aicr-auditing-docs

bởi nvidia

Sử dụng khi rà soát tài liệu Markdown của AICR để tìm trùng lặp, sai lệch, cồng kềnh, và khoảng trống — nhằm giữ tài liệu có giá trị cao khi dự án phát triển. Kích hoạt khi "audit…

npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/aicr --skill aicr-auditing-docs

Auditing AICR Documentation

Overview

AICR's docs are mature and already well-structured: a persona split under docs/ (user / integrator / contributor), a docs hub with glossary (docs/README.md), ADRs in docs/design/, and a strong root README.md. The recurring risk is not missing structure — it is duplication and drift as features land. This skill is a repeatable audit, not a rewrite: default to a findings report; only edit when explicitly asked.

When to Use

  • Periodic doc health check, or before a release.
  • After a large feature merges (new CLI flag, API endpoint, component, recipe field).
  • When the same explanation appears in multiple files and you suspect drift.
  • Not for: writing a single new doc (just write it, following the style rules below), or generated content (docs/conformance/, docs/user/container-images.md).

The Map (what to audit, and how it's owned)

AreaCanonical ownerNotes
Project pitch, features, supported envsroot README.mdQuick Start may duplicate docs/user/installation.md — acceptable for README only.
User how-to / referencedocs/user/cli-reference.md owns flags; task narrative belongs in task docs (validation.md, agent-deployment.md).
Integration / embeddingdocs/integrator/Resolver internals belong in contributor/, not here.
Project internalsdocs/contributor/Architecture overview = contributor/index.md.
Demos / runbooksdemos/GitHub-only (not in fern/docs.yml nav). Terse names hurt discovery.
GovernanceCONTRIBUTING.md, DEVELOPMENT.md, RELEASING.md, SECURITY.mdEach owns one concern; cross-link instead of repeating.
Agent rules.claude/CLAUDE.md (canonical) → AGENTS.md (CI-synced mirror — never flag).github/copilot-instructions.md should be a pointer, not a copy.

Sources of Truth (drift hotspots — check these first)

Drift between examples and these authoritative sources is the highest-value class of finding:

  • Component/chart/image versionsdocs/user/container-images.md (the BOM, regenerated by make bom-docs). Inline version examples elsewhere (cli-reference.md, api-reference.md, data-flow.md) should be marked illustrative and point here — never hand-pinned to a stale tag.
  • Tool versions (golangci-lint, Go, Ko) → .settings.yaml. Never hardcode in prose or sample workflow YAML.
  • Criteria/enum values (service, accelerator, os, intent, platform, error codes) → the Go type (e.g. pkg/recipe/criteria.go). Enums are enumerated in many files; see the enum-audit checklist in CLAUDE.md → Documentation updates.
  • API shapeapi/aicr/v1/server.yaml (OpenAPI). The component lists and response samples in api-reference.md drift from the registry — diff them.

The Five Audit Dimensions

Run every file through these. Group findings by dimension, prioritized.

  1. Duplication — same steps/tables/concepts in >1 file. Pick the canonical owner (table above), trim the rest to a cross-link. Known repeat offenders: agent/snapshot deployment, recipe-evidence walkthrough, constraint paths/operators table, make-target block, DCO/signing rules, the six demos/cuj*-{eks,gke}.md files (~80% shared).
  2. Overlap / misplacement — content in the wrong persona tree (e.g., resolver internals in integrator/, agent deployment in integrator/ when it's a user concern), or a topic split awkwardly across files.
  3. Bloat — verbose sections that lose no value when cut: embedded SBOM/JSON dumps, repeated export TAG= blocks, stub code that contradicts the architecture ("AICR is not a controller"), generic K8s boilerplate that isn't AICR-specific, walls of text needing structure.
  4. Gaps (Diátaxis) — is each of tutorial / how-to / reference / explanation present for the persona? Known holes: no end-to-end tutorial (install→recipe→bundle→deploy→validate), no aicr bundle how-to.
  5. Staleness / style violations — TODOs, "(Future)" content shown as usable, contradictory version numbers, leftover template placeholders (__AICR (AICR)__), and violations of the repo's own doc-style rules below.

