reporter for more information
  • ready-for-agent — fully specified, ready for an AFK agent
  • ready-for-human — needs human implementation
  • wontfix — will not be actioned

Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.

These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. The mapping should have been provided to you - run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.

State transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to needs-triage first; from there it moves to needs-info, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human, or wontfix. needs-info returns to needs-triage once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.

Invocation

The maintainer invokes /triage and describes what they want in natural language. Interpret the request and act. Examples:

  • "Show me anything that needs my attention"
  • "Let's look at #42"
  • "Move #42 to ready-for-agent"
  • "What's ready for agents to pick up?"

Show what needs attention

Query the issue tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:

  1. Unlabeled — never triaged.
  2. needs-triage — evaluation in progress.
  3. needs-info with reporter activity since the last triage notes — needs re-evaluation.

Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.

Triage a specific issue

  1. Gather context. Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read .out-of-scope/*.md and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.

  2. Recommend. Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the issue. Wait for direction.

  3. Reproduce (bugs only). Before any grilling, attempt reproduction: read the reporter's steps, trace the relevant code, run tests or commands. Report what happened — successful repro with code path, failed repro, or insufficient detail (a strong needs-info signal). A confirmed repro makes a much stronger agent brief.

  4. Grill (if needed). If the issue needs fleshing out, run a /grill-with-docs session.

  5. Apply the outcome:

    • ready-for-agent — post an agent brief comment (AGENT-BRIEF.md).
    • ready-for-human — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
    • needs-info — post triage notes (template below).
    • wontfix (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
    • wontfix (enhancement) — write to .out-of-scope/, link to it from a comment, then close (OUT-OF-SCOPE.md).
    • needs-triage — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.

Quick state override

If the maintainer says "move #42 to ready-for-agent", trust them and apply the role directly. Confirm what you're about to do (role changes, comment, close), then act. Skip grilling. If moving to ready-for-agent without a grilling session, ask whether they want to write an agent brief.

Needs-info template

## Triage Notes

**What we've established so far:**

- point 1
- point 2

**What we still need from you (@reporter):**

- question 1
- question 2

Capture everything resolved during grilling under "established so far" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not "please provide more info".

Resuming a previous session

If prior triage notes exist on the issue, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.

来自 mattpocock 的更多技能

grill-me
mattpocock
对用户的计划或设计进行持续追问,直到达成共识,解决决策树的每个分支。当用户想要对计划进行压力测试、接受设计拷问,或提到“grill me”时使用。
researchcommunicationproject-management
grill-with-docs
mattpocock
一场烧烤式讨论,用现有领域模型挑战你的计划,打磨术语,并在决策成型时同步更新文档(CONTEXT.md、ADRs)。当用户希望用项目的语言和已有决策对计划进行压力测试时使用。
developmentdocumentresearch
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock
在代码库中发现深层优化机会,依据CONTEXT.md中的领域语言和docs/adr/中的决策。适用于用户希望改进架构、寻找重构机会、整合紧耦合模块,或使代码库更易于测试和AI导航时使用。
developmentcode-reviewapi
teach
mattpocock
在此工作空间内,教授用户一项新技能或新概念。
communicationproductivity
tdd
mattpocock
采用红绿重构循环的测试驱动开发。当用户希望使用TDD构建功能或修复缺陷、提及“红绿重构”、需要集成测试或要求测试优先开发时使用。
developmenttesting
to-prd
mattpocock
将当前对话上下文转化为PRD并发布到项目问题追踪器。当用户希望从当前上下文创建PRD时使用。
developmentdocumentproject-management
handoff
mattpocock
将当前对话压缩为交接文档,供其他代理接手处理。
communicationproject-managementdocument
diagnose
mattpocock
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
developmenttestingcode-review