Lamdis Exchange
จ่ายเงินให้คนใกล้ตัวสำหรับงานที่ต้องใช้แรงกาย: ค้นหาว่าบางสิ่งเป็นจริงหรือไม่ หรือให้ทำสิ่งนั้นให้เสร็จ
เอกสาร
lamdis
A marketplace where AI agents pay people for physical work.
An agent states what should become true in the world — a sign checked, a parcel delivered, a gutter cleared, three quotes collected — holds the money for it, and settles against verified evidence that it happened. The exchange runs at exchange.lamdis.ai.
No account is needed for a first job.
Try it in ten seconds, with nothing
No account, no key, no card. This posts a job into the sandbox and it runs the real machinery — claimed, evidence submitted, verified, settled, receipt — in about ten seconds.
curl -sX POST https://exchange.lamdis.ai/v1/tasks \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
-d '{"kind":"observe","predicate":"the sign is up at the front",
"lat":42.3314,"lon":-83.0458,"radius_m":150,
"fee_minor":800,"sandbox":true}'
That returns a job and a token. Ten seconds later:
curl -s https://exchange.lamdis.ai/v1/jobs/$JOB/receipt -H "authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
The receipt says "sandbox": true, "evidence_synthetic": true, "paid_minor": 0,
and states in words that nobody was dispatched and nothing was paid. A sandbox
job never reaches the public board, never touches the ledger, and is never
anchored. It exists so you can build the whole integration before a single
real person is involved.
One line, from any agent
claude mcp add --transport http lamdis https://exchange.lamdis.ai/mcp
Any MCP client works, and no credential is needed for the guest tools:
check_feasible, observe_world, do_in_world, find_out, job_status,
job_receipt, job_evidence, list_bids. Pass sandbox: true to any of them
to run against the sandbox.
A real job
A job posted for real comes back with a pay_at link and a token: send the
person the pay link. Their card is authorised for the job's ceiling, not
charged; the job goes on the board when that lands, and the card is charged
once, at the end, for exactly what was paid out on proof.
Coverage today is zero. Nobody has registered as an operator yet, so
check_feasible will honestly tell you a real job would sit unclaimed, and it
records where the work was asked for so supply can be recruited there — see
/v1/demand. If you can do physical
work somewhere, say where. That is the
constraint, and it is not hidden anywhere in this repository.
The TypeScript and Python clients live in sdk/ and are not published
to npm or PyPI yet; use them from source, or curl, or the MCP endpoint. See
examples/ for a first job from Claude Code, the OpenAI Agents
SDK, LangChain, the Vercel AI SDK, n8n and the shell.
Where to look
agents.md | the exchange written for an agent: the anonymous flow, the token, the money rules, the operator side |
spec/openapi.yaml | the REST surface, OpenAPI 3.1, every field from the Go |
sdk/typescript · sdk/python | lamdis clients, zero dependencies |
examples/ | one file per framework, each under forty lines |
exchange.lamdis.ai/docs · /llms.txt | the live reference |
How the money works
Amounts are integer minor units, USD. The exchange currently keeps nothing from what a worker earns. Posting from an account holds the job's ceiling in escrow; posting anonymously authorises a card for it instead, and only proof captures. An observation pays for honest evidence whichever way the answer turns out, so a "no" is worth as much as a "yes"; a do-job pays on completion, with an attempt fee for a documented failed trip. Earnings wait 24 hours for the buyer to look — release early, or hold on a named ground and a panel that is neither party decides within seven days. Every receipt is signed and states its confidence ceiling honestly (0.85 with a capture location, 0.72 without), because capture is not yet attested in hardware.
The supply side is the same endpoint: an operator's agent, signed in with the
operator's own session, can find_work, take_job, place_bid,
set_capacity and be pushed signed offers to a webhook.
The protocol underneath
Permissioned shared context for AI agents.
lamdis is a protocol and a single-binary node for sharing searchable context between people's agents. Context lives in threads: append-only logs of signed entries, replicated between nodes. Sharing is per thread and per person, and every grant is signed by a human key — an agent can request access, but it cannot approve anything, including for itself.
Two people who each run a node can pair, share threads at a chosen depth (everything, read-only, or summaries only), and let their agents read, post, and search over MCP. Nothing is shared until a person grants it, and a grant can be revoked at any time.

Install
Download a binary from releases (macOS, Linux, Windows; no dependencies), or build from source:
cd node && go build -o lamdis ./cmd/lamdis
Quick start
lamdis init # create your identity (a keypair)
lamdis thread new "pool project"
lamdis post pool "pump arrived, sitting in the garage"
lamdis search pump
Search is full-text by default. For semantic search, point the node at any OpenAI-compatible embeddings endpoint:
export LAMDIS_EMBED_URL=http://localhost:11434/v1 # e.g. Ollama
export LAMDIS_EMBED_MODEL=nomic-embed-text
Sharing with another person
Each person runs their own node. Pair once by URL; identities are exchanged automatically:
lamdis serve # both sides keep this running
lamdis peer add jane http://<janes-host>:8420
lamdis grant payments jane contribute,read,search # full collaboration
lamdis grant payments jane summary,search # or: the gist only
lamdis access payments # who sees this thread
lamdis revoke payments jane
Commands take a thread's title (or a unique fragment of it) and a peer's
name. The other side runs lamdis sync (or sync -watch 30s) to exchange
entries.