Repo Doc-Style Rules (enforce during audit)

These are defined in CLAUDE.mdDocumentation Style; flag violations:

  • Auto-anchors, no manual TOCs — GitHub/Fern generate anchors. Manual ## Table of Contents blocks (present in CONTRIBUTING.md, DEVELOPMENT.md) are violations.
  • Promote **Bold Label:** to a heading sparingly — only a named topic with ≥ ~8 lines beneath it.
  • Anchor hygiene — when renaming/removing a heading, grep <file>.md#<old-slug> repo-wide and fix inbound links. Broken anchors fail CI via lychee on any docs/** PR (.github/workflows/fern-docs-ci.yaml) — but not make qualify.

How to Run It

  1. Parallelize by area to protect context: dispatch one research agent per tree — (a) docs/ persona trees, (b) root + agent docs, (c) demos/. Give each the five dimensions and the sources-of-truth list; ask for a concise (<600 word) report with file paths and concrete recommendations.
  2. Synthesize into one prioritized report. Lead with version/enum drift (highest value), then duplication consolidations, then bloat/gaps.
  3. Report, don't rewrite by default. If asked to fix: one focused PR per theme (e.g., "de-dup agent deployment", "trim SECURITY.md"), keep diffs reviewable, and after any change run make qualify (and note lychee is separate). Touching docs/** requires the lychee anchor check.

Common Mistakes

  • Flagging the AGENTS.mdCLAUDE.md mirror as duplication — it's intentional and CI-enforced.
  • Recommending a TOC "for navigation" — violates the auto-anchor rule.
  • Hand-fixing a version in an example — fix the pattern (mark illustrative, link to container-images.md) so it can't re-drift.
  • Editing generated files (container-images.md, docs/conformance/) directly instead of their generators.
  • Auditing one file in isolation — duplication only shows up across files; read the tree.

Thêm skills từ nvidia

compileiq-debug
nvidia
Sử dụng khi có điều gì đó không ổn: Search() bị treo, tất cả các đánh giá đều trả về INVALID_SCORE, điểm số không cải thiện, mọi cấu hình đều trả về cùng một số, lỗi ptxas…
create-github-pr
nvidia
Tạo pull request GitHub bằng cách sử dụng gh CLI. Sử dụng khi người dùng muốn tạo PR mới, gửi mã để xem xét, hoặc mở pull request. Từ khóa kích hoạt -…
nemoclaw-maintainer-cross-issue-sweep
nvidia
Quét các vấn đề đang mở khác để tìm những vấn đề mà một PR nhất định có thể sửa hoặc vô tình làm hỏng. Đưa ra các cơ hội sửa lỗi liền kề và rủi ro mâu thuẫn với file:dòng…
fhir-basics
nvidia
Dạy các tác nhân cách hoạt động của API FHIR R4, những tài nguyên có sẵn, cách truy vấn chúng với tham số tìm kiếm, và cách phân tích chính xác tất cả các định dạng phản hồi…
compileiq-validate-result
nvidia
Sử dụng SAU KHI tìm kiếm hoàn tất và TRƯỚC KHI yêu cầu tăng tốc hoặc gửi ACF. Tải tệp CSV dump_results, trích xuất các ứng viên top-K (đơn mục tiêu)…
changelog-audit
nvidia
Kiểm tra Warp CHANGELOG.md trước khi phát hành: khôi phục các mục bị mất, sắp xếp theo tác động người dùng, tinh chỉnh ngôn ngữ mục, xuống dòng và (chế độ nhánh phát hành) so sánh bump…
maintain-dynamic-plugins
nvidia
Duy trì các bộ nạp plugin động NeMo Relay, tệp kê khai, SDK gốc Rust, giao thức worker gRPC, SDK worker Python, tài liệu, kiểm thử và phạm vi quy trình phát hành
dgx-diagnose
nvidia
Chẩn đoán các sự cố thường gặp của DGX Station GB300 — lỗi CUDA, nhắm sai GPU, lỗi container vLLM/SGLang, vấn đề trạng thái MIG, lỗi NVLink/Fabric Manager,…