aicr-auditing-docs

bởi nvidia

Sử dụng khi rà soát tài liệu Markdown của AICR để tìm trùng lặp, sai lệch, cồng kềnh, và khoảng trống — nhằm giữ tài liệu có giá trị cao khi dự án phát triển. Kích hoạt khi "audit…

npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/aicr --skill aicr-auditing-docs

Auditing AICR Documentation

Overview

AICR's docs are mature and already well-structured: a persona split under docs/ (user / integrator / contributor), a docs hub with glossary (docs/README.md), ADRs in docs/design/, and a strong root README.md. The recurring risk is not missing structure — it is duplication and drift as features land. This skill is a repeatable audit, not a rewrite: default to a findings report; only edit when explicitly asked.

When to Use

  • Periodic doc health check, or before a release.
  • After a large feature merges (new CLI flag, API endpoint, component, recipe field).
  • When the same explanation appears in multiple files and you suspect drift.
  • Not for: writing a single new doc (just write it, following the style rules below), or generated content (docs/conformance/, docs/user/container-images.md).

The Map (what to audit, and how it's owned)

AreaCanonical ownerNotes
Project pitch, features, supported envsroot README.mdQuick Start may duplicate docs/user/installation.md — acceptable for README only.
User how-to / referencedocs/user/cli-reference.md owns flags; task narrative belongs in task docs (validation.md, agent-deployment.md).
Integration / embeddingdocs/integrator/Resolver internals belong in contributor/, not here.
Project internalsdocs/contributor/Architecture overview = contributor/index.md.
Demos / runbooksdemos/GitHub-only (not in fern/docs.yml nav). Terse names hurt discovery.
GovernanceCONTRIBUTING.md, DEVELOPMENT.md, RELEASE.md, SECURITY.mdEach owns one concern; cross-link instead of repeating.
Agent rules.claude/CLAUDE.md (canonical) → AGENTS.md (CI-synced mirror — never flag).github/copilot-instructions.md should be a pointer, not a copy.

Sources of Truth (drift hotspots — check these first)

Drift between examples and these authoritative sources is the highest-value class of finding:

  • Component/chart/image versions → docs/user/container-images.md (the BOM, regenerated by make bom-docs). Inline version examples elsewhere (cli-reference.md, api-reference.md, data-flow.md) should be marked illustrative and point here — never hand-pinned to a stale tag.
  • Tool versions (golangci-lint, Go, Ko) → .settings.yaml. Never hardcode in prose or sample workflow YAML.
  • Criteria/enum values (service, accelerator, os, intent, platform, error codes) → the Go type (e.g. pkg/recipe/criteria.go). Enums are enumerated in many files; see the enum-audit checklist in CLAUDE.md → Documentation updates.
  • API shape → api/aicr/v1/server.yaml (OpenAPI). The component lists and response samples in api-reference.md drift from the registry — diff them.

The Five Audit Dimensions

Run every file through these. Group findings by dimension, prioritized.

  1. Duplication — same steps/tables/concepts in >1 file. Pick the canonical owner (table above), trim the rest to a cross-link. Known repeat offenders: agent/snapshot deployment, recipe-evidence walkthrough, constraint paths/operators table, make-target block, DCO/signing rules, the six demos/cuj*-{eks,gke}.md files (~80% shared).
  2. Overlap / misplacement — content in the wrong persona tree (e.g., resolver internals in integrator/, agent deployment in integrator/ when it's a user concern), or a topic split awkwardly across files.
  3. Bloat — verbose sections that lose no value when cut: embedded SBOM/JSON dumps, repeated export TAG= blocks, stub code that contradicts the architecture ("AICR is not a controller"), generic K8s boilerplate that isn't AICR-specific, walls of text needing structure.
  4. Gaps (Diátaxis) — is each of tutorial / how-to / reference / explanation present for the persona? Known holes: no end-to-end tutorial (install→recipe→bundle→deploy→validate), no aicr bundle how-to.
  5. Staleness / style violations — TODOs, "(Future)" content shown as usable, contradictory version numbers, leftover template placeholders (__AICR (AICR)__), and violations of the repo's own doc-style rules below.