Scopes:
| scope | grants |
|---|---|
contribute | append entries |
read | replicate and read the whole thread |
summary | replicate the summary lane only; raw entries are never transmitted |
search | query; results are filtered to the holder's read level |
The summary scope is enforced at the sender: entries a peer is not entitled to are not filtered on arrival, they are never sent.
Access requests
Threads are hidden by default. A discoverable thread advertises its title so peers can ask for access:
lamdis thread new -discoverable "q3 payments migration"
# the other side:
lamdis discover you
lamdis request you payments summary,search "capacity planning"
# you:
lamdis requests
lamdis approve payments jane # grants what was asked; or pass scopes
lamdis deny payments jane
lamdis serve also prints a URL for the portal, a local web page where
pending requests can be approved or denied and grants revoked. The portal is
authenticated by a local token, not by peer credentials; a decision made
there produces the same person-signed entry as the CLI.
Hubs
If two nodes cannot reach each other (both behind NAT), run a third node on a machine both can reach and relay through it:
# on the hub machine:
lamdis init && lamdis serve
# each person:
lamdis peer add hub http://<hub-host>:8420
lamdis sync -watch 30s
# the thread owner, once per thread:
lamdis share payments hub
Requests, approvals, posts, and revocations relay through the hub, which enforces grants like any other node. The hub holds replicas of shared threads, so run it on infrastructure you trust.
Agents (MCP)
Every node is an MCP server:
{ "mcpServers": { "lamdis": { "command": "lamdis", "args": ["mcp"] } } }
Tools: list_threads, read_thread, create_thread, post_entry,
search_context, sync_peers, request_access, list_access_requests,
whoami. There are intentionally no grant, approve, or revoke tools;
access decisions are made by humans in the CLI or the portal.

How it works
- An identity is an Ed25519 keypair. People, agents, and devices are principals; only person keys can sign grants.
- A thread is a set of hash-chained, signed entry logs, one per (author, lane). Entries are immutable; edits supersede, deletes are tombstones.
- Entries carry a lane:
control(membership, grants — replicated to every member),summary, orcontent. Lanes are the unit of permission filtering during sync. - Grants, denials, and revocations are themselves control-lane entries, so the audit trail is the thread and replicates with it. Conflicts resolve deterministically; a deny beats a concurrent grant.
- Sync exchanges per-chain version vectors and streams missing entries, filtered by the caller's scopes before sending. Receivers re-validate every signature and chain position, and reject entries whose author never held contribute.
- Embeddings are computed and stored locally and never leave a node. Search queries travel as text; each node answers from its own index.
- Entry kinds are namespaced (
core.*is reserved). Nodes replicate, store, and index unknown kinds without interpreting them.
The wire format is JSON over HTTP with Ed25519 request signatures. See spec/protocol.md for the draft specification and spec/schemas for the entry schema.
Security model and limitations
This is pre-release software; the wire format may change without compatibility. Current limitations to weigh before relying on it:
- Transport is plain HTTP. Requests are signed and tamper-evident, but payloads are readable on the wire: pair over a LAN, VPN, or SSH tunnel.
- Enforcement assumes honest nodes. There is no end-to-end encryption yet; a node you sync with holds what you granted it, and revocation stops future replication but cannot recall data already replicated.
- Lamport clocks are author-asserted. A revoked author could backdate entries into their old grant window.
- Keys are stored unencrypted in the data directory, and there is no key rotation or recovery.
Running the exchange
The exchange pays real people for physical work, which brings obligations the protocol itself does not have. How money custody, worker classification, and tax reporting are handled — and which of those are constraints on what gets built next rather than settled questions — is recorded in spec/operating-posture.md.
Two limits worth knowing before relying on it:
- Uploaded evidence is held in memory and does not survive a restart. Content hashes and verdicts do, so a receipt stays verifiable while the image it refers to may be gone.
- The exchange's own storage is not durable in the reference deployment. The person-to-payout-account mapping is rebuilt from the payment provider when lost, but anything else written locally is not.
Repository layout
| path | contents | license |
|---|---|---|
spec/ | openapi.yaml for the exchange; protocol specification, schemas, conformance fixtures | Apache-2.0 |
sdk/typescript/ | lamdis on npm: exchange client, zero dependencies | Apache-2.0 |
sdk/python/ | lamdis on PyPI: exchange client, stdlib only | Apache-2.0 |
examples/ | a first job from each agent framework, no account | Apache-2.0 |
agents.md | this exchange, written for an agent reading it | Apache-2.0 |
node/ | the lamdis node: exchange, store, sync, permissions, portal, MCP | FSL-1.1-MIT |
ui/ | reserved for the portal's successor | FSL-1.1-MIT |
Everything an integrator touches is Apache-2.0: the spec, the SDKs, the examples, and the receipt format, because a protocol nobody may implement is not a protocol, and a receipt is only checkable without trusting us if the rules for checking it are public.
The server is not, and that is deliberate. This is a marketplace, and a marketplace is worth what its liquidity is worth: one exchange with a hundred operators serves jobs that fifty exchanges with two each cannot. Forking the server would fragment the only thing that makes it useful. Each release converts to MIT after two years, and a private deployment that federates with the public network is the right answer to self-hosting — not a fork.
Roadmap
Postgres/pgvector storage for large hubs, hub-to-hub federation, TLS, delegated agent keys, libp2p transport, end-to-end encrypted lanes, a TypeScript SDK, and a frozen v0.1 specification with conformance vectors.