Repo Doc-Style Rules (enforce during audit)

These are defined in CLAUDE.md → Documentation Style; flag violations:

  • Auto-anchors, no manual TOCs — GitHub/Fern generate anchors. Manual ## Table of Contents blocks (present in CONTRIBUTING.md, DEVELOPMENT.md) are violations.
  • Promote **Bold Label:** to a heading sparingly — only a named topic with ≥ ~8 lines beneath it.
  • Anchor hygiene — when renaming/removing a heading, grep <file>.md#<old-slug> repo-wide and fix inbound links. Broken anchors fail CI via lychee on any docs/** PR (.github/workflows/fern-docs-ci.yaml) — but not make qualify.

How to Run It

  1. Parallelize by area to protect context: dispatch one research agent per tree — (a) docs/ persona trees, (b) root + agent docs, (c) demos/. Give each the five dimensions and the sources-of-truth list; ask for a concise (<600 word) report with file paths and concrete recommendations.
  2. Synthesize into one prioritized report. Lead with version/enum drift (highest value), then duplication consolidations, then bloat/gaps.
  3. Report, don't rewrite by default. If asked to fix: one focused PR per theme (e.g., "de-dup agent deployment", "trim SECURITY.md"), keep diffs reviewable, and after any change run make qualify (and note lychee is separate). Touching docs/** requires the lychee anchor check.

Common Mistakes

  • Flagging the AGENTS.md ↔ CLAUDE.md mirror as duplication — it's intentional and CI-enforced.
  • Recommending a TOC "for navigation" — violates the auto-anchor rule.
  • Hand-fixing a version in an example — fix the pattern (mark illustrative, link to container-images.md) so it can't re-drift.
  • Editing generated files (container-images.md, docs/conformance/) directly instead of their generators.
  • Auditing one file in isolation — duplication only shows up across files; read the tree.

Thêm skills từ nvidia

fhir-basics
nvidia
Dạy các tác nhân cách hoạt động của API FHIR R4, những tài nguyên có sẵn, cách truy vấn chúng với tham số tìm kiếm, và cách phân tích chính xác tất cả các định dạng phản hồi…
compileiq-validate-result
nvidia
Sử dụng SAU KHI tìm kiếm hoàn tất và TRƯỚC KHI yêu cầu tăng tốc hoặc gửi ACF. Tải tệp CSV dump_results, trích xuất các ứng viên top-K (đơn mục tiêu)…
changelog-audit
nvidia
Kiểm tra Warp CHANGELOG.md trước khi phát hành: khôi phục các mục bị mất, sắp xếp theo tác động người dùng, tinh chỉnh ngôn ngữ mục, xuống dòng và (chế độ nhánh phát hành) so sánh bump…
dgx-diagnose
nvidia
Chẩn đoán các sự cố thường gặp của DGX Station GB300 — lỗi CUDA, nhắm sai GPU, lỗi container vLLM/SGLang, vấn đề trạng thái MIG, lỗi NVLink/Fabric Manager,…
aicr-managing-openvex
nvidia
Use when adding, updating, or removing CVE/GHSA suppressions in `.openvex.json` — the OpenVEX document consumed by the daily image vulnerability scan workflow.…
aicr-creating-slide-decks
nvidia
Sử dụng khi xây dựng một bộ trình chiếu HTML độc lập hoặc điểm trình bày trực quan cho một khái niệm kỹ thuật hoặc quy trình làm việc (ví dụ: demos/*.html) — hiển thị toàn màn hình hoặc…
aicr-creating-guided-demos
nvidia
Tạo khung kịch bản demo có hướng dẫn tương tác (demos/*.sh), trực tiếp hoặc tự học, theo mẫu Frame → Tell → Show → Close. Kích hoạt khi có "demo script", "guided…
aicr-analyzing-snapshots
nvidia
Sử dụng khi phân tích tệp YAML snapshot AICR, xem xét trạng thái cụm, so sánh đặc điểm nhà cung cấp, trích xuất thông tin chi tiết về cấu trúc liên kết GPU/mạng, hoặc